What is *Survival of the Friendliest* about?

*Survival of the Friendliest* by Brian Hare and Vanessa Woods argues that human evolutionary success stems from cooperation and friendliness, not aggression. It explores "self-domestication," where traits like empathy and sociability allowed early humans to thrive over stronger hominids like Neanderthals. The book uses examples from bonobos, domesticated foxes, and dogs to show how friendliness drives survival, while also warning of its dark side: tribalistic aggression toward outsiders.

Who should read *Survival of the Friendliest*?

This book is ideal for readers interested in evolutionary biology, anthropology, or psychology. Educators, policymakers, and anyone curious about human behavior’s roots in cooperation will find its insights actionable. Fans of authors like Yuval Noah Harari or Richard Wrangham will appreciate its interdisciplinary approach to explaining human dominance through social bonding.

Is *Survival of the Friendliest* worth reading?

Yes, for its fresh perspective on human evolution. Hare and Woods combine rigorous science (e.g., fox domestication experiments) with accessible storytelling to challenge the "survival of the fittest" myth. Critics praise its balance of hope and caution, though some note gaps in addressing modern polarization.

What is the self-domestication theory in *Survival of the Friendliest*?

Self-domestication theory posits that humans, like bonobos and dogs, evolved friendlier traits through natural selection. Reduced aggression and increased cooperation allowed early humans to form complex societies. Dmitry Belyaev’s fox experiment—where selecting for tameness led to physical and behavioral changes—mirrors this process in humans.

How do bonobos illustrate the book’s thesis?

Bonobos, unlike aggressive chimpanzees, resolve conflicts through empathy and cooperation. Female-led bonobo societies prioritize social harmony, demonstrating how friendliness fosters survival. The authors argue humans similarly evolved through selective pressure for tolerance, which enabled large-scale collaboration and innovation.

What is the “dark side” of human friendliness?

While friendliness unites groups, it also fuels hostility toward outsiders. The book compares humans to mother bears: fiercely protective of their own but vicious toward perceived threats. This tribalistic instinct, combined with modern weaponry, explains humanity’s capacity for both kindness and cruelty.

How does *Survival of the Friendliest* explain Neanderthal extinction?

Neanderthals, though physically stronger, lacked humans’ cooperative communication skills. Hare and Woods argue that Homo sapiens’ ability to build trust across groups via shared rituals and language gave them a survival edge, enabling resource-sharing and innovation that isolated Neanderthal groups couldn’t match.

What practical solutions does the book offer for modern tribalism?

The authors advocate designing inclusive societal structures to reduce fear of outsiders. Examples include fostering casual cross-group interactions (e.g., integrated workplaces) and emphasizing shared identities over divisions. They cite Elliot Aronson’s “jigsaw” classroom method as proof collaboration overcomes prejudice.

ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」

私たちの起源を理解し、共通の人間性を再発見する

ブライアン・ヘア＆ヴァネッサ・ウッズ

4.03(1649 Reviews)

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』の概要

「適者生存」は忘れましょう。ブライアン・ヘアは、競争ではなく協力こそが人類の進化を突き動かしたのだと明かします。従来の常識を覆す彼の「自己家畜化」理論は、私たちの友好的な性質がいかにして複雑な社会を可能にしたかを示す一方で、それが逆説的に部族的な攻撃性を煽る原因となっていることも浮き彫りにします。もし、支配ではなく「親切さ」こそが私たちの進化上のスーパーパワーだとしたらどうでしょうか？

語り方を選ぶ

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」の同じアイデアを、あなたに合う声・深さ・ペースで学べます。いつでも切り替えられます。

第1章

The Paradox of Human Nature: How Friendliness Shaped Our Evolution

Imagine a world where the most successful species isn't the strongest or most aggressive, but the friendliest. This isn't a utopian fantasy-it's the scientific reality of human evolution. In "Survival of the Friendliest," Brian Hare and Vanessa Woods overturn conventional wisdom about what made humans the dominant species on Earth. The book has garnered praise from luminaries like Yuval Noah Harari and Richard Wrangham, who call it "brilliant" and "revolutionary." Featured in Bill Gates' reading list and named one of the best science books of 2020 by publications ranging from The Wall Street Journal to Scientific American, this work challenges our fundamental understanding of human nature. What if our greatest evolutionary advantage wasn't our intelligence or aggression, but our unique capacity for friendliness? And what if this same trait that enabled our success also explains our darkest tendencies?

