What is *Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few* about?

*Saving Capitalism* critiques the myth of a "free market," arguing that government-created rules shape capitalism’s outcomes, often favoring the wealthy. Robert Reich analyzes systemic inequality, corporate power, and the erosion of middle-class prosperity, advocating for policy reforms to redistribute economic power. The book focuses on five pillars of capitalism—property, monopoly, contracts, bankruptcy, and enforcement—to demonstrate how laws can be redesigned to benefit the majority.

Who should read *Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few*?

This book is ideal for readers interested in economic policy, social justice, or political reform. Policymakers, activists, and students of economics will find Reich’s analysis of corporate influence and regulatory frameworks particularly valuable. It’s also accessible to general audiences seeking to understand wage stagnation, wealth concentration, and the role of government in market systems.

Is *Saving Capitalism* worth reading?

Yes—the book is praised for its clear explanation of complex economic concepts and its compelling case for rebalancing power. While some critics desire more detailed policy solutions, Reich’s historical context and data-driven arguments make it a vital read for those concerned about inequality and democracy. Its blend of academic rigor and readability has earned widespread acclaim.

What are the five building blocks of capitalism according to Reich?

Reich identifies **property rights, monopoly laws, contractual agreements, bankruptcy rules, and enforcement mechanisms** as capitalism’s foundational pillars. He argues these aren’t neutral but are shaped by political power, often advantaging corporations and the wealthy. For example, bankruptcy laws favoring corporations over individuals exemplify systemic bias.

How does *Saving Capitalism* address income inequality?

The book traces rising inequality to policy choices, such as weakened antitrust enforcement and tax cuts for the wealthy. Reich highlights stagnating wages, skyrocketing CEO pay (up 930% since 1978), and corporate lobbying as drivers of disparity. He proposes strengthening labor unions, campaign finance reform, and progressive taxation to counterbalance concentrated wealth.

What role does government play in Reich’s analysis?

Reich rejects the "free market vs. government" dichotomy, stressing that all markets rely on government-made rules. He argues the real debate is about *whose interests* those rules serve—whether they protect monopolies, enable wage suppression, or safeguard consumers. Examples include patent laws favoring Big Pharma and deregulation enabling financial crises.

How does *Saving Capitalism* criticize corporate power?

Reich demonstrates how corporations influence legislation to entrench dominance, such as lobbying for tax loopholes or opposing antitrust measures. He critiques CEO pay structures tied to stock prices, which incentivize short-term gains over worker welfare. This "upward pre-distribution" redirects wealth from employees to executives and shareholders.

What solutions does Reich propose to "save" capitalism?

Key reforms include: - Reviving antitrust enforcement to break up monopolies - Raising minimum wages and strengthening collective bargaining - Closing tax loopholes for corporations and the ultra-wealthy - Publicly financing elections to reduce corporate lobbying influence Reich argues these changes would create a more inclusive economy.

Salvare il capitalismo

Per i molti, non per i pochi

Robert B. Reich

4.18(5309 Reviews)

Panoramica di Salvare il capitalismo

La critica esplosiva di Reich rivela come il capitalismo sia stato dirottato dall'élite, scatenando il dibattito tra le varie fazioni politiche. Persino i repubblicani conservatori hanno trovato punti d'incontro con il suo appello a porre fine al welfare aziendale e a ripristinare l'equilibrio economico. La sopravvivenza della democrazia dipende dalla correzione di questo sistema truccato.

Scegli come raccontarlo

Un libro. Tanti modi per ascoltarlo.

Le stesse idee di Salvare il capitalismo. Scegli la voce, la profondità e il ritmo adatti a te. Cambia in qualsiasi momento.

Capitolo 1

The Market's Invisible Hand: Who Really Controls Capitalism?

