What is The Conservative Sensibility by George F. Will about?

The Conservative Sensibility is George F. Will's 500-page attempt to define what true conservatism means in America today. The book argues that the Founders embedded natural rights in the Constitution that should remain superior to government power, covering topics from capitalism and education to religion and the administrative state. Will calls for a return to constitutional principles and measured conservatism over populist politics.

Who should read The Conservative Sensibility?

The Conservative Sensibility is ideal for political philosophy students, conservative intellectuals, and readers seeking a scholarly defense of classical American conservatism. Those interested in constitutional theory, critiques of the administrative state, and erudite political commentary will find value in Will's extensive analysis. However, readers seeking populist conservative viewpoints may find Will's measured approach less appealing than current rightward movements.

Is The Conservative Sensibility worth reading?

The Conservative Sensibility offers an intellectually rigorous exploration of conservative principles, though its 500+ pages demand significant commitment. Will's erudite writing style and deep analysis of constitutional theory provide substantial intellectual value for serious political readers. However, critics argue his moderate conservatism may be less relevant to today's populist political landscape, making it more valuable as academic study than practical political guidance.

What are George F. Will's main arguments in The Conservative Sensibility?

Will argues that America's Founders understood natural rights perfectly and embedded them in the Constitution to keep government forever inferior to individual liberty. He critiques the rise of the administrative state, executive branch power expansion, and Congress's abdication of traditional roles. The book calls for conservatives to embrace classical liberal elements while rejecting both progressive overreach and thoughtless populism.

What is Will's "Conservatism Without Theism" chapter about?

In Chapter 9, Will attempts to defend conservative principles from an atheistic perspective, asking whether moral sense can exist independent of religion. Despite brilliantly expressing the Declaration's belief in natural rights from "nature's God," Will struggles to provide ultimate justification for human dignity without foundational religious standards. Critics note this creates a weak foundation for moral and political reasoning, with Will offering only that human behavior "somehow matters" under a "blank sky."

How does The Conservative Sensibility critique modern higher education?

Will treats higher education with deep skepticism, viewing universities as dangerously radical and prone to utopianism and muddled thinking. He criticizes what he calls "intellectual gerrymandering," where curricula are carved into protected enclaves for racial, gender, and ethnic factions. Will sees academia as contributing to America's "thoughtless culture" rather than fostering genuine intellectual inquiry and constitutional understanding.

What does George F. Will say about the administrative state?

Will bemoans the rise of the administrative state with its boundless production of regulations that expand government power beyond constitutional limits. He argues this represents a fundamental departure from the Founders' vision of limited government constrained by natural rights. The book connects administrative overreach to the broader flow of power toward the executive branch as Congress abandons its traditional legislative role.

How does The Conservative Sensibility address American political culture?

Will warns of a "thoughtless culture" linked to an "inattentive state" within a highly populist political system. He argues that both elites and the general population recognize something is fundamentally wrong with America but lack proper understanding of constitutional principles. The book calls for rethinking what conservatism means today while facing the reality of cultural and political deterioration.

保守主義の精神

ジョージ・ウィル

4.11(1040 Reviews)

『保守主義の精神』の概要

ピューリッツァー賞受賞者ジョージ・ウィルによるベストセラー宣言書は、保守主義を再定義し、現代の行政による過剰な介入からアメリカの建国理念を擁護しています。ジョナ・ゴールドバーグが「アメリカの保守主義について書かれた史上最高の著書の一つ」と評した本作は、党派政治を超越した哲学的傑作です。

