1장
The Silencing of a Young Voice: A Harrowing Journey Through Privilege and Pain
When Lacy Crawford published "Notes on a Silencing" in 2020, it wasn't just another memoir-it was a seismic revelation that shook the foundations of elite education in America. This unflinching account of sexual assault and institutional betrayal at the prestigious St. Paul's School became an instant New York Times bestseller, praised for its courage and clarity. The book arrived at a pivotal cultural moment, as institutions across the country were being forced to reckon with long-buried histories of abuse. What makes Crawford's narrative so powerful isn't just the assault she endured, but her meticulous documentation of how a renowned boarding school mobilized its considerable resources to protect its reputation rather than its students. Through her story, Crawford doesn't just speak her truth-she illuminates the machinery of privilege that enables such silencing to persist across generations.
2장
The Gilded Cage of Privilege
St. Paul's School in New Hampshire represented the pinnacle of American educational privilege-a place where the children of the elite were groomed for positions of power and influence. Crawford arrived as a fifteen-year-old fourth-former (junior), already aware of the school's reputation and her family's expectations. The campus itself embodied this prestige with its manicured grounds, Gothic architecture, and the ever-present reminders of its "goodly heritage" through famous alumni whose names adorned buildings and plaques.
The social hierarchy at St. Paul's was immediately apparent and ruthlessly enforced. Crawford quickly learned her place in this ecosystem when she discovered her picture in a "newb book" where senior boys had rated new girls, writing under hers: "If a fart had a face." This casual cruelty established the power dynamics that would later enable more serious abuses.
The school operated on unspoken rules about everything from sports preferences to clothing choices. The most privileged students-those from old Boston Brahmin families with names carved into school lintels-moved through the halls effortlessly, "needing and admiring nothing." For students like Crawford, who came from comfortable but less established backgrounds, there was constant pressure to prove they belonged.
This pressure manifested in strange ways. Crawford's mother added "de Menil" to her name on enrollment paperwork, a fabricated connection to a wealthy art-collecting family that was "both a good-luck charm and a little joke on the school's obsession with heritage." Years later, when Crawford met an actual de Menil who insisted she couldn't possibly have the name, she realized how perfectly her mother's aim had been-"to give me a boost into a world of holdings and pride."
The culture of excellence and privilege at St. Paul's created an environment where students were expected to push through discomfort and illness. This ethos of stoicism would later contribute to Crawford's silence after her assault, as she had been conditioned to believe that enduring suffering without complaint was part of what made one worthy of belonging to this elite world.
3장
The Vulnerability of Youth in a Predatory Environment
At fifteen, Crawford was young for her grade, still physically and emotionally a girl rather than a woman. This vulnerability was compounded by her struggles with depression, for which she had been prescribed Prozac as part of a clinical trial-a fact she kept hidden from her peers, aware that emotional vulnerabilities could be weaponized in the school's competitive environment.
The summer before her assault at St. Paul's, Crawford had already experienced sexual violation when Mr. Lane, a family friend whose children were staying at her home, cornered her late at night and forced his tongue into her mouth. When she told her parents, their response was telling: they simply decided not to have the Lanes stay overnight anymore. "This stuff happens," her father said. "It's infuriating, but it does." This early lesson taught Crawford that even when adults knew about sexual misconduct, they might choose to manage rather than confront it.
Back at school for her fifth-form year, Crawford found herself increasingly isolated. Assigned a single room in Brewster House, separated from most of her friends, she formed a new friendship with Elise, an independent-minded artist from Kentucky. She also began tutoring struggling students in calculus, including hockey players-a connection that would later prove fateful.
One night, Crawford received a late-night call from "Rick," a hockey player she had been tutoring. He claimed to be in distress about something related to his mother and begged her to come to his dorm. Despite her fear of breaking rules and being caught, his desperate pleas convinced her. When she arrived at his window, his roommate "Taz" was there too, both shirtless. What followed was a sexual assault where both boys took turns forcing themselves into her throat while she focused only on breathing. Afterward, she walked back to her dorm in shock, telling herself it "wasn't that bad" even as she felt "shattered and erased as a person."
The vulnerability of youth in this environment wasn't just physical but psychological. Crawford had been conditioned to believe that rules existed to protect the institution rather than its students. When faced with a seemingly desperate plea for help, her instinct was to respond with compassion-a quality that her attackers exploited. The assault occurred within a context where young women were simultaneously sexualized and denied agency, expected to navigate complex social dynamics without the tools or support to do so safely.