Remember when a single income could support a family? In the 1950s, America built history's largest middle class, with workers' earnings doubling alongside economic growth. Fast forward to today, and the economy has doubled again, but typical earnings have stagnated while CEO pay skyrocketed from 20 to over 200 times worker compensation. What changed? Robert Reich's "Saving Capitalism" offers a compelling answer that transcends traditional political divides. This New York Times bestseller has influenced policymakers across the spectrum, from Elizabeth Warren to Marco Rubio, and even inspired a Netflix documentary. Reich, a former Secretary of Labor under Clinton, brings both insider knowledge and outsider critique to this examination of how capitalism's rules have been rewritten to favor those already at the top. His analysis resonates particularly in our current moment of record inequality, as Americans across political lines increasingly question whether the economic system still works for ordinary people.

Capitolo 2

The Free Market Myth: How Rules Shape Markets

The prevailing view of markets versus government has poisoned public discourse and created a false dichotomy that dominates political debate. We endlessly debate whether "free markets" work better than government intervention, with conservatives championing laissez-faire capitalism and smaller government while liberals advocate for more active government oversight and intervention. But this entire framework fundamentally misunderstands how markets actually function. There can be no "free market" without government - markets aren't natural phenomena where the strongest simply prevail through some form of economic natural selection. Rather, they're complex systems defined by intricate rules, regulations, and structures that governments create and enforce. As Thomas Hobbes recognized centuries ago in Leviathan, without such structure, life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." From property rights to contract law, from currency to courts, government doesn't intrude on markets-it creates the very foundation that makes them possible. These market rules aren't neutral, universal, or permanent fixtures. They reflect society's evolving values and, crucially, who has power to influence them at any given time. Consider how labor laws evolved from allowing child labor to prohibiting it, or how intellectual property rights expanded to cover software and genetic sequences. The interminable debate over "free market" versus "government" prevents meaningful examination of who exercises power over these rules and how they might be altered to benefit more people rather than concentrating wealth at the top. The rules ARE the economy - they determine winners and losers, shape incentives, and distribute power. Those arguing for "less government" actually want different government rules-often ones favoring themselves or their patrons. The "deregulation" of finance in the 1980s-90s wasn't removing government from markets; it was reregulation with different rules benefiting Wall Street through mechanisms like the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the rise of complex derivatives trading. The myth of the "free market" distracts the public from examining how these rules are generated and changed, who has power over this process, and who ultimately benefits. To have a functioning market, society must make fundamental decisions about five essential building blocks: • Property: What can be owned, by whom, and with what restrictions • Monopoly: What degree of market concentration and power is permissible • Contract: What can be bought and sold, and under what terms • Bankruptcy: What happens when purchasers can't pay their debts • Enforcement: How to ensure compliance with these rules and what violations to prioritize These decisions aren't obvious or unchanging - they reflect ongoing societal debates and power struggles. Property rights continue to evolve - while we've decided humans can't be owned, fierce debates rage over ownership of the human genome, artificial intelligence, or water rights. Monopoly power must be carefully defined - how large can companies become before they harm competition? Should tech giants be broken up? Contracts have necessary limits - most societies prohibit selling sex, organs, babies, and votes, but debate continues over surrogacy and carbon credits. Bankruptcy rules invariably favor some parties over others - corporations can shed pension obligations through Chapter 11 while students remain shackled to education debt. Enforcement priorities determine which rules matter in practice - tax evasion by wealthy individuals often receives less attention than benefit fraud by the poor. In a truly functioning democracy, these market rules would reflect citizens' collective values and improve the wellbeing of the majority. But when democratic processes fail, the rules instead enhance wealth for the few while keeping others poor and insecure. This isn't corruption through direct bribes, but through sophisticated mechanisms like campaign contributions, lobbying, and revolving doors between industry and government that create market rules appearing neutral but systematically benefiting the powerful at the expense of the many.

Vedi ogni parola mentre la ascolti

Segui la lettura senza sforzo mentre ogni parola di Salvare il capitalismo si illumina in tempo reale.

