What is Teaching as a Subversive Activity about?

Teaching as a Subversive Activity is a 1969 educational manifesto by Neil Postman and Charles Weingartner that advocates for radical school reform. The book argues that education should teach students how to think critically and learn independently, rather than memorizing content. Postman and Weingartner propose eliminating textbooks, grades, tests, and traditional subjects in favor of inquiry-based learning where teachers ask questions instead of providing answers.

Who wrote Teaching as a Subversive Activity?

Teaching as a Subversive Activity was written by Neil Postman and Charles Weingartner, both education professors at Queens College in New York. Neil Postman later became chairman of the department of culture and communication at New York University and authored numerous influential books on education, media, and technology. Charles Weingartner served as a professor of English and Education at SUNY New Paltz and the University of South Florida.

Who should read Teaching as a Subversive Activity?

Teaching as a Subversive Activity is essential reading for educators, administrators, and education reformers seeking alternatives to traditional teaching methods. The book appeals to anyone questioning conventional schooling practices and interested in student-centered, inquiry-based learning. Parents, curriculum designers, and educational policymakers will find valuable insights about fostering critical thinking skills in students. Those exploring progressive education philosophies will discover thought-provoking ideas about transforming classroom dynamics.

Is Teaching as a Subversive Activity worth reading today?

Teaching as a Subversive Activity remains remarkably relevant despite being published over 55 years ago. While some language feels dated, Postman and Weingartner's central argument—that schools should teach students how to learn and think critically rather than memorize content—is more applicable than ever in today's rapidly changing world. The book offers practical strategies for inquiry-based education that complement modern learning theories. However, readers should approach some radical proposals with contextual understanding of the 1960s era.

What is the main idea of Teaching as a Subversive Activity by Neil Postman?

The main idea of Teaching as a Subversive Activity is that education must shift from content transmission to teaching students "how to learn". Postman and Weingartner argue that rapid societal change means what made sense to previous generations may not apply to current students. The book advocates replacing traditional teacher-centered instruction with inquiry-based learning where students tackle real problems and develop critical thinking skills. The ultimate goal is creating flexible, creative individuals capable of facing uncertainty and formulating new meanings.

What is "crap detecting" in Teaching as a Subversive Activity?

"Crap detecting" is Postman and Weingartner's term for critical thinking and the ability to identify false or misleading information. Teaching as a Subversive Activity argues that the primary purpose of education should be giving students a fully operational "crap detector" to question authority and analyze claims skeptically. This concept emphasizes developing students' abilities to distinguish truth from propaganda, question popular ideas, and think independently. The authors believe this skill is essential for navigating a world filled with misinformation and rapid change.

What radical proposals do Postman and Weingartner make in Teaching as a Subversive Activity?

Teaching as a Subversive Activity proposes 15 provocative recommendations including: * declaring a five-year moratorium on all textbooks and tests * having teachers teach subjects outside their expertise * dissolving all traditional subjects and course requirements * limiting teachers to three declarative sentences per class Other proposals include requiring teachers to undergo psychotherapy, making every class elective, withholding teacher paychecks if students lose interest, and reproducing bathroom graffiti in school halls. While some suggestions seem antagonistic, they challenge educators to fundamentally rethink traditional schooling structures.

What is the inquiry method in Teaching as a Subversive Activity?

The inquiry method in Teaching as a Subversive Activity emphasizes presenting students with real, open-ended problems rather than predetermined solutions. Teachers should ask questions they don't already know the answers to, encouraging genuine exploration instead of rote responses. Postman and Weingartner advocate for a "What's-Worth-Knowing Questions Curriculum" where the art of asking questions becomes the source of all knowledge. This approach makes learning a process rather than a product, with teachers serving as guides or coaches rather than authority figures dispensing information.

