What is Dreyer's English by Benjamin Dreyer about?

Dreyer's English is a style guide and writing manual that combines practical grammar advice with entertaining prose on clarity and style. Originally an internal memo for Random House copy editors, the book covers everything from words to avoid and common writing mistakes to debunking outdated grammar myths. Benjamin Dreyer delivers authoritative guidance with wit and personality, making language rules accessible and enjoyable for writers at all levels.

Who is Benjamin Dreyer?

Benjamin Dreyer served as the copy chief and vice-president at Random House (now Penguin Random House) from 2008 until his retirement in 2023. He supervised the publication of hundreds of titles annually and personally copy-edited works by acclaimed authors including Elizabeth Strout, E.L. Doctorow, and Shirley Jackson. The Washington Post calls him "the unofficial language guru on Twitter," where he shares writing advice with a devoted following.

Who should read Dreyer's English?

Dreyer's English is essential for writers, editors, journalists, students, and anyone who wants to improve their writing skills. Fiction authors will particularly benefit from the dedicated chapter on novel editing, while professionals seeking clearer communication will appreciate the practical advice on eliminating wordiness. Even casual readers who "simply revel in language" will find the book entertaining and enlightening.

Is Dreyer's English worth reading?

Yes, Dreyer's English is worth reading for its combination of authoritative guidance and entertaining delivery. The book debuted at number nine on the New York Times bestseller list and received enthusiastic reviews from The New Yorker, Wall Street Journal, and other major publications. Readers gain practical tools for improving their writing while enjoying Dreyer's witty observations and passion for language.

What are the main ideas in Dreyer's English?

Dreyer's English covers eliminating unnecessary words like "very" and "rather," understanding the difference between real grammar rules and arbitrary "nonrules," and mastering commonly confused words. The book emphasizes that copy editors should enhance rather than correct an author's voice, helping writers achieve their vision. Dreyer also provides specific guidance on fiction techniques, dialogue formatting, flashback integration, and maintaining consistency throughout manuscripts.

What words does Benjamin Dreyer say to avoid in Dreyer's English?

Benjamin Dreyer identifies meaningless modifiers to eliminate from writing, including: * **very** * **rather** * **really** * **quite** * **in fact** * **just** He suggests writers avoid these words for one week to recognize how unnecessary they are in most contexts. The book also catalogs "trimmables"—redundant phrases like "hollow tube" where one word already implies the other. This pruning approach helps writers achieve clearer, more direct prose.

What are the "Great Nonrules" in Dreyer's English?

The "Great Nonrules of the English Language" are outdated writing prohibitions that Benjamin Dreyer systematically debunks in Dreyer's English. These include never splitting infinitives, never starting sentences with "and" or "but," and never ending sentences with prepositions. Dreyer calls these nonrules "largely unhelpful, pointlessly constricting, feckless, and useless," arguing they restrict writers unnecessarily. He provides evidence that accomplished authors regularly violate these so-called rules to create better prose.

How does Dreyer's English approach grammar rules differently?

Dreyer's English distinguishes between legitimate grammar rules and arbitrary prescriptions imposed by "some long dead dude who didn't understand the importance of bathing more than once a month." Rather than dictating rigid rules, Dreyer explains the principles behind effective writing and acknowledges that English "developed without codification" and "continues to evolve anarchically." He prioritizes what makes prose pleasurable and clear over pedantic correctness, giving writers freedom within informed guidelines.

ドレイヤーの英語術

明快さとスタイルに関する極めて正しいガイド

ベンジャミン・ドレイヤー

『ドレイヤーの英語術』の概要

『Dreyer's English』は、退屈な文法をスリリングなものへと変貌させます。ジョージ・ソーンダーズ、エリザベス・ストラウト、さらにはスティングまでもが絶賛するこのニューヨーク・タイムズのベストセラーは、言語のルールを心から楽しめるものにしています。なぜこのスタイルガイドは、人々が最初から最後まで一気に読み通してしまう、稀有な文法書となったのでしょうか？

語り方を選ぶ

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

ドレイヤーの英語術の同じアイデアを、あなたに合う声・深さ・ペースで学べます。いつでも切り替えられます。

第1章

The Art of Precision: Why Good Writing Matters

Benjamin Dreyer's "Dreyer's English" has become something of a cultural phenomenon since its publication, earning praise from Stephen King who called it "essential" and making regular appearances on the desks of professional writers nationwide. As Random House's copy chief with over three decades of experience, Dreyer has crafted what The New York Times describes as "utterly delightful" - a style guide that manages to be both authoritative and wickedly funny. The book's unexpected commercial success speaks to our collective hunger for guidance in an era when written communication has never been more important or more scrutinized. Whether you're crafting emails, social media posts, or the next great American novel, Dreyer's insights offer something invaluable: the confidence that comes from knowing the rules, when to follow them, and perhaps most importantly, when to break them with style.