Capitolo 3

Freedom, Power, and the Rules of Ownership

As wealth concentrates at the top, political power follows, creating a self-reinforcing cycle that shapes market dynamics and societal structures. Those with the most resources can influence legislation, fund political campaigns, and shape public discourse while championing "free enterprise" and equating markets with liberty. This process systematically erodes the economic and political freedoms of most people, despite rhetoric suggesting otherwise. The notion of freedom of contract becomes particularly hollow in modern labor markets. Workers increasingly face take-it-or-leave-it agreements that surrender basic rights. Amazon warehouse workers report being monitored by AI systems that track "time off task," while delivery drivers face algorithmic supervision of their routes and speeds. Some companies implement strict bathroom monitoring systems limiting breaks to six minutes daily, with sophisticated tracking systems flagging "excessive" bathroom use. Tech companies require employees to sign broad non-compete agreements, limiting their ability to seek better opportunities. "Free enterprises" pursuing shareholder value frequently externalize costs onto society. Examples abound: chemical companies dumping waste into waterways, automakers concealing safety defects, banks creating fraudulent accounts, and energy companies suppressing climate research. When potential profits exceed likely penalties, corporations often choose to violate regulations, treating fines as merely a cost of doing business. Private property's role as capitalism's foundation deserves closer examination. Property rights aren't natural laws but human constructs shaped by political processes. Consider land ownership: zoning laws, environmental regulations, mineral rights, and air rights all reflect political choices rather than immutable principles. These rules emerge from complex negotiations between competing interests, with outcomes typically favoring those with greater political influence. The pharmaceutical industry provides a stark illustration of politically determined property rights. Americans pay dramatically more for medications than other nations - often 2-3 times more for identical drugs. This results from specific policy choices: Medicare is legally prohibited from negotiating drug prices, patent terms have been repeatedly extended, and importation restrictions limit competition. Companies like Gilead Sciences have charged $84,000 for hepatitis C treatments that cost under $1,000 to produce, protected by patent laws. Drug companies employ sophisticated strategies to maintain monopoly pricing: They conduct "product hopping" by slightly reformulating drugs just before patent expiration, spend billions marketing directly to consumers through TV ads (legal only in the US and New Zealand), maintain powerful lobbying operations in Washington, and pay competitors to delay generic competition. The industry spent $233 million on lobbying in 2022 alone. Copyright law evolution similarly demonstrates how property rights adapt to serve powerful interests. What began as fourteen-year protections now extend to ninety-five years for corporate owners. Disney's successful lobbying for the 1998 Copyright Term Extension Act (nicknamed the "Mickey Mouse Protection Act") prevented early Mickey Mouse cartoons from entering the public domain, while also restricting access to countless other cultural works. The core issue isn't a binary choice between "free markets" and government intervention. Rather, it's about understanding how property rights are defined and enforced through political processes, who influences these decisions, and how resulting rules distribute economic power and social benefits.

Capitolo 4

The New Monopolies: How Giants Control Markets

Modern corporations have gained market dominance through various means: extending intellectual property domains, controlling natural monopolies with critical economies of scale, merging with competitors, establishing industry-standard networks and platforms, and using licensing agreements to solidify control. This economic power simultaneously increases their influence over government decisions about whether such practices should be allowed. These developments have created formidable barriers to new market entrants. Between 1978 and 2011, the rate of new business formation in America was halved, with the downward trend continuing regardless of economic cycles or which political party controlled government. By 2014, America had some of the highest broadband prices and slowest speeds among advanced nations, with average connection speeds 40% slower than Hong Kong or South Korea. This poor service results from local cable monopolies controlling access. While cities like Stockholm created competitive markets through city-owned fiber lines leased to private operators (providing universal coverage at $28/month), American cable companies have blocked similar efforts by paying franchise fees to cities and lobbying for laws prohibiting municipal fiber networks in twenty states. With 80% of Americans having no choice but their local cable provider, companies like Comcast face little incentive to improve service or lower prices. Comcast maintains its dominance through extensive lobbying ($7 million annually) and a revolving door with government-of its 126 lobbyists in 2014, 104 previously worked in government. Monsanto exemplifies another monopolistic strategy, owning key genetic traits in over 90% of U.S. soybeans and 80% of corn. Their carefully crafted approach involves patented genetically modified seeds that don't produce viable offspring, forcing farmers to repurchase annually. In under fifteen years, most American commodity farmers became dependent on Monsanto, facing price increases far beyond inflation-soybean planting costs rose 325% between 1994-2011, corn seed 259%. The new monopolists control networks rather than production, with unprecedented economic and political power. By 2014, Google and Facebook had become Americans' primary news sources, while Amazon was the first shopping destination for nearly a third of all American consumers. Despite an explosion of websites, internet traffic has concentrated dramatically-the top ten websites accounted for 75% of all American page views by 2010, up from just 31% in 2001. Modern antitrust enforcement has lost sight of one of its original purposes: preventing large concentrations of economic power from gaining excessive political influence. This connection between economic and political power was central to the first antitrust laws in the late nineteenth century, when "political economy" recognized that inordinate economic power undermined democracy.