第2章

When Cooperation Trumps Competition

In 1971, psychologist Elliot Aronson confronted a classroom in crisis at an Austin, Texas school. Despite legal desegregation mandates, racial tensions simmered dangerously beneath the surface. The catalyst for his groundbreaking work came from observing a Hispanic student named Carlos, who faced relentless mockery for his pronounced stammer. The situation epitomized how traditional classroom structures, with their emphasis on individual achievement and competition, were exacerbating rather than healing social divisions. Aronson's innovative solution - the "jigsaw" method - demonstrated remarkable elegance in its simplicity. He divided students into diverse groups of six, with each student receiving a unique piece of material to master and teach others. Like pieces of a puzzle, every child's contribution became essential for the group's success. When Carlos's classmates discovered they needed his knowledge about Ancient Egypt to complete their assignment, their previous derision transformed into active engagement and support. The results were dramatic: after just six weeks, students showed marked improvements across multiple metrics. They not only preferred working with members of their diverse groups but also demonstrated enhanced self-esteem, reduced prejudice, and improved academic performance across all subjects. This classroom transformation illuminates a fundamental truth about human evolution that has been persistently misinterpreted. The phrase "survival of the fittest" has been hijacked to glorify physical dominance and ruthless competition, fueling everything from Social Darwinism to modern extreme ideologies. This represents a profound misunderstanding of Darwin's work. In "The Descent of Man," Darwin explicitly emphasized that communities with "the most sympathetic members" would flourish and produce more offspring, highlighting the evolutionary advantages of cooperation and mutual aid. Modern biological research has extensively validated this perspective. Studies across species demonstrate that maximizing friendliness, not aggression, represents the optimal evolutionary strategy. Research on baboon troops, wolf packs, and chimpanzee communities shows that aggressive individuals, while sometimes achieving short-term dominance, face significant long-term costs: chronic stress, compromised immune function, reduced reproductive success, and shorter lifespans. Aggression carries high metabolic costs and increases injury risks, while cooperation has proven remarkably successful throughout nature. From the ancient bacterial partnerships that evolved into mitochondria to the intricate relationships between flowering plants and their pollinators, to the complex social structures of ant colonies functioning as superorganisms, cooperation drives evolutionary innovation. Our own species' evolutionary journey powerfully demonstrates this principle. While Homo sapiens appeared physically in Africa 200,000-300,000 years ago, we remained culturally stagnant for at least 100,000 years. Early technological innovations like simple tools and fire use appeared sporadically but failed to gain lasting traction. During this period, our cousin species Homo erectus had already successfully colonized most of the planet, mastered fire use, and developed sophisticated stone tool technologies. Our species came perilously close to extinction, with some populations dropping to perhaps a few thousand individuals. The dramatic turning point came approximately 50,000 years ago with the emergence of complex technological innovations, particularly projectile weapons. This sparked a rapid expansion across Eurasia, accompanied by sophisticated developments in clothing, food processing, and social organization. Evidence of expanding social networks appeared through long-distance trade routes and symbolic art. This "behavioral modernity" emerged not from increased individual intelligence but from our species' unique cognitive superpower: cooperative communication. This ability to work collaboratively even with strangers toward shared goals became the cornerstone of human civilization.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第3章

