What is *Why Are We Yelling?* about?

*Why Are We Yelling?* by Buster Benson redefines conflict as a tool for growth, offering strategies to transform heated arguments into productive conversations. It teaches readers to identify biases, communicate empathetically, and reframe disagreements as opportunities to strengthen relationships and solve problems effectively.

Who should read *Why Are We Yelling?*?

Professionals, couples, and anyone navigating polarized discussions will benefit from this book. It’s ideal for leaders, team members, or individuals seeking to improve communication in high-stakes environments, inspired by Benson’s experience at Amazon, Twitter, and Slack.

Is *Why Are We Yelling?* worth reading?

Yes—it provides actionable frameworks for conflict resolution, making it valuable for personal and professional growth. Reviews highlight its practicality in addressing modern communication challenges, from workplace tensions to family disagreements.

What are the key principles in *Why Are We Yelling?*?

Benson outlines eight principles, including reframing conflict as curiosity, identifying argument types, and practicing empathy. These habits help redirect unproductive debates toward solutions while fostering mutual understanding.

How does *Why Are We Yelling?* suggest handling anxiety during arguments?

The book emphasizes recognizing personal anxieties and triggers, then channeling them into constructive dialogue. By focusing on shared goals and asking open-ended questions, individuals can reduce defensiveness and create safer spaces for disagreement.

What does *Why Are We Yelling?* say about “winning” arguments?

Benson argues that productive disagreements prioritize understanding over victory. He identifies four “fruits” of conflict: stronger relationships, better decisions, expanded perspectives, and collaborative problem-solving—all more valuable than traditional “winning.”

Can *Why Are We Yelling?* help with workplace conflicts?

Absolutely. Techniques like articulating opponents’ viewpoints before rebutting them and categorizing argument types are tailored for team dynamics. Benson’s strategies draw from his work with tech giants, offering scalable solutions for workplace tension.

What critiques exist about *Why Are We Yelling?*?

Some may find its approach overly idealistic for deeply entrenched conflicts. However, the book addresses this by providing incremental steps to build “disagreement muscles,” making it accessible even for conflict-averse readers.

なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術

生産的な議論の技術

バスター・ベンソン

3.6(1076 Reviews)

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』の概要

『Why Are We Yelling?（なぜ私たちは怒鳴り合うのか）』の中で、バスター・ベンソンは対立に対する見方を変え、議論を脅威ではなく機会として捉え直しています。AmazonやTwitterでの経歴を持つ著者によるこのガイドは、ベーグルの切り方を巡る論争のような日常的な意見の相違さえも、創造性、問題解決、そして人間関係を深めるための強力なツールへと変えてくれます。

語り方を選ぶ

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術の同じアイデアを、あなたに合う声・深さ・ペースで学べます。いつでも切り替えられます。

第1章

The Art of Disagreement: When Conflict Becomes Conversation

In a world increasingly divided, Buster Benson's "Why Are We Yelling?" arrives as a timely antidote to our cultural inability to disagree productively. This book has become required reading in conflict resolution courses at Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia Business School, with Brene Brown calling it "a guide to disagreeing without disconnecting." Benson, a former product leader at Twitter, Amazon, and Slack, draws from his experience managing teams through difficult conversations to present a radical idea: what if arguments aren't problems to eliminate but opportunities to embrace? Through personal stories, research, and practical frameworks, Benson transforms our understanding of disagreement from something to avoid into something to cultivate-like a gardener who discovers that some "weeds" actually strengthen the ecosystem. As anxiety disorders affect one in five American adults and "deaths of despair" continue rising, this book offers a path forward that treats disagreement not as a threat but as a skill that can be mastered.