教育の再定義

ニール・ポストマン

4.21(1343 Reviews)

『教育の再定義』の概要

1969年、『教育は破壊的活動である（Teaching as a Subversive Activity）』は、従来の教室内の力学に異を唱えることで教育に革命をもたらしました。メディア理論家のマーシャル・マクルーハンが支持し、プレイボーイ誌が「新しい教育」の入門書と称賛したこの宣言書の「探究学習法」は、教育的変革を求める教師たちにとって、今なお学びの扉を開く鍵となっています。

語り方を選ぶ

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

教育の再定義の同じアイデアを、あなたに合う声・深さ・ペースで学べます。いつでも切り替えられます。

第1章

The Classroom Revolution: Challenging Education's Status Quo

In an era when our educational system seems perpetually stuck in reverse gear, Neil Postman and Charles Weingartner's provocative manifesto stands as a clarion call for radical transformation. Published in 1969 during a period of intense social upheaval, "Teaching as a Subversive Activity" remains startlingly relevant today-perhaps even more so in our age of information overload and accelerating change. The book became an underground classic among progressive educators, with luminaries like Marshall McLuhan praising its revolutionary approach. Though controversial in traditional educational circles, its influence quietly permeates modern pedagogical thinking, with tech industry leaders and innovative schools worldwide drawing inspiration from its core principles. At its heart lies a deceptively simple question: What if education were designed not to preserve the status quo but to equip students with the critical thinking skills needed to transform it?

第2章

Detecting Nonsense: Education's Primary Function

In a democratic society, schools must develop in youth the attitudes and skills of social, political, and cultural criticism. As Hemingway noted, to be a great writer requires "a built-in, shockproof crap detector"-a quality that represents not just literary discernment but an essential survival strategy in our complex world. Our intellectual history chronicles those who helped contemporaries recognize misconceptions and falsehoods. From Socrates to modern thinkers, these "subversives" have consistently challenged prevailing wisdom. Schools should cultivate this expertise in "crap detecting"-what sociologist David Riesman calls the "counter-cyclical" approach to education, mathematician Norbert Wiener terms "anti-entropic feedback systems," and philosopher John Gardner describes as the "ever-renewing society." This requires developing an anthropological perspective-being part of one's culture while simultaneously viewing it objectively. Such perspective demands courage to achieve freedom from tribal intellectual constraints, recognizing that most people's doctrinal acceptance stems from birth accident rather than rational choice. Those sensitive to language's built-in biases appear "subversive" precisely because they see beyond words to underlying processes. Three urgent problems demand schools become training centers for "subversion." First, the "communications revolution" has created environments requiring entirely new survival strategies. When technological elements change an environment, political and social forms radically transform, necessitating new patterns of defense, perception and evaluation. Second, the "Change Revolution" has fundamentally altered our relationship with time and knowledge. Using a clock face metaphor representing 3,000 years of human writing, most significant media changes occurred only in the last "minutes"-printing press (nine minutes ago), telegraph and photography (three minutes ago), and television, computers and satellites mere seconds ago. Unlike previous generations who could live without confronting serious challenges to their knowledge or values, today's rapid change forces each person to continuously develop viable personal value systems that quickly become irrelevant as circumstances transform. Third, bureaucracies naturally resist change, their motto being "Carry On, Regardless." They rarely ask "Why?" but only "How?" As John Gardner observed, the problem isn't finding new ideas but getting them heard through the "crusty rigidity" of the status quo. Schools must function as "anti-bureaucracy bureaucracies," providing youth with a "What is it good for?" perspective on society.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『教育の再定義』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第3章