The Canine Connection: What Dogs Reveal About Human Evolution

My childhood best friend wasn't human-it was my dog Oreo. Though he couldn't speak, our connection transcended language. This relationship sparked my scientific journey into animal cognition, eventually leading to groundbreaking research on dogs' remarkable social intelligence. Working with psychologist Mike Tomasello, I discovered that dogs possess a sophisticated understanding of human cooperative gestures that even our closest relatives-chimpanzees-lack. When presented with the simple task of following a pointing gesture to find hidden food, Oreo immediately understood my intentions, while chimpanzees struggled consistently with this task. To ensure this wasn't unique to Oreo, I tested unfamiliar dogs at a local daycare. They performed equally well. Like human babies, dogs understood any intentionally helpful gesture-even novel ones-and responded better when I made eye contact and used a friendly voice. This pattern suggested dogs evolved specialized cognitive abilities for communicating with humans during domestication. This discovery was revolutionary. Something during dog domestication caused canine cognition to evolve in ways parallel to humans. Just as certain physical traits have independently evolved multiple times in nature, the ability to cooperatively communicate appears to have evolved separately in both humans and dogs. The most compelling evidence for this evolutionary connection came from Dmitry Belyaev's remarkable experiment in Siberia. After Stalin executed his brother Nikolai for genetic research, Dmitry conducted perhaps the century's greatest behavioral genetic experiment from the safety of distant Novosibirsk. He divided foxes into two groups: one bred solely for friendliness toward humans, the other bred randomly. After forty-four years, the friendly foxes had transformed dramatically. They weren't just behaviorally different-they showed physical changes seen across domesticated species: smaller bodies, shorter snouts, floppy ears, curly tails, and colorful coats. When I tested these foxes myself, I found they could follow human pointing gestures to find hidden toys, while regular foxes chose randomly. Even more remarkably, friendly fox kits who had never met humans followed pointing gestures successfully, while socialized regular foxes performed barely above chance. This confirmed that breeding for friendliness accidentally enhanced cooperative communication abilities. Without fear, foxes could apply their social skills more flexibly in relationships with humans. Dogs' unique abilities evolved through domestication, not from their wolf ancestors.

第4章

Self-Domestication: Nature's Pathway to Cooperation

The domestication of dogs likely began not through intentional breeding but through self-domestication. When humans arrived in Eurasia around 50,000 years ago-long before agriculture-our garbage created opportunities for wolves brave enough to approach our camps. These wolves gained a reproductive advantage, and after just a few generations of natural selection for friendliness, they began developing different physical traits and communication abilities. This self-domestication process continues today with urban wildlife. Urban coyotes, red foxes, blackbirds, and deer show less aggression, earlier breeding, longer lifespans, and reduced stress hormones compared to their rural counterparts. Some urban deer even display unusual coloring and physical traits reminiscent of the domestication syndrome. But could this process occur without human involvement? Bonobos provide a fascinating case study. Sharing a common ancestor with chimpanzees about a million years ago, bonobos display many traits associated with domestication: smaller brains, smaller faces with crowded teeth, depigmentation in lips and tufts, and retention of juvenile playfulness into adulthood. Unlike the often violent chimpanzees, bonobos have evolved a dramatically different social structure that emphasizes friendliness over aggression. Chimpanzee aggression can be brutal and deadly-males conduct border patrols and attack neighboring groups, while females maintain strict hierarchies. In captivity, I witnessed a horrific attack where four chimpanzees pinned down another named Travis, kicking his head into concrete and biting off his fingertips. Bonobos, meanwhile, never have a single dominant male. Surprisingly, some of the highest-ranking bonobos are babies with mothers in the group, with adult males behaving submissively around infants. Female bonobos have evolved strategies to prevent infanticide: they obscure ovulation by maintaining genital swellings throughout their cycle and form aggressive coalitions against males who attempt forced mating or threaten infants. Unlike chimpanzees who only help relatives, bonobo females help all females, even newcomers. This solidarity evolved because food resources south of the Congo River are more plentiful and predictable. This cooperative female environment has made friendliness the winning reproductive strategy for males. No male bonobo has ever been observed killing a baby or another bonobo. Neighboring bonobo groups often travel together, share food, and interact peacefully. These "momma's boys" who show friendliness toward females are reproductively more successful than even alpha male chimpanzees, supporting the hypothesis that female preference for friendliness drives the evolution of a more peaceful society.