Ottieni di più da Salvare il capitalismo

Ricevi spunti ogni giorno da oltre 100.000 lezioni
Le parole si illuminano in sincronia con l'audio
La tua libreria salvata su ogni dispositivo

Capitolo 5

Contracts, Bankruptcy, and Enforcement: The Rigged Rules

Contracts are the third building block of capitalism-agreements between buyers and sellers that enable trade. But contracts don't just happen; they require rules about what can be bought and sold, what constitutes fraud or coercion, and how breaches are handled. These rules emerge from legislatures, agencies, and courts, making the "free market versus government" debate misleading. New technologies have created complex moral questions about what should be tradeable. Social norms play a role in determining these boundaries, but they vary widely across societies. The United States bans organ sales but allows blood selling and surrogacy in most states, while European countries have different regulations. The law has long held that contracts made under coercion won't be enforced-a moral principle that parties shouldn't be forced into agreements against their will. But how is "coercion" defined? When large corporations lock up markets through intellectual property, control over standards, or armies of lawyers, contracts become inherently coercive. Today's contracts often contain small-print conditions denying employees, borrowers, and customers any meaningful choice. Mandatory arbitration clauses have become common, requiring grievances to be settled by company-selected arbitrators rather than courts. Employees with discrimination complaints succeed only 21 percent of the time in arbitration versus 50-60 percent in court. Internet sites similarly force users to waive rights to sue through terms of service most never read. Bankruptcy is the fourth basic building block of the market, balancing competing goals. It allows debtors to reduce obligations to manageable levels while spreading losses equitably among creditors under judicial oversight. The central idea is shared sacrifice, but powerful interests often shape the rules determining who can use bankruptcy, how losses are allocated, and what happens when it's unavailable. Major U.S. airlines have repeatedly used bankruptcy to renege on labor union contracts, as the bankruptcy code gives low priority to worker pay. American Airlines CEO Don Carty threatened bankruptcy to extract $2 billion in concessions from unions while secretly establishing an executive retirement plan protected from bankruptcy. When American actually entered bankruptcy in 2011, it rejected remaining labor agreements and froze pensions. Upon emerging in 2013, creditors were fully repaid with interest, shareholders profited, and the CEO received a $19.9 million severance-while employees lost pay and benefits. So much for "shared sacrifice." Meanwhile, small investors and homeowners bore the real burden of the 2008 financial crisis. Chapter 13 of the bankruptcy code (largely drafted by the financial industry) prevents homeowners from declaring bankruptcy on primary residence mortgages. Without bankruptcy as a bargaining chip, more than five million Americans lost their homes, with another two million near foreclosure by 2014. The fifth building block of markets is enforcement-protecting property, constraining market power, enforcing contracts, and allocating bankruptcy losses. While broad consensus exists on the need for enforcement, the details are constantly reconsidered through legislative amendments, court cases, and administrative rules. This process offers endless opportunities for vested interests to exert influence, particularly on what not to enforce, how to prioritize limited resources, and what penalties to impose.