語り方を選ぶ

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

保守主義の精神の同じアイデアを、あなたに合う声・深さ・ペースで学べます。いつでも切り替えられます。

第1章

America's Paradox: Natural Rights in a Progressive Age

The Conservative Sensibility arrives at a pivotal moment in American history. As the nation approaches its quarter-millennium, George F. Will offers a profound meditation on the intellectual foundations of American conservatism. This book has become required reading among political philosophers, with figures ranging from Barack Obama to Justice Neil Gorsuch citing its insights. Will's analysis resonates particularly with those seeking to understand America's current political polarization, as he traces our contemporary divisions to a century-old philosophical battle between the Founders' vision of natural rights and the Progressives' vision of an evolving Constitution. Unlike many conservative manifestos, Will's work transcends partisan talking points, instead excavating the Republic's intellectual foundations to reveal something both beautiful and practical. His Harvard-educated perspective brings remarkable clarity to complex ideas, making this book accessible to readers across the political spectrum. As America wrestles with questions about its identity and future, Will's exploration of the "conservative sensibility" offers a timely reminder of what the nation was designed to conserve.

第2章

The Battle Between Madison and Wilson

The American Revolution's fate hinged on contingency and individual agency rather than historicism's autonomous processes. The Battle of Princeton in 1777, though lasting just forty-five minutes, proved one of history's most consequential conflicts. When American troops initially panicked before British bayonets, Washington's personal bravery reversed their retreat. His charge shattered Britain's aura of invincibility and halted American defeatism. Present that day were Washington and John Marshall-the two men most important in making the infant republic into a nation. This revolutionary spirit established a distinctly American conservatism unlike European varieties. While European conservatism defended throne-and-altar traditions, American conservatism sought to conserve institutions promoting social dynamism and mobility. This fundamental difference explains why American exceptionalism connects so deeply to conservative principles-Americans were born free from feudal structures, had a revolution setting people free to pursue happiness as they choose, and created a Constitution limiting what government may do to them. Today's political arguments reflect a century-old debate between Madisonians and Wilsonians. The Madisonian persuasion holds that rights are natural, discernible by reason, and pre-exist collective human will, making limited government natural. The Wilsonian persuasion rejects this philosophy, embracing flux and malleability, making the social context a political choice. This conflict grows more intense as both sides sharpen their fundamental differences. The stakes are immense: if rights are natural, they exist beyond majority rule. As Justice Jackson famously declared in the 1943 West Virginia v. Barnette decision: "Fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." This principle-that certain rights lie beyond majority rule-forms the cornerstone of American conservatism properly understood.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『保守主義の精神』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第3章

Natural Rights and the Founders' Vision

The Founders believed in a fixed human nature and natural rights discernible through reason. Lincoln acknowledged this in 1842, calling human nature "God's decree" that "never can be reversed." President Coolidge, commemorating the Declaration's 150th anniversary, reaffirmed these "old theories and principles" as "sound," noting that America represented a "new civilization" with greater regard for individual rights. Locke's assertion that "men may chuse different things, and yet all chuse right" launched classical liberalism by acknowledging the legitimacy of diverse human tastes. This pluralism, alongside Hobbes's demotion of politics from sacred to utilitarian, established the foundation for modern governance-not to make men virtuous but to provide security so individuals could pursue their own conceptions of happiness. The Founders designed a system accommodating human defectiveness without requiring constant public-spiritedness. Unlike progressives who view human nature as malleable, the Founders saw it as a source of normative guidance. They understood natural rights as inalienable and universal-the foundation of democratic equality and limited government. Government's purpose wasn't imposing opinions about happiness but securing pre-existing rights. Madison's revolution in democratic theory overturned the pessimistic consensus that democracy could only work in small, homogeneous societies. His solution to preventing tyranny of the majority was counterintuitive: cultivate factions. In an "extensive republic," the sheer scale ensures majorities remain unstable coalitions of minorities. As he explained in Federalist 10, "Extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests; you make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens." The Constitution follows logically from the Declaration, with democracy serving as the means to secure liberty, not as an end itself. The Founders embraced democracy firmly but without sentimentality, understanding its susceptibility to degeneracy. Their constitutional architecture reflected what Martin Diamond called "the American people's sensible self-doubt."