The Medium Shapes the Message

Marshall McLuhan's famous aphorism "The medium is the message" reveals that environments themselves convey critical messages by controlling the perceptions and attitudes of participants. What you learn comes from what your environment permits, encourages, or insists you experience. Yet people struggle to see classrooms as such environments, where organization determines what's learned. Educational discourse is trapped by the false dichotomy between "content" (the substance students are there to "get") and "method" (merely the means of presentation). This separation communicates that content courses are "real" while methods courses are "fake." The critical content of any learning experience is the method through which learning occurs. What students do in classrooms is what they learn-and mostly, they sit listening to teachers, believing authorities, and memorizing information. Classrooms primarily feature "convergent questions"-"Guess what I'm thinking" questions about nouns, Civil War causes, or chromosome counts. Students constantly supply "The Right Answer" across all subjects. Since content is rarely remembered beyond quizzes, the only lasting learning comes from the classroom structure itself. These unwritten but powerfully communicated messages include: passive acceptance trumps active criticism; knowledge discovery is beyond students' capacity; recall is the highest intellectual achievement; authority outweighs independent judgment; students' ideas are inconsequential; feelings are irrelevant; and every question has one unambiguous Right Answer.

第4章

The Inquiry Method: A New Learning Environment

The Inquiry Method represents a complete redesign of classroom structure-not merely a refinement of old approaches but a revolutionary new medium with entirely different messages. Unlike traditional environments that transmit pre-packaged knowledge, this approach fundamentally changes how learning happens. Our tendency to dismiss ideas by merely naming them-"labeling as libeling"-prevents true understanding. While educators debate whether to call it Socratic, inductive, or discovery method, such naming misses the point. The inquiry method is a process requiring description and scrutiny rather than taxonomic classification. Most educators evaluate the inquiry method through outdated metrics: Will students pass Regents exams? Score well on College Boards? Memorize facts? This backward-looking perspective misses the point entirely. Like viewing locomotives as "iron horses" or electric lights as powerful candles, it fails to recognize that inquiry learning activates different senses, attitudes, and perceptions, generating a bolder, more potent intelligence. Traditional education follows a linear "story line" where teachers transmit pre-packaged narratives to passive students. The inquiry method, reflecting our electric age's disruption of linear information flow, eliminates this approach. Instead of asking "Who discovered America?", it asks "How do you discover who discovered America?" Students generate their own understanding by engaging with methods of learning rather than absorbing content. Good learners possess distinctive qualities: confidence in their ability to learn despite frustrations; enjoyment in solving problems without being given answers; awareness of what's relevant to their survival; reliance on their own judgment rather than authorities; comfort with being wrong and changing their minds; patience in delaying judgments until gathering sufficient information; flexibility in shifting perspectives; respect for facts while understanding their tentative nature; skilled inquiry behaviors including asking meaningful questions and examining assumptions; and comfort with uncertainty. The inquiry environment has four components: teacher, students, problems, and problem-solving strategies. The inquiry teacher rarely tells students what they should know, preferring questioning (especially divergent) as their primary discourse mode. They reject single "right answers," encourage student-student interaction over student-teacher interaction, avoid summarizing positions, develop lessons from student responses rather than predetermined structures, pose problems rather than deliver content, and measure success by behavioral changes in students' inquiry skills.

『教育の再定義』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第5章

The Relevance Crisis: Connecting Learning to Life

The problem of relevance in education cannot be overstated. Too often, educators teach subjects "for their own sake" or merely because they personally enjoy them, without connecting content to students' lives and needs. This disconnect creates a profound alienation between students and the educational process - a gap that widens as students progress through their academic careers. Consider the typical school assignment about Ancient Egypt or Greece, featuring structured questions about climate, geography, and occupations that students must answer after reading assigned texts. While these topics hold intrinsic historical value, the way they're typically taught bears no relation to students' actual concerns or the pressing issues they face in their lives. Instead of exploring how ancient civilizations solved problems similar to those we face today, or drawing parallels between historical social structures and modern society, students are often reduced to memorizing dates and facts without context or relevance. The consequences of this irrelevance became starkly clear in the 1967 cheating scandal at DeWitt Clinton High School, where four seniors distributed stolen exam answers, resulting in 2,000 students having to retake tests. Student reactions revealed their deep alienation from the educational process - they discussed the unfairness of retesting and their anxiety about passing without cheating, but showed no concern for the actual learning that was supposedly taking place. This incident exemplifies how the educational system had failed to create meaningful connections between academic content and student development. This disconnect between education and students' perceived needs creates a system where cheating becomes a rational response to an irrational environment. When education fails to address what students genuinely need to know - whether it's critical thinking skills, practical life skills, or knowledge applicable to their future careers - the entire enterprise becomes a game of compliance rather than learning. Students learn to navigate the system rather than engage with the material, focusing on grades and test scores instead of genuine understanding and personal growth. Modern educational research suggests that relevant learning experiences should connect to at least one of three areas: students' current lives, their aspirations for the future, or their cultural and personal identities. When these connections are missing, students struggle to find meaning in their educational experiences, leading to decreased motivation, poor retention of information, and a diminished capacity for applying knowledge in real-world situations. The challenge for educators lies not just in teaching content, but in demonstrating its relevance to students' lives in ways that spark genuine interest and engagement.

