What is *Apocalypse Never* about?

*Apocalypse Never* debunks environmental alarmism, arguing that exaggerated claims about climate change, deforestation, and plastic waste hinder effective solutions. Michael Shellenberger advocates for nuclear energy, critiques anti-development policies, and promotes "environmental humanism"—balancing ecological health with human progress. The book blends scientific analysis, firsthand reporting from Brazil to Congo, and critiques of groups like Extinction Rebellion.

Who should read *Apocalypse Never*?

This book suits environmental policymakers, climate skeptics, and anyone seeking alternatives to mainstream climate narratives. It’s valuable for readers interested in nuclear energy’s role in decarbonization, the psychology of apocalyptic thinking, or critiques of Malthusian environmentalism. Shellenberger’s accessible style appeals to both specialists and general audiences.

Is *Apocalypse Never* worth reading?

Yes, for its well-researched counterarguments to climate catastrophism and nuclear energy advocacy. Reviewers praise its synthesis of scientific data, global policy analysis, and the author’s transition from radical activist to pragmatic reformer. Critics argue it oversimplifies opponents’ views, but even skeptics acknowledge its provocative insights.

What are the main arguments in *Apocalypse Never*?

Key points include: - Climate change impacts are overstated, and decarbonization via renewables alone is unrealistic - Nuclear energy is safer and more scalable than wind/solar - Anti-development policies harm poor nations by restricting energy access - Environmentalism has become a "religion" fostering unnecessary despair.

How does *Apocalypse Never* address nuclear energy?

Shellenberger dismantles nuclear myths, highlighting its lower mortality rate than solar/wind and minimal waste issues. He critiques environmental groups for opposing nuclear while accepting fossil fuel partnerships. The book details how nuclear shutdowns increased emissions in California and Germany, advocating for next-gen reactors as essential for clean energy transitions.

What criticisms exist about *Apocalypse Never*?

Detractors accuse Shellenberger of cherry-picking data, downplaying climate risks, and constructing strawman arguments about environmentalists. Some scientists dispute his nuclear safety claims, while ethicists challenge his characterization of Malthusianism. However, even critics acknowledge his compelling case for energy abundance.

How does *Apocalypse Never* compare to Bjorn Lomborg’s *False Alarm*?

Both critique climate alarmism’s economic costs, but Shellenberger’s work is more personal and expansive. While Lomborg focuses on cost-benefit analyses, *Apocalypse Never* incorporates global fieldwork, psychological insights about environmental "religiosity," and stronger nuclear advocacy. The Claremont Review calls Shellenberger’s approach "more satisfying" for blending narrative with analysis.

What is "environmental humanism" in *Apocalypse Never*?

This framework prioritizes human flourishing alongside ecological stewardship. It rejects austerity-focused policies, instead advocating for high-energy civilizations enabled by nuclear power and industrialization. Shellenberger argues this approach reduces emissions faster while lifting nations from poverty—contrasting with what he calls the "sadness" of traditional environmentalism.

地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める

なぜ環境アラミズム（過激な警告）が私たち全員に害を及ぼすのか

マイケル・シェレンバーガー

4.17(6162 Reviews)

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』の概要

マイケル・シェレンバーガーのベストセラーは、科学的根拠に基づいた反論によって環境警鐘主義に挑んでいます。ピューリッツァー賞受賞者のリチャード・ローズも絶賛した本書は、パニックが進歩を妨げていると主張し、激しい論争を巻き起こしました。もし私たちの終末論的な恐怖が、実際には真の解決策を阻んでいるとしたらどうでしょうか？

語り方を選ぶ

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極めるの同じアイデアを、あなたに合う声・深さ・ペースで学べます。いつでも切り替えられます。

第1章

Environmental Alarmism's Fatal Flaws: Why Science Doesn't Support Apocalyptic Narratives