Capitolo 6

The Myth of Meritocracy: Work and Worth

Many workers have internalized the belief that they're paid what they're "worth" based on their abilities and skills, accepting low wages as a reflection of personal deficiency while the wealthy view their fortunes as deserved proof of superior talent and effort. This deeply ingrained mindset ignores how bargaining power, market structures, and institutional arrangements fundamentally shape compensation. In the 1950s, when 30 percent of private-sector workers were unionized, blue-collar laborers earned the equivalent of thirty dollars an hour in today's money-not because they were inherently more skilled or productive than today's workers, but because they had collective bargaining power through strong labor unions and supportive public policies. The tautological view that people are "worth" what they're paid fundamentally ignores how power dynamics and market manipulation shape economic outcomes. Steven A. Cohen's case provides a stark illustration - he earned $2.3 billion in 2013 despite his firm SAC Capital pleading guilty to insider trading and paying a $1.8 billion fine. This wasn't a reflection of value creation but of market manipulation and regulatory failure. If regulations had been properly enforced, his clients wouldn't have "voluntarily" invested with him. Similarly, if unions retained their historical strength, workers across industries would command far higher wages through collective action. The market systematically fails to properly value many socially beneficial professions that create enormous positive externalities. Teaching, nursing, social work, and elder care are among the lowest-paid jobs despite extensive evidence they generate tremendous social benefits - studies show good teachers alone increase their students' lifetime earnings by $250,000 per classroom, creating millions in societal value. Early childhood educators, who shape crucial developmental years, earn near-poverty wages. Conversely, many highly-paid professionals like CEOs, hedge fund managers, high-frequency traders, and corporate lawyers often engage in zero-sum activities that merely redistribute wealth rather than creating new value. Some financial practices, like microsecond trading, extract value while adding no productive capacity to the economy. CEO compensation has exploded from 20 times average worker pay in 1965 to over 300 times today, with total executive pay climbing an astounding 937 percent between 1978 and 2013 while typical worker pay rose just 10.2 percent. The common justification that CEOs deserve this astronomical pay for maximizing shareholder returns falls flat under scrutiny. Research shows most companies simply rode the overall market boom rather than outperforming it through superior leadership. Even when companies underperform, CEO pay often continues to rise. The dramatic rise in CEO pay stems from a system of corporate cronyism where executives play outsized roles in appointing board directors who are paid handsomely ($251,000 average in 2012) for part-time work and naturally want to remain in good graces with CEOs. Compensation consultants establish benchmarks based on other CEOs' pay, creating an upward ratchet effect where each increase justifies further increases across the corporate landscape. This self-reinforcing cycle operates independently of actual performance metrics. Since the mid-1990s, CEOs receive increasingly larger portions of compensation as stock options and awards, incentivizing them to pump up short-term share prices through stock buybacks-a practice that was heavily restricted until Reagan's SEC chairman removed limitations in 1982. Between 2001-2013, S&P 500 companies spent an enormous $3.6 trillion on buybacks, allowing CEOs to strategically time their stock sales to coincide with price increases. This represents a massive transfer of corporate resources from productive investment to enriching executives, often at the expense of long-term company health and worker wages.

Vedi ogni parola mentre la ascolti

Segui la lettura senza sforzo mentre ogni parola di Salvare il capitalismo si illumina in tempo reale.