4장
The Aftermath: Physical Trauma and Institutional Betrayal
Ten days after the assault, Crawford's throat began hurting "like swallowed glass." She could barely eat, sipping ice water and milk to soothe the pain. She examined her throat in bathroom mirrors at odd hours, searching for visible signs but finding nothing. Despite the pain, she continued singing in choir, taking herself "up and out" of her own throat.
When she finally sought medical help, she was sent to an ear-nose-throat doctor in Concord who diagnosed "aphthous ulcers"-canker sores-though she had none in her mouth. When she returned to the infirmary days later, feverish and having lost ten pounds, the school pediatrician wrote "herpetic lesions" in her chart and prescribed Zovirax-but never told her or her parents about this suspected sexually transmitted disease.
Twenty-five years later, Crawford would discover this deception in her medical records. She would find evidence that St. Paul's School had faxed progress notes to her Chicago doctors-proving the school's pediatrician knew her diagnosis but failed to disclose it to her. She would also discover a damning note showing that John Buxton, the vice rector, had called her doctor about her "sensitive matter" without her knowledge or consent.
This medical neglect represented a profound institutional betrayal. Rather than providing Crawford with appropriate care and support after her assault, the school actively concealed information that might have helped her understand what had happened to her. This deception served the institution's interests by preventing any official acknowledgment of sexual assault on campus, but it came at the cost of Crawford's physical and psychological well-being.
The physical trauma of her throat condition became a metaphor for her silencing-she literally lost her voice, both physically as a singer and metaphorically as a person with agency and the right to name what had happened to her. "I kept waiting for someone to recognize my suffering," she writes, "to see that I was 'ruined.' But no one did-except the boys who assaulted me."
5장
The Machinery of Silencing
As Crawford's physical symptoms worsened, the social aftermath of her assault was equally devastating. By dinner the day after the assault, she noticed senior boys staring at her. One called out "Threesome?"-a term that hadn't occurred to her. The gossip spread quickly through the isolated campus, transforming her from a quiet chorister to a "prep-school porn star" virtually overnight.
Boys began harassing her in the hallways with comments about her freckles being "everywhere." One hockey player named "Budge" threatened to "pop her cherry" in the hallway. Crawford began experiencing a curious out-of-body perspective, watching herself move across campus from above, feeling exposed and vulnerable.
What makes this social ostracism particularly insidious is that it functioned as a form of secondary trauma-the community's response to her assault caused harm that in some ways exceeded the initial violation. Crawford was not only victimized by her attackers but by an entire system that rallied to protect them while condemning her.
This machinery of silencing operated through multiple channels:
1. Gossip and reputation destruction: The boys controlled the narrative about what happened, spreading stories that cast Crawford as promiscuous rather than victimized.
2. Medical neglect: School health professionals failed to properly diagnose, treat, or inform Crawford about her condition, preventing her from connecting her physical symptoms to the assault.
3. Administrative indifference: When Crawford finally told her mother what happened and school officials became involved, they treated her with discomfort and disgust rather than compassion.
4. Explicit victim-blaming: Years later, Crawford would learn that Rector Matthews had told her father, "She's not a good girl, Jim. You don't want to go there."
This coordinated response wasn't random but reflected a systematic approach to protecting the institution's reputation at all costs. Crawford would later recognize the pattern: "First they refused to believe me, then they shamed me, then they silenced me."
The effectiveness of this silencing machinery is evident in how long it took Crawford to fully process and speak about her experience. It would be decades before she would obtain her medical records and piece together the full extent of the school's betrayal.
6장
Finding Sanctuary in Unexpected Places
Despite the overwhelming hostility she faced, Crawford found moments of connection and sanctuary that helped her survive her time at St. Paul's. These relationships and spaces offered glimpses of what the school could have been-a place of genuine learning, growth, and care.
Ms. Radley, a Religion and violin teacher, became an unexpected ally. During a Vespers service in the Old Chapel, Crawford was moved by Ms. Radley's prayer: "Keep watch, dear Lord, with those who work, or watch, or weep this night... shield the joyous; and all for your love's sake." The phrase "shield the joyous" struck her deeply-though she wasn't joyous herself, she found comfort in the idea that compassion might extend even to the lucky ones.
When Crawford approached Ms. Radley about advising her Independent Study Project on biochemical depression and creative genius, the teacher made an extraordinary offer: "If you ever feel unsafe, at any hour, you just come right in through that door. It's unlocked. The guest room is just there... Just come up and you may sleep there. I will vouch for you." This simple act of kindness-offering unconditional safety without requiring explanation-nearly overwhelmed Crawford with its generosity.