第2章

Anxiety as Your Personal Map of What Matters

When reality doesn't match our expectations, anxiety sparks-signaling that something we value feels threatened. These sparks aren't random; they form a detailed map of our personal expectations, hopes, dreams, and disappointments. Left unexamined, they dictate our responses, often causing us to misread situations and try forcing the world to conform to our expectations rather than updating our beliefs to match reality. Consider a seemingly trivial example: does water go bad if left sitting out for a few days? When the author posed this question, it sparked immediate, visceral reactions. The "absolutely not" camp feared bacteria and unknown contaminants, while others (particularly those from rural backgrounds or medical families) saw no issue. This seemingly simple question had triggered decade-long arguments between friends. Our anxiety response operates on a scale from 1 (mild discomfort, like finding a tear in your favorite shirt) to 5 (life-altering emergencies like hospitalization). By noticing these sparks, we glimpse how we've been conditioned to react automatically to specific information. Even something as innocuous as a bagel sliced vertically can trigger surprising outrage, as demonstrated when a photo of bread-sliced bagels went viral on Twitter with comments like "Officer, I would like to report a crime." This is cognitive dissonance in action-when something contradicts our expectations, we feel motivated to resolve that tension. Social media provides quick relief through qualifying perspectives ("That's a St. Louis thing") or rejecting them outright. But this makes us dependent on platforms for anxiety resolution rather than developing our own skills. When anxiety arises in disagreement, first identify whether you're anxious about what is true, meaningful, or useful. For truth-based anxiety, seek mutually trusted information sources. For meaning-based anxiety, explore why the issue matters to each person. For utility-based anxiety, consider the consequences of inaction and confidence levels in proposed solutions. The key insight: in disagreements, people who value rationality often make a critical mistake-focusing on simple truth-based arguments when conflicts are actually about meaning, values, or purpose. In the author's conflict with his wife about leaving their son home alone, he clung to an information-based argument rather than addressing the underlying concerns about family priorities. The path to better conversations starts with recognizing the anxiety spark that initiates the conflict.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第3章

The Four Voices That Drive Our Responses

Our internal voices represent our default reactions to anxiety-inherited from parents, culture, and experience. When facing opposing viewpoints, we experience cognitive dissonance proportional to how far the conflicting perspective is from our own. This often leads to demonizing those with opposing views. These automatic reactions come from what psychologist Daniel Kahneman calls "System 1"-our fast, instinctive thinking that makes quick judgments to reduce anxiety. With practice, we can learn to treat these internal voices as suggestions rather than commands. Our System 1 thinking manifests as four distinct internal voices that automatically respond to anxiety and cognitive dissonance: The voice of power is our most primal, ancient internal voice that resolves disagreements by forcefully shutting them down. It's the voice that declares "Mine!" and uses force to end conflicts in our favor. We're born with this voice-as demonstrated by the author's two-year-old son screaming for his pink train. While the voice of power offers an evolutionary advantage by decisively ending conflicts, it's also the most expensive strategy, requiring constant battles to maintain dominance. The voice of reason uses logic and appeals to higher authority rather than raw strength. It operates through institutions (religion, government, business, science) that establish internal systems of reason built on power foundations. The voice of reason works best within groups sharing the same cultural norms and authority structures-like using "sharing" and "taking turns" with children. Its effectiveness breaks down when addressing conflicts across different institutional boundaries or when cultural norms evolve. The voice of avoidance addresses conflict by refusing to participate altogether. Unlike power and reason, avoidance operates covertly-there are no explicit rules or consequences around it, yet surveys show 85% of employees admit there are issues people are afraid to raise at work. This voice works best in low-stakes conflicts but doesn't actually solve problems-it merely postpones them. The voice of possibility offers a fundamentally different approach. Unlike the first three voices that try to resolve conflict as a problem, this fourth voice seeks to make conflict productive. It's like seeing weeds not as pests to eradicate but as potential flowers that might produce sweet berries. This voice treats conflict like a blackberry bush that can be cultivated rather than yanked out-integrated into the garden, watered, and brought to health so it can play its part. To identify how these voices manifest for you personally, try "talking" to them by asking questions: What's urgent right now? What's threatening? What could I be doing instead? How can I know if these answers serve my best interests? What would happen if I did nothing? This self-talk isn't a sign of mental health problems-it's normal and can generate real insight when you can distinguish between what's in your head versus what's in the world.