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第5章

The Domesticated Human Mind

Could we be self-domesticated? Could domestication account for our unique cognitive capabilities? The evolution of cooperative communicative skills in both dogs and bonobos represents the type of cognitive evolution in humans we need to explain. This pattern of increased sociability and reduced aggression appears consistently across domesticated species, suggesting a common underlying mechanism. Self-control, governed by the prefrontal cortex, is central to human cognition. Studies comparing self-control across species reveal that animals with larger brains and higher neuron density demonstrate better inhibitory control. Humans take this to the extreme with brains nearly three times the size of chimpanzees. This enhanced capacity for self-control enables complex social interactions, delayed gratification, and strategic planning that characterize human societies. Research shows that children as young as four demonstrate greater self-control than adult chimpanzees in delayed reward tasks. However, our brains reached modern size around 200,000 years ago, while evidence of modern human behavior only appears extensively about 50,000 years ago. This gap suggests a crucial distinction between raw cognitive capacity and its application. What distinguished us wasn't brain size or self-control alone, but rather the rapid expansion of our social networks, enabling the accumulation and transmission of cultural knowledge across generations. The human self-domestication hypothesis proposes that friendliness was the spark that ignited our technological revolution, with natural selection favoring individuals with hormonal and developmental profiles promoting cooperation and communication. We thrived not because we got smarter, but because we got friendlier. This process involved changes in multiple systems, including reduced levels of stress hormones, increased oxytocin sensitivity, and modified neural crest cell development. Selection for friendliness causes physical changes in domesticated animals, and humans show similar evidence of self-domestication. These changes include reduced facial prognathism, smaller teeth, and decreased sexual dimorphism. Our unique white sclerae (eyeball whites) are a distinctive marker of this process. Unlike all other primates whose dark sclerae camouflage their gaze direction, our white sclerae with almond-shaped eyes make our gaze direction highly visible, facilitating complex social interactions. This adaptation promotes cooperation from birth-babies use eye contact to trigger oxytocin release in parents, creating a mutual bonding cycle essential for our survival. Studies show that newborns prefer faces with direct gaze within hours of birth, and by three months, infants engage in complex gaze-based interactions. Our eyes are designed for cooperative communication, allowing even young infants to follow another's gaze direction using just eye movements, while chimpanzees require head movements and don't understand that sight depends on eyes. White sclerae appear to be universal in humans despite our many other variations in appearance, suggesting they emerged over 80,000 years ago through selection for friendliness. This timing coincides with evidence of expanded social networks and technological innovation. We use white sclerae to identify something as human or human-like, while darkened eyes create an immediate sense of the non-human or threatening. This psychological response is so ingrained that it influences character design in animation and robotics, where visible eye whites are crucial for creating relatable characters.

第6章

The Power of Perpetual Youth

Development patterns serve as powerful evolutionary engines, where even slight adjustments to growth timing can create dramatically different outcomes. The key to understanding domestication lies in how developmental patterns change-specifically how juvenile traits persist into adulthood. When animals are selected for friendliness, they maintain juvenile traits and behaviors into adulthood. Jean-Louis Gariepy bred mice for friendliness toward other mice, producing adults that exhibited juvenile shivering behaviors when meeting strangers instead of aggression, which reduced attacks from other mice. Dogs and bonobos similarly maintain juvenile behaviors throughout life while developing cooperative communication earlier than their relatives. Puppies are ready to bond immediately after their eyes open and remain motivated to explore new environments. While wolves' socialization window lasts only weeks, dogs' extends for months or years. The remarkable connection between friendliness and physical changes stems from neural crest cells-special stem cells that appear briefly in vertebrate embryos. These migratory cells influence virtually every trait associated with domestication syndrome: they develop the adrenal glands, ear and tail cartilage, skin pigmentation, facial bones, teeth, and even aspects of brain development affecting neurohormones like serotonin and oxytocin. Humans exhibit unique developmental patterns compared to other primates and extinct human species. We're born with brains only a quarter their adult size (versus half for other apes), making us exceptionally helpless as infants. Yet between nine and twelve months, we begin developing sophisticated social cognition. Research comparing human, bonobo and chimpanzee infants found that two-year-old humans significantly outperformed the apes in social problem-solving, despite having less developed brains. These early-emerging social skills give humans a unique advantage, allowing even underdeveloped children to leverage others' knowledge. Fossil evidence reveals that humans maintain fetal brain growth rates for two years after birth, particularly affecting the parietal regions housing our theory of mind network. Unlike our early social cognition, human self-control develops slowly, not reaching adult levels until our early twenties. Human self-domestication uniquely expanded our definition of who belongs to our group. Unlike apes who recognize group members solely by familiarity and territory, humans evolved to instantly recognize strangers as group members through shared symbols, appearance, or identity markers. Oxytocin likely drove our evolution to perceive group members as family. This neurohormone works with serotonin and reduced testosterone to create powerful social bonds beyond immediate family. When inhaled experimentally, oxytocin enhances empathy and emotion recognition, disrupting the brain's connection with the fear center to reduce fear and enable trust. This oxytocin-mediated friendliness toward intragroup strangers emerged during the Middle Paleolithic (over 80,000 years ago), allowing larger communities as both men and women immigrated between groups. Denser populations accelerated technological innovation, expanded our ecological range, and created trade networks that spread ideas and resources.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