When climate activist group Extinction Rebellion disrupted London's electric-powered Tube trains in October 2019, angry commuters fought back, kicking and punching protesters who were blocking their way to work. In a subsequent television interview, the group's spokesperson made a startling claim: the disruption merely previewed what climate change would bring-"empty supermarkets, power systems turned off, transport system disrupted." This moment crystallized what environmental activist Michael Shellenberger had increasingly observed: the climate conversation had spiraled out of control, with manageable environmental problems transformed into apocalyptic threats. Shellenberger's "Apocalypse Never" has become a cultural touchstone for those seeking evidence-based environmentalism rather than fear-driven narratives. The book has sparked fierce debate among environmentalists, with figures like Bill Gates praising its pragmatic approach while others condemn its challenges to conventional wisdom. As a lifelong environmentalist with three decades of activism experience, Shellenberger's transformation from traditional environmental advocate to critic of apocalyptic environmentalism offers a compelling journey through the science, politics, and psychology of our most pressing ecological challenges.

第2章

The Climate Crisis That Isn't

Headlines scream that we have "just over a decade to get climate change under control" before facing civilization's collapse. Public figures from Leonardo DiCaprio to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez warn of imminent catastrophe, with the latter famously claiming "the world is going to end in twelve years." Greta Thunberg urges people to "panic" about climate change rather than maintain hope. These apocalyptic narratives have become so commonplace that questioning them invites accusations of "climate denial." Yet climate scientists themselves reject these doomsday timelines. When Ocasio-Cortez made her twelve-year claim, NASA scientist Gavin Schmidt called such time-limited frames "bullshit," while paleoclimate researcher Andrea Dutton noted the IPCC report had been "completely mischaracterized." The IPCC had actually stated that to limit warming to 1.5C, emissions needed to decline 45% by 2030-not that the world would end. Stanford scientist Ken Caldeira emphasized that "climate change does not threaten human extinction," and MIT's Kerry Emanuel expressed frustration with "apocalypse criers." The data supports these more measured scientific assessments. Despite climate change, vulnerability to extreme weather has dramatically decreased, with death rates from natural disasters declining 92% since their 1920s peak. A 2019 study in Global Environmental Change found death rates and economic damage from weather events dropped 80-90% over the previous four decades. Sea levels have risen 7.5 inches between 1901 and 2010, yet societies like the Netherlands have successfully adapted to much greater challenges. For perspective, consider the Democratic Republic of Congo, where 98% of eastern Congolese rely on wood and charcoal for cooking, only one in five has electricity access, and the entire country operates on just 1,500 megawatts-enough for a single developed city of one million. Armed militias kill villagers with machetes while authorities seem powerless to intervene. With an annual per capita income of just $561, Congo demonstrates that immediate threats of poverty, lack of medical care, and armed conflict far outweigh long-term climate risks for the world's most vulnerable. When pressed for evidence supporting claims that "billions will die" from climate change, scientists like Johan Rockstrom admit, "I must admit I have not seen a study." In fact, studies by his own Potsdam Institute colleagues found food production could increase even with 4-5C warming. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization projects food production rising 30% by 2050 in most scenarios, with technological improvements outweighing climate impacts.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第3章