第4章

Understanding and Working With Our Biases

In an ideal world, we would observe reality, orient ourselves to what it means, and then take appropriate action. However, cognitive biases interfere at each step, causing us to see things that aren't there, misinterpret meanings, or take inappropriate actions. Despite identifying over two hundred cognitive biases, we can't simply eliminate them-they're fundamental to how we think and necessary for functioning in an overwhelming world. Biases stem from three unsolvable conundrums: too much information, not enough meaning, and not enough time and resources. These aren't bugs but necessary shortcuts. Three key biases affect our decision-making: The availability heuristic makes us consider only options that come easily to mind. In-group favoritism causes us to trust and favor people in our group over outsiders. Loss aversion makes us value things we already have more than things we don't yet possess. Information overload influences the "head realm" and our looking process. When faced with too much information, we employ five strategies representing fifty biases: depending on context to determine what deserves attention, accepting what readily comes to mind, amplifying bizarre elements that might signal threats or opportunities, noticing new or different things, and seeking takeaways we'll need later. In hiring scenarios, hundreds of applications force us to use biased shortcuts. Pattern matching influences the "heart realm" and how we orient ourselves. We transform scattered data points into meaningful stories, but this creates illusions as we fill gaps with assumptions and stereotypes. In hiring contexts with limited interview time, we unconsciously use stereotypes about protected characteristics to make judgments. Constraints influence the "hands realm" and our leaping to action. With limited time and resources, we use biases to transform stories into quick decisions. Amazon's "bias for action" principle and Jeff Bezos's advice on "high-velocity decision making" suggest most decisions should be made with only 70% of desired information. Bezos advocates for "disagree and commit" to avoid decision paralysis. Instead of trying to eliminate bias, we should embrace discomfort as essential for growth. Robin DiAngelo's work on white fragility illustrates how claiming to be "color-blind" actually reinforces bias. We can't escape bias-it's embedded in our institutions and environment. But we can learn to recognize and work with it by following four steps: opt in by acknowledging your blindness exists; observe your biases by noticing when defenses are triggered; repair damage caused by blind spots; and normalize challenging your own perspectives.

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第5章

The Power of Speaking Only for Yourself

The author observes that disagreements quickly deteriorate when people stop speaking from their own perspective and start speculating about others' views. Our cognitive biases lead us to fill gaps with stereotypes and project our internal states onto others, then forget which parts came from reality versus our own fabrications. When speaking from our own heart and perspective, we reveal truths that cannot be contested by others. We are the primary source of truth for our own hearts. Conversely, when we speak for others, we're merely speculating about things we have no claim on, which can be fully contested. Speaking for yourself means avoiding two common bad habits: speaking for other people and speculating about groups. For example, saying "If you don't vaccinate your kids, it means you prioritize your children over mine" speculates about someone else's internal thoughts. Instead, speaking for yourself would involve sharing your own motivations and asking questions about theirs. The author notes that opinion columns frequently engage in harmful speculation about groups, which relies on uncharitable generalizations. Speaking only for yourself invites people into conversations instead of talking about them, improves your mental model of others' positions, and helps others more accurately understand your position. This approach also reduces reliance on group stereotypes and requires finding actual representatives of different perspectives, which grounds conversations in reality and opens up important new questions. By reframing discussions to invite personal perspectives rather than generalizations about what others should do, it becomes easier to see how each person arrived at their unique position.

