What is *Attention Span* by Gloria Mark about?

*Attention Span* by Gloria Mark challenges the myth of sustained focus, arguing that multitasking and shifting attention types—like focused, rote, or relaxed states—are natural and beneficial. Drawing on decades of research, Mark explains how kinetic attention (strategic switching between modes) boosts productivity while preventing burnout in our distraction-filled world.

Who should read *Attention Span* by Gloria Mark?

This book is ideal for professionals, educators, and anyone struggling with digital distractions. It offers evidence-based strategies for optimizing attention cycles, making it valuable for remote workers, students, or individuals seeking to balance productivity with mental well-being in tech-driven environments.

Is *Attention Span* by Gloria Mark worth reading?

Yes—it provides a science-backed alternative to traditional productivity advice. Mark’s insights on kinetic attention and practical tips for managing interruptions make it a fresh take on thriving in the digital age. However, some readers critique its structure as disorganized.

What is kinetic attention in *Attention Span*?

Kinetic attention refers to intentionally shifting between four attention states: **focused** (deep work), **rote** (automatic tasks), **frustrated** (task-switching), and **bored** (mental rest). Mark argues this dynamic balance enhances creativity and reduces cognitive fatigue compared to forced concentration.

What are the main ideas in *Attention Span*?

Key ideas include: - Attention spans naturally fluctuate (avg. 47 seconds per screen). - Distractions aren’t inherently harmful if managed strategically. - “Flow states” are overrated; kinetic attention is more sustainable. - Digital tools fragment focus but can be optimized with mindfulness.

How does *Attention Span* suggest improving focus?

Mark recommends: - Scheduling tasks around natural attention cycles (e.g., complex work post-break). - Using mindfulness to notice distraction triggers. - Embracing “boredom breaks” to reset mental energy. - Grouping interruptions instead of addressing them immediately.

What critiques exist about *Attention Span*?

Some readers find the book’s structure disjointed, blending research with anecdotal advice. Others argue it downplays systemic workplace factors causing distraction. A minority feel the tips are too similar to existing productivity guides.

How does *Attention Span* compare to *Deep Work* by Cal Newport?

While *Deep Work* prioritizes uninterrupted focus, *Attention Span* argues for flexible attention cycling. Mark critiques Newport’s approach as unrealistic for most modern roles, advocating instead for adaptive strategies that acknowledge inevitable distractions.

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약

글로리아 마크

3.51(1608 Reviews)

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약 개요

"집중력의 심리학(Attention Span)"에서 저명한 심리학자 글로리아 마크(Gloria Mark)는 집중에 대한 우리의 이해에 도전합니다. 일반적인 믿음과는 반대로, 그녀의 연구는 페이스북 사용자들이 예상보다 더 높은 행복 수치를 보인다는 점을 밝혀냅니다. 칼 뉴포트(Cal Newport)가 그녀를 "산만함에 관한 최고의 전문가"라고 부르는 이유, 그리고 끊임없는 집중이 실제로는 왜 당신을 방해하고 있을 수 있는지 그 이유를 확인해 보세요.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

다양한 학습 방식으로 도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약 살펴보기

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

The Digital Age's Attention Crisis: How We Lost Our Focus

In a world where the average person spends just 47 seconds on any screen before switching to something else, Gloria Mark's groundbreaking research couldn't be more timely. "Attention Span" has quickly become essential reading for anyone struggling with digital distraction-from tech executives at Google and Microsoft to everyday knowledge workers drowning in notifications. As a scientist who has tracked our collective attention for over two decades, Mark offers something rare: not just another productivity manual, but a deeply researched exploration of why our relationship with technology has become so problematic. With Bill Gates naming it one of his top books of 2023 and countless readers finding validation in its pages, "Attention Span" has struck a nerve in our increasingly fragmented digital culture.