第2章

Breaking the Rules: The Freedom of Knowing Better

The English language developed without codification, absorbing new constructions and vocabulary with each foreigner who set foot on British soil-to say nothing of American mischief-and continues to evolve anarchically. It has no enforceable laws, much less someone to enforce the laws it doesn't have. This anarchic evolution is precisely what makes English both frustrating and beautiful. Certain prose rules are essentially inarguable-a sentence's subject and verb should agree in number, and in a "not only x but y" construction, the x and y must be parallel. These rules are firmly entrenched because they help us communicate clearly with readers, following what Dreyer calls the Four C's: Convention, Consensus, Clarity, and Comprehension. A well-constructed sentence literally sounds better when read aloud. But what about those supposed "rules" that have been drilled into our heads since grade school? Dreyer identifies several major nonrules you should feel free to ignore. First among these is the prohibition against beginning sentences with "And" or "But." Great writers do it all the time. However, habitually using these conjunctions can make your writing boring and lazy. You may find you don't need that "And" at all, or that your sentences can be connected with a comma or semicolon. Writing is about making conscious, careful choices. Similarly, the prohibition against splitting infinitives (as in Star Trek's "to boldly go where no man has gone before") is a bogus rule. The unsplit alternatives-"boldly to go" or "to go boldly"-sound awkwardly translated from Vulcan. And ending a sentence with a preposition? This leads to Winston Churchill's apocryphal remark about "the kind of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put." While ending with prepositions isn't always ideal since sentences should aim for powerful finales rather than dribbling off, tying sentences into strangling knots to avoid prepositional conclusions is unhelpful and unnatural. Other nonrules worth ignoring include the ban on contractions in formal writing (which produces prose that sounds like it was written by a Martian), the blanket avoidance of passive voice (which has legitimate uses when you want to emphasize what's being acted upon), and the idea that sentence fragments are always wrong (consider Dickens's magnificent opening to Bleak House-paragraphs of vivid fragments describing London's fog and mud). The freedom to break these artificial constraints allows your writing to breathe naturally. The goal isn't rebellion for its own sake but developing an ear for what works. As Dreyer puts it, "Once you've learned the rules, you can break them." The key is knowing why you're breaking them.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『ドレイヤーの英語術』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第3章

Punctuation: The Breath of Good Writing

If words are the flesh, muscle, and bone of prose, punctuation is the breath. Punctuation conveys to readers how you want your writing to be read and how it should sound-a comma sounds different than a semicolon; parentheses make a different noise than dashes. While some writers use punctuation with impressionistic flair, not all punctuation is a choice. Even a single comma can convey key information. Take the series comma (also known as the Oxford comma), which separates the last two items in a list before the concluding conjunction. Whatever you call it: Use it. No sentence has ever been harmed by a series comma, and many have been improved by one. Consider the famous example from a book dedication: "To my parents, Ayn Rand and God." Without the series comma after "Rand," the writer appears to be claiming divine parentage. Commas also help us avoid crashing proper nouns together. "In June Trump's personal lawyer spoke to representatives in Moscow" might momentarily confuse readers about who June Trump is. Similarly, "On arrival at Random House I was informed" could suggest the existence of Random House II and Random House III. The placement of commas with dialogue follows specific rules. We use commas when dialogue is preceded or followed by attributions like "he said" or "she replied." However, this rule doesn't apply when dialogue is preceded or followed by forms of "to be"-no comma is needed in sentences like "Lloyd's last words were 'That tiger looks highly pettable'" because the quoted phrase functions as a noun rather than dialogue. Semicolons, often maligned as pretentious, serve a crucial function in dividing items in a list when any individual element contains commas. Dreyer passionately defends semicolons against those who consider them "show-offy," quoting Lewis Thomas on their elegance in T.S. Eliot's poetry and showcasing Shirley Jackson's masterful use in "The Haunting of Hill House." Jackson's semicolons create a tightly woven, almost claustrophobic connection between ideas that separate sentences would lose. Apostrophes cause endless confusion, particularly in possessives. Dreyer emphatically warns: "DO NOT EVER ATTEMPT TO USE AN APOSTROPHE TO PLURALIZE A WORD." The British call such errors "greengrocer's apostrophes" (from produce signs advertising "banana's"). For possessives, most people handle simple cases correctly (the dog's toy, Beyonce's Grammy). For common nouns ending in s, modern style favors adding 's (the boss's office, the princess's tiara) rather than just an apostrophe. The same applies to proper nouns ending in s (Charles Dickens's novels). Dashes come in two varieties: em dashes (-) and en dashes (-). Em dashes interrupt dialogue, show external interruptions, or set off parenthetical text. Use no more than two per sentence to avoid creating breathless prose. En dashes, the "guild secret" of copyediting, connect multiword proper nouns ("New York-Chicago flight," "Pulitzer Prize-winning play") and indicate ranges (pp. 3-21) and scores (Yankees 14-2).