第6章

Building a Curriculum Worth Knowing

What if all curricula, textbooks, and standardized tests suddenly disappeared? This hypothetical "catastrophe" presents an opportunity to increase educational relevance by building a curriculum entirely of questions-not just any questions, but ones worth seeking answers to from the students' perspective. Education should be about drawing out what's latent in students, not filling them with information. True learning happens in relation to what we already know, which requires a major revision of educational metaphors. A relevant curriculum might begin with deeply meaningful questions about personal values, meaning-making, symbols, change, survival strategies, and ultimately, what's worth knowing. The standards for evaluating educational questions should be: Will they increase the learner's will and capacity to learn? Will they provide joy and confidence in learning? Do they require inquiry and allow alternative answers? Do they stress learner uniqueness while helping understand universal human conditions? These standards contrast sharply with traditional "high standards" that focus on covering ground and difficult assignments. A Questions Curriculum demonstrates how a single question like "What is language?" can expand into hundreds of meaningful inquiries. Students in one class developed extensive questions about advertising language, news reporting, political language, religious language, and scientific language-revealing how traditional subject boundaries dissolve when inquiry is prioritized. This approach works especially well for "disadvantaged children" by focusing on learners rather than predetermined content. Question-asking is the source of all knowledge, and meaningful learning requires problems perceived as relevant by learners themselves.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『教育の再定義』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第7章

Making Meaning: The Core of Learning

There is no learning without a learner and no meaning without a meaning maker. To survive in a world of rapid change, the most valuable skill is knowing how to make viable meanings. The new education isn't about offering more, but about entering a fundamentally new business: crap-detecting and relevance-finding. Teachers have always been ambivalent about what they do, especially regarding conceptions of the human mind. Some see themselves as Lamplighters illuminating darkness, others as Gardeners cultivating minds, Personnel Managers keeping minds busy, Muscle Builders strengthening flabby minds, or Bucket Fillers filling minds up. But all these metaphors have limitations. We can only speak of "the mind" metaphorically. The word itself suggests a thing rather than a process. As Dewey noted, "minding" (as process) is more accurate than "the mind" (as thing). Our language forces "thing" conceptions upon us through nouns, when reality is more fluid. The fundamental metaphor of the new education is "minding" as "meaning making," a concept rooted in Adelbert Ames Jr.'s perception studies. His work revealed several critical insights: First, our perceptions come from us, not from external things. Second, what we perceive depends largely on our previous experiences, assumptions, and purposes. Third, we rarely change our perceptions until frustrated in acting upon them. Fourth, each individual perceives uniquely. Fifth, perception largely functions through available linguistic categories. Sixth, a perception's meaning is revealed in how it causes us to act. Professor Robert Rosenthal's studies dramatically illustrate the meaning-making concept. He discovered rats performed better when experimenters were told they were "intelligent," and similarly, randomly selected schoolchildren made dramatic gains when teachers were told these students would excel. This demonstrates how expectations shape both perception and performance. If teachers treated students as meaning makers, schooling would transform completely. Most school practices wrongly assume students are passive receivers of fixed subject matter. In reality, learners make something uniquely their own from whatever we tell them, building it into their existing experience. This means "student-centered curriculum" isn't just motivational-it's the only viable approach.