2장

Our Fragmented Digital Minds

We've developed unbreakable bonds with our devices, creating a pattern where we constantly switch attention between apps, screens, and devices. This isn't just a matter of poor discipline-it's a fundamental shift in how our minds operate in the digital age. As a research scientist tracking attention for twenty years, Gloria Mark has observed how our collective ability to focus has dramatically changed. We now spend much of our waking hours in what she calls the "digital world," developing new habits that often leave us feeling out of control. This creates several paradoxes: technology designed to augment our capabilities leaves us distracted and exhausted; managers expect immediate responses while demanding productivity; and the internet's structure, while mirroring our associative memory, encourages endless surfing. Multitasking carries significant costs: the switch cost of reorienting to new tasks, emotional costs of anxiety and stress, and depletion of our limited cognitive resources. Research shows we typically spend twenty-five minutes on other tasks before returning to interrupted work. Studies where email was cut off for a week revealed people focused longer, switched attention less frequently, and showed measurably reduced stress via heart rate monitoring. Four modern myths about attention persist: First, that we should always strive to be focused (in reality, attention naturally ebbs and flows); Second, that flow is the ideal state (though rare for most knowledge workers); Third, that distractions stem primarily from notifications and lack of discipline (ignoring environmental, social, and technological forces); Fourth, that mindless activity has no value (when it actually helps replenish cognitive resources). Instead of optimizing for ceaseless productivity, we should adjust our lives for balance, maintaining positive cognitive resources. Attention isn't binary but nuanced-focus works best when balanced with other forms of attention that tax our resources less.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

The Science of Attention: How Our Minds Process Information

To understand our rapidly shifting attention on digital devices, we must examine the psychological processes behind our behaviors. William James, psychology's founding father, defined attention as focusing consciousness on one object among many possibilities, believing we control what shapes our experience through selective attention. Modern science reveals attention isn't centralized but comprises different brain networks-alerting (maintaining vigilance), orienting (selecting stimuli), and executive control (managing interference)-all working together like an orchestra. When we use our devices, these systems become overtaxed as we battle constant visual cues and the temptation of unlimited information access. Our minds operate with a finite pool of cognitive resources that deplete as we use them throughout the day. This well-established psychological theory explains why by afternoon, after managing emails, texts, meetings, and resisting distractions, we feel drained and turn to social media for relief. Like spending cash until only pennies remain, we allocate our attentional resources across activities until they're nearly gone. Neuroscience confirms this through blood flow measurements-sustained focus increases carbon dioxide in active brain regions, and as we maintain focus, blood velocity decreases, indicating resource depletion. We need breaks to replenish these resources through sleep, nature exposure, psychological detachment, or even simple games. In everyday life, we don't just fluctuate between focus and distraction on one task-we rapidly shift between different screens, apps, and activities. This dynamic, energetic switching pattern represents what Mark calls "kinetic attention"-a vigorous, motion-filled state characterized by rapid shifts between applications, websites, and devices. Kinetic attention isn't inherently good or bad, but research shows we generally aren't skilled at utilizing it effectively, resulting in stress, fatigue, poor performance and burnout because such rapid switching depletes our cognitive resources.

4장

The Constant Battle for Your Attention

People frequently struggle with controlling their attention in our device-filled world, often feeling mentally drained from constant digital bombardment. This happens because much of our attention operates automatically through well-learned responses that require minimal effort, like answering phones or checking email notifications. This automatic (exogenous) attention is stimulus-driven and difficult to inhibit, as demonstrated by the classic Stroop test where reading words interferes with naming colors. Our devices constantly challenge us to resist these automatic responses. Research shows that maintaining cognitive control over extended periods gradually breaks down our resistance to distractions, leading to more impulsive choices as brain activity in regions related to working memory and task-switching diminishes-a phenomenon called cognitive fatigue. People commonly fall into behavioral patterns-attention traps-where they lose control of their attention when using devices. These include: 1. The attention-wandering trap: Our attention naturally wanders between external stimuli and internal thoughts. When using devices, browser tabs and apps provide triggers that lead our minds astray. While mind-wandering isn't inherently bad and can spark creativity, excessive internet meandering can steal time from important tasks. 2. The rote attention trap: Simple, repetitive digital activities like playing Candy Crush or browsing social media lightly engage our attention and can help us replenish attentional resources. However, we often misjudge how much time we'll spend on these activities. The emotional rewards keep us engaged through intermittent reinforcement, where rewards come occasionally rather than consistently. 3. The social media trap: Social media captures our attention because we're inherently social beings craving connection. The intermittent conditioning from social rewards (like Facebook likes) functions as a powerful hook, increasing our sense of social worth. We keep posting hoping for likes, just as we keep scrolling TikTok knowing eventually we'll find something entertaining. 4. The identity trap: Many people spend considerable attention designing and maintaining their online personas. For some, their social media persona becomes more important than their real-world identity, with followers and likes serving as validation. Because we naturally want to present ourselves in the best possible light, maintaining these carefully constructed personas can consume significant attention. 5. The sunk cost trap: We often continue digital activities because we've already invested so much time that stopping feels wasteful. After reading an article for thirty minutes and realizing it's not valuable, we might continue hoping for a worthwhile ending rather than accepting the lost time. Choosing where to focus our attention is essentially allocating limited resources. While traditional models suggest these choices are governed by individual preferences, priorities, and resource needs, this view is incomplete. We're embedded in social, cultural, and technical environments that profoundly influence our attention. Our attention choices reflect not just individual factors but the complex interplay between our internal preferences and the broader social and technical world we inhabit.