第6章

Questions That Invite Surprising Answers

Surprising answers carry the most information. Our biases help us converge on stories and decisions without becoming paralyzed by too many options, but asking great questions balances our impatience for quick answers with finding the best possible answers. To understand productive questions, the author compares two childhood games: Battleship and Twenty Questions. In Battleship, each question yields only one piece of information through trial and error. Twenty Questions requires more strategic questioning that "cleaves through the unknown" by dividing possibilities efficiently. But real-life disagreements offer even more potential-we aren't confined to yes-or-no questions and can invite detailed stories and perspectives from others' minds. Open-ended questions like "What experiences led to your beliefs about ghosts?" create space for surprising answers and make people feel truly heard. The author explores their nuanced perspective on ghosts as "unresolved open questions, living in limbo between reality and possibility." After surveying people about ghost beliefs, they found 52% believed in ghosts while 48% didn't, with ghost believers generally more open to considering conflicting information. Rather than debating whether ghosts are "real," the author found more meaningful conversations by asking about people's relationship to mystery, sensitivity to nature, and experiences with the unexplainable. This approach revealed that "belief alignment" is just one reason to have conversations, and often not the most fulfilling one. If disagreement is a tree nourished by anxiety and cognitive dissonance, it produces four distinct fruits: security, growth, connection, and enjoyment. When we fixate solely on security, we can't ask productive questions because information becomes weaponized. We must reorient conversations toward all four fruits together. Security is our primary, instinctive fruit of disagreement-protecting possessions, self-worth, and group cohesion. Growth requires risk-taking at the frontier rather than staying safe at home. Connection often requires trusting others despite differences. Enjoyment binds the other fruits together, making disagreement sustainable and even relationship-strengthening. When stuck in frustrating arguments, better questions can transform the conversation. Examples include "What formative events brought you to this belief?", "What's really at stake here?", "What's complicated about your position that people don't usually notice?", and "What would have to be true for you to change your mind?"

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

第7章

Building Arguments Together

Disagreements become productive when we stop "nutpicking"-selecting the weakest opponents to tear apart-and instead seek out the wisest representatives of opposing views. The author suggests we should actually help opponents build their strongest arguments while enlisting them to strengthen ours. Due to our cognitive biases, we're better at finding flaws in others' arguments than our own, and vice versa-a quirk we can leverage for mutual benefit. The author references W.W. Jacobs' short story "The Monkey's Paw," where wishes are granted with terrible unintended consequences. This illustrates how we're often blind to the loopholes in our own desires and arguments. The gun control debate exemplifies how difficult productive disagreement can be. When the author posed polarizing statements about guns, participants noticed which ones triggered anxiety and how intensely. These included claims about gun control reducing violence, the right to self-defense, the "guns don't kill people" argument, and Second Amendment interpretations. The author illustrates the gun debate through a hypothetical brother and aunt arguing on Facebook. Both see the other as threatening their worldview-the brother fears public safety is compromised by easy gun access, while the aunt believes America's founding principles of self-reliance and freedom are under attack. People are remarkably misinformed about those who disagree with them. A 2017 study showed that political partisans drastically overestimated certain demographic characteristics of the opposing party. Even on our own positions, we're often uninformed-the author discovered many Californians proposed gun laws already on the books. When traditional debate formats failed to engage people in productive gun discussions, the author shifted to hosting a potluck dinner. Fifteen diverse guests gathered, bringing both food and their personal gun experiences. The shared meal created a tribal, inclusive atmosphere where different experiences could be exchanged naturally. After sharing key statistics about guns in America, they tackled the question of what would constitute success in the gun debate. Various endgames were proposed, from eliminating semiautomatic weapons to reducing mass shootings. One participant suggested reframing the goal: "reduce the total number of homicides and suicides across the board as much as possible, regardless of how they happened." This shift allowed everyone to consider the problem differently. The potluck format unlocked possibilities that typical debate formats couldn't. Sharing food created a primal sense of community and good faith that allowed the voices of reason and force to step back. Though they didn't solve gun violence, they gained wisdom by allowing their black-and-white positions to fade into a spectrum of gray possibilities.