第4章

The Progressive Challenge

The progressives launched a fundamental challenge to the Founders' natural rights philosophy, seeking to replace limited government with an expansive state guided by expert administration. Woodrow Wilson rejected the Founders' anxieties about government being inherently dangerous, especially when wielded by majorities. In 1879, he ridiculed those who denounce "the tyranny of partisan majorities" yet praise "true representative government" as "laughably inconsistent." He believed government was not evil but "the indispensable organ of society." Wilson's vision required "wresting the Constitution to strange and as yet unimagined uses," later softened to requiring "a nice adjustment" determined by "the exigencies and new aspects of life itself." He saw the state as "an instrumentality for quickening" both collective and individual development, with no clear limits on its authority. In his 1887 essay "Socialism and Democracy," Wilson argued that "all idea of a limitation of public authority by individual rights be put out of view" and "no line can be drawn between private and public affairs which the State may not cross at will." He maintained that "the difference between democracy and socialism is not an essential difference, but only a practical difference," both resting on "the absolute right of the community to determine its own destiny." Wilson's democratic theory subordinated individual rights to collective rights. He admired socialism as a "revolt from selfish, misguided individualism" attempting to bring individuals "into complete harmony with society." He considered the Constitution's system of checks and balances a "radical defect" that "parcels out power and confuses responsibility," believing the Framers would admit "the only fruit of dividing power had been to make it irresponsible." Roosevelt's San Francisco Commonwealth Club speech revealed his vision of a transformed America requiring strong government. Most radically, Roosevelt reinterpreted the Declaration of Independence as a "contract" where "rulers were accorded power" in exchange for certain rights, with statesmanship involving "the re-definition of these rights in terms of a changing and growing social order." This fundamentally reversed the Founders' understanding that rights precede government. From the Founding until the 1930s, America operated on the premise that government's function was to provide ordered liberty for the pursuit of happiness, not happiness itself. The New Deal fundamentally changed this relationship, creating a sanguine estimation of central government competence that has grown steadily more ambitious without making Americans more content with their government.

『保守主義の精神』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第5章

The Administrative State and Constitutional Disequilibrium

The modern presidency has become "a pernicious conflation" of executive function with "semi-sacerdotal" spiritual leadership, catering to citizens seeking from politics "excitements, satisfactions, and consolations that politics should not try to supply." Despite early American aversion to monarchy, the presidency evolved to fulfill the need for "a visible point serving as a common centre in the government." The transformation began with technological changes. Theodore Roosevelt became the first filmed by movie cameras and to use the office as a "bully pulpit." The evolution continued with FDR mastering radio to bypass Congress and journalists, speaking directly to Americans in their living rooms with artificial intimacy: "My friends" and "Tell me your troubles." Woodrow Wilson transformed presidential communication, arguing presidents should engage in "interpretation" of the people's hearts. Modern transportation and communication technologies enabled presidents to be omnipresent, evolving into today's concept of president as "tribune of the people" and "molder of the public mind." This contradicts the Constitution's remarkably limited presidential role, centered on the Take Care Clause: "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." Eight decades after FDR called for a "temporary departure from the normal balance" between executive and legislative authority in his first inaugural address, this departure has become permanent. Barack Obama, who campaigned in 2008 promising to reverse executive overreach, instead declared he would not wait for Congress to "help" him. Madison foresaw this development in 1791, warning that as the federal government assumed powers belonging to state and local governments, the federal legislature would become overwhelmed and forced to transfer many functions to the executive branch. The administrative state began with the Interstate Commerce Commission in 1887 and has grown exponentially-in 2016, Congress passed 2,966 pages of laws while federal agencies produced 97,110 pages of regulations. This accumulation of legislative, executive, and judicial powers in the same hands fulfills Madison's definition of tyranny in Federalist 47. While Chief Justice Marshall declared it "emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is," today's administrative state has upended this principle.