Media Narratives vs. Scientific Reality

In August 2019, celebrities like Leonardo DiCaprio and Cristiano Ronaldo shared dramatic images claiming the Amazon rainforest-"Earth's lungs"-was burning and produced "more than 20% of the world's oxygen." News outlets warned the Amazon could "self-destruct" in a "nightmare scenario," while European leaders threatened Brazil with trade consequences. But IPCC lead author Dan Nepstad dismissed the "lungs of the Earth" claim as "bullshit" with "no science behind that," explaining that the Amazon consumes as much oxygen through respiration as it produces. The viral photos celebrities shared weren't even of the 2019 Amazon fires-Ronaldo's was from 2013 in southern Brazil, and Madonna's was thirty years old. While deforestation had increased, it began rising in 2013 (six years before Bolsonaro took office) and was still only one-quarter of 2004 levels. About 80% of the Amazon remains intact. This pattern of exaggeration extends to many environmental issues. Media coverage consistently amplifies the most pessimistic climate scenarios while ignoring more measured scientific assessments. A 1989 Associated Press article predicted entire nations would disappear by 2000 due to climate change-demonstrating the long history of unfulfilled apocalyptic predictions. Roger Pielke's review of "The Uninhabitable Earth" noted how carefully qualified scientific scenarios get filtered through media coverage that converts worst-case scenarios into "our most likely futures." The environmental movement's focus on the Amazon reflects a deeper hypocrisy. European nations that grew wealthy through deforestation centuries ago now pressure tropical nations against similar development paths, while many European countries still produce more carbon emissions per capita than Brazil. Globally, forests are actually returning, with a 25% decrease in annual burned area from 1998-2015, and new tree growth exceeding tree loss for 35 years by an area the size of Texas and Alaska combined.

第4章

The Plastic Straw Distraction

Marine biologist Christine Figgener's dramatic 2015 video showing the painful extraction of a plastic straw from a sea turtle's nostril garnered over sixty million views and sparked action-Seattle, Starbucks, and other entities banned plastic straws. While Figgener was pleased with the awareness raised, she noted that straws represent just 0.03 percent of the nine million tons of plastic waste entering oceans annually. The plastic crisis is real-half of all sea turtles have consumed plastic waste, whales have been found with 48-88 pounds of plastic in their bodies, and plastic ingestion is found in 90% of seabird species. Global plastic production has jumped from 2 million tons in 1950 to nearly 400 million by 2015. Just four developing nations (China, Indonesia, Philippines, and Vietnam) produce half of all mismanaged plastic waste at risk of entering oceans. Yet the focus on plastic straws and consumer items misses the larger picture. For sea turtles, commercial fishing and habitat loss rival plastic as mortality causes, with research showing fishing nets kill approximately half a million olive ridley turtles in just one economic zone over a decade-likely millions annually worldwide. The IUCN notes habitat loss to coastal development and aquaculture ponds threatens olive ridleys, while overfishing is identified by the IPCC as one of the most important non-climatic threats to fisheries sustainability. Ironically, plastic itself was originally an environmental solution. For millennia, humans harvested hawksbill sea turtle shells to create luxury items, heating turtles (sometimes alive) to extract their "tortoiseshell." Scientists estimate nine million hawksbills were killed since 1844-about 60,000 annually-dramatically altering coral reef ecosystems worldwide. Similarly, elephant ivory was prized for piano keys, billiard balls, and art, with Americans consuming enough ivory by the 1870s to kill 15,000 elephants annually. Plastic ultimately saved both species, with even turtle researcher Figgener acknowledging, "Plastic is a miracle product... I'm not that hardline on it."