第8章

Creating Neutral Spaces for Productive Conflict

Disagreements don't exist in a vacuum but are shaped by their environments. When reflecting on arguments, consider the power dynamics, expectations for outcomes, and hidden contextual influences like cultural norms or time constraints. The author's online community, fruitful.zone, continued productive immigration conversations as participants used language of possibility rather than confrontation. They examined border safety data showing that exposure (heatstroke, dehydration) was the leading cause of death, with an estimated 10,000 people dying since 1994 according to Border Angels. When discussing whether walls work, they approached it from multiple perspectives-the voice of power sees walls as effective barriers and symbols of strength, while the voice of reason examines data. They collaboratively researched immigration statistics, discovering that 85% of undocumented immigrants are visa overstays, most drugs enter through legal ports of entry, and immigration's impact on wages is minimal (0-0.3%). Creating neutral spaces isn't without challenges. In the fruitful.zone community, they faced incidents like a misinterpreted comment about racism causing someone to leave (though they later returned) and instances of name-calling that tested their code of conduct. While tech companies increasingly use "deplatforming" controversial figures, research shows this creates initial attention spikes followed by significant drop-offs in reach. However, censorship often backfires long-term-banned books like "Catcher in the Rye" and "To Kill a Mockingbird" gained popularity precisely because they were forbidden. Each act of censorship creates martyrs whose ideas gain symbolic power, similar to how we remember Socrates, Jesus, and Giordano Bruno partly because they were martyred for their ideas. The alternative is creating communities that accept disagreement without resorting to censorship by treating participants as complex individuals rather than one-dimensional representatives of positions. A truly neutral space for productive disagreement must operate on three levels: it must welcome different perspectives so new ideas can emerge, allow people to freely enter and exit conversations as ideas develop, and permit the space's own character to evolve based on the relationships and conversations it hosts. The paradox of uncertainty reveals that while we're trained to seek certainty, there's wisdom in acknowledging what we don't know-what Socrates called "aporia." This realization that a path doesn't lead to truth can be frustrating initially but ultimately enjoyable because it frees us from maintaining false certainty.

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第9章

Accepting Reality and Participating in It

Things can't be changed from the realm of wishful thinking and willful blindness. The Festival of Dangerous Ideas, cofounded by the Ethics Centre and Sydney Opera House in 2009, exemplifies both the power and challenges of creating neutral spaces for controversial topics. It has featured opposing viewpoints like Christopher Hitchens' "Religion Poisons Everything" alongside Cardinal George Pell's "Without God We Are Nothing"-demonstrating how presenting contrasting perspectives creates healthier dialogue than either would in isolation. However, the festival's 2014 controversy over a scheduled talk titled "Honour Killings Are Morally Justified" shows the limits of what even a space dedicated to dangerous ideas can tolerate. The talk was canceled after public outcry, with organizers explaining they intended to provoke thought, not simply provoke. Accepting a dangerous idea without endorsing it means being willing to hear its specific version to confirm whether it matches your assumptions. When Uthman Badar's talk was canceled, the public condemned him for ideas he wasn't actually planning to present. The key is remaining open to the possibility that speakers don't think what we assume they think. Whether to entertain dangerous ideas is a matter of personal preference, involving an internal assessment of risk tolerance and desire for adventure. When opinions differ on matters of heart, the best approach is asking questions that might spark surprising answers: What formative experiences have we had with dangerous ideas? Which ideas do we find most threatening? Could exploring them lead to growth, connection, and enjoyment? Unproductive disagreement is perhaps our greatest existential threat-not because of some new disease, but our inability to properly face everyday problems. We must commit to having productive disagreements above fighting for any one thing, leading by example rather than passing blame. This final step means stepping into the flow of what's happening and participating in an imperfect world as imperfect agents ourselves-yet with a desire to move the dance toward new possibilities. The goal isn't to emerge from disagreements unscathed, but to actually engage with them-to become scathed.

