What is Firearms Law and the Second Amendment by Nicholas Johnson about?

Firearms Law and the Second Amendment: Regulation, Rights, and Policy is the first comprehensive law school textbook dedicated to Second Amendment jurisprudence. The book provides extensive coverage of arms law from ninth-century England through 2021, examining the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, federal and state firearms regulations, and landmark Supreme Court cases like Heller and McDonald.

Who are the authors of Firearms Law and the Second Amendment?

The book is authored by Nicholas Johnson, George A. Mocsary, David B. Kopel, E. Gregory Wallace, Donald Kilmer, and Michael O'Shea. This collaborative team brings together expertise from multiple legal disciplines to create what's described as "the leading casebook and scholarly treatise on arms law". Their combined scholarship provides both academic rigor and practical guidance for firearms law practice.

Who should read Firearms Law and the Second Amendment?

This comprehensive textbook is designed for law students, professors, and practicing attorneys who need expertise in firearms law. The book serves both academic and professional needs, offering practical advice for early career prosecutors and defenders who will practice firearms law. Legal scholars researching Second Amendment jurisprudence will also find the extensive historical analysis and case coverage invaluable.

Is Firearms Law and the Second Amendment worth reading?

Yes, this book is essential for anyone serious about understanding modern firearms law. As the first dedicated law school textbook on the Second Amendment, it fills a critical gap in legal education. The comprehensive coverage spans over 650 pages and includes supplemental online chapters, making it both a thorough academic resource and practical reference guide for legal practitioners.

What Supreme Court cases does Firearms Law and the Second Amendment cover?

The book provides in-depth analysis of watershed Second Amendment decisions, particularly District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010). It includes five chapters examining how lower courts have applied these Supreme Court precedents to contemporary laws. The third edition also covers New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022) and other important cases decided since 2018.

How does Firearms Law and the Second Amendment address historical context?

The textbook traces arms law history from ninth-century England through modern America, providing essential historical background for understanding current Second Amendment jurisprudence. It examines how English legal history shapes modern cases on the right to bear arms, and includes extended analysis of Native American firearm policies and their influence on American arms culture. Seven online chapters provide additional global historical context from Confucian times to present.

What social contexts does Firearms Law and the Second Amendment examine?

Rather than examining arms laws in isolation, the book pays careful attention to changing contexts in race, class, religion, and technology. It includes coverage of arms law and policy relating to race, gender, sexual orientation, and other statuses. The book also examines how technological advances have shaped firearms regulation and addresses contemporary issues like smart guns and Red Flag laws.

What practical guidance does Firearms Law and the Second Amendment provide?

The book offers practical advice and resource guides specifically for lawyers, including early career prosecutors and defenders who will practice firearms law. It covers modern federal and state laws and litigation to prepare students to be practice-ready for firearms cases. The comprehensive coverage includes stop-and-frisk developments, surety statutes, and firearms rights restoration processes.

銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条

規制、権利、および政策

ニコラス・J・ジョンソン、ジョージ・A・モクサリ、E・グレゴリー・ウォレス、ドナルド・キルマー

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の概要

第2修正案の法理に完全に特化した初のロースクール向け教科書であり、9世紀のイングランドからブルーエン判決後のアメリカに至るまで、1,367ページにわたる法的進化を網羅しています。今日のますます分極化する銃論争において、どのような歴史的前例が憲法上の権利に対するあなたの理解を再構築するでしょうか？

語り方を選ぶ

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条の同じアイデアを、あなたに合う声・深さ・ペースで学べます。いつでも切り替えられます。

第1章

The Second Amendment's Complex Legacy: A Journey Through American Firearms Law

In a nation where firearms ownership is as contentious as it is commonplace, "Firearms Law and the Second Amendment" offers a comprehensive examination of one of America's most divisive constitutional provisions. This groundbreaking casebook, authored by legal scholars Nicholas Johnson, George Mocsary, Gregory Wallace, and Donald Kilmer, has become required reading in law schools nationwide. Praised by constitutional scholars across the political spectrum, the book has influenced Supreme Court opinions and shaped the modern understanding of firearms law. What makes this work particularly noteworthy is its methodical approach to a topic often clouded by partisan rhetoric-examining the Second Amendment not merely as a legal abstraction but as a living right with deep historical roots and profound contemporary implications.