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第5章

Extinction Exaggerations and Conservation Realities

The American Museum of Natural History warns visitors that we're experiencing the "Sixth Extinction," caused solely by humanity. According to the 2019 IPBES report, one million animal and plant species risk extinction due to human activity, with extinction rates tens to hundreds of times higher than the average over the past 10 million years. Earth could potentially lose 40% of amphibians, 30% of marine mammals, 25% of mammals, and 20% of reptiles. These alarming claims, however, don't align with more careful assessments. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) reports more modest figures: 6% of species are critically endangered, 9% endangered, and 12% vulnerable. Only 0.8% of 112,432 studied species have gone extinct since 1500-fewer than two species yearly. Biodiversity has actually increased over the past 100 million years, with the number of genera nearly tripling. Protected areas have expanded dramatically, now covering 15% of Earth's land surface across nearly 245,000 designated areas. The real problem isn't extinction but population decline, with wild animal populations decreasing by roughly half between 1970 and 2010. The causes are complex but often tied to energy poverty. In Virunga National Park, Congo, the charcoal trade worth $35 million annually drives deforestation and threatens mountain gorilla habitat. By the early 2000s, 25% of old-growth forest in southern Virunga had been lost to charcoal production, with 90% of wood harvested from the Congo Basin used for fuel. Conservation efforts that ignore these economic realities often fail. The colonial conservation model of displacing indigenous peoples from their lands has created millions of "conservation refugees" and deep resentment among local communities who view conservation as a form of neocolonialism. By the 1990s, conservationists recognized that "fighting the locals is a losing battle," yet practical solutions remain elusive. Gorilla tourism-now costing $1,500 per hour in Rwanda-benefits countries broadly but rarely helps local communities. For Congolese to stop using forest-destroying wood and charcoal, they need access to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and cheap electricity. Research from India proves that subsidizing rural villagers with LPG reduces deforestation and allows forest recovery. Some conservationists believe oil drilling in Virunga is inevitable and potentially beneficial, with responsible companies minimizing environmental impact while generating income for conservation.

第6章

Industrial Development: Environmental Savior, Not Villain

During London Fashion Week 2019, hundreds of Extinction Rebellion activists staged dramatic protests against the fashion industry's environmental impact. Some lay in streets covered in fake blood while others conducted mock funerals complete with coffins and marching bands. Targeting both luxury shows like Victoria Beckham's and fast-fashion retailers like H&M, protesters highlighted the industry's estimated 10% contribution to global carbon emissions. But factories in developing countries aren't destroying forests-they're actually helping save them. When young people like Suparti, a 25-year-old Indonesian factory worker, leave farming for urban factory work, the remaining farmers must produce more food. This pattern of manufacturing growth and agricultural productivity has driven economic development for 250 years. Factory workers spend their earnings on consumer goods, creating a wealthier, more diversified workforce. Cities concentrate human populations on just over half a percent of Earth's ice-free surface, leaving more countryside for wildlife. As farms become more productive, reforestation is catching up to slowing deforestation globally. Humanity's wood use has peaked, and agricultural land use is near its peak. Since 1961, while agricultural land expanded only 8 percent, food production grew 300 percent. A person's wealth directly correlates with energy consumption: the average Congolese uses energy equivalent to 1.1 kilograms of oil per day, Indonesians 2.5 kg/day, and Americans 19 kg/day. However, these figures obscure crucial differences in energy quality-Congolese rely primarily on burning wood and biomass, while only 24% of Indonesian energy comes from these sources, and almost none of American energy does. When women like Suparti move to cities, they transition from cooking with wood or rice husks to using liquefied petroleum gas, which produces one-third fewer carbon emissions and saves precious time. Humans have been moving away from wood to fossil fuels for centuries-globally, wood provided nearly all primary energy in 1850 but only 7% today. This transition allows forests to regenerate and wildlife to return. The real threat to forests isn't energy-intensive factories in poor nations, but rather their absence. Africa has made agricultural progress over the last half century, but manufacturing was actually a higher percentage of the economy in the mid-1970s than today. Economist Dani Rodrik notes that "most countries of Africa are too poor to be experiencing de-industrialisation, but that is precisely what seems to be taking place."