Capitolo 7

The Declining Middle and Rising Extremes

For three decades after World War II, average worker compensation rose in lockstep with productivity gains, creating a virtuous cycle that expanded the middle class and fueled economic growth. But beginning in the late 1970s, this cycle halted. While productivity continued to grow, wages flattened. By 2013, median household income was $51,939, below 1989 levels when adjusted for inflation. Before the 1980s, large corporations were effectively owned by all stakeholders. Corporate executives like Standard Oil's Frank Abrams saw themselves as "industrial statesmen" balancing the interests of stockholders, employees, customers, and the public. But in the late 1970s, a radically different vision emerged with corporate raiders mounting hostile takeovers using junk bonds. These raiders viewed shareholders as the only legitimate owners, and maximizing shareholder returns as the corporation's only valid purpose. Even when raids didn't occur, CEOs felt pressured to maximize shareholder returns. Coca-Cola's Roberto Goizueta articulated the new philosophy: "We have one job: to generate a fair return for our owners." The easiest way to accomplish this was cutting costs-especially payrolls. Corporate statesmen were replaced by "corporate butchers" focused on "cutting to the bone." Workers' willingness to accept lower pay stems partly from job insecurity created by trade agreements that enable American companies to outsource jobs abroad. The conventional view equating "free trade" with "free market" is misguided-all trade agreements involve complex negotiations about integrating different market systems. In these negotiations, corporate and Wall Street interests typically trump those of average workers. The middle class has also shouldered increasing economic risk. New Deal policies had placed most risks on large corporations through employment contracts, Social Security, worker's compensation, overtime rules, and employer-provided health benefits. By the 1950s, employees effectively had property rights in their jobs. After the 1980s takeover mania, this relationship collapsed. Even long-term employees can now lose jobs overnight without severance, placement help, or health insurance. Nearly one-fifth of working Americans hold part-time jobs, while growing numbers work as temporaries, freelancers, or contractors with unpredictable incomes. By 2014, 66 percent of American workers lived paycheck to paycheck. Fifty years ago, General Motors workers earned $35 per hour in today's dollars. By 2014, America's largest employer was Walmart, paying average hourly wages of $11.22. This difference reflects union strength-GM workers had collective bargaining power that raised wages across industries. With over a third of American workers unionized then, even non-union firms had to match union contracts to avoid unionization.

Capitolo 8

Saving Capitalism: Restoring Countervailing Power

The essential challenge facing America is political rather than economic. Economic reform is impossible when the rules are controlled by an economic elite without first altering the political power structure behind that control. Research by Princeton's Martin Gilens and Northwestern's Benjamin Page analyzed 1,799 policy issues and concluded that "the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy." Instead, lawmakers respond primarily to wealthy individuals and business interests with lobbying power and campaign funding capabilities. After World War II, American democracy remained stable through "interest-group pluralism"-a system where citizens belonged to various organizations that collectively influenced politicians. Starting in the 1980s, however, this system fundamentally changed. Not only did corporations and wealthy individuals gain greater political power, but the centers of countervailing economic power began to wither. Grassroots membership organizations declined as Americans had less time for civic engagement due to stagnant wages requiring more work hours. Union membership dropped as corporations sent jobs abroad, moved to right-to-work states, and fought unionization efforts. The decline of unions reduced both the bargaining power of average workers and their political influence to shape labor laws, trade agreements, and corporate governance. By 2012, the Koch brothers' political network alone spent more than $400 million-twice the political spending of the ten largest labor unions combined. To restore countervailing power, Americans must first reject two prevailing myths: that the "free market" exists separately from government, and that people earn what they're worth to society. Only then can we see the real choice isn't between more or less government, but between a government responsive to wealthy minorities or to the needs of an increasingly poorer majority. The new countervailing power would first reform campaign finance to get big money out of politics. This would require reversing the Supreme Court's Citizens United and McCutcheon decisions, ensuring full disclosure of political expenditures, implementing public financing through small-donor matching, banning gerrymandered districts that suppress minority votes, and eliminating revolving doors between government service and corporate interests. Beyond ending upward pre-distribution, countervailing power would seek fairer pre-distribution within markets by reinventing the corporation itself. For thirty years, corporate incentives have driven lower worker pay and higher executive compensation-these incentives must be reversed. One approach would tie corporate tax rates to the ratio between CEO and median worker pay. Another proposal would lower taxes on employers giving workers raises commensurate with national productivity growth while raising taxes on those who don't. Additional reforms could give workers more direct ownership through employee stock ownership, profit sharing, or employee-owned cooperatives. The coming challenge isn't about technology or economics but democracy. The debate isn't about government size but whom government serves. The choice isn't between "free market" and government but between a market organized for broadly based prosperity versus one designed to deliver gains primarily to those at the top. The issue isn't how much to tax away from the wealthy but how to design market rules that generate fair distributions without requiring large redistributions afterward. The vast majority of citizens do have the power to alter market rules to meet their needs. But exercising that power requires understanding what's happening, recognizing where their interests lie, and joining together. History suggests we will do so again.