第8章

Language: The Window and Prison of Perception

Simple yet profound ideas can transform societies-like the Copernican revolution or evolution theory. The concept that our perceptions come from us-that we see things not as they are but as we are-has similar transformative potential. Each person creates their unique world, generating whatever reality they know. Language isn't neutral in perception but fully implicated in reality assessment. We don't "get" meaning from things; we assign meaning through our symbol systems. Our language habits shape our perceptions-like believing time consists of past, present and future, or that things have inherent characteristics. This perspective on language and reality, named after anthropologists Edward Sapir and Benjamin Whorf, suggests each language represents a unique way of perceiving reality. We're imprisoned in a "house of language" with tinted windows at odd angles, limiting what we can perceive. This reaffirms that "the medium is the message"-language isn't just a vehicle of expression but the driver itself. Almost everything we call "knowledge" is language-a subject IS its language. Biology, history, astronomy-all are inseparable from their specialized vocabularies. Every teacher is therefore a language teacher, teaching ways of talking and seeing the world. The new education must be language-centered, studying language as the major factor producing our perceptions, judgments, and institutions. Alfred Korzybski developed "General Semantics" to address how language simultaneously enables humans to "bind time" while blinding them to reality. His system aims to keep language users conscious of how their words correspond to sense verification. Key concepts include: meaning exists in people, not words; words are not what they refer to; consciousness of abstraction-recognizing that we select only portions of reality for which we have verbal labels; and the "photographic" effects of language that fix changing realities. A language-centered classroom puts semantic awareness at the heart of all inquiries. Students learn that language shapes perception and determines what we can know. They explore how different subjects require different language systems-what constitutes a "fact" in biology differs from mathematics, and what "theory" means shifts between disciplines. They learn to distinguish between closed systems (with fixed right/wrong answers) and open systems (with degrees of rightness that change over time).

『教育の再定義』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第9章

Transforming Teachers for a New Education

If the new education makes sense to you, you've likely wondered where we'll find teachers capable of implementing it. Most existing educators are too committed to old metaphors and procedures to adapt. When teen students confronted teachers about communication problems in schools, some teachers walked out rather than listen. One teacher even shouted "It's not my job to love my pupils-it's my job to teach them," revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how learning happens. Since perception change sometimes occurs when people are forced into new viewpoints, consider these proposals to radically alter the school environment: Ban all textbooks for five years; have teachers teach subjects outside their expertise; swap elementary and high school teachers; require teachers to write books on their subjects; dissolve all subjects, courses and requirements; limit teachers to three declarative sentences and fifteen questions per class; prohibit teachers from asking questions they already know the answers to; declare a moratorium on tests and grades; require all teachers to undergo psychotherapy; classify teachers publicly by ability; require teachers to pass tests prepared by students; make classes elective with teacher pay dependent on student interest; require teachers to work outside education every fourth year; require evidence of loving relationships; display toilet graffiti in school halls; ban educational jargon. Current teacher education produces intellectual paraplegics who've spent 16 years learning not to think independently. An alternative approach shifts prospective teachers into the role of inventors rather than passive recipients. In a "general methods course," students from various subject specialties might collaboratively design "Quo Vadimus High School"-the best possible secondary school for the nuclear space age. Their first reaction is incredulity, then hostility at the instructor's refusal to lecture or give exams. The challenge requires them to unlearn educational myths they "know" that "ain't so"-like content expertise equals teaching ability, departmentalization is necessary, or homogeneous grouping works.