第2章

Firearms Fundamentals: Understanding the Tools of the Debate

To understand the legal landscape surrounding firearms, one must first grasp the basic technology and terminology. America houses approximately 230-300 million privately owned firearms - roughly equal to or exceeding its adult population. About 34% of American adults own firearms, with approximately half of American households containing at least one. This ownership pattern varies significantly by region, with rural areas showing higher rates than urban centers, and states like Wyoming and Montana having ownership rates above 65%, while states like New Jersey and Massachusetts hover around 15%. These weapons fall into three primary categories: handguns, rifles, and shotguns. Handguns - the most controversial category due to their concealability - comprise about 80% of firearms used in crimes. Yet as the Supreme Court noted in Heller, they're also "overwhelmingly chosen by American society" for lawful self-defense. Modern handguns come primarily as semi-automatic pistols (about four-fifths of new handguns) or revolvers, each with distinct operational characteristics. Semi-automatic pistols typically hold more ammunition and can be reloaded more quickly, while revolvers are often praised for their mechanical simplicity and reliability. Common calibers range from .22 to .45, with 9mm being the most popular for both civilian and law enforcement use. Rifles, which offer greater range and accuracy than handguns, include several distinct subcategories. Bolt-action models, preferred for hunting due to their accuracy and reliability, remain popular for sport shooting and precision applications. Semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15 platform have become increasingly common, despite controversy over their military appearance. These rifles actually function identically to many hunting rifles, firing one round per trigger pull, though their modular design allows for customization. Lever-action rifles, iconic from America's Western expansion, continue to attract enthusiasts and hunters. Traditional single-shot designs persist in specialized roles like competition shooting. Despite their capabilities, rifles are least commonly used in violent crime, appearing in only 1.3% of offenses. Shotguns represent perhaps the most versatile category, with their distinctive ammunition of multiple projectiles in plastic shells. They come in pump-action (manually operated), semi-automatic (self-loading), and double-barreled varieties. Gauge sizes range from the common 12-gauge to smaller 20 and 28-gauge options better suited for smaller shooters. Their applications span hunting different game types - from birds to larger animals - to home defense and competitive shooting sports. While effective, their substantial weight and recoil can make them challenging for smaller individuals to handle effectively, leading many to choose other options for personal defense. Understanding these technical distinctions proves crucial in legal contexts, particularly when crafting effective legislation. When we debate "assault weapons" or "Saturday Night Specials," the technical realities often differ dramatically from public perceptions. For instance, many banned features like adjustable stocks or flash suppressors relate more to comfort and safety than lethality. This disconnect between policy intentions and practical outcomes has led to numerous legal challenges and revisions of firearms legislation across different jurisdictions.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第3章

The Historical Origins: Ancient Roots of the Right to Arms

The right to bear arms didn't materialize from thin air in 1791. Its philosophical foundations stretch back millennia across diverse civilizations, reflecting universal concerns about self-defense, community protection, and the relationship between arms and political power. Even in ancient China, Confucian and Taoist texts revealed nuanced views on weapons. Confucius taught that people needed proper training before taking up arms, while Taoist writings like the Wen-Tzu advocated "making people equal by arming them" to ensure justice. The Huainanzi emphasized that "what makes warriors strong is readiness to fight to the death" and "what makes people ready to fight to death is justice." In Greece, Plato and Aristotle agreed that arms possession and political power were inseparable but drew opposite conclusions. Plato envisioned an ideal state where weapons would be stored in central armories and used only during state-supervised training. Aristotle, conversely, connected arms bearing with self-government, observing that constitutional governments arise when "the fighting-men have the supreme power, and those who possess arms are the citizens." He explicitly identified disarmament as a tactic of tyrants who "mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." Roman law provided even more direct precedents for modern self-defense rights. Cicero articulated a natural law of self-defense as "not written, but born with us," arguing that "laws are silent when arms are raised" and that "every means of securing our safety is honorable" when faced with danger. The Corpus Juris Civilis later codified that "it is permissible to repel force by force, and this right is conferred by nature." These ancient philosophies weren't merely academic exercises-they profoundly influenced the Framers, who studied classical history extensively to understand how liberty had been defended and lost throughout time. When they crafted the Second Amendment, they did so with these historical lessons firmly in mind.