第4章

Numbers: When to Spell Them Out

Generally, write out numbers from one through one hundred and easily expressed numbers beyond (two hundred, eighteen hundred), but use numerals for complex numbers (250, 1,823). While periodicals often limit written numbers to "nine" or "ten" to save space, words look friendlier and more natural on the page when space isn't an issue. This rule applies particularly to creative writing, novels, and narrative nonfiction where readability and flow take precedence over brevity. When one number in a paragraph requires numerals, all related numbers should also use numerals for consistency. For example, not "seventy-five acres, twelve cows, thirty-seven mules, and 126 chickens" but rather "75 acres, 12 cows, 37 mules, and 126 chickens." This principle extends to any series of related quantities - whether describing distances, measurements, ages, or other numerical data within the same context. Dialogue requires special consideration regarding numbers. Generally, spell out numbers as they would be spoken: "sixteen apples" rather than "16 apples," "twenty-three years old" instead of "23 years old." However, common sense should prevail - certain numbers naturally appear as numerals even in speech. For instance, addresses ("142 Maple Street"), years ("1999"), and phone numbers remain as numerals. Similarly, technical or specific references like "Route 66" or "Room 402" are acceptable in dialogue. Starting sentences with numerals is universally discouraged in formal writing. Instead of "1967 dawned clear and bright," write "Nineteen sixty-seven dawned clear and bright" or "The year 1967 dawned clear and bright." For dates at the beginning of sentences, consider restructuring: "The summer of 1967 brought change" or "During 1967, the landscape changed dramatically." Time expressions require careful attention to format and clarity. Use "five a.m." or "4:32 p.m." with small caps for a.m./p.m. (or AM/PM in some style guides). Avoid redundancies like "6 a.m. in the morning" or "9 p.m. at night" - choose either "6 a.m." or "six in the morning." For approximate times, spell them out: "around eleven o'clock," "just past midnight." When precision matters, use numerals: "The train departs at 3:45 p.m." Date formatting varies by region and style guide. In U.S. style, place commas on both sides of the year: "November 6, 1988, in Scottsdale." International format omits these commas: "6 November 1988 in Scottsdale." Regardless of format, avoid ordinal numbers in dates - write "November 6," not "November 6th." When referring to decades, either spell them out ("the nineteen eighties") or use numerals ("the 1980s"), but avoid apostrophes ("the 1980's" is incorrect).