第10章

City Schools as Community Transformation Centers

City schools confine students to boxes where they must either submit to teacher demands or leave. The conventional structure of these schools, especially for "disadvantaged" students, actually creates the problems educators deplore. For urban disadvantaged children, particularly when white teachers work with Negro students, schools become hostile environments. The predictable result: students neither learn what schools claim to teach nor remain enrolled once legally able to escape. Rather than viewing city schools as structures, we should see them as processes focused on community service. This approach transforms schools into local "think tanks" where students identify community problems, plan solutions, and implement immediate improvements. The community becomes the curriculum, with students across all age ranges serving as primary action agents, rewarded not just with grades but with valued currency including public recognition. This schooling approach uses the entire city as a learning laboratory, with services including community planning, repair services, cultural productions, athletic programs, and work in city agencies. Students could produce and sell goods ranging from clothing to food to art, operate gardens and workshops, and even create kibbutz-like experiences. Such a system develops community leadership while freeing students from alienating detention, channeling adolescent energy into constructive rather than destructive directions.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『教育の再定義』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第11章

Practical Steps Toward Educational Revolution

If you're a teacher in an ordinary school, and these ideas make sense to you... what can you do about it, say tomorrow? Your first act of subversion might be writing three questions on a paper to view daily: What am I going to have my students do today? What's it good for? How do I know? These questions will make you uneasy about teaching things of specious value and may drive you to reconsider everything you're doing. In class, avoid telling your students answers. Instead, present problems and let them work through without your advice. Your talk should consist only of questions based on their remarks. When students ask questions, tell them you don't know the answer, even if you do. Don't fear silence-it might mean they're thinking or growing productively hostile as the burden of intellectual activity shifts to them. Try several practical experiments: Listen to your students without reacting or judging-imagine yourself as a psychiatrist trying to understand rather than instruct. Have students practice asking questions by requiring all utterances be in question form for two days. Present a problem and have them compile questions that might help solve it. Examine your grading practices by writing down reasons for each grade and imagining yourself as the student receiving it. Track your judgments about students, both verbal and nonverbal. Both negative and positive judgments can impede learning-negative ones cause students to judge themselves negatively, while excessive positive judgments create dependency. Experiment with imagining your students as the smartest in school. What would you do differently if you acted as if they had great potential? People often become what others expect them to be. This "self-fulfilling prophecy" is particularly powerful in education. Try giving all students A's for the term. Initially they won't believe you, but once they do, they can focus on learning rather than grades. Help them discover what knowledge they find worth pursuing without fear of reprisal. Most students will work diligently without grade pressure; the few who "goof off" are a small price for providing others with perhaps their only decent intellectual experience in school.

第12章

Survival in an Age of Accelerating Change

The basic function of education is to increase the survival prospects of the group. When this function isn't fulfilled, groups and even entire civilizations disappear. The problem arises when educational systems become devoted exclusively to conserving old ideas, which works only in stable environments. But when change becomes the primary environmental characteristic, survival depends on identifying which old concepts remain relevant and which must be unlearned. We've now reached a stage environmentally where "selective forgetting" has become necessary for survival. Technologically wrought changes have rendered many traditional concepts not merely irrelevant but actual threats to survival if we fail to recognize their obsolescence. The Ecumenical Council convened by Pope John XXIII illustrates institutional adaptation to environmental change. The Church "selectively forgot" concepts conserved for nearly 2,000 years, including the notion that "Christ was killed by the Jews." These changes, though belated, were necessary for the Church's survival as it faced a widening gap between its institutional structure and the changing environment. Almost all concepts we've painfully had to unlearn resulted from scientific method. When Galileo suggested humans weren't the center of the universe, institutions conserving the opposite concept responded without enthusiasm. Darwin faced similar resistance when his observations challenged Genesis. The concept "that we must unlearn dead concepts" is itself new and uncongenial to most encountering it. Electronic machines now perform intellectual tasks better than humans, creating unprecedented environmental changes. Robert Theobald warns that incredible changes will occur within 35 years, requiring us to help young people learn new beliefs, institutions and values. Education's most important function is helping people recognize the world they actually live in while mastering concepts to cope with it. The concepts we must learn now are those which both shape and derive from technological change: relativity, probability, contingency, uncertainty, function, structure as process, multiple causality, nonsymmetrical relationships, degrees of difference, and incongruity. These intellectual strategies for nuclear-space-age survival comprise the ingredients for changing ourselves to meet environmental demands. The new education's purpose is developing people who are actively inquiring, flexible, creative, innovative, tolerant, and liberal-personalities who can face uncertainty without disorientation and formulate new meanings to meet threatening changes. In sum, we need to help students develop built-in, shockproof crap detectors as basic equipment in their survival kits.