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

第7章

Energy Transitions and Environmental Progress

The heroic narrative of environmental activists saving whales from greedy corporations makes for compelling drama but misrepresents history. Humans have hunted whales for centuries, but the whales' first salvation came not from activism but capitalism-when Samuel Kier developed petroleum refining in Pittsburgh, followed by Edwin Drake's 1859 oil strike in Pennsylvania. Within three years, petroleum production matched whaling's peak output. An 1861 Vanity Fair cartoon showed whales celebrating with champagne, toasting "the discovery of the oil wells in Pennsylvania" that had saved them. Capitalism saved whales not once but twice. By 1900, American whaling had declined to just 10% of its peak, but whaling surged again between 1904-1978, with whalers killing one million whales-triple the nineteenth century's harvest. The second salvation came when industrial chemists developed margarine from palm oil, largely from Congo, making it cheaper than whale oil by 1940. Between 1938-1951, vegetable oil use quadrupled while whale oil declined by two-thirds. Italian physicist Cesare Marchetti discovered that energy transitions follow predictable patterns regardless of wars, price changes, or depressions, as if "the system had a schedule, a will, and a clock." Contrary to scarcity-driven theories, markets regularly abandoned energy sources long before exhaustion. Marchetti observed humanity's progression toward increasingly energy-dense and hydrogen-rich fuels: wood to coal (twice as dense), coal to petroleum, and petroleum to natural gas (methane with four hydrogen atoms to one carbon). Despite climate activists like Bill McKibben claiming natural gas is worse for climate than coal, the evidence shows otherwise. Natural gas emits 17-40 times less sulfur dioxide, minimal nitrous oxide, almost no mercury, is one-eighth as deadly counting accidents and pollution, and requires 25-50 times less water than coal. The fracking revolution reduced U.S. carbon emissions by 13% between 2005-2018 and is helping limit global temperature rise.

第8章

Nuclear Energy: The Misunderstood Climate Solution

The 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident, triggered by a tsunami that disabled electrical power and cooling systems, accelerated nuclear energy's pre-existing decline. The disaster prompted Germany, Taiwan, and South Korea to phase out nuclear energy entirely while turning public opinion further against it. Nuclear's share of global electricity has dropped from 18% in 1996 to 10% in 2018, and could soon reach 5%. Yet despite public fears, the actual health impacts of nuclear accidents are remarkably limited. At Fukushima and Three Mile Island, no radiation deaths occurred. Nuclear power has proven remarkably safe compared to other energy sources-hydroelectric dam failures have killed hundreds of thousands, while air pollution kills millions annually. Nuclear has actually saved over two million lives by preventing deadly air pollution. France and Germany provide a clear comparison of nuclear versus renewable energy approaches. France spends about half as much for electricity that produces just one-tenth the carbon emissions of German electricity. Had Germany invested its $580 billion in nuclear instead of renewables, it could be generating 100% zero-emission electricity with enough capacity for all its vehicles. Most conservationists in the 1960s favored nuclear as a clean alternative to coal and hydroelectric dams, including famed photographer and Sierra Club board member Ansel Adams, who was "absolutely adamant" in his support. Sierra Club president Will Siri, a biophysicist and Manhattan Project veteran, argued that "nuclear power is one of the chief long-term hopes for conservation" and that "cheap energy in unlimited quantities" was essential for preserving wildlands while supporting growing populations. The anti-nuclear movement ultimately killed half of all planned U.S. nuclear reactors, even when coal plants would replace them. Some activists later admitted using fear tactics strategically, with one confessing "playing dirty, if you have a noble end, is fine."