第4章

English Precedents and Colonial America: The Evolution of Arms Rights

The English tradition of arms rights formed the immediate backdrop for American constitutional thinking. The 1689 English Bill of Rights, created after James II had illegally disarmed Protestants, declared that "subjects which are protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions as and allowed by law." This right, though limited by class and religion, established an important precedent. William Blackstone's influential Commentaries described the right to arms as an "auxiliary right" protecting the three primary rights of personal security, liberty, and property. He declared it "a public allowance under due restrictions, of the natural right of resistance and self preservation, when the sanctions of society and laws are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression." In colonial America, these English traditions evolved into something broader. Most colonies actually required citizens to own and maintain firearms, with Massachusetts Bay Colony adopting the first known mandate in 1631. By 1645, Massachusetts required "all inhabitants" to have "armes in their howses fitt for service." Similar laws appeared across the colonies, with some even requiring churchgoers to "bring their pieces, swords, pouder and shotte" to Sunday services. These mandates reflected practical realities of frontier life, where defense against Native American attacks, foreign powers, and criminal threats required an armed citizenry. They also embodied a philosophical commitment to citizen participation in community defense that would later influence the Second Amendment's militia clause. Colonial restrictions on firearms were generally limited to safety regulations preventing false alarms or dangerous discharge in populated areas. More problematic were racially discriminatory laws that increasingly restricted arms possession by both slaves and free Blacks, reflecting the South's growing fears of slave insurrections.

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第5章

The Revolutionary Period: When Gun Control Sparked a War

The American Revolution itself was ignited by British attempts to disarm the colonists. Following growing tensions, General Thomas Gage ordered 260 Redcoats to seize gunpowder from the Charlestown powder house on September 1, 1774. This "Powder Alarm" provoked widespread outrage, with the Massachusetts Provincial Congress condemning the seizure and urging militia companies to organize. In October 1774, Lord Dartmouth, the British Secretary of State for America, recommended disarming New England colonists. General Gage replied that such disarmament was not practicable without "having Recourse to Force, and being Masters of the Country." When this exchange became public, Americans viewed it as confirmation of Britain's intentions to subjugate them by force. The war began on April 19, 1775, when 700 British Redcoats left Boston to seize American arms at Lexington and Concord. At dawn, they confronted 200 militiamen at Lexington Green, with Major Pitcairn ordering: "Disperse you Rebels-Damn you, throw down your Arms and disperse!" After routing the Americans at Lexington, the British marched to Concord where militia briefly drove off a British detachment at North Bridge. The British conducted house-to-house searches for firearms and powder at both locations. After Lexington and Concord, General Gage in Boston recognized his troops were outnumbered by armed Bostonians. On April 23, 1775, he offered Bostonians the opportunity to leave town if they surrendered their arms. After collecting 2,674 guns, Gage refused to allow Bostonians to leave, claiming many more arms had been concealed. These disarmament efforts featured prominently in the Continental Congress's July 6, 1775 Declaration of Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms, which specifically cited Gage's actions at Lexington, Concord, and Boston as grievances. The declaration affirmed that Americans had been "compelled by our enemies to assume" arms, and they would employ them "for the preservation of our liberties," resolving to "die freemen rather than live slaves."