第7章

The Shadow Side of Human Friendliness

Rachel, a Banyamulenge nanny from eastern Congo, bears machete scars on her legs-physical reminders of tribal violence. Her people, related to Rwandan Tutsis, faced discrimination despite living in Congo for 400 years. Following Belgian colonization that exacerbated tribal divisions, Rachel survived the Congo Wars only to experience the 2004 Gatumba Massacre, where rebels murdered her husband and daughters before subjecting her to prolonged captivity and rape. Her story introduces the dark side of self-domestication-how the same mechanisms that enable our extraordinary cooperation can also facilitate extreme cruelty. One fundamental principle of social psychology is that people prefer their own group members. We become xenophobic toward strangers from rival groups, and it takes very little to trigger this psychology. Even arbitrary differences like armbands or eye color can create antagonism between groups. The human self-domestication hypothesis suggests our worst behaviors toward other groups aren't merely "negative feelings" but involve dampening our theory of mind network. This blindness to outsiders' humanity prevents empathy for their suffering, making aggression permissible and suspending moral rules for their treatment. Reduced activity in our brain's theory of mind network directly links to negative treatment of outsiders. The amygdala responds to threats and influences our theory of mind network, with oxytocin modulating this relationship. When shown photographs of people perceived as low in both competence and warmth (like homeless people), brain scans reveal increased amygdala activity, suggesting threat perception and reduced attribution of full humanity. Oxytocin dramatically affects our treatment of outsiders. Dutch men given oxytocin were three times more likely to donate to their group members and more likely to punish outsiders. In a moral dilemma involving sacrificing one person to save many, oxytocin made participants 25% less likely to sacrifice someone with a Dutch name versus an Arab name. This pattern appears in all studied hunter-gatherer groups and throughout history, from ancient massacres to modern genocides. Social psychologist Nour Kteily's research using the "Ascent of Man Scale" found Americans rated certain ethnic groups as less than fully human, with Muslims scoring 10 points below "fully human." This dehumanization increased after terrorist attacks and correlated with support for torture and drone strikes. While children typically receive more protection than adults in society, research shows white university students overestimate Black children's ages by about five years. This means a 13-year-old Black child is perceived as 18-old enough for adult prosecution. Police officers most likely to use force against children were also most likely to associate Black people with apes. Groups who perceive themselves as dehumanized will dehumanize in return. Studies show both Black and white people demonstrate stronger empathy responses to pain inflicted on members of their own race. This reciprocal dehumanization creates dangerous cycles that can rapidly escalate in today's social media environment.