★★★★★

Hai raggiunto la fine di Salvare il capitalismo

Amato da oltre 1 milione di persone

“Sono passati 23 giorni e l'ho usata ogni giorno. Ora fa parte della mia routine quotidiana.”

jayallen

Temi chiave in Salvare il capitalismo

market rule manipulation
wealth concentration mechanics
economic power dynamics
corporate lobbying influence
income inequality causes

Citazioni da Salvare il capitalismo

Capitalism is not a thing. It is not some immutable object, like a rock, that exists in nature. Capitalism is a set of rules.
The central insight of this book is that what we take to be 'free markets' are not free at all.
The most basic rules define what can be privately owned.
The second set of rules establishes the terms of exchange.
The third set of rules concerns the degree of market power.

Personaggi di Salvare il capitalismo

Robert B. ReichAuthor and former Secretary of Labor
Elizabeth WarrenPolicymaker influenced by the book's analysis
Marco RubioPolicymaker influenced by the book's analysis

Sull'autore

Robert B. Reich, autore di Saving Capitalism, è un rinomato economista politico, autore di bestseller ed ex Segretario del Lavoro degli Stati Uniti sotto il presidente Bill Clinton.

Voce autorevole sulla disuguaglianza economica e sul potere delle grandi imprese, il lavoro di Reich fonde l'esperienza politica con un'analisi accessibile delle iniquità sistemiche. Il suo mandato come Segretario del Lavoro ha visto traguardi storici come il Family and Medical Leave Act e l'aumento del salario minimo, radicando le sue critiche in un'esperienza diretta di governo.

Le opere influenti di Reich includono L'opera delle nazioni (tradotto in 22 lingue) e Il bene comune, insieme a commenti regolari su Marketplace di NPR e apparizioni sulla CNN.

Professore emerito (Chancellor’s Professor) alla UC Berkeley, ha co-fondato The American Prospect e co-creato il documentario Netflix Inequality for All. Saving Capitalism amplia la sua critica alla concentrazione della ricchezza, adattata successivamente nel film Netflix Saving Capitalism, amplificando ulteriormente il suo appello per una riforma economica strutturale.

Scarica il riassunto di Salvare il capitalismo

Ottieni il riassunto di Salvare il capitalismo in formato PDF o EPUB gratuito. Stampalo o leggilo offline quando vuoi.

Agli utenti è piaciuto anche

The common good

Robert B. Reich

Future of Capitalism

Paul Collier

Capital and Ideology

Thomas Piketty

Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Thomas Piketty

It's OK to Be Angry about Capitalism

Bernie Sanders

Reimagining Capitalism in a World on Fire

Rebecca Henderson

Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy

Joseph Schumpeter

PostCapitalism

Paul Mason

FAQ su questo libro

Scopri di più

PIANO DI APPRENDIMENTO

Capitalism destroys humanity and society

This learning plan provides a critical framework for understanding how modern economic structures impact social stability and planetary health. It is essential for activists, students, and citizens seeking to move beyond profit-driven models toward a sustainable and equitable future.

5 h 14 m•4 Sezioni

PIANO DI APPRENDIMENTO

Marx, Class, and the Power Struggle

This plan is essential for anyone seeking to understand the hidden structures of economic and social power that shape our world. It is ideal for students of sociology, political activists, or curious minds wanting to grasp the complexities of modern inequality and systemic change.

1 h 36 m•4 Sezioni

PIANO DI APPRENDIMENTO

Billionaires, Bots, and the Ballot

In an era where tech giants and high-net-worth individuals wield unprecedented power, understanding the mechanics of modern democracy is essential. This plan is ideal for political analysts, tech policy advocates, and concerned citizens looking to navigate the intersection of private capital and state machinery.