第6章

The Birth of the Second Amendment: Constitutional Debates

Following the Revolutionary War, the Constitutional Convention created a new federal government with significant military powers. This alarmed many Americans who feared a powerful central government might use military force to oppress the people. During state ratification debates, Anti-Federalists repeatedly expressed concerns about potential disarmament. In Virginia, Patrick Henry warned that without explicit protections, citizens would be defenseless against tyranny: "Your arms, wherewith you could defend yourselves, are gone." George Mason, who had refused to sign the Constitution, demanded explicit guarantees of states' concurrent power to arm militias, warning that the Constitution as written "will take from the state legislatures what divine Providence has given to every individual-the means of self-defence." In response to these concerns, James Madison fulfilled his promise to propose a bill of rights to the First Congress. On June 8, 1789, he proposed what would become the Second Amendment: "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country: but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person." A House committee revised Madison's proposal to read: "A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, being the best security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; but no person religiously scrupulous shall be compelled to bear arms." After further debate and revision, the final version emerged: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The most comprehensive contemporary analysis came from Tench Coxe, who published a section-by-section exposition on the Bill of Rights just ten days after Madison introduced it. Regarding the arms amendment, Coxe wrote: "As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow-citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms."

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第7章

Early Republic and Antebellum Period: Developing the Right to Arms

After ratification, Congress enacted the Militia Acts of 1792, which became the main governing statute for the United States militia until 1903. The Second Militia Act required every "free able-bodied white male citizen" between 18 and 45 to enroll in the militia and "provide himself with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch with a box therein to contain not less than twenty-four cartridges" or alternatively "a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch and powder-horn, twenty balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a pound of powder." St. George Tucker's 1803 American edition of Blackstone's Commentaries became the most influential law textbook of the early Republic. Tucker emphasized that the American right to arms existed "without any qualification as to their condition or degree," unlike in Britain where game laws effectively disarmed most people under "specious pretext." He called the Second Amendment "the true palladium of liberty," connecting it to the natural right of self-defense. State courts during the antebellum period established important precedents regarding the right to arms. In Nunn v. State (1846), the Georgia Supreme Court struck down portions of an 1837 state law that prohibited the possession of most pistols and the open carrying of weapons, while upholding the ban on concealed weapons. Judge Lumpkin ruled that the Second Amendment protected an individual right to openly carry arms for self-defense that states could not infringe. The court argued that the right to bear arms was a fundamental liberty predating the Constitution, tracing it to the 1689 English Bill of Rights. Lumpkin declared this right belonged to "the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys," covering arms "of every description." Other courts took different approaches. In Aymette v. State (1871), the Tennessee Supreme Court established the "civilized warfare test" for protected arms. The court distinguished between the right to keep arms (a private individual right) and bearing arms for common defense (potentially a political right). While the legislature could not absolutely prohibit carrying weapons, it could regulate their use in public spaces.

第8章

Reconstruction and the Fourteenth Amendment: Extending the Right

The post-Civil War period brought new urgency to the right to arms. After emancipation, Southern states enacted Black Codes to maintain white control over freedmen. These laws explicitly prohibited Black people from possessing firearms or required special permits that were generally denied. Florida's 1865 act provided that "it shall not be lawful for any negro, mulatto, or other person of color, to own, use or keep in his possession or under his control, any Bowie-knife, dirk, sword, fire-arms, or ammunition of any kind" without a license that required the recommendation of two "respectable" white citizens. Beyond legal restrictions, white supremacists formed terrorist organizations across the South. The Ku Klux Klan, formed in 1866 by Confederate veterans in Tennessee, terrorized Blacks who exercised their rights. Their initial tactic was often to forcibly disarm Blacks and white political opponents, making subsequent intimidation easier. Congress responded with three key initiatives: the Fourteenth Amendment, the Second Freedmen's Bureau Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Throughout debates on these measures, the right to keep and bear arms was frequently invoked as a fundamental civil right that freedmen should enjoy equally with whites. The Second Freedmen's Bureau Act explicitly protected the "constitutional right to bear arms" as among the "immunities and rights" to be secured. However, the Supreme Court's 1875 Cruikshank decision severely limited the federal government's power to protect freedmen's rights. The Court held that the First and Second Amendments restricted only federal, not state, power. Chief Justice Waite wrote that the right to bear arms "is not a right granted by the Constitution" but rather pre-existed it, and the Second Amendment "means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress." This ruling effectively neutered federal protections for freedmen's civil rights, including their right to bear arms, leaving them at the mercy of hostile state governments and private violence. It would take another 135 years before the Supreme Court would revisit this question in McDonald v. City of Chicago.