Another unexpected connection came through Scotty, a boy who approached Crawford with kindness after her reputation had been destroyed. When she confessed to him about Rick and Taz-"they called me to cruise...and did stuff to me"-he didn't flee but simply said "That sucks" and kept his arm around her. This basic acknowledgment of her pain, without judgment or disbelief, offered a rare moment of validation.
Crawford also found sanctuary in running. Excused from tennis due to a broken hand, she began running the perimeter of campus, which gave her a new relationship with the physical space of St. Paul's: "For the first time, I understood the physical layout of St. Paul's-how it was wedged between Turkey Pond and Pleasant Street, how the trails connected, where the boundaries lay." This knowledge brought an important realization: "The school was a place, like any other place-stationary, platted, with boundaries. It was possible to leave it. One day I would." This perspective reduced the school's psychological power over her by making it finite and escapable.
The Old Chapel also became a refuge-unlike the domineering new chapel, it seemed "curled and impervious as a sleeping cat," a quiet space where Crawford could imagine a future beyond St. Paul's reach. These physical and relational sanctuaries didn't erase the trauma Crawford experienced, but they provided essential counterpoints to the institution's betrayal, reminding her that alternative ways of being and relating were possible.
7장
The Long Shadow of Trauma
The effects of Crawford's assault and the subsequent institutional betrayal extended far beyond her time at St. Paul's. Her experience fundamentally altered her relationship with her own body and sexuality. After the assault, she described her body as "cold"-"whatever glitter had swept through me kissing Shep beneath the lamplight was gone now."
During spring break following the assault, Crawford broke her hand skiing-what her therapist years later would suggest was an unconscious plea for help. That same break, she engaged in a sexual encounter with a St. Paul's graduate that was driven not by desire but by "a need to reclaim power after feeling violated." She was "exploring the dimensions of control, wanting to be unpredictable rather than vulnerable." Afterward, she felt nothing, "folding up the experience like a receipt in my pocket."
Crawford's trauma manifested in other ways as well. She began barricading her door at night with her camp footlocker and books. She slept only five hours a night and became "disconnected and careless," though she maintained nearly perfect grades. She deliberately watched her attackers at hockey practice to prove she wasn't afraid.
The psychological impact of the assault was compounded by the realization that one of her attackers, Rick, had previously shown her kindness-he had been the one who carried her to the infirmary after a bicycle accident the previous year. This contradiction shattered something inside her: the person who had once helped her had later violated her in one of the most intimate ways possible.
Crawford's relationship with her parents was also affected. When she finally told her mother what happened, her mother's first question was "Were you raped?" Crawford's answer-"Only my mouth"-reflected how she had internalized the hierarchy of sexual violations that minimized oral assault. Years later, when Crawford contacted her estranged parents during the investigation, their memories focused not on her assault but on how her reputation was destroyed-"perhaps this was less painful for them to recall than my violation."
The long-term impact of trauma is evident in Crawford's description of herself as experiencing "decades of emotional arrest." It would take her years to fully process what had happened to her and to recognize the extent of the institutional betrayal she had experienced. This delayed recognition is common in cases of sexual assault, particularly when the victim is young and the institution responsible for their care actively works to minimize or deny what happened.
8장
Justice Delayed and Denied
Twenty-five years after her assault, Crawford found herself drawn back into her St. Paul's experience when the school became the subject of a criminal investigation. The Prout family had courageously come forward about their daughter's sexual assault at the school, triggering a broader examination of the institution's handling of sexual misconduct over decades.
Detective Julie Curtin and Lieutenant Sean Ford of the Concord Police Department contacted Crawford as part of this investigation. They revealed that the statute of limitations hadn't expired on prosecuting her attackers-they could still bring a case if she wished. "Speaking as a cop," said Lieutenant Ford, "this is predatory behavior." But Crawford declined, seeing no value in revenge or disrupting the lives they'd built.
What Crawford did want was accountability from the institution that had failed her. Detective Curtin retrieved her student files from campus, discovering evidence of administrators reviewing her records years after graduation-and something unexpected the school wouldn't have wanted investigators to find: medical records documenting her assault and the positive culture for herpes that the school had concealed from her.
The investigation revealed a pattern of obstruction by St. Paul's School and its attorneys. When Detective Curtin interviewed both boys who had assaulted Crawford, neither denied the assault-they claimed it was consensual but didn't dispute what happened, essentially admitting to a statutory crime. This confirmation of Crawford's account should have strengthened the case against the school for its handling of the incident.
However, in a shocking turn of events, Julie called Crawford with disturbing news: "I can't work on your case anymore." For "murky" reasons, the attorney general's office had severed them from the investigation-something that had never happened before. Even more disturbing: "The attorney general's office doesn't want your file."