1 h 30 m•3 Sezioni

PIANO DI APPRENDIMENTO

Art, War, and the Capitalist Soul

This interdisciplinary plan bridges the gap between cultural history, geopolitics, and economic evolution. It is ideal for history buffs, political science students, or curious minds looking to understand how the modern world was forged through art and industry.

1 h 12 m•3 Sezioni

PIANO DI APPRENDIMENTO

Anarchy Unbound: The Economics of Self-Governance

This course is essential for anyone interested in how order emerges from chaos, providing a deep dive into the economic incentives that drive cooperation without government. It is ideal for students of political economy, institutional design, and strategic management who want to understand the limits of formal law.

2 h 8 m•3 Sezioni

PIANO DI APPRENDIMENTO

Power, Virtue, and the Corporate Game

In modern organizations, formal titles rarely tell the whole story of how decisions are made. This plan is essential for rising leaders who need to master the art of institutional survival without compromising their personal character.

1 h 30 m•3 Sezioni

PIANO DI APPRENDIMENTO

Compare pol/econ systems

This learning plan equips you to navigate one of the most consequential debates of our time: how should societies organize their economic and political systems? Whether you're a student, policy professional, journalist, or engaged citizen, understanding these competing frameworks is essential for making sense of contemporary politics, evaluating policy proposals, and participating meaningfully in debates about capitalism, socialism, regulation, and reform.

4 h 56 m•4 Sezioni

PIANO DI APPRENDIMENTO

The Laws of Corporate Survival

In high-stakes corporate environments, technical skill alone is rarely enough to ensure longevity. This plan is designed for ambitious professionals who need to master soft power, protective maneuvers, and assertive communication to thrive amidst organizational complexity.

1 h 30 m•3 Sezioni

Creato da alumni della Columbia University a San Francisco

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

Scopri di piu su come si parla di BeFreed nel web

Creato da alumni della Columbia University a San Francisco

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

Scopri di piu su come si parla di BeFreed nel web

Inizia il tuo percorso di apprendimento, ora

Capitolo 2

Salvare il capitalismo

PanoramicaPanoramica di Salvare il capitalismo

Un libro. Tanti modi per ascoltarlo.

The Market's Invisible Hand: Who Really Controls Capitalism?

The Free Market Myth: How Rules Shape Markets

Vedi ogni parola mentre la ascolti

Freedom, Power, and the Rules of Ownership

The New Monopolies: How Giants Control Markets

Ottieni di più da Salvare il capitalismo

Contracts, Bankruptcy, and Enforcement: The Rigged Rules

The Myth of Meritocracy: Work and Worth

Vedi ogni parola mentre la ascolti

The Declining Middle and Rising Extremes

Saving Capitalism: Restoring Countervailing Power

Hai raggiunto la fine di Salvare il capitalismo

Temi chiave in Salvare il capitalismo

Citazioni da Salvare il capitalismo

Personaggi di Salvare il capitalismo

Sull'autore

Scarica il riassunto di Salvare il capitalismo

Agli utenti è piaciuto anche

FAQ su questo libro

What is Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few about?

Who should read Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few?

Is Saving Capitalism worth reading?

What are the five building blocks of capitalism according to Reich?

Scopri di più

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

Un libro. Tanti modi per ascoltarlo.

The Market's Invisible Hand: Who Really Controls Capitalism?

The Free Market Myth: How Rules Shape Markets

Vedi ogni parola mentre la ascolti

Freedom, Power, and the Rules of Ownership

The New Monopolies: How Giants Control Markets

Ottieni di più da Salvare il capitalismo

Contracts, Bankruptcy, and Enforcement: The Rigged Rules

The Myth of Meritocracy: Work and Worth

Vedi ogni parola mentre la ascolti

The Declining Middle and Rising Extremes

Saving Capitalism: Restoring Countervailing Power

Hai raggiunto la fine di Salvare il capitalismo

Agli utenti è piaciuto anche

Scopri di più

Panoramica di Salvare il capitalismo