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第9章

The Modern Era: From Gun Control to Gun Rights

The twentieth century saw dramatic shifts in firearms regulation. The first major federal gun control statute, the National Firearms Act of 1934, created a tax and registration scheme for specific firearms thought to be "gangster weapons" - primarily short-barreled shotguns and rifles, machine guns, and silencers. The Federal Firearms Act of 1938 required federal licenses for persons engaged in interstate firearms commerce and prohibited interstate shipment of firearms to individuals under indictment, convicted of crimes of violence, or fugitives. In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court upheld provisions of the National Firearms Act. The Court held that without evidence showing a short-barreled shotgun had "some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia," they couldn't say the Second Amendment protected such weapons. This ambiguous ruling would be interpreted by lower courts to severely limit Second Amendment protections for decades. The Gun Control Act of 1968 expanded federal regulation, prohibiting certain categories of people from receiving or possessing firearms, including convicted felons, fugitives, controlled substance users, those adjudicated mentally defective, and illegal aliens. The 1986 Firearms Owners Protection Act curtailed ATF powers, created due process rules for dealer licensing, explicitly outlawed federal gun registration, and declared the Second Amendment an individual right. The 1990s saw significant victories for gun control advocates, including the Brady Act of 1993 (requiring background checks) and the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994. However, the political backlash was severe. In the 1994 elections, Democrats lost control of both the House and Senate, with President Clinton himself acknowledging "the NRA is the reason the Republicans control the House."

第10章

Heller and McDonald: The Supreme Court Speaks

The Second Amendment underwent a remarkable scholarly renaissance beginning in the 1970s. What was once dismissed as a collective right tied solely to militia service emerged as a rich field of constitutional inquiry. By the mid-1990s, it had evolved from an academically neglected provision to a topic of intense debate among constitutional scholars. Even prominent liberal scholars like Sanford Levinson and Lawrence Tribe - previously skeptical of broad Second Amendment rights - eventually endorsed the "Standard Model" view of the Second Amendment as protecting an individual right. This shift reflected both new historical research and a growing recognition that the Amendment's text and structure supported an individual rights interpretation. This scholarly evolution culminated in the landmark District of Columbia v. Heller decision in 2008. The Court, in a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Scalia, held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess firearms independent of militia service and to use arms for traditionally lawful purposes, including self-defense within the home. The majority opinion conducted an extensive historical analysis, examining English common law, colonial practice, and founding-era sources to conclude that self-defense was the core purpose of the right. The Court struck down DC's handgun ban as violating this right, while also emphasizing that many traditional gun regulations remained presumptively lawful, including restrictions on carrying weapons in sensitive places and prohibitions on dangerous or unusual weapons. Two years later, in McDonald v. City of Chicago, the Court extended this protection against state and local governments through the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Alito's plurality opinion used standard selective incorporation doctrine to apply the Second Amendment to states, finding that the right to keep and bear arms was fundamental to the American scheme of ordered liberty and deeply rooted in the nation's history and traditions. Justice Thomas concurred but argued for incorporation through the Privileges or Immunities Clause - representing the first serious consideration of reviving that clause since its effective nullification in the Slaughter-House Cases of 1873. These watershed decisions transformed Second Amendment jurisprudence, establishing for the first time that the right to keep and bear arms is an individual right enforceable against all levels of government. However, they also left many crucial questions unanswered, creating uncertainty in lower courts. These open issues include the appropriate level of scrutiny for reviewing gun regulations, the extent to which the right applies outside the home, the constitutionality of assault weapon bans and large-capacity magazine restrictions, and the scope of "sensitive places" where firearms can be prohibited. This ambiguity has led to conflicting decisions across federal circuits and continues to fuel ongoing litigation over the boundaries of Second Amendment rights.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第11章