第10章

The Transformative Power of Productive Disagreement

Writing this book helped the author discover what productive disagreement meant personally. Once they stopped avoiding disagreements, their conversational world expanded dramatically, leading to significant life changes-quitting jobs, starting therapy, organizing disagreement potlucks, and experiencing both gains and losses in relationships. When we learn to accept reality and participate in it, three superpowers emerge: disagreements transform from anxiety-inducing problems to opportunities; we recognize how few disagreements truly exist and can choose them proactively; and our world expands as we enter difficult conversations that once intimidated us, focusing on those where we can have direct impact. If a disagreement is "an unacceptable difference between two perspectives," what happens when differences become acceptable or even exciting? The exchange transforms into something we barely have words for-dialogue, conversation, or an exchange resulting in improved perspectives. When fear of disagreement dissolves, the world becomes a treasure trove of possibility. Disagreements become visible once you stop avoiding them. They become part of the environment, like blackberries on an overproducing bush-you don't need to eat them all, just enjoy the ripest ones ready for participation. Political polarization isn't a disagreement itself but the cultural debt created by unproductive disagreements running on overdrive. Systemic problems like racism, sexism, the opioid epidemic, and climate change persist not because of specific disagreements but because those disagreements are stuck in unproductive states or exiled from discussion. Imagine a world where we're no longer arguing whether climate change is real but building proposals for sustainability; where we're not debating if immigrants deserve entry but extending quality of life to everyone; where we're not fighting to appear worthy of basic human rights but contributing to society with our limited time. The voice of possibility helps us see these obstacles as exactly what we need to address next-our call to adventure. We've grown to expect the obstacles between us and productive disagreement to never go away, and we use that expectation to justify not looking at them as they really are. Following these open possibilities to wherever they lead is our next call to adventure.

★★★★★

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』を最後まで読み終えました

100万人以上の学習者に愛用されています

“23日間、毎日使い続けています。今では日課の一部です。”

jayallen

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』の主要テーマ

productive disagreement
cognitive dissonance resolution
conflict mediation frameworks
anxiety-driven communication
internal voice management

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』の名言

Arguments aren't problems to eliminate but opportunities to embrace.
Anxiety sparks-signaling that something we value feels threatened.
We can learn to treat these internal voices as suggestions rather than commands.
The voice of power resolves disagreements by forcefully shutting them down.
Loss aversion makes us value things we already have more.

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』の登場人物

Buster BensonAuthor and former product leader
Buster Benson's sonThe author's child used in conflict case studies
Buster Benson's wifeThe author's partner in family disagreements

著者について

『Why Are We Yelling? The Art of Productive Disagreement（なぜ私たちは怒鳴り合うのか：生産的な議論の技術）』の著者であるバスター・ベンソン（Buster Benson）は、著名なプロダクトリーダーであり、起業家、そして建設的なコミュニケーションの提唱者です。

シリコンバレーのベテランであるベンソンのキャリアは、Amazon、Twitter、Slack、Patreonといった企業での影響力のある役割に及んでおり、そこでコラボレーションと紛争解決の専門知識を磨きました。自己啓発と行動心理学を融合させた彼の著書は、ハイステークスなテック環境でチームワークを育んできた数十年の経験や、「Health Month」やジャーナリングプラットフォーム「750words.com」などのベンチャーを設立した経験に基づいています。

ベンソンの議論に対するアプローチは、好奇心と共感を重視しており、摩擦がイノベーションを促進し得るという彼の信念を反映しています。この哲学は、個人の成長や組織のダイナミクスのためのツールを構築してきた彼の仕事を通じて形成されました。生産性とコミュニケーションに関する講演者としても頻繁に活動しており、彼の洞察は人間の行動を探求するポッドキャストやエッセイでも取り上げられています。

『Why Are We Yelling?』は、論争の多い議論を有意義な対話へと変えようとする専門家たちの間で広く受け入れられ、現代の職場文化における実用的な提言者としてのベンソンの評価を確固たるものにしました。

なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術の要約をダウンロード

なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術の要約をPDFまたはEPUBで無料でダウンロード。印刷やオフラインでいつでもお読みいただけます。

他のユーザーのお気に入り

We Need to Talk

Celeste Headlee

Argument Hangover

Jocelyn Freeman and Aaron Freeman

Win Every Argument

Mehdi Hasan

Possible

William Ury

Habits of a Peacemaker

Steven T. Collis

From Conflict to Connection: Fighting Better Together の書籍表紙

Mastering High Conflict: The Ultimate Guide to Difficult Relationships

28 sources

From Conflict to Connection: Fighting Better Together

27 sources

The Art of Productive Conflict

The art of conversation

Catherine Blyth

この本に関するよくある質問

この学習プランの一部

学習プラン

Besser diskutieren ohne Eskalation

5 h 39 m•4 エピソード

学習プラン

Stop Fighting and Start Connecting

3 h 56 m•5 エピソード

学習プラン

Stop Fighting and Start Connecting

Conflict is inevitable in relationships, but how we handle it determines whether it damages or strengthens our connections. This learning plan provides practical tools for anyone struggling with recurring arguments, communication breakdowns, or the desire to build more authentic and resilient relationships.