第8章

Building Societies That Nurture Our Better Nature

We evolved as egalitarian hunter-gatherers who valued social currency and prevented power monopolization. But with agriculture came the seeds of despotism-as we produced and stored food, societies grew larger, and mechanisms that kept despotism in check began to fail. The Industrial Revolution brought a breakthrough with constitutional democracies. Beginning with England's 1689 Bill of Rights, these systems limited rulers' power and built in checks for power-sharing and compromise. Democratic countries rarely go to war with each other and better protect human rights, freedoms, education, and healthcare. America's founders understood humanity's tendency toward group identity and dehumanization. James Madison observed that "mankind" has such strong propensity to "fall into mutual animosities" that even "frivolous and fanciful distinctions" can spark violent conflicts. To prevent this "tyranny of the majority," they established a strong central government promoting national identity rather than state self-governance. The Constitution established the Electoral College to prevent populous states from imposing their will on rural ones, and created checks and balances through veto power, separation of powers, and a bicameral legislature. Today, this experiment faces criticism from all sides. Most alarming is young people's disenchantment-only a third consider democracy essential, a quarter believe it's a "bad" way to run the country, and another third would prefer a strong leader who doesn't need elections. Dehumanization isn't limited to one country, economy, culture, or political orientation. The human self-domestication hypothesis suggests the ability to dehumanize "others" is universal and can appear across the entire political spectrum, with those at the extremes most likely to dehumanize their opponents. Most people in democracies occupy the "moderate middle"-they may lean one way or another but remain responsive to facts and capable of compromise. Outside this moderate middle are ideologues who believe their political views are absolutely right while others are wrong. At the furthest extremes are those who favor oligarchy with their group in power, those who trust autocratic leaders defending their threatened values, and their left-wing counterparts advocating extreme egalitarianism or rejecting all authority. Research confirms dehumanization occurs across the political spectrum. Every demographic contains people who dehumanize others, regardless of political affiliation, age, gender, or location. The underlying psychology remains consistent: extremists convince their group they're being dehumanized, increasing perceived threat levels until even moderates become primed for violence. The most effective antidote to dehumanization is contact. During World War II, Andrzej Pitynski exemplified extraordinary moral courage by hiding Jews in his Polish apartment. When sociologists analyzed testimonials from hundreds of Holocaust rescuers, they found just one common denominator: all had close pre-war relationships with Jewish neighbors, friends, or coworkers. Schools, universities, and military service provide ideal settings for sustained friendly contact. White children who attended integrated schools in the 1960s grew up more likely to support interracial marriage and have black friends. Even imagining positive contact with stigmatized groups increases empathy. Most significantly, contact has the greatest impact on the most intolerant people, creating "reciprocal humanization" that counteracts the "reciprocal dehumanization" that occurs under threat. Political scientist Erica Chenoweth's research confirmed that peaceful resistance campaigns are twice as likely to succeed as violent ones. While extreme tactics gain media attention, they decrease popular support and increase threat perception. Peaceful demonstrations reduce perceived threat and often lead security forces to defect rather than attack protesters. Self-domestication enabled humans to live in increasingly larger groups, evolving from Neanderthal bands of dozens to settlements of hundreds, thousands, and eventually millions. Cities at their best create vibrant communities mixing diverse populations, facilitating contact that promotes tolerance and drives innovation. Effective urban design includes mid-rise buildings where residents maintain visual connection with street life, mixed-income housing, pedestrian-friendly sidewalks, and communal spaces like gardens and playgrounds. For humans to thrive, we need spaces that facilitate interaction between diverse groups-parks, cafes, theaters-where we can meet neighbors and exchange ideas, just as our ancestors did at trade route settlements. To maintain healthy democracy and express the best of human nature, we must design spaces where we can meet without fear, disagree respectfully, and befriend those least like ourselves.

★★★★★

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』を最後まで読み終えました

100万人以上の学習者に愛用されています

“23日間、毎日使い続けています。今では日課の一部です。”

jayallen

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』の主要テーマ

self-domestication theory
cooperative communication
evolutionary sociality
interspecies bonding
collective intelligence

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』の名言

Friendliness, not aggression, represents the optimal evolutionary strategy.
Cooperation drives evolutionary innovation.
Our species came perilously close to extinction.
Dogs understood any intentionally helpful gesture.
Without fear, foxes could apply their social skills.

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』の登場人物

Brian HareAuthor and researcher of animal cognition
Vanessa WoodsAuthor and researcher of human evolution
Elliot AronsonPsychologist who developed the jigsaw method
Mike TomaselloPsychologist who studied cooperative gestures

著者について

『Survival of the Friendliest: Understanding Our Origins Through the Power of Friendship』（邦題：『「親切」が生き残る武器になる』）の著者であるブライアン・ヘアとヴァネッサ・ウッズは、人間と動物の認知を専門とする著名な進化人類学者およびサイエンス・コミュニケーターです。デューク大学の進化人類学・心理学・神経科学教授であるヘアは、「デューク・パピー・キンダーガーテン（子犬の幼稚園）」を共同設立し、ウッズがそのディレクターを務めています。彼らの活動は、厳格な研究と親しみやすいストーリーテリングを融合させ、協力、社会的絆、そして進化心理学というテーマを探求しています。

この夫妻は以前にも、犬の知能に対する理解に革命をもたらしたニューヨーク・タイムズのベストセラー『The Genius of Dogs: How Dogs Are Smarter Than You Think』（邦題：『犬はあなたより知っている』）を共著しています。受賞歴のあるサイエンス・ジャーナリストであるウッズは、『Scientific American』誌への寄稿や、英国王立協会に認められた『It’s True! Space Turns You Into Spaghetti』などの児童書の執筆も行っています。ヘアによる家畜化表現型（domestication syndromes）に関する画期的な研究は、NPRやTEDxトークでも取り上げられました。

彼らの共同著作は、学術的な知見と市民の関心を結びつけ、向社会的行動を通じた人類の進化上の優位性を強調しています。『Survival of the Friendliest』は、これまでの研究をさらに発展させ、従来の「適者生存」というナラティブに対する対抗軸を提示しています。本書のテーゼは2020年の『Scientific American』誌の表紙を飾る特集記事を通じて広く注目を集め、進化心理学における第一人者としての彼らの地位を確固たるものにしました。

ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」の要約をダウンロード

ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」の要約をPDFまたはEPUBで無料でダウンロード。印刷やオフラインでいつでもお読みいただけます。

他のユーザーのお気に入り

The Age of Empathy

Frans de Waal

The Evolution of Friendship: Your Social Brain's Secret Superpower の書籍表紙

25 sources

The Evolution of Friendship: Your Social Brain's Secret Superpower

BeFreed

HUMANKIND

Rutger Bregman

The Social Animal

David Brooks

Blueprint

Nicholas A. Christakis

The social animal

Elliot Aronson

Survival of the prettiest

Nancy Etcoff

Social

Matthew D. Lieberman

この本に関するよくある質問

学習プラン

The Biology of Belonging

Understanding the biological roots of social interaction is essential for anyone looking to deepen their interpersonal skills or lead more effectively. This plan is ideal for psychologists, leaders, and curious minds seeking to bridge the gap between hard science and human connection.

1 h 12 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

The Laws of Human Nature

In an era of constant social interaction, understanding the hidden forces that drive human behavior is a vital competitive advantage. This plan is designed for leaders, negotiators, and anyone seeking to improve their interpersonal dynamics and self-mastery.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Evolutionary Psychology

This learning plan is essential for anyone seeking to understand the biological foundations of human behavior and why our ancient brains often clash with modern environments. It is particularly beneficial for students of psychology, marketers, and individuals interested in self-improvement and better decision-making.

6 h 44 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Explore Human Mind, Culture & History

This plan bridges the gap between biological evolution and cultural history to explain what truly makes us human. It is ideal for curious minds seeking to understand the intersection of neuroscience, anthropology, and sociology.

6 h 22 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Strategist's Toolkit for Human Dynamics

In high-stakes environments, understanding the hidden layers of human behavior is a critical survival skill. This plan is designed for leaders and professionals who need to identify predatory tactics and apply strategic decision-making to win in competitive social landscapes.

1 h 45 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Robert Greene: The Power & Human Nature Pod

This plan distills Robert Greene's essential wisdom on influence and social dynamics into actionable lessons. It is ideal for leaders, entrepreneurs, and anyone seeking to navigate human nature with greater strategic clarity and psychological insight.

1 h•4 セクション

学習プラン

Decode human nature for business success

This plan is essential for anyone looking to navigate social environments with higher emotional intelligence and psychological awareness. It is ideal for leaders, communicators, and individuals seeking to protect themselves from manipulation while understanding the biological roots of behavior.

5 h 44 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Human Book: Decoding Hidden Intent

In an era of complex communication, understanding what remains unsaid is a critical competitive advantage. This plan is essential for leaders, negotiators, and recruiters who need to master behavioral baselines, facial analysis, and linguistic markers to navigate high-stakes interactions.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

今すぐ学習の旅を始めよう

第8章

ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」

概要『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』の概要

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Paradox of Human Nature: How Friendliness Shaped Our Evolution

When Cooperation Trumps Competition

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Canine Connection: What Dogs Reveal About Human Evolution

Self-Domestication: Nature's Pathway to Cooperation

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Domesticated Human Mind

The Power of Perpetual Youth

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Shadow Side of Human Friendliness

Building Societies That Nurture Our Better Nature

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』を最後まで読み終えました

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』の主要テーマ

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』の名言

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』の登場人物

著者について

ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」の要約をダウンロード

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この本に関するよくある質問

What is Survival of the Friendliest about?

Who should read Survival of the Friendliest?

Is Survival of the Friendliest worth reading?

What is the self-domestication theory in Survival of the Friendliest?

もっと見る

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Paradox of Human Nature: How Friendliness Shaped Our Evolution

When Cooperation Trumps Competition

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Canine Connection: What Dogs Reveal About Human Evolution

Self-Domestication: Nature's Pathway to Cooperation

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Domesticated Human Mind

The Power of Perpetual Youth

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Shadow Side of Human Friendliness

Building Societies That Nurture Our Better Nature

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』を最後まで読み終えました

他のユーザーのお気に入り

もっと見る

『ヒトは〈共感〉する動物である ― 進化で解き明かす「人類が生き残った理由」』の概要