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

The Four States of Attention

Our attention is far more nuanced than simply being focused or unfocused. From John Locke's early observations to William James's distinctions between controlled attention and scattered states, thinkers have long recognized different attentional modes. But our digital age demands a new framework for understanding attention. Working at Microsoft Research, Mark and her colleagues discovered that engagement alone wasn't sufficient to describe attention-the challenge level of activities also mattered significantly. They developed a framework with two dimensions: engagement and challenge. Unlike flow theory, they found people could be engaged in activities with varying degrees of mental effort and cognitive resource demands. This framework identifies four distinct attentional states: 1. Focus: When people are highly engaged and highly challenged, they enter a state of focus. This represents absorption in an activity that requires significant mental effort. Being focused correlates with motivation, concentration, creativity and satisfaction. Though not identical to flow, focus can be considered a precondition to flow. As the phrase "paying attention" suggests, maintaining focus costs considerable cognitive resources. 2. Rote: Rote attention occurs when people are highly engaged but not challenged. This mechanical, routine attention absorbs us without requiring mental effort-like playing solitaire or Candy Crush. Because rote activities aren't challenging, they use fewer cognitive resources, explaining why people can engage in them for extended periods without feeling depleted. 3. Bored: When neither engagement nor challenge is present, we experience boredom. This might manifest as aimlessly surfing the internet or flipping through TV channels without interest. Boredom underuses available cognitive resources and creates low arousal, making concentration difficult. Unlike flow where time awareness diminishes, during boredom we're hyperaware of time's slow passage. 4. Frustrated: Frustration occurs when we're highly challenged but not engaged. This happens when we struggle with difficult tasks we can't abandon-perhaps due to deadlines, managerial requirements, or inner compulsion. This state consumes substantial cognitive resources despite our disengagement. Attention follows natural rhythms, just as our bodies do with circadian cycles, metabolism, and hormone fluctuations. Research shows that alertness and selective attention vary throughout the day, influenced by circadian rhythms and homeostatic processes. Focus peaks at 11am and 3pm, with people needing time to "power up" in the morning and after lunch before gradually declining after 3pm. Rote attention rises from 9am until 2pm before declining, while boredom peaks around 1pm post-lunch. Rather than viewing distractions as external forces that break focus, research reveals that certain attentional states make people more susceptible to distractions. When people are bored or engaged in rote activities, they're more likely to switch their attention to Facebook or face-to-face interactions. Without strong goal-directed attention, our focus becomes "like a reed in the wind." While flow might seem ideal, it's rarely achievable in typical knowledge work. Instead of chasing this elusive state, we should aim for balanced attentional rhythms. Rather than striving for constant focus, we should recognize our cognitive ebbs and flows, purposefully shifting between different attentional states to maintain balance.