3 h 56 m•5 セクション

学習プラン

Anger management

Uncontrolled anger can damage health and relationships, yet traditional advice often fails to address its root causes. This plan is ideal for anyone seeking to transition from reactive outbursts to mindful, constructive communication and emotional stability.

3 h 49 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Unshakable: Stoic Drills for Modern Chaos

In an era of constant digital noise and social volatility, emotional resilience is a survival skill. This plan is designed for high-stress professionals and individuals seeking to regain control over their reactions and mental clarity through practical, ancient wisdom.

2 h 30 m•5 セクション

学習プラン

Become better at talking, argumenting

Effective communication is the cornerstone of professional leadership and personal influence. This plan is designed for professionals and aspiring leaders who want to transform their debating skills into a powerful tool for negotiation and persuasion.

4 h 41 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Art of Conversational Competence

In an era where communication defines professional success, mastering the nuances of human interaction is essential. This plan is designed for leaders and professionals who need to navigate high-stakes conflicts and persuade diverse audiences with poise.

2 h•4 セクション

学習プラン

Quiet the Noise: A Guide to Clear Thinking

In an era of constant information overload, the ability to regulate your physiological response and mental clarity is a critical skill. This guide is designed for professionals and individuals who feel overwhelmed by anxiety and want to transition from reactive stress to intentional, clear thinking.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

The Human Book: Decoding Hidden Intent

In an era of complex communication, understanding what remains unsaid is a critical competitive advantage. This plan is essential for leaders, negotiators, and recruiters who need to master behavioral baselines, facial analysis, and linguistic markers to navigate high-stakes interactions.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

How to argue

Effective argumentation is a foundational skill for success in any field where ideas matter—from business negotiations to academic discourse to everyday relationships. This learning plan benefits professionals seeking to influence stakeholders, students developing critical thinking abilities, and anyone who wants to communicate more persuasively while maintaining intellectual integrity and fostering genuine understanding.

5 h 15 m•4 セクション

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

今すぐ学習の旅を始めよう

第3章

なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術

概要『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』の概要

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Art of Disagreement: When Conflict Becomes Conversation

Anxiety as Your Personal Map of What Matters

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Four Voices That Drive Our Responses

Understanding and Working With Our Biases

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Power of Speaking Only for Yourself

Questions That Invite Surprising Answers

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Building Arguments Together

Creating Neutral Spaces for Productive Conflict

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』をもっと深く楽しむ

Accepting Reality and Participating in It

The Transformative Power of Productive Disagreement

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』を最後まで読み終えました

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』の主要テーマ

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』の名言

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』の登場人物

著者について

なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術の要約をダウンロード

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この本に関するよくある質問

What is Why Are We Yelling? about?

Who should read Why Are We Yelling??

Is Why Are We Yelling? worth reading?

What are the key principles in Why Are We Yelling??

この学習プランの一部

Besser diskutieren ohne Eskalation

Stop Fighting and Start Connecting

もっと見る

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Art of Disagreement: When Conflict Becomes Conversation

Anxiety as Your Personal Map of What Matters

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Four Voices That Drive Our Responses

Understanding and Working With Our Biases

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Power of Speaking Only for Yourself

Questions That Invite Surprising Answers

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Building Arguments Together

Creating Neutral Spaces for Productive Conflict

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』をもっと深く楽しむ

Accepting Reality and Participating in It

The Transformative Power of Productive Disagreement

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』を最後まで読み終えました

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この学習プランの一部

Besser diskutieren ohne Eskalation

Stop Fighting and Start Connecting

もっと見る

『なぜ、私たちは対立してしまうのか――１０の型で身につく「より良い議論」の技術』の概要