『ドレイヤーの英語術』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第5章

Grammar Without the Jargon

Dreyer hates grammar jargon, not grammar itself. When he started as a copy editor, he knew instinctively how grammar worked without knowing the terminology. He doesn't know what a nominative absolute is, thinks "genitive" sounds vaguely smutty, and can't diagram a sentence. He learned just enough grammar to do his job, consulting stylebooks when puzzled. For writers, knowing how to do something correctly matters more than knowing what it's called. Here's an infuriating grammar rule: "Here's one of those grammar rules that infuriate people" uses "infuriate," not "infuriates." Though "one" seems to demand a singular verb, the verb in a relative clause agrees with the antecedent of the relative pronoun-in this case "rules," which requires the plural form. Reports of "whom" dying are greatly exaggerated. Think of "who" as cousin to subject pronouns (I, he, she, they) and "whom" as cousin to object pronouns (me, him, her, them). Use "whom" for the object being acted upon: "The man whom Shirley met" or "To whom did you give the shirt?" Avoid hypercorrections like "Sebastian, whom she believes has drowned" (incorrect) or "I gave candy to whomever wanted it" (should be "whoever"). In constructions like "not x but y," "either x or y," and "neither x nor y," ensure that x and y match structurally. Not "She achieved success not only through intelligence but perseverance" but "through intelligence but through perseverance." For "neither x nor y," the verb agrees with y: "Neither the president nor the representatives have..." but "Neither the representatives nor the president has..." The singular "they" is no longer a grammatical flashpoint but the wave of the present. The proscription against it was a Victorian-era invention we should abandon. However, don't embrace it so vigorously you write absurdities like "Every girl should do what they like." Beyond grammatical considerations, using someone's preferred pronouns (including "they" for nonbinary people) is a matter of basic human respect. Parallelism requires matching grammatical structures. Not "as real or realer than Des Moines" but "as real as or realer than Des Moines." Similarly, not "A mother's responsibilities are to cook, clean, and the raising of children" but "to cook, to clean, and to raise the children." Properly parallel constructions have a bracing attractiveness: "He was not beholden to, responsible for, or in any other way interested in the rule of law."

第6章

Fiction: Creating Believable Worlds

Good writing transcends mere correctness, especially in fiction where a writer's voice is paramount. However, claiming "it's just my voice" doesn't excuse logical inconsistencies. Fiction requires internal logic and consistency, even while being fictional. Characters must age consistently with the calendar and with each other. Someone born in May 1960 must be twenty-five in May 1985 and forty in May 2000. Two characters who meet at thirty-five and eighteen can't later be fifty and twenty-six. Time passage must be tracked carefully-I've seen many a Friday arriving two days after Tuesday. Physical characteristics like height, eye color, and handedness need to remain consistent. Stage management matters too-watch for characters who go upstairs only to step directly onto the driveway, or who remove their shoes twice in five minutes. Real-world details must be honored-readers will notice errors. If setting a story on September 24, 1865, verify it was indeed a Sunday using online perpetual calendars. When researching historical events, remember to check newspapers from the following day. Travel times must be realistic-I once edited a novel where a journey that would take ten hours was completed in three. Geographic details like New York City's one-way streets and avenues matter. Don't forget that sunrise and sunset times vary throughout the year, and not all plants flourish everywhere. For historical accuracy, check when words came into use-"hangover" didn't appear until 1894; before that, people had a "katzenjammer." Avoid pronoun confusion by using character names strategically. While repetition might seem excessive to you as the writer, readers need clarity about which "she" or "he" you're referring to. When distinguishing between unnamed characters, give them identifiable traits rather than calling them "the first girl" and "the second girl." Vary your quantifiers beyond just "a couple"-use "a few," "several," or "some." Watch for repetition of distinctive adjectives and be wary of thesaurus-derived replacements that don't match your character's voice. Repetition can be powerful when deliberate, as in L. Frank Baum's brilliant use of "gray" nine times in four paragraphs to establish Dorothy's dreary Kansas surroundings. Keep dialogue natural by avoiding semicolons and characters constantly addressing each other by name. Limit overused actions like murmuring, whispering hoarsely, nodding heads, shrugging shoulders, pushing up glasses, and staring into the middle distance. Use italics for emphasis sparingly, and go extremely light on exclamation points. The "he said/she said" school has merit, but moderate use of other dialogue tags is acceptable-just avoid overwrought combinations like "objected Tom crossly" or "broke out Tom violently." Characters who "hiss" should only hiss words with sibilants. Place dialogue tags early in long speeches, and eliminate redundancies like "thought to herself." For internal thoughts, simple roman text works best, and please-characters rarely blurt out their thoughts and then clap their hands over their mouths.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『ドレイヤーの英語術』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第7章