Contemporary Debates: Balancing Rights and Regulation

In the wake of Heller and McDonald, courts have struggled to develop a coherent framework for evaluating gun regulations. Some have adopted a two-step inquiry that first determines whether the restricted activity falls within Second Amendment protection, then applies an appropriate level of scrutiny. Others have proposed a "substantial burden" test similar to abortion jurisprudence. These methodological debates reflect deeper questions about the nature of constitutional rights. Should Second Amendment cases be analyzed through originalism, examining historical understandings from 1791 or 1868? Should they follow a more living constitutionalist approach that considers evolving societal needs? How should courts balance individual rights against public safety concerns? The debate also intersects with important questions about race, gender, and vulnerability. Gun control has historically been used to disarm marginalized communities, from Black Americans during Reconstruction to labor organizers in the early twentieth century. Today, some argue that strict gun control disproportionately impacts vulnerable populations who may have the greatest need for self-defense, including women, the elderly, the disabled, and LGBT individuals who face hate crimes. As we continue to grapple with these complex issues, the historical and legal foundations provided by "Firearms Law and the Second Amendment" offer invaluable context. The Second Amendment's journey from ancient philosophical roots through revolutionary struggle to modern constitutional jurisprudence reminds us that rights are not static abstractions but living principles that evolve through ongoing democratic engagement. Understanding this journey is essential for anyone seeking to contribute meaningfully to one of America's most consequential constitutional debates.

★★★★★

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』を最後まで読み終えました

100万人以上の学習者に愛用されています

“23日間、毎日使い続けています。今では日課の一部です。”

jayallen

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の主要テーマ

constitutional jurisprudence
firearms technology
self-defense doctrine
second amendment history
gun control legislation

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の名言

Laws are silent when arms are raised.
Every means of securing our safety is honorable.
Disarmament [is] a tactic of tyrants.
Making people equal by arming them.
What makes warriors strong is readiness to fight to the death.

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の登場人物

Nicholas J. JohnsonLead author and legal scholar
George A. MocsaryCo-author and legal scholar
E. Gregory WallaceCo-author and legal scholar
Donald KilmerCo-author and legal scholar

著者について

Nicholas J. Johnson、George A. Mocsary、E. Gregory Wallace、Donald Kilmerは、憲法上の銃器法の主要な法的専門家および学者として認められており、**『Firearms Law and the Second Amendment: Regulation, Rights, and Policy』**の共著者です。

ハーバード・ロースクールを卒業し、フォーダム大学の教授を務めるJohnsonは、連邦議会で証言を行い、最高裁判所によって引用された実績を持ち、ニューヨーク・タイムズやワシントン・ポストなどの主要メディアにも定期的に寄稿しています。Mocsaryはワイオミング大学の法学教授を務めており、以前は銃器政策連合（Firearms Policy Coalition）の客員学者でもありました。Wallaceはキャンベル・ロースクールで26年にわたり憲法を教えた経験を持ち、米国公民権委員会のノースカロライナ州諮問委員会の委員も務めています。

彼らは共同で、9世紀のイングランドから現代の連邦および州の訴訟に至るまでの法制史を網羅した、銃器法に関する決定版的な学術論文を作成しました。彼らの包括的な2,240ページに及ぶ教科書は、ロースクールで広く使用されており、全米の法曹実務家、裁判官、学者にとって不可欠な参考文献となっています。

銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条の要約をダウンロード

銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条の要約をPDFまたはEPUBで無料でダウンロード。印刷やオフラインでいつでもお読みいただけます。

他のユーザーのお気に入り

The Second Amendment

Michael Waldman

Origins and Development of the Second Amendment

David T. Hardy

In Defense of the Second Amendment

Larry Correia

A Well-Regulated Militia

Saul Cornell

The Second Amendment: Militia or Individual? の書籍表紙

Historical Background on Second Amendment | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

Overview of Second Amendment, Right to Bear Arms | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

The Second Amendment as a Case Study in Constitutional Interpretation

New York State Rifle & Pistol Association (NYSRPA) v. Bruen (2022) | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

6 sources

The Second Amendment: Militia or Individual?

The Gun Debate

Philip J. Cook and Kristin A. Goss

The global war on your guns

Wayne LaPierre

The second treatise of government

John Locke

この本に関するよくある質問

学習プラン

Power, Blood, and Statecraft

This plan provides a deep dive into the brutal evolution of political authority and the shift from divine right to state sovereignty. It is essential for students of political science, history buffs, or anyone seeking to understand the ruthless mechanics behind how power is seized and held.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

The Architecture of Modern Order

This plan offers a deep dive into the intellectual history and political shifts that shaped our current global landscape. It is ideal for students of political science, history, or philosophy seeking to understand the roots of modern governance and individual rights.