第6章

Judicial Engagement and Natural Rights

The judicial branch must become more energetic in defending the separation of powers that serves liberty. The Constitution continues what the Declaration began, embedding the doctrine of natural rights at the center of national identity. The Declaration of Independence was not specifically "democratic" but contingently implies democracy as the form of government most likely to secure natural rights. As Leon Kass notes, any government is legitimate if it secures natural rights and rules by consent of the governed. The Constitution's essential drama derives from the tension between individual natural rights and the community's constructed right to make laws through majority rule. The Declaration is chronologically and logically prior to the Constitution, setting the framework for reading it and serving as its conscience. As Timothy Sandefur writes, "Liberty is the goal at which democracy aims, not the other way around." After Washington and Lincoln, John Marshall stands as America's third most important figure. This self-taught lawyer from humble origins embedded constitutional reasoning at the core of American governance during his thirty-four years as Chief Justice. The path to judicial review began with the Magna Carta's incremental expansion of liberty, but America revolutionized rights theory by establishing that people who are born free create government to secure pre-existing natural rights, rather than receiving rights granted from above. The paradox of American governance lies in our profound skepticism of government power alongside our reliance on a government institution-the Supreme Court-to elaborate and apply our political philosophy. Constitutional lawyers function as our practitioners of political philosophy, interpreting the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution that provides institutional architecture for its precepts. The great divide in America today exists between those who believe "first come rights and then comes government" (the Republican Constitution view) and those who believe "first comes government and then come rights" (the Democratic Constitution view). This distinction reflects competing understandings of "We the People"-either as individuals possessing natural rights or as a collective entity whose majority will should prevail.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『保守主義の精神』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第7章

Markets, Knowledge, and Human Flourishing

Political economy is properly the study of how production and exchange are shaped by customs, laws, and governments. A mature capitalist economy is not spontaneous but a complex government construct requiring laws that guarantee transparency and reliable information. After World War II, leaders like Kennedy and Nixon expressed supreme confidence in their ability to "manage" the economy, only to be humbled by phenomena like stagflation. Hayek's seminal 1945 essay explained why central economic planning fails: necessary knowledge exists only in "dispersed bits" among countless individuals, not in any centralized form. Markets function as marvels that coordinate actions through price signals, allowing responses to scarcity without anyone needing to understand the entire system. As Hayek noted, "The more civilized we become, the more relatively ignorant must each individual be of the facts on which the working of civilization depends." The conservative sensibility delights in market society's spontaneous order and surprising innovations, while progressives yearn for predictability and control. Intellectuals' disdain for capitalism stems partly from resentment that markets function effectively without their guidance. This ingratitude ignores how the "vulgar" commercial class makes the intellectual class possible-as economist George Stigler noted, "we professors are much more beholden to Henry Ford than to the foundation which bears his name." Modern government faces a fundamental contradiction: it must promote economic growth to fund its expanding promises while simultaneously imposing regulatory and redistributive burdens that impede that very growth. This creates what Daniel Bell called "the cultural contradictions of capitalism"-capitalism requires virtues like thrift, industriousness and deferred gratification, yet its success produces abundance, leisure and appetite emancipation that undermine these same virtues. Would you trade your middle-class life today for John D. Rockefeller's billion-dollar fortune in 1916? Don Boudreaux of George Mason University suggests you'd be foolish to accept. Despite palatial homes and private islands, you'd suffer primitive healthcare, limited entertainment, and technological deprivation. You'd have no antibiotics, modern dentistry, reliable birth control, or treatments for depression, influenza, or countless other ailments.