6장

The Multitasking Myth: How We Fragment Our Attention

Multitasking isn't new-our ancestors multitasked for survival 1.5 million years ago. Today, despite no longer needing to constantly scan for predators, we still struggle to focus deeply. People fall on a continuum between monochronic (preferring to complete one task before starting another) and polychronic (preferring to juggle multiple tasks). True multitasking is rarely possible-what we're actually doing is rapidly switching attention between activities. This works only when at least one activity requires minimal cognitive resources. When activities demand full attention, performance suffers significantly. While occasional attention-switching can be beneficial for refreshing cognitive resources or breaking negative thought patterns, excessive rapid switching depletes our mental capacity and increases stress. To study attention in real-world environments, Mark created "living laboratories" where researchers shadowed knowledge workers with stopwatches, timing precisely how long they spent on activities before switching. This painstaking data collection revealed people in workplaces averaged only three minutes, five seconds on any activity before switching, with computer attention spans even shorter at two and a half minutes. As sensor technologies evolved, more sophisticated tracking methods using heart rate monitors, actigraphs, and precise computer logging measured attention spans in real-world settings. The results were striking: average attention duration on screens has declined dramatically from 150 seconds in 2004 to just 47 seconds in recent years. This pattern holds true across all job types from managers to software developers. Though our attention on any screen has stabilized at about forty-seven seconds, the problem extends beyond low-level task switching. Even when considering higher-level "working spheres" (distinct projects or areas of responsibility), our focus remains fragmented. Studies show people manage about twelve working spheres daily, spending just ten and a half minutes on each before switching. When interrupted, it takes an average of twenty-five minutes and twenty-six seconds to return to the original task, with people working on an average of 2.26 intervening tasks before returning to their interrupted work. Despite some people's belief that multitasking boosts productivity, evidence consistently shows the opposite. As early as 1927, psychologist Arthur T. Jersild demonstrated that task-switching slows performance and increases errors. Beyond reduced productivity, multitasking creates "attention residue" from previous tasks that interferes with current work. Laboratory and real-world studies consistently link multitasking with higher stress markers, including decreased immunoglobulin A, higher blood pressure, and greater perceived mental workload. In our digital culture, multitasking has become normalized from very young ages. Though it increases physiological stress, fragments work, drains cognitive resources, and harms productivity, multitasking feels unavoidable in our polychronic world. For knowledge workers especially, monochronic work styles seem increasingly like a luxury-we multitask because falling behind feels like the alternative.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

The Hidden Forces Shaping Our Attention

The psychological pull of internet distractions is so powerful that some professionals resort to extreme measures-like one doctor who purchased round-trip plane tickets just to write without internet access. While interruptions can sometimes offer beneficial mental breaks or social connections, their costs are well-documented. Bluma Zeigarnik's groundbreaking research discovered what became known as the Zeigarnik effect-we remember interrupted tasks better than completed ones. Her 1927 experiments showed that interrupted tasks create a state of tension from the unsatisfied need to finish, which persists in our memory. According to Kurt Lewin's field theory, unfulfilled needs create tension that's released only when goals are completed. This theory explains why interrupted tasks linger in our minds-the memory "sizzles on the back burner" until resolution. Surprisingly, people self-interrupt nearly as often as they're interrupted by external factors. These internal interruptions stem from thoughts, memories, or habits that pull us away from tasks without any external trigger. We may not even recognize how frequently this happens-suddenly checking email or searching for unrelated information based on random thoughts. Self-interruption patterns can form quickly-taking anywhere from 18 to 254 days to become habits. Email has evolved from an occasional pleasure to a constant interruption. Studies tracking computer activity revealed people check their email an astonishing 74-77 times daily on average, with one dedicated individual checking 374 times daily. Most participants (41%) self-interrupted to check email rather than responding to notifications. Beyond email, Facebook users averaged 38 daily visits-with one person checking 264 times-typically in brief 18-second "snacks" of social media consumption. In a groundbreaking experiment at a scientific research organization, Mark eliminated email access for participants for a full workweek while monitoring their stress levels via heart rate variability. The results were striking: without email, participants maintained significantly longer attention spans while working on computers and experienced measurably less stress by week's end. Participants described email as "ruining my life" and "interfering with happiness," while the email-free experience felt "freeing," "liberating," and allowed working at "a human pace." The internet's design itself contributes significantly to our wandering attention. Its node-link structure deliberately mimics our natural mental organization of associative thinking. When we surf the internet, our attention often shifts from goal-directed searching to following associations through clicks, setting our minds on unexpected paths. This internet browsing parallels mind-wandering-both lack rigid goals, allow free conceptual exploration, and often occur without awareness that our thoughts have meandered. The internet provides countless entry points that prime our mental networks. When browsing topics like the Winter Olympics, related concepts like ice-skating and ski jumping spring to mind, making contextually relevant links attract our attention "like a neon sign." Priming can trigger automatic responses without conscious choice-advertisers leverage this by exposing us to brand names that later influence our product choices.