The Confusables: Words That Trip Us Up

Spellcheck can't save you when you use the wrong word that's still a legitimate word. These confusable pairs are the linguistic landmines waiting to embarrass even careful writers, and they frequently slip past editors because both words are technically correct - just not in the intended context. The affect/effect pair causes endless confusion. To affect is to influence (verb); an effect is a result (noun). You can affect someone's mood, which may have the effect of changing their behavior. However, "affect" can be a noun describing emotional demeanor in psychology ("The patient showed a flat affect"), and "effect" can be a verb meaning "to cause to happen" as in "to effect change" or "to effect reforms in government." "Discreet" people show discretion and tact, while "discrete" things are separate and distinct. Remember: if you're being secretive or tactful, you're being discreet. If you're describing separate elements - like discrete mathematical units or discrete components of a system - you want "discrete." A helpful memory aid: the separated "t's" in "discrete" represent separated things. "Farther" is for physical distance you can measure: "The store is farther down the road." "Further" is for figurative distance, degree, or time: "Let's discuss this further" or "Nothing could be further from the truth." When in doubt, use "further," as the British do for nearly everything - it's becoming increasingly accepted as an all-purpose choice. To "flaunt" is to show off ostentatiously: "She flaunted her new engagement ring." To "flout" is to defy or show contempt for rules or laws: "He flouted the dress code by wearing jeans." People often confuse these, writing about "flaunting the rules" when they mean "flouting" them. Think: you flaunt what you've got; you flout what you don't respect. The lay/lie distinction trips up even professional writers. "Lay" is transitive - it needs an object. I lay a book down; chickens lay eggs. "Lie" is intransitive - I lie down, period. The trouble comes with conjugation: "lay" becomes "laying/laid/laid" while "lie" becomes "lying/lay/lain." That the past tense of "lie" is "lay" is maddening, but with practice, you'll get it. Pro tip: if you can replace the word with "place," use "lay." "Prone" means lying on your stomach - think "prone position" in yoga or military training. "Supine" means lying on your back - imagine looking up at the sky. This confusion gets past writers, copy editors, and proofreaders more than almost any other error. Despite helpful mnemonics (supine = spine up to the sky), many writers need to consult the dictionary when faced with either word. In medical contexts, these terms are crucial for precise communication, making their correct usage particularly important.

第8章

Pet Peeves: The Language Hills We Die On

All word people harbor language peeves - those words or usages that drive otherwise reasonable people to unreasonable outbursts. While everyone's pet peeves differ, we all believe our own reflect refined linguistic appreciation while others' reveal diseased minds. These linguistic irritants often reveal more about the complainers than the language itself, yet they persist as passionate points of contention among writers, editors, and language enthusiasts. Using "literally" as an intensifier rather than to mean "actually, without exaggeration" drives many language lovers to distraction. No, you did not literally die laughing, and your friends are not literally rolling on the floor laughing either. The word's meaning has evolved through hyperbolic use, much to traditionalists' dismay. While dictionaries now include this intensifier meaning, many maintain that this dilutes the word's essential purpose of distinguishing actual events from figurative expressions. The strict differentiation between "fewer" and "less" is another common battleground that ignites fierce debate. Use "fewer" for countable objects (fewer bottles, fewer people, fewer problems) and "less" for singular nouns (less happiness, less time) and mass nouns (less guacamole, less water). Exceptions include discussions of distance (less than five hundred miles), time (less than sixty minutes), money (less than fifty dollars), and weight (less than ten pounds), where "less than" is preferred because you're focusing on the quantity rather than the individual units. The "10 items or fewer" sign at grocery stores has become a rallying point for grammatical sticklers. "Irregardless" stands as perhaps the most derided word in English - an unnecessary mash-up of "irrespective" and "regardless" that adds nothing to the language except confusion and contempt. Similarly, "could care less" logically means the opposite of what people intend (that they still have some caring left to do), though the phrase has taken on an idiomatic meaning through widespread use. Language traditionalists argue that "couldn't care less" remains the only logical choice. The business world has spawned its own set of contentious usage patterns. Using "impact" as a verb when "affect" would suffice irritates many language purists, as does "gift" as a verb when perfectly good alternatives like "give," "present," or "bestow" exist. These business-speak terms often sound pretentious and unnecessary. Other corporate language offenders include "leverage" (instead of "use"), "utilize" (instead of "use"), and "actionable" (for anything that can be acted upon). The increasing prevalence of corporate jargon in everyday speech represents a particular source of frustration for those who value clear, straightforward communication.