第8章

Culture and Opportunity

The American creed holds that all individuals possess equal freedom and the right to exercise it, with government instituted to protect this liberty. In an open society, people with equal rights inevitably develop unequal conditions due to differences in aptitudes, abilities, and circumstances. Will critiques conservatives' facile distinction between supporting "equality of opportunity" while opposing "equality of condition." This formulation, he argues, ignores how deeply opportunities are shaped by existing conditions. While equality of outcomes remains neither possible nor desirable, equality of opportunity proves far more elusive than conservatives comfortably acknowledge. Lincoln spoke of lifting "weights" from all men's shoulders to give them "equal chance." Lyndon Johnson expanded this thinking in his landmark 1965 Howard University speech, arguing "freedom is not enough"-one cannot merely bring formerly chained people to a starting line and call the race fair. The government itself had closed opportunity gates through policies like FHA "redlining," which explicitly steered mortgages away from Black neighborhoods and buyers. In 1966, sociologist James Coleman delivered findings so "seismic" that the Johnson administration tried burying them by releasing the report on July Fourth weekend. Coleman discovered that schools were "remarkably similar" in their impact on student achievement when accounting for socioeconomic background. The crucial predictor of school performance wasn't funding or resources, but the quality of families from which students came. The verbal environment of early childhood creates profound inequalities before formal education begins. Children from poor families hear about 600 words per hour, working-class children 1,200, and professional-class children 2,100. By age three, poor children have heard 30 million fewer words than their professional-class peers. This verbal deficit creates an "early catastrophe" where learning trajectories diverge radically in the first three years of life. America has made remarkable progress reducing racial barriers, but the Great Society's anti-poverty efforts have created a "tangle of pathologies." While material poverty has declined dramatically, this progress has been accompanied by family disintegration, welfare dependency, and "flight from work." Most alarming is the "quiet catastrophe"-a smaller percentage of prime-working-age men are employed today than during the Great Depression. This retreat from work is largely voluntary, with millions choosing economic inactivity financed by government benefits and family support. America now ranks second-to-last among affluent nations in male workforce participation despite having neither a weaker economy nor more generous welfare than other developed countries.

『保守主義の精神』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第9章

Education and Cultural Inheritance

America must re-establish its national character to ensure "We the People" denotes something real. Though the Declaration claimed "one people," Americans were diverse in faith, language and local attachments. Democracy requires a demos-a shared identity built through education and civic liturgies that nourish collective memory. Woodrow Wilson understood education as a conserving enterprise making young people artificially "old" through seasoned ideas, preventing society from "becoming infantile in every generation." The Founders aimed not for perfection but for happiness, believing moral truths could be apprehended by ordinary minds unclouded by passion. History-deprivation was once a control mechanism of American slavery, preventing enslaved people from developing pride, solidarity, and a sense of potential by disconnecting them from their past. Today, America inflicts this same deprivation on itself through presentism-judging historical figures by contemporary standards. This practice combines ignorance with arrogance, allowing people to flatter themselves as morally superior to figures like Washington or Lincoln without making the imaginative leap to understand earlier generations' struggles with reconciling moral principles and inherited institutions. Educators should conserve, enlarge and transmit the ideas and virtues on which a society based on persuasion and consent depends. Instead, postmodernism-Nietzsche's claim that "there are not facts, only interpretations"-has seeped into academia and society like a slow toxin. But facts do exist, and ignorance of them proves embarrassing, as when students cheered Franco's fascists in a documentary because they were labeled "rebels." Multiculturalism as policy rather than fact has become an ideology claiming all standards for judging cultures are culture-bound, making it wrong to "privilege" Western culture. This attacks individualism by defining people as mere manifestations of groups rather than self-defining participants in a free society. The resulting intellectual gerrymandering carves curricula into protected enclaves based on the insulting assumption that people have only derivative identities stemming from victim group membership.