★★★★★

『教育の再定義』を最後まで読み終えました

100万人以上の学習者に愛用されています

“23日間、毎日使い続けています。今では日課の一部です。”

jayallen

『教育の再定義』の主要テーマ

critical thinking skills
inquiry based learning
media literacy
educational reform
information overload survival

『教育の再定義』の名言

Once you have learned how to ask questions — relevant and appropriate and substantial questions — you have learned how to learn and no one can keep you from learning whatever you want or need to know.
Schools must develop in youth the attitudes and skills of social, political, and cultural criticism.
Bureaucracies naturally resist change, their motto being "Carry On, Regardless."
The critical content of any learning experience is the method through which learning occurs.
Passive acceptance trumps active criticism.

『教育の再定義』の登場人物

Neil PostmanCo-author and proponent of educational reform
Charles WeingartnerCo-author and advocate for the Inquiry Method
Marshall McLuhanMedia theorist whose theories shape the book
John GardnerPhilosopher cited on societal renewal
David RiesmanSociologist cited on counter-cyclical education

著者について

ニール・ポストマン（1931–2003）は、**『教育：破壊的な活動としての（Teaching as a Subversive Activity）』**の共著者であり、先駆的なアメリカの教育者、メディア理論家、そして文化批評家でした。1969年にチャールズ・ワインガートナーと共著したこの本は、伝統的な教育に対する急進的な批判であり、テストや教科書の廃止と、探究型学習への転換を訴えました。ポストマンの教育学とメディアに関する洞察は、ニューヨーク大学での40年にわたるキャリアの中で形成されました。彼は1971年に同大学で、通信技術がいかに文化と思考を形作るかを研究する分野である「メディア・エコロジー」の大学院プログラムを創設しました。

マーシャル・マクルーハンの強い影響を受けたポストマンは、テクノロジー、教育、社会の交差点を探求する20冊以上の著書を執筆しました。代表作には、『テレビ消滅：アミューズメントに溺れる現代（Amusing Ourselves to Death）』（1985年）、『子供の消滅（The Disappearance of Childhood）』（1982年）、『テクポリ：技術至上主義共和国（Technopoly）』（1992年）などがあります。

彼は主要な出版物の常連寄稿者であり、テレビやラジオ番組にも頻繁に出演しました。特筆すべきは、ポストマンが自らの教えを実践していたことです。彼はパーソナルコンピュータを避け、すべての著作を手書きで執筆しました。**『教育：破壊的な活動としての』**は出版と同時に広く注目を集め、現在も進歩主義教育理論の金字塔的なテキストであり続けています。

教育の再定義の要約をダウンロード

教育の再定義の要約をPDFまたはEPUBで無料でダウンロード。印刷やオフラインでいつでもお読みいただけます。

他のユーザーのお気に入り

Amusing ourselves to death

Neil Postman

Unschooled

Kerry McDonald

Teaching as Art and Calling: Education Philosophy の書籍表紙

6 sources

Teaching as Art and Calling: Education Philosophy

The abolition of man, or, Reflections on education with special reference to the teaching of English in the upper forms of schools

C.S. Lewis

Experience and education

John Dewey

Case Against Education

Bryan Caplan

Ignorance

Stuart Firestein

The Learning Revolution: Why Traditional Education Isn't Enough の書籍表紙

3 sources

The Learning Revolution: Why Traditional Education Isn't Enough

この本に関するよくある質問

学習プラン

Learn engaging teaching methods for fun study

This plan is essential for educators and trainers looking to move beyond traditional lectures and foster genuine excitement for learning. It bridges the gap between cognitive science and classroom practice, making it ideal for anyone wanting to boost student retention and engagement.