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第9章

Renewable Energy's Hidden Environmental Costs

In spring 2015, Elon Musk unveiled Tesla's Powerwall battery with characteristic showmanship, promising a fundamental transformation of global energy. He boldly declared that just 160 million Powerpacks could power the United States, and 900 million could energize the entire world. "The path I've talked about, solar panels and the batteries, is the only path that I know of that can do this," Musk concluded to enthusiastic applause. Despite initial enthusiasm for solar and batteries, practical limitations have prevented widespread adoption. A Tesla Powerwall costs over $10,000 to install, with solar panels adding $10,000-$30,000 more-requiring 17+ years to recoup investment for average households. In developing nations, solar-battery systems prove inadequate for reliable power, as demonstrated by the author's experience at an African eco-lodge that required diesel backup after just one cloudy day. While renewables are projected to grow significantly, these statistics are misleading-64% of renewable energy comes from hydroelectric dams, which face environmental opposition and limited expansion potential. Solar and wind together provide just 3% of global primary energy. Battery storage limitations are severe: Australia's famous Tesla battery project powers just 7,500 homes for four hours in a country with 9 million households. Backing up the entire U.S. grid for just four hours would cost nearly $900 billion. Lisa Linowes, a lifelong environmentalist, became an unexpected opponent of wind energy after discovering its devastating impacts on wildlife. Wind turbines have emerged as one of the greatest threats to bats after habitat loss and white-nose syndrome, with the industry resisting mitigation efforts despite pushing many bat species toward extinction. Unlike the wind industry's misleading claims comparing turbine deaths to house cats, wind turbines specifically kill large, threatened, slow-reproducing birds like eagles, hawks, and condors that never evolved to deal with such threats. Solar farms require enormous land areas due to sunlight's dilute nature-California's Ivanpah solar farm needs 450 times more land than the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant. Solar panels require sixteen times more materials than nuclear plants and create 300 times more waste. These panels often contain toxic chemicals that can't be safely landfilled, yet recycling remains economically unfeasible.

第10章

Environmental Activism's Conflicts of Interest

In January 2020, climate activists protested Pete Buttigieg for taking money from "fossil fuel billionaires." The protest spokesperson, Griffin Sinclair-Wingate, was actually a paid staff member of 350.org-a group funded by fossil fuel billionaire Tom Steyer, who was also running for president. Steyer's wealth largely derived from fossil fuel investments. His firm was "like an anchor in the Indonesian coal industry," yet 350.org founder Bill McKibben and Sierra Club head Mike Brune praised him as a "climate champ" when he announced his presidential run. Despite promising to divest from fossil fuels by July 2014, Steyer misrepresented his investments for five more years. In 2019, he claimed he'd "divested from all that stuff," but Bloomberg News discovered he still held millions in coal mining, oil pipelines, and fracking investments. The hypocrisy extends beyond Steyer. Every major climate activist group in America has sought to close nuclear plants while taking money from or investing in natural gas and renewable energy companies that profit from nuclear closures. Closing a nuclear plant like Indian Point redirects potential $32 billion in revenue over forty years to natural gas and renewables companies. Sierra Club, NRDC, and EDF have worked since the 1970s to shut down nuclear plants, producing reports claiming neither nuclear nor fossil fuels are needed thanks to efficiency and renewables. Yet almost everywhere nuclear plants close, fossil fuels replace them. In 2012, Sierra Club's executive director Michael Brune publicly confessed that his organization had secretly accepted over $25 million from fracking pioneer Aubrey McClendon. Brune portrayed this revelation as a principled stand against fossil fuel funding, claiming he'd discovered and rejected the money. In reality, the confession came only after a journalist was about to break the story. More importantly, under Brune's leadership, Sierra Club went on to accept $110 million from Michael Bloomberg, a major natural gas investor.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