第10章

America's Foreign Policy Dilemma

Woodrow Wilson's sleepless night in Paris during the 1919 peace conference reveals the hubris of American idealism in foreign affairs. While Europe's leaders were focused on ending a devastating war, Wilson was preoccupied with details as minute as "the composition of the railway police in Shantung." Wilson's belief that America was uniquely "disinterested and trusted" contrasted sharply with European realism. The clash between American idealism and European realism continues to shape foreign policy. America's character as "less a place than an idea" means its foreign policy will always have "an indelible color of idealism." However, conservatism must leaven this with "an unsentimental, almost bleak realism" about human nature-which is "desirous and competitive, hence anxious, and hence given to conflict." Our history is littered with shattered illusions about war's end. In 1862, photographers captured Civil War dead at Antietam, yet graphic journalism didn't prevent future conflicts. In 1910, economist Norman Angell's bestseller "The Grand Illusion" wrongly predicted nations would find war unprofitable. Jefferson's attempt to use trade embargoes instead of military force proved that "the ledger book was no match for human atavism." America's commercial republic naturally approaches international relations through business-like reasoning and legal negotiation, but this often fails against "animal spirits, national atavisms, and ideological frenzies." America's unique founding created a distinctive approach to foreign policy. John Quincy Adams articulated this in 1821: "She goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy... She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own." Vietnam was "the professors' war"-too clever by half with "carefully calibrated violence" sending "signals" to an uncomprehending enemy. The phrase "the best and the brightest" has become sarcastic shorthand for elite failure. Vietnam exemplified America's tragic tendency toward mutual incomprehension in foreign affairs-from refugees mistaking cheese for soap to McNamara's mangled Vietnamese pronunciation to Westmoreland's cultural tone-deafness.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『保守主義の精神』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第11章

A Conservative Sensibility Without Theism

If God is uninterested in humanity's affairs, He becomes politically irrelevant. Religion becomes problematic when divine revelation enters, with God actively intervening and providing behavioral strictures. Biblical religion defends individual dignity linked to moral agency, and should therefore be wary of government untethered from securing natural rights. Tocqueville warned of a "milder" democratic despotism that would "degrade men without tormenting them," treating citizens like children while providing for all their needs and "gradually robbing a man of all the uses of himself." Religious institutions struggle to flourish under government that presumes to satisfy every human need, while secularists must consider whether limited government can endure without religion's role in civil society. The Founders' deistic view saw God as like "a rich aunt in Australia-benevolent, distant, and infrequently heard from." This deity, having wound up the universe, has no continuing interest in human affairs and makes no interventions. If religion should console and enjoin as well as explain, deism barely qualifies as religion. The Founders typically discussed religion in terms of temporal utility rather than timeless truths. Franklin became "a thorough Deist" who considered belief in a creator and immortality "the essentials of every religion." Washington employed his "famous gift of silence" about religion, refused to kneel in prayer, avoided church on communion Sundays, and died without ministers or prayers present. Darwin's theory of natural selection severed the intellectual anchor rope of natural theology by providing an explanation for nature's orderliness without requiring divine intention. Like mathematician Laplace who told Napoleon "I have no need of that hypothesis" when asked about God's absence from his celestial mechanics, Darwin displaced the hypothesis that anchored natural theology. There exists a conservative sensibility that finds flux exhilarating rather than depressing. This secular conservative aesthetic finds beauty in Darwin's worldview of creative contingencies, tracing to Lucretius' poem "On the Nature of Things." This vision of atoms, void and constant motion creates a world "not rendered insignificant but made more beautiful by its transience."