8장

The Social and Technological Forces Hijacking Our Focus

What can algorithms infer about you from your digital footprints? Far more than you realize. Digital phenotyping-analyzing your online behavior-reveals your emotional state and personality with impressive accuracy. Researchers found that linguistic patterns in social media posts correlate strongly with subjective well-being; using "I" frequently indicates negative feelings. Even minimal data like Facebook likes can predict personality traits better than your significant other after analyzing just 300 likes. Companies leverage this knowledge to target ads based on your psychological profile-showing fear-inducing insurance ads to neurotics or party cruises to extroverts. Your smartphone tracks physical activity, location, ambient sound, and usage patterns, all revealing your personality traits. These insights feed algorithms designed to capture your attention by presenting precisely what will interest you most, keeping you engaged on platforms longer. Algorithms exploit our fundamental human instincts, particularly our social curiosity. When we receive notifications about friends' posts, we're compelled to investigate. Many algorithms deliberately trigger lower-order emotions-happiness, surprise, fear, disgust, anger-which demand our attention automatically, without cognitive processing. This makes us particularly vulnerable when our attentional resources are depleted. TikTok's sophisticated recommender engine creates an attention trap through meticulous data collection about both videos and users. The algorithm creates a feedback loop: observe, tweak, present another video, repeat. TikTok videos captivate attention by mimicking condensed film structure-introduction, tension, and climax-often with surprise endings packed into fifteen seconds. This triggers operant conditioning: when videos make you laugh, that positive reinforcement strengthens your behavior to keep watching. Our broader media environment fundamentally shapes our attention patterns beyond just computers and phones. Film and television shot lengths have dramatically shortened over decades-from twelve seconds in 1930s films to less than four seconds by 2010. Music videos feature even briefer shots, averaging just 1.6 seconds. These rapid visual transitions condition viewers to expect quick changes, potentially influencing how we interact with our personal devices. Social influence can override rational judgment in our digital interactions. Digital traces signal others' presence-posts, comments, even the "inner reading voice" 81% of people report hearing when reading text. Young people are particularly vulnerable to social influence, with the brain's reward center showing heightened activation when viewing Instagram photos with many likes versus few. This activation peaks around ages 16-17. We invest significant attention in constructing our online personas, performing on the internet as Shakespeare's "stage." While we manage impressions in face-to-face settings through clothing and social choices, online impression management can lead to exaggeration, with studies showing people unknowingly inflate their self-importance in Facebook updates. We must navigate "context collapse" where different social groups (colleagues on LinkedIn, family on Instagram) see our posts, requiring multiple carefully maintained identities-a rewarding but time-consuming endeavor.

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

Reclaiming Your Attention in the Digital Age

While we can't blame algorithms alone for our attention problems, we can develop agency in the digital world by understanding how underlying factors constrain our attention in complex ways. By reframing our goal from achieving absolute free will to developing agency, we can become aware of our conditioning and take control of our behaviors even when we can't control our desires. We need to shift from maximizing productivity with our devices to maintaining psychological balance while still achieving our aims. Psychological balance means achieving homeostasis between the parasympathetic ("rest and digest") and sympathetic (fight-or-flight) nervous systems. Multitasking and constant interruptions create stress through sympathetic dominance, leading to health problems. When our nervous system is balanced, we experience positive emotions that enhance creativity and problem-solving. Applying Bandura's four properties of agency can help us control our attention in the digital world: 1. Meta-awareness means observing your digital behavior like an outsider would, bringing habitual actions to a conscious level. By asking yourself questions like "What value will I gain?" or "How much time have I spent here?", you switch from passive to active attention management. With practice, meta-awareness becomes natural-like developing a muscle-helping you avoid rabbit holes and sunk cost attention traps. 2. Forethought means visualizing how your current digital actions will affect your future. Before indulging in social media or games, imagine the consequences hours later-will you see a finished presentation or be staying up late making up for lost time? The more detailed your visualization, including anticipated emotions, the easier it becomes to course-correct. 3. Self-regulation can be developed through: - Restructuring your digital environment to reduce stimuli that trigger automatic attention - Creating "hooks" that pull you out of potential attention traps - Resisting the initial temptation to switch screens-it's easier to not start than to pull yourself out once engaged 4. Self-reflection enables course correction to achieve attention control and balance. Instead of mindlessly scrolling social media, leverage these platforms intentionally to connect meaningfully with individuals who make you happy. Traditional day scheduling focuses on listing tasks, meetings and deadlines to maximize productivity, often causing stress. In our digital world, we need to relearn day design to include strategies for well-being, understanding our rhythm of attentional states and limited cognitive resources. Design your day with awareness of your limited mental resources, understanding which activities drain them and which replenish them. Include "negative space"-intentional breaks surrounding hard work that allow you to reset and boost attention capacity. Instead of forcing yourself into marathon sessions of focus, strive for psychological balance by following your natural attentional rhythm. The narrative that we shouldn't allow mindless activities isn't based in science-rote activities like gardening, knitting, or even certain digital activities help us relax, reset, and replenish cognitive resources. We're still in the digital world's infancy-personal computers only became widespread in the mid-1980s, the internet in the mid-1990s, and smartphones in 2007. Our understanding of healthy digital integration lags behind technological development. Yet we can be optimistic-despite notifications, conditioning, and personality factors, we still own our attention-no one can take that away. We can learn to harness our dynamic attention, sustain focus when needed, and step back when appropriate, creating a digital world in the image we want.