第11章

Environmentalism as Religion

In 2019, Bill McKibben published "Falter," claiming climate change is "the greatest challenge humans have ever faced"-a bold assertion from America's leading environmental writer whose organization commands a $20 million annual budget. For this claim to be true, climate change must reverse the 90 percent decline in extreme weather deaths over the last century and prove more challenging than the Black Death, world wars, nuclear proliferation, and extreme poverty. Environmentalism has become the dominant secular religion of the educated elite, providing collective purpose, heroes and villains, all legitimized through scientific language. Though appearing to reject Judeo-Christian traditions, apocalyptic environmentalism merely replaces God with nature, priests with scientists. Most environmentalists unconsciously repeat Judeo-Christian myths in secular language, attracted to environmentalism because it provides purpose and meaning while maintaining the illusion they follow science, not superstition. Apocalyptic environmentalism emerged from the post-WWII crisis of faith when leading scholars rejected teaching morality as unscientific. Environmental apocalypticism intensified during moments of global crisis-Earth Day amid Vietnam War turmoil, nuclear protests during Cold War tensions, and climate change after the Soviet Union's collapse. According to Ernest Becker's "The Denial of Death," humans create "immortality projects" to manage our fear of mortality. Climate activism offers this psychological benefit-providing courage, meaning, and transformation. Research shows children engaged in climate activism have better mental health than those aware but inactive, and Thunberg's activism helped her escape depression. After two weeks of Extinction Rebellion's death-focused protests, a British columnist labeled them an "upper-middle-class death cult." Their tactics culminated in protesters blocking London Tube trains, provoking violent reactions from angry commuters. Young climate activists, believing emissions result from malevolence rather than necessary poverty reduction, develop understandable but isolating anger. Lauren Jeffrey observed peers saying disturbing things like "there is no future" and "we should give up." Even Thunberg's mother acknowledged that apocalyptic environmental content contributed to her daughter's depression and eating disorder. We must embrace environmental humanism, affirming humanity's specialness against Malthusian condemnation. Following Bacon's wisdom that science needs the "corrective spice" of charity or love, we should question whether apocalyptic claims are motivated by love for humanity. Environmental humanism will triumph over apocalyptic environmentalism because most people want both prosperity and nature, not nature without prosperity.

★★★★★

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』を最後まで読み終えました

100万人以上の学習者に愛用されています

“23日間、毎日使い続けています。今では日課の一部です。”

jayallen

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』の主要テーマ

environmental alarmism
evidence-based environmentalism
climate change adaptation
energy poverty
scientific misinformation

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』の名言

Greta Thunberg urges people to "panic" about climate change rather than maintain hope.
"Climate change does not threaten human extinction."
The "lungs of the Earth" claim as "bullshit" with "no science behind that"
Plastic itself was originally an environmental solution.

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』の登場人物

Michael ShellenbergerAuthor and environmental activist
Greta ThunbergClimate activist who urges public panic
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezPublic figure warning of imminent catastrophe
Dan NepstadIPCC lead author and Amazon rainforest expert
Leonardo DiCaprioCelebrity advocate for apocalyptic narratives

著者について

マイケル・シェレンバーガー（Michael Shellenberger）は、ベストセラーとなった『Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All』の著者であり、タイム誌の「環境のヒーロー（Hero of the Environment）」に選出された、気候政策における第一人者です。彼の著書は環境科学と調査報道を融合させたものであり、原子力エネルギーや技術革新といった現実的な解決策を提唱することで、主流の気候変動ナラティブに挑戦しています。

30年以上の活動歴を持つシェレンバーガーは、「エンバイロメンタル・プログレス（Environmental Progress）」を設立し、世界各地の原子力発電所の閉鎖を阻止してきました。これにより、道路に2,400万台の自動車を追加するのと同等の炭素排出を防ぐなど、世界のエネルギー政策に影響を与えてきました。

アーラム大学の平和・グローバルスタディーズ・プログラムを卒業したシェレンバーガーの活動は多岐にわたり、『San Fransicko: Why Progressives Ruin Cities』では都市政策を、また『Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility』ではシステムの変化を論じています。気候回復力とエネルギーに関する彼のTEDトークは何百万回も再生されており、議会での証言やジェームズ・ハンセンといった科学者との協力関係は、彼の権威を裏付けています。『Apocalypse Never』はグリーン・ブック・アワードを受賞し、多言語に翻訳され、環境過激主義に対する刺激的な批判書としての地位を確立しています。

地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極めるの要約をダウンロード

地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極めるの要約をPDFまたはEPUBで無料でダウンロード。印刷やオフラインでいつでもお読みいただけます。

他のユーザーのお気に入り

The Uninhabitable Earth

David Wallace-Wells

Bill McKibben

Ozzie Zehner

Steven E. Koonin

Bjørn Lomborg

Nathaniel Rich

Greta Thunberg

Elizabeth Kolbert

この本に関するよくある質問

学習プラン

The Environmental Crisis: Law and Science

This plan addresses the urgent need to integrate scientific reality with legal strategy to combat the triple planetary crisis. It is ideal for legal professionals, environmental advocates, and students seeking a deep, multi-disciplinary understanding of how law can drive ecological restoration.