『ドレイヤーの英語術』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第9章

The Final Word: There Is No Final Word

Virginia Woolf's Lily Briscoe concludes To the Lighthouse by thinking, "It was done; it was finished. Yes, she thought, laying down her brush in extreme fatigue, I have had my vision." But unlike Lily, Dreyer lacks such certainty about finality, though he recognizes her exhaustion. There is no last word on language - only the next word, the continuous evolution of expression, and the endless possibilities that await on the blank page. Language refuses to be permanently fixed. What was considered grammatically incorrect in the 18th century might be standard usage today - think of split infinitives, which were once literary sins but are now widely accepted. Even supposedly ironclad rules like "never end a sentence with a preposition" have proven themselves to be more flexible guidelines than unchangeable laws. There's no rule without an exception, no thought without an afterthought, always something you meant to say but forgot. The dictionary itself is a living document, annually adding new words and retiring obsolete ones. Good writing emerges from understanding this fluidity while maintaining precision. It's about making conscious choices that serve your purpose and respect your readers - choosing "amble" instead of "walk" when you want to convey a particular pace, or breaking a grammatical rule because the resulting sentence carries more impact. Writing well requires balancing technical proficiency with artistic sensitivity, much like a musician who must master scales before improvising jazz. The best writers approach their craft with both humility and confidence. They understand that clarity doesn't mean blandness - personality can shine through even in technical writing. They know that precision doesn't require pedantry - sometimes a conversational tone serves better than formal correctness. As Dreyer reminds us throughout his book, writing well isn't about showing off - it's about disappearing so your ideas can shine through unobstructed by clumsy constructions or distracting errors. The journey of writing mirrors the journey of thought itself: recursive, sometimes contradictory, always seeking better expression. Each revision brings us closer to what we mean to say, though we may never quite arrive at perfection. And perhaps that's the point - the pleasure lies not in reaching a final destination but in the continuous refinement of our craft. In the end, good writing is simply good thinking made visible. It's the bridge between minds, the vehicle for understanding, and the tool by which we make sense of our world. And that's worth every comma, semicolon, and carefully chosen word - even if we know tomorrow might bring new rules, new words, and new ways of expressing ourselves.

★★★★★

『ドレイヤーの英語術』を最後まで読み終えました

100万人以上の学習者に愛用されています

“23日間、毎日使い続けています。今では日課の一部です。”

jayallen

『ドレイヤーの英語術』の主要テーマ

copy editing standards
punctuation mechanics
stylistic clarity
grammatical myths
prose refinement

『ドレイヤーの英語術』の名言

If you have the choice between omitting an unnecessary word and adding an unnecessary word, please omit the unnecessary word.
You can begin a sentence with 'But'. And you can end one with a preposition.
Nobody wants to read writing that sounds as if it was generated by a computer.
DO NOT EVER ATTEMPT TO USE AN APOSTROPHE TO PLURALIZE A WORD.

『ドレイヤーの英語術』の登場人物

Benjamin DreyerAuthor and Random House copy chief
Shirley JacksonAuthor noted for her masterful use of semicolons
Lewis ThomasWriter quoted on the elegance of semicolons

著者について

ベンジャミン・ドレイヤー（Benjamin Dreyer）は、ベストセラーとなった『Dreyer's English: An Utterly Correct Guide to Clarity and Style』の著者であり、文法、編集、そして明快な散文における著名な権威です。1958年に生まれ、ニューヨークで育ったドレイヤーは、ランダムハウス社で副社長、エグゼクティブ・マネージング・エディター、およびコピー・チーフとして30年間勤務しました。そこでは毎年数百冊の書籍を統括し、エリザベス・ストラウト、E・L・ドクトロウ、フランク・リッチといった文学界の巨匠たちの作品の校閲を担当しました。言語とスタイルに関する彼の専門知識は、作家や編集者の間でカルト的な人気を博し、『ワシントン・ポスト』紙は彼を「Twitter上の非公式な言語の導師（グル）」と呼びました。

『Dreyer's English』は『ニューヨーク・タイムズ』のベストセラーリストで初登場9位を記録し、『O: The Oprah Magazine』によってその年のベストブックの一冊に選ばれました。

この本は、もともとランダムハウス社内のメモとして始まりましたが、散文を楽しいものに変えると称賛される包括的なガイドへと発展しました。ドレイヤーは、2万人以上の購読者を抱えるニュースレターを通じて、継続的に洞察を共有しています。彼は2023年にランダムハウス社を退職し、現在はカリフォルニア州サンタモニカに居住しています。

ドレイヤーの英語術の要約をダウンロード

ドレイヤーの英語術の要約をPDFまたはEPUBで無料でダウンロード。印刷やオフラインでいつでもお読みいただけます。

他のユーザーのお気に入り

The flavor bible

Andrew Dornenburg

The Grammar Guidebook

Susan Wise Bauer

Says Who?