★★★★★

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 완독을 축하합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약의 핵심 주제

digital distraction
cognitive resource depletion
task switching costs
kinetic attention
attentional fatigue

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약의 명문장

Technology designed to augment our capabilities leaves us distracted and exhausted.
Attention naturally ebbs and flows.
Mindless activity helps replenish cognitive resources.
We've developed unbreakable bonds with our devices.
Choosing where to focus our attention is essentially

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약의 등장인물

Gloria MarkAuthor and research scientist tracking attention

저자 소개

*집중력의 탄생: 균형, 행복, 생산성을 회복하는 획기적인 방법(Attention Span: A Groundbreaking Way to Restore Balance, Happiness, Productivity)*의 저자이자 캘리포니아 대학교 어바인 캠퍼스의 정보학 석좌 교수인 글로리아 자넷 마크(Gloria Janet Mark)는 인간-컴퓨터 상호작용 및 디지털 행동 분야의 선구적인 연구자입니다. 컬럼비아 대학교에서 심리학 박사 학위를 받은 그녀는 주의력 분산, 멀티태스킹, 그리고 기술이 심리에 미치는 영향에 대해 수십 년간 연구해 왔으며, 이는 현대의 집중력 문제를 탐구하는 이 비소설 저작의 근간이 되었습니다.

2012년부터 마이크로소프트의 수석 방문 연구원으로 활동하고 있는 마크 교수는 이전에 기술 과잉 환경에서의 업무 생산성을 조사한 *디지털 시대의 멀티태스킹(Multitasking in the Digital Age)*을 저술한 바 있습니다. 그녀의 연구 결과는 뉴욕 타임스, 월스트리트 저널, NPR, BBC 등에 소개되었으며, SXSW와 아스펜 아이디어 페스티벌에서 강연을 진행하기도 했습니다.

인간-컴퓨터 상호작용 분야의 리더십을 인정받아 ACM CHI 아카데미에 헌액된 마크의 작업은 학술적 엄밀함과 인지적 통제력을 되찾기 위한 실용적인 통찰력을 연결합니다. 집중력의 탄생은 그녀의 150편 이상의 동료 검토 논문을 바탕으로 디지털 과부하를 헤쳐 나가기 위한 증거 기반 전략을 제시합니다. 이 책은 2023년 출간 이후 광범위한 언론의 주목을 받으며, 기술이 사회에 미치는 영향을 이해하는 데 있어 선도적인 목소리로서 마크의 명성을 공고히 했습니다.

