Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work by Nick Srnicek Summary

1. Neoliberalism's political paralysis demands a new leftist vision for postcapitalism
2. Full automation liberates humanity from work enabling a post-labor society
3. Universal basic income provides financial security beyond wage labor's constraints
4. Folk politics' local focus fails to transform neoliberal capitalist systems
5. Repurposing technology for public good unlocks postcapitalist creative potential
6. Expanding the Overton Window rebuilds collective imagination for radical change
7. Post-work society requires shorter workweeks and automation-driven productivity gains
8. Leftist strategy must prioritize universal demands over fragmented local actions
9. Democratic control of technology redirects innovation from profit to people
10. Building cross-movement solidarity accelerates transition to postcapitalist futures
11. Abandoning the work ethic is essential for human flourishing beyond jobs
12. Nick Srnicek's manifesto ties Black Lives Matter to post-work possibilities

『Inventing the Future』の著者について

Nick Srnicek, a Canadian political economist and co-author of Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work, is a leading voice on technology’s role in reshaping labor and capitalism.

A lecturer in Digital Economy at King’s College London, Srnicek holds a PhD in International Relations from the London School of Economics. He co-founded accelerationist theory through works like #Accelerate: Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics.

Srnicek’s analysis of automation, post-work societies, and platform dominance aligns with his broader critique of neoliberalism. This perspective is informed by roles at institutions like the CCCB and contributions to publications such as The Guardian. His influential Platform Capitalism examines tech monopolies, while After Work: The Politics of Free Time (co-authored with Helen Hester) expands on anti-work politics.

Translated into over 15 languages, Inventing the Future has been widely cited in debates about utopian futurism and economic transformation, cementing Srnicek’s reputation as a provocative thinker bridging radical theory and tech-driven societal change.

『Inventing the Future』に関するよくある質問

What is Inventing the Future by Nick Srnicek about?

Inventing the Future critiques neoliberalism’s failures and advocates for a post-work society through full automation, universal basic income (UBI), and shorter workweeks. Authors Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams argue for reimagining technology’s role to liberate humanity from labor, expand political possibilities, and create a equitable, postcapitalist world.

Who should read Inventing the Future?

This book is ideal for policymakers, activists, and readers interested in political economy, automation’s societal impact, or alternatives to capitalism. It appeals to those exploring topics like UBI, post-work theory, or strategies for systemic change beyond traditional "folk politics".

Is Inventing the Future worth reading in 2025?

Yes—its analysis of automation, neoliberalism, and labor remains critically relevant amid AI advancements and shifting labor markets. The book’s vision for repurposing technology and redefining work offers actionable insights for addressing contemporary economic challenges.

What is “folk politics” in Inventing the Future?

“Folk politics” refers to localized, short-term activism focused on direct action rather than systemic transformation. Srnicek and Williams argue this approach is inadequate for dismantling global capitalism, urging instead for scalable, visionary strategies to reshape societal structures.

How does Inventing the Future propose achieving a post-work society?

The book outlines three pillars:

• Full automation to eliminate unnecessary labor.
• Shorter workweeks to redistribute remaining work equitably.
• Universal basic income to decouple survival from wages.

What role does the Overton Window play in Inventing the Future?

The Overton Window—the range of politically acceptable ideas—is central to expanding post-work advocacy. The authors stress reshaping public discourse through media, culture, and policy to normalize concepts like UBI and automation.

How does Inventing the Future suggest repurposing technology?

It advocates democratizing technology to prioritize social good over profit. Examples include public investment in green energy and AI systems designed for collective benefit, challenging corporate control of innovation.

What critiques exist about Inventing the Future?

Critics argue its vision is overly utopian or dismissive of grassroots movements. Others question the feasibility of rapid automation or UBI implementation. Supporters praise its bold rethinking of labor and techno-optimism.

How does Inventing the Future relate to contemporary movements like Black Lives Matter?

The book connects systemic critiques to intersectional struggles, urging solidarity across race, gender, and class lines. It encourages movements to pair immediate demands with long-term visions for structural change.

What are key quotes from Inventing the Future?

• “The future isn’t working”: Highlights capitalism’s failure to provide stable employment.
• “A post-work world is not a utopia”: Emphasizes achievable steps toward liberation from labor.

How does Inventing the Future compare to Srnicek’s Platform Capitalism?

While Platform Capitalism analyzes tech monopolies’ economic power, Inventing the Future focuses on solutions—using technology to dismantle capitalism and create post-work systems. Both emphasize restructuring labor and ownership.

Why is Inventing the Future relevant to AI discussions in 2025?

As AI accelerates job displacement, the book’s frameworks for UBI, automation ethics, and democratic tech governance provide critical tools for addressing inequality and redefining work in an AI-driven economy.