Once again, Crawford found herself silenced-this time, ironically, to avoid discouraging other victims from coming forward. The machinery that had protected St. Paul's when she was fifteen was still operational decades later, reaching into the highest levels of law enforcement.
This denial of justice represents perhaps the most profound betrayal in Crawford's story. Even when presented with clear evidence of wrongdoing, the systems designed to protect victims and hold institutions accountable failed to do so. The school's power, wielded through its alumni and trustees, extended far beyond its campus boundaries.
9장
Breaking the Silence
Crawford's decision to write "Notes on a Silencing" represents her final and most definitive refusal to be silenced. After years of careful consideration about potential courses of action-whether to press criminal charges against the boys or pursue legal action against St. Paul's, both of which would likely result in settlements demanding her continued silence-she arrived at a more profound realization. Her true desire was "to release my peers from their shame by exposing the institutional mechanisms designed to silence victims." This choice marked a transition from personal healing to collective advocacy.
The support of her family proved crucial in this decision, particularly her husband's stark and unflinching response when asked about the personal exposure the book would bring: "Burn it all down." This raw, uncompromising statement encapsulates the radical nature of Crawford's decision to speak publicly about her experience. By meticulously naming what happened to her and documenting the school's systematic response in exhaustive detail, she challenged not just St. Paul's but confronted the entire ecosystem of elite education that routinely sacrifices student welfare at the altar of institutional reputation.
Throughout the writing process, Crawford encountered numerous obstacles-legal threats, social pressure, and the weight of institutional power-yet remained committed to excavating the truth. Her detailed account exposes how prestigious institutions often deploy their considerable resources not to protect vulnerable students but to shield themselves from accountability, using tactics ranging from character assassination to bureaucratic stonewalling.
The memoir concludes with a symbolically charged image: the ceremonial banner her parents had donated to restore for St. Paul's. During her graduation service, Crawford observed the renewed banner's procession down the aisle, experiencing neither rage nor pride-"simply acknowledging that this silk would remain as evidence of my time there." This banner, like her memoir, stands as an indelible material witness to what transpired, refusing to let the truth be diminished or forgotten through institutional amnesia or deliberate erasure.
The act of writing transforms into a powerful act of reclamation-Crawford seizes back control of her narrative from those who had sought to define her through degrading labels like "not a good girl" or a "prep-school porn star." Her writing process becomes both testimony and healing: "I've written my story exactly as I remember it, to accompany that girl leaving the boys' room that October night and walk with her all the way home." Through this act of literary courage, she not only begins to heal her younger self but forges a path for others to follow, demonstrating how speaking truth can break the chains of institutional silence and create space for collective healing and systemic change.
The impact of Crawford's decision rippled beyond her personal story, inspiring others at similar institutions to come forward with their experiences and challenging the culture of silence that often pervades elite educational institutions. Her memoir serves as both a personal testament and a powerful catalyst for institutional accountability and reform.
10장
The Legacy of Institutional Failure
Crawford's story illuminates how institutions designed to nurture and protect young people can instead become sites of profound harm when their priorities shift from care to self-preservation. St. Paul's School, with its "goodly heritage" and commitment to excellence, failed in its most basic duty: to keep its students safe.
This failure wasn't simply a matter of individual bad actors or isolated incidents. It reflected a systematic approach to handling sexual misconduct that prioritized the school's reputation over student welfare. From the medical staff who concealed Crawford's diagnosis to the administrators who reviewed her records years after graduation, the institution mobilized its considerable resources to contain the damage rather than address the harm.
The legacy of this institutional failure extends beyond Crawford's individual experience. She notes that after her book's completion, the trustees removed Rector Bill Matthews's name from the hockey center-"not because of my case but due to more recent events." This acknowledgment suggests that the patterns of misconduct and cover-up continued long after Crawford left St. Paul's.
Perhaps the most damning indictment of the institution comes in Crawford's reflection on one of her attackers, Taz, whose life after St. Paul's was marked by multiple arrests beginning just six months after graduation. Looking at his mug shots, she sees "the boy turned to misery" and realizes "St. Paul's failed him too when they let him graduate without consequences after assaulting me." By failing to hold students accountable for their actions, the school not only harmed their victims but also denied the perpetrators an opportunity to learn and change.
Crawford's story challenges us to examine how institutions respond to allegations of sexual misconduct and what values guide those responses. When schools prioritize their reputation over the welfare of their students, they betray their educational mission and perpetuate cycles of harm. "Notes on a Silencing" stands as both a personal testimony and a call for institutional accountability-a reminder that the true measure of an institution is not its prestige or history but how it cares for its most vulnerable members.