第12章

Returning to First Principles

Conservatives today harbor radical worries about America's government and culture. While progressives focus on distributive justice, conservatives question the post-New Deal state's power, seeing a connection between government overreach and cultural decay. The conservative mission is to convince people that government promises are unsustainable and that modern government has become a deforming force corrupting the country's character. As Reagan noted, "We asked things of government that government was not equipped to give." Government grows through interest group bargaining, with none willing to disarm in the scramble for benefits. Americans' trust in government has plummeted from 77 percent in 1964 to just 20 percent in 2017, coinciding with government's expansion through ambitious distributive justice programs. Despite Clinton's 1997 proclamation that "the fight over government's role" was ending, this argument-as old as Plato's Republic-continues unabated. Conservatives must build a society nurturing self-sufficient individuals against the pull of urbanization and statism toward dependency. The federal government has been emancipated from constitutional circumscription, teaching Americans to expect Washington to address every problem and satisfy every want. Reviving states' rights-and responsibilities-would be an act of fidelity to the Founders, moving politics to the periphery of American life as Jefferson intended. F. Scott Fitzgerald's conclusion to The Great Gatsby captures America's melancholy relationship with its past. The novel ends with Nick Carraway imagining Dutch sailors seeing the "fresh, green breast of the new world" with wonder, then reflecting on Gatsby's pursuit of the green light at Daisy's dock-a dream already behind him. "So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past." The American Founding was a luminous moment that turned world history, translating ideas into constitutional institutions. The challenge now is whether we can get back not to original conditions but to original premises, living by the exacting principles of our Founding.

★★★★★

『保守主義の精神』を最後まで読み終えました

100万人以上の学習者に愛用されています

“23日間、毎日使い続けています。今では日課の一部です。”

jayallen

『保守主義の精神』の主要テーマ

natural rights philosophy
madisonian constitutionalism
progressive era critique
limited government theory
american exceptionalism

『保守主義の精神』の名言

Rights are natural, discernible by reason, and pre-exist collective human will.
Americans were born free from feudal structures.
Government's purpose wasn't imposing opinions about happiness but securing pre-existing rights.
Extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests.
No line can be drawn between private and public affairs which the State may not cross at will.

『保守主義の精神』の登場人物

George F. WillAuthor and political philosopher
Woodrow WilsonProgressive leader who challenged the Founders
John MarshallKey figure in establishing the American nation

著者について

ジョージ・フレデリック・ウィル（George Frederick Will）は、『The Conservative Sensibility』の著者として知られる、アメリカで最も影響力のある保守派政治評論家・作家の一人です。1941年にイリノイ州シャンペーンで生まれたウィルは、保守主義の原則とアメリカの統治に関する探求において、政治哲学と論評における数十年の専門知識を注ぎ込んでいます。

ウィルの政治思想における権威は、プリンストン大学で取得した政治学の博士号を含む学術的背景と、ジャーナリズムにおける比類なきキャリアに基づいています。1974年以来、『ワシントン・ポスト』紙に掲載されている彼のシンジケート・コラムは全米300以上の新聞に掲載され、1977年にはピューリッツァー賞（評論部門）を受賞しました。洗練された語彙と政治哲学者への言及を特徴とする彼の博識な執筆スタイルは、保守的な知的言説における主導的な声となっています。

政治評論にとどまらず、ウィルはベストセラーとなった『Men at Work: The Craft of Baseball』や『Statecraft as Soulcraft』を含む16冊の著書を執筆しています。また、ABC、FOXニュース、MSNBC、そして『ニューズウィーク』誌などの主要メディアの常連寄稿者でもあります。彼のコラムやテレビ出演は50年以上にわたってアメリカの政治対話を形成し続け、世界で最も広く読まれている作家の一人としての地位を確立しています。

保守主義の精神の要約をダウンロード

保守主義の精神の要約をPDFまたはEPUBで無料でダウンロード。印刷やオフラインでいつでもお読みいただけます。

他のユーザーのお気に入り

Conservative Mind

Russell Kirk

The conservative tradition in America

Charles W. Dunn & J. David Woodard

The Conscience of a Conservative

Barry Goldwater

Reflections on the Revolution in France and Other Writings

The conservative intellectual movement in America since 1945

Ten Conservative Principles | The Heritage Foundation

8 sources

The Conservative Mindset

The conservative's handbook

Phil Valentine

The Portable conservative reader

Russell Kirk

10 Books Every Conservative Must Read

Benjamin Wiker

How to be a conservative

Roger Scruton

この本に関するよくある質問

学習プラン

The Will to Power and Self-Mastery

This plan is essential for individuals seeking to break free from societal conditioning and reclaim their personal narrative. It is designed for those who want to master their internal impulses and transform their lives through the lens of existential philosophy and self-determination.