4 h 8 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Architecture of Defiance

This curriculum is essential for those seeking to understand how high-stakes philosophy translates into lived resistance and psychological resilience. It is ideal for students of literature, political activists, and anyone grappling with the burden of personal freedom in a post-truth world.

1 h 36 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Teach Psych with AI-Resistant Assessments

As generative AI reshapes academia, psychology educators must evolve their pedagogical approach to ensure genuine student mastery. This plan is designed for instructors and professors who want to combine science-based teaching methods with innovative assessment strategies that prioritize human critical thinking over automated outputs.

4 h 47 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Way of Play: Core Arguments & Examples

This learning plan bridges the gap between abstract philosophy and practical game design to reveal how play functions as a driver of human progress. It is essential for educators, designers, and leaders looking to leverage playful mechanics for social impact and cognitive development.

5 h 2 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Power, Resistance, and the Ordinary Life

This plan traces the evolution of social power from prehistoric cooperation to modern revolutionary strategy. It is essential for students of history and political science seeking to understand how ordinary people disrupt established hierarchies.

30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Study MKUltra and manipulation techniques

Understanding the history of mind control and the mechanics of influence is essential for maintaining psychological autonomy in an age of mass persuasion. This plan is ideal for students of psychology, history buffs, or anyone seeking to build a robust defense against manipulative social dynamics.

4 h 54 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Art of Systemic Rebellion

This plan is designed for individuals feeling stifled by societal expectations and seeking a more authentic existence. It provides a philosophical and creative framework for those ready to trade hollow success for a life of deep, personal significance.

2 h•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Oxford Tutorial: Power, Gender, and Meaning

This interdisciplinary tutorial bridges political science, gender studies, and theology to dismantle traditional power structures. It is ideal for students and thinkers looking to challenge established norms and deepen their understanding of societal legitimacy and human purpose.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

今すぐ学習の旅を始めよう

第5章

教育の再定義

概要『教育の再定義』の概要

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Classroom Revolution: Challenging Education's Status Quo

Detecting Nonsense: Education's Primary Function

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Medium Shapes the Message

The Inquiry Method: A New Learning Environment

『教育の再定義』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Relevance Crisis: Connecting Learning to Life

Building a Curriculum Worth Knowing

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Making Meaning: The Core of Learning

Language: The Window and Prison of Perception

『教育の再定義』をもっと深く楽しむ

Transforming Teachers for a New Education

City Schools as Community Transformation Centers

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Practical Steps Toward Educational Revolution

Survival in an Age of Accelerating Change

『教育の再定義』を最後まで読み終えました

『教育の再定義』の主要テーマ

『教育の再定義』の名言

『教育の再定義』の登場人物

著者について

教育の再定義の要約をダウンロード

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この本に関するよくある質問

What is Teaching as a Subversive Activity about?

Who wrote Teaching as a Subversive Activity?

Who should read Teaching as a Subversive Activity?

Is Teaching as a Subversive Activity worth reading today?

もっと見る

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Classroom Revolution: Challenging Education's Status Quo

Detecting Nonsense: Education's Primary Function

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Medium Shapes the Message

The Inquiry Method: A New Learning Environment

『教育の再定義』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Relevance Crisis: Connecting Learning to Life

Building a Curriculum Worth Knowing

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Making Meaning: The Core of Learning

Language: The Window and Prison of Perception

『教育の再定義』をもっと深く楽しむ

Transforming Teachers for a New Education

City Schools as Community Transformation Centers

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Practical Steps Toward Educational Revolution

Survival in an Age of Accelerating Change

『教育の再定義』を最後まで読み終えました

他のユーザーのお気に入り

もっと見る

『教育の再定義』の概要