2 h 30 m•5 セクション

学習プラン

Law, Power, and the Feminist Project

This learning plan provides a critical foundation for understanding how legal systems both enforce and dismantle gender-based hierarchies. It is essential for law students, activists, and social science scholars seeking to master the evolution of feminist legal theory and its intersectional future.

2 h•4 セクション

学習プラン

American history

This comprehensive survey of American history provides essential context for understanding current political, social, and cultural debates in the United States. It's ideal for students, professionals working in American contexts, global citizens seeking to understand U.S. influence, or anyone wanting to grasp how historical forces continue to shape contemporary American society and its role in the world.

4 h 43 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Judicial system

This learning plan is essential for anyone seeking to understand how the rule of law maintains societal order and protects individual liberties. It is particularly beneficial for aspiring legal professionals, civic-minded citizens, or students of political science.

5 h 27 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

History of the world wars

This learning plan provides essential context for understanding the modern world, as the two world wars fundamentally transformed global politics, economics, and society in ways that still resonate today. It's ideal for history enthusiasts, students of international relations, educators, and anyone seeking to comprehend how 20th-century conflicts shaped current geopolitical dynamics, humanitarian law, and our collective responsibility to prevent future atrocities.

5 h 33 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

US Politics

This learning plan provides essential knowledge for anyone seeking to understand how American democracy actually works beyond news headlines and partisan talking points. It's ideal for engaged citizens, students, professionals working in policy or government, and anyone who wants to participate more meaningfully in civic life by understanding both the constitutional foundations and contemporary challenges facing US political institutions.

5 h 34 m•5 セクション

学習プラン

Learn philosophy & law basics

This learning plan provides essential intellectual tools for anyone seeking to understand the fundamental principles that shape our legal systems, ethical frameworks, and political institutions. It's ideal for aspiring lawyers, policy makers, educators, and engaged citizens who want to think critically about justice, rights, and governance in modern society.

5 h 29 m•4 セクション

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

今すぐ学習の旅を始めよう

第2章

銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条

概要『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の概要

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Second Amendment's Complex Legacy: A Journey Through American Firearms Law

Firearms Fundamentals: Understanding the Tools of the Debate

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Historical Origins: Ancient Roots of the Right to Arms

English Precedents and Colonial America: The Evolution of Arms Rights

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Revolutionary Period: When Gun Control Sparked a War

The Birth of the Second Amendment: Constitutional Debates

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Early Republic and Antebellum Period: Developing the Right to Arms

Reconstruction and the Fourteenth Amendment: Extending the Right

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Modern Era: From Gun Control to Gun Rights

Heller and McDonald: The Supreme Court Speaks

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Contemporary Debates: Balancing Rights and Regulation

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』を最後まで読み終えました

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の主要テーマ

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の名言

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の登場人物

著者について

銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条の要約をダウンロード

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この本に関するよくある質問

What is Firearms Law and the Second Amendment by Nicholas Johnson about?

Who are the authors of Firearms Law and the Second Amendment?

Who should read Firearms Law and the Second Amendment?

Is Firearms Law and the Second Amendment worth reading?

もっと見る

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Second Amendment's Complex Legacy: A Journey Through American Firearms Law

Firearms Fundamentals: Understanding the Tools of the Debate

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Historical Origins: Ancient Roots of the Right to Arms

English Precedents and Colonial America: The Evolution of Arms Rights

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Revolutionary Period: When Gun Control Sparked a War

The Birth of the Second Amendment: Constitutional Debates

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Early Republic and Antebellum Period: Developing the Right to Arms

Reconstruction and the Fourteenth Amendment: Extending the Right

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Modern Era: From Gun Control to Gun Rights

Heller and McDonald: The Supreme Court Speaks

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Contemporary Debates: Balancing Rights and Regulation

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』を最後まで読み終えました

他のユーザーのお気に入り

もっと見る

『銃器法と合衆国憲法修正第2条』の概要