1 h 12 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Power, Ideas, and the State

In an era of deep polarization, understanding the intersection of economic interests and political theory is essential for informed citizenship. This plan is designed for aspiring leaders and policy enthusiasts who want to move beyond headlines to the structural roots of governance.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Philosophy for Modern Chaos

In an era of digital overload and misinformation, traditional wisdom offers a vital survival kit. This plan is designed for professionals and students seeking to maintain mental sovereignty and ethical consistency amidst modern societal pressures.

1 h 12 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

American history

This comprehensive survey of American history provides essential context for understanding current political, social, and cultural debates in the United States. It's ideal for students, professionals working in American contexts, global citizens seeking to understand U.S. influence, or anyone wanting to grasp how historical forces continue to shape contemporary American society and its role in the world.

4 h 43 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Strategist's Guide to Clear Thinking

In an era of information overload, the ability to think structurally and argue ethically is a critical leadership asset. This guide is designed for professionals and decision-makers who need to strip away noise, validate evidence, and lead through high-level persuasion and debate.

2 h•4 セクション

学習プラン

Analyze Profiles in Courage & Modern Lessons

This plan is essential for aspiring leaders and public servants who want to anchor their decision-making in proven moral frameworks. It bridges the gap between historical presidential integrity and the high-stakes ethical dilemmas of the modern political landscape.

5 h 31 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Birth of Wisdom

This plan bridges the gap between ancient logic and modern existential critique, offering a powerful toolkit for independent thought. It is ideal for students of philosophy, debaters, or anyone seeking to liberate their mind from conventional biases.

1 h•2 セクション

学習プラン

Jocko willink

This learning plan distills the battle-tested leadership philosophy of Jocko Willink, a retired Navy SEAL commander who has transformed how thousands approach personal accountability and team leadership. It's ideal for aspiring leaders, business professionals, entrepreneurs, and anyone seeking to develop elite-level discipline, decision-making skills, and the ability to lead teams through high-pressure situations with clarity and confidence.

3 h 39 m•4 セクション

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

今すぐ学習の旅を始めよう

第8章

保守主義の精神

概要『保守主義の精神』の概要

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

America's Paradox: Natural Rights in a Progressive Age

The Battle Between Madison and Wilson

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Natural Rights and the Founders' Vision

The Progressive Challenge

『保守主義の精神』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Administrative State and Constitutional Disequilibrium

Judicial Engagement and Natural Rights

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Markets, Knowledge, and Human Flourishing

Culture and Opportunity

『保守主義の精神』をもっと深く楽しむ

Education and Cultural Inheritance

America's Foreign Policy Dilemma

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

A Conservative Sensibility Without Theism

Returning to First Principles

『保守主義の精神』を最後まで読み終えました

『保守主義の精神』の主要テーマ

『保守主義の精神』の名言

『保守主義の精神』の登場人物

著者について

保守主義の精神の要約をダウンロード

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この本に関するよくある質問

What is The Conservative Sensibility by George F. Will about?

Who should read The Conservative Sensibility?

Is The Conservative Sensibility worth reading?

What are George F. Will's main arguments in The Conservative Sensibility?

もっと見る

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

America's Paradox: Natural Rights in a Progressive Age

The Battle Between Madison and Wilson

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Natural Rights and the Founders' Vision

The Progressive Challenge

『保守主義の精神』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Administrative State and Constitutional Disequilibrium

Judicial Engagement and Natural Rights

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Markets, Knowledge, and Human Flourishing

Culture and Opportunity

『保守主義の精神』をもっと深く楽しむ

Education and Cultural Inheritance

America's Foreign Policy Dilemma

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

A Conservative Sensibility Without Theism

Returning to First Principles

『保守主義の精神』を最後まで読み終えました

他のユーザーのお気に入り

もっと見る

『保守主義の精神』の概要