2 h 30 m•5 セクション

学習プラン

Think like Nassim taleb

In an increasingly volatile world, traditional linear thinking often leads to catastrophic failure. This plan is essential for decision-makers, investors, and strategists who want to move beyond mere resilience and learn to profit from uncertainty.

5 h 30 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Romero Apocalypse Survival Guide

This guide is essential for survivalists and horror enthusiasts who want to apply classical cinematic logic to real-world tactical preparedness. It provides a structured approach to home fortification and environmental awareness for those living in semi-rural settings.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Nature's Lethal Ambition

This plan offers a unique look at how humanity has harnessed nature's toxins for power, war, and status. It is ideal for history buffs, science enthusiasts, and true crime fans interested in the dark evolution of toxicology.

1 h 12 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

The Antediluvian Blueprint

This plan bridges the gap between historical philosophy, genetics, and catastrophe theory to uncover the hidden foundations of human history. It is designed for researchers and history enthusiasts eager to explore the intersection of myth, science, and the antediluvian past.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Unshakable: Stoic Drills for Modern Chaos

In an era of constant digital noise and social volatility, emotional resilience is a survival skill. This plan is designed for high-stress professionals and individuals seeking to regain control over their reactions and mental clarity through practical, ancient wisdom.

2 h 30 m•5 セクション

学習プラン

The 2025 Science Reset

This learning plan is essential for staying informed about the rapid paradigm shifts occurring across biology, physics, and anthropology. It is designed for science enthusiasts and professionals who need to understand how new data is dismantling old certainties.

1 h 36 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Management Shadow: Taleb/Kahneman/Greene

In an era of radical uncertainty, traditional management frameworks often fail because they ignore human irrationality and the impact of rare events. This plan is designed for leaders and strategists who want to master the hidden psychological and systemic forces that govern success and power.

4 h 43 m•4 セクション

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

今すぐ学習の旅を始めよう

第11章

地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める

概要『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』の概要

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

Environmental Alarmism's Fatal Flaws: Why Science Doesn't Support Apocalyptic Narratives

The Climate Crisis That Isn't

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Media Narratives vs. Scientific Reality

The Plastic Straw Distraction

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』をもっと深く楽しむ

Extinction Exaggerations and Conservation Realities

Industrial Development: Environmental Savior, Not Villain

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Energy Transitions and Environmental Progress

Nuclear Energy: The Misunderstood Climate Solution

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』をもっと深く楽しむ

Renewable Energy's Hidden Environmental Costs

Environmental Activism's Conflicts of Interest

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Environmentalism as Religion

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』を最後まで読み終えました

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』の主要テーマ

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』の名言

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』の登場人物

著者について

地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極めるの要約をダウンロード

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この本に関するよくある質問

What is Apocalypse Never about?

Who should read Apocalypse Never?

Is Apocalypse Never worth reading?

What are the main arguments in Apocalypse Never?

もっと見る

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

Environmental Alarmism's Fatal Flaws: Why Science Doesn't Support Apocalyptic Narratives

The Climate Crisis That Isn't

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Media Narratives vs. Scientific Reality

The Plastic Straw Distraction

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』をもっと深く楽しむ

Extinction Exaggerations and Conservation Realities

Industrial Development: Environmental Savior, Not Villain

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Energy Transitions and Environmental Progress

Nuclear Energy: The Misunderstood Climate Solution

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』をもっと深く楽しむ

Renewable Energy's Hidden Environmental Costs

Environmental Activism's Conflicts of Interest

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Environmentalism as Religion

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』を最後まで読み終えました

他のユーザーのお気に入り

もっと見る

『地球温暖化の不都合な真実――環境パニックの真実を見極める』の概要