Anne Curzan

Sense of Style

Steven Pinker

Word by Word

Kory Stamper

English Speaking: From Student to User の書籍表紙

How to improve your English speaking | LearnEnglish

How to improve your spoken English: 8 tips ‹ EF GO Blog | EF Global Site (English)

21 Most Effective Ways to Improve Your English Speaking Skills | FluentU

How to Write an Engaging Podcast Script in English – 5 Minute English

5 sources

English Speaking: From Student to User

Language Intelligence

Joseph J Romm

Economical Writing, Third Edition

Deirdre Nansen McCloskey

この本に関するよくある質問

学習プラン

The Mechanics of Spoken English

This plan is essential for educators and advanced learners who want to move beyond textbook English and master the nuances of real-world communication. It is particularly beneficial for teachers looking to improve classroom dynamics through a deeper understanding of phonology and sociolinguistics.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

The Gatsby Guide to Eloquence

This guide is essential for professionals and socialites looking to elevate their personal brand through sophisticated communication. It combines historical charisma with modern psychological techniques to help anyone project confidence and mastery in high-stakes environments.

1 h 12 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Learning English 100%

This comprehensive plan is designed for learners who want to bridge the gap between basic understanding and professional fluency. It is ideal for students or professionals aiming to master grammar, elegant writing, and persuasive speaking in any cultural context.

5 h 7 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Speak English like a native New Yorker

This learning plan is essential for anyone looking to integrate into New York City's unique social and professional landscape. It is designed for non-native speakers or transplants who want to move beyond textbook English and embrace the specific rhythm, attitude, and vocabulary of the five boroughs.

3 h 5 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Analyze unique takes on English books.

This plan is essential for students and literature enthusiasts who want to move beyond basic comprehension toward sophisticated critique. It is ideal for anyone seeking to master diverse theoretical frameworks and develop a scholarly, unique voice in literary analysis.

4 h 22 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Deep Reading Renaissance

In an era of digital distraction, the ability to focus on long-form text has become a rare competitive advantage. This plan is designed for lifelong learners and professionals who want to rewire their brains for depth and move beyond superficial skimming.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Master the Digital Reflex

This plan is essential for digital marketers and linguists looking to decode the chaotic energy of online slang. It bridges the gap between traditional literacy and the visceral, expressive language of modern internet subcultures.

1 h•3 セクション

学習プラン

From Textbooks to Literary Fluency

This plan is designed for intermediate learners who feel stuck using language apps and want to transition to real-world content. It provides the structural tools and cognitive strategies needed to move from textbook exercises to enjoying authentic Hispanic literature with native-level fluency.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

今すぐ学習の旅を始めよう

第6章

ドレイヤーの英語術

概要『ドレイヤーの英語術』の概要

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Art of Precision: Why Good Writing Matters

Breaking the Rules: The Freedom of Knowing Better

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Punctuation: The Breath of Good Writing

Numbers: When to Spell Them Out

『ドレイヤーの英語術』をもっと深く楽しむ

Grammar Without the Jargon

Fiction: Creating Believable Worlds

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Confusables: Words That Trip Us Up

Pet Peeves: The Language Hills We Die On

『ドレイヤーの英語術』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Final Word: There Is No Final Word

『ドレイヤーの英語術』を最後まで読み終えました

『ドレイヤーの英語術』の主要テーマ

『ドレイヤーの英語術』の名言

『ドレイヤーの英語術』の登場人物

著者について

ドレイヤーの英語術の要約をダウンロード

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この本に関するよくある質問

What is Dreyer's English by Benjamin Dreyer about?

Who is Benjamin Dreyer?

Who should read Dreyer's English?

Is Dreyer's English worth reading?

もっと見る

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Art of Precision: Why Good Writing Matters

Breaking the Rules: The Freedom of Knowing Better

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Punctuation: The Breath of Good Writing

Numbers: When to Spell Them Out

『ドレイヤーの英語術』をもっと深く楽しむ

Grammar Without the Jargon

Fiction: Creating Believable Worlds

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Confusables: Words That Trip Us Up

Pet Peeves: The Language Hills We Die On

『ドレイヤーの英語術』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Final Word: There Is No Final Word

『ドレイヤーの英語術』を最後まで読み終えました

他のユーザーのお気に入り

もっと見る

『ドレイヤーの英語術』の概要