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약 다운로드

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

The Distraction Addiction

Alex Soojung-Kim Pang

Reclaim Your Focus: Science-Based Attention Training 책 표지

How to Improve Your Concentration and Focus in a Distracted World

Focus Training: 5 Simple Exercises to Improve Attention and Concentration

6 sources

Reclaim Your Focus: Science-Based Attention Training

The Attention Crisis: Reclaiming Focus in a Distracted World 책 표지

Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World

Digital Minimalism: On Living Better with Less Technology

25 sources

The Attention Crisis: Reclaiming Focus in a Distracted World

BeFreed

The Distracted Mind

Adam Gazzaley

Focus

Daniel Goleman

Evidence-Based Techniques to Boost Focus and Productivity

6 sources

Reclaiming Your Focus: The Attention Revolution

Hyperfocus

Chris Bailey

The Mindful Focus Revolution: Breaking Free from Digital Distractions 책 표지

3 sources

The Mindful Focus Revolution: Breaking Free from Digital Distractions

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약에 관한 자주 묻는 질문

더 알아보기

학습 계획

Focus Lab: Reclaiming Your Attention

In an era of constant digital distraction, the ability to protect your focus is a competitive advantage. This plan is designed for professionals and creatives who need to move beyond busywork to achieve high-impact, elite-level results through disciplined attention.

30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Improve focus and attention

In an era of constant digital distraction, the ability to control your attention is a competitive advantage. This plan is ideal for professionals and students looking to master deep work, leverage neuroscience, and build sustainable peak performance habits.

3 h 56 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Productivity and focus

In an era of constant distraction, the ability to manage your attention is a competitive advantage. This plan is designed for professionals and students who want to move beyond busywork to achieve elite-level performance and sustainable success.

3 h 45 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Master Focus, Energy, and Productivity

In an era of constant digital distraction, mastering your attention is the ultimate competitive advantage. This plan is designed for professionals and high-achievers who want to stop feeling busy and start being effective by aligning their biology with their work habits.

5 h 7 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Become more focused and more social

In an age of constant distraction and digital isolation, the ability to concentrate deeply while maintaining strong interpersonal bonds is a rare competitive advantage. This plan is designed for professionals and individuals looking to sharpen their mental edge while elevating their social influence and presence.

4 h 51 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

High-IQ Habits for Deep Focus

In an era of constant distraction, cognitive energy is a finite resource that requires strategic management. This plan is designed for professionals and students who want to leverage decision logic and externalized systems to achieve elite levels of concentration.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Stop Distractions & Stay on Track Daily

In an era of constant digital noise, the ability to maintain focus is a competitive advantage. This plan is designed for professionals and students who need to reclaim their attention and build sustainable systems for high-impact productivity.

3 h 52 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Master Focus and Science-Based Habits

This learning plan is essential for professionals and students seeking to reclaim their attention in the digital age. It combines neuroscience with practical systems, making it ideal for high-performers looking to build lasting habits and superior cognitive resilience.

4 h 51 m•4 섹션

컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 제작 샌프란시스코에서 개발

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

4.7

평균 평점

앱 평가 7.84천 개 이상

BeFreed Community

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 제작 샌프란시스코에서 개발

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

4.7

평균 평점

앱 평가 7.84천 개 이상

BeFreed Community

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

9장

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약 개요

다양한 학습 방식으로 도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약 살펴보기

The Digital Age's Attention Crisis: How We Lost Our Focus

Our Fragmented Digital Minds

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Science of Attention: How Our Minds Process Information

The Constant Battle for Your Attention

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Four States of Attention

The Multitasking Myth: How We Fragment Our Attention

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Hidden Forces Shaping Our Attention

The Social and Technological Forces Hijacking Our Focus

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Reclaiming Your Attention in the Digital Age

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 완독을 축하합니다

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약의 핵심 주제

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약의 명문장

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약의 등장인물

저자 소개

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약에 관한 자주 묻는 질문

What is Attention Span by Gloria Mark about?

Who should read Attention Span by Gloria Mark?

Is Attention Span by Gloria Mark worth reading?

What is kinetic attention in Attention Span?

더 알아보기

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

다양한 학습 방식으로 도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 요약 살펴보기

The Digital Age's Attention Crisis: How We Lost Our Focus

Our Fragmented Digital Minds

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Science of Attention: How Our Minds Process Information

The Constant Battle for Your Attention

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Four States of Attention

The Multitasking Myth: How We Fragment Our Attention

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Hidden Forces Shaping Our Attention

The Social and Technological Forces Hijacking Our Focus

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Reclaiming Your Attention in the Digital Age

도둑맞은 주의력 집중력의 탄생 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기