What is *The Sense of Style* by Steven Pinker about?

*The Sense of Style* merges linguistics, cognitive science, and practical advice to help writers craft clear, engaging prose. Pinker critiques outdated style manuals, advocating for a modern approach that prioritizes clarity, coherence, and reader-centric communication. Key themes include overcoming the "curse of knowledge," mastering grammar to avoid ambiguity, and balancing traditional rules with evidence-based insights.

Who should read *The Sense of Style*?

Writers, editors, students, and professionals seeking to refine their communication skills will benefit from Pinker’s insights. The book is particularly valuable for those frustrated by rigid style guides, as it offers a flexible, science-backed framework for effective writing. Educators and linguists will also appreciate its analysis of language evolution.

Is *The Sense of Style* worth reading?

Yes—it’s a bestselling guide praised for blending scholarly rigor with actionable advice. Pinker’s emphasis on "classic style" (writing as a conversation) and his debunking of arbitrary grammar myths make it a standout compared to traditional manuals like *The Elements of Style*. Readers gain tools to simplify complex ideas and avoid common pitfalls like jargon overload.

What is "classic style" in *The Sense of Style*?

Classic style treats writing as a window to the world, where the writer directs the reader’s gaze to shared truths. Pinker encourages simulating a dialogue, using clear syntax and concrete details over abstract nouns. This approach fosters engagement and avoids the stiffness of overly formal prose.

How does Pinker address the "curse of knowledge"?

The "curse of knowledge" refers to writers assuming readers share their expertise, leading to unclear jargon or underexplained concepts. Pinker advises soliciting feedback from non-experts, defining technical terms, and structuring content to prioritize the reader’s perspective.

What grammatical advice does Pinker emphasize?

Pinker highlights syntax trees to visualize sentence structure, avoiding mismatches like dangling modifiers or noun piles (e.g., "health care policy changes"). He advocates for active voice when appropriate and stresses coherence through logical connectors (e.g., "however," "therefore").

What are key quotes from *The Sense of Style*?

- **"Omit needless words"**: A call for brevity and precision. - **"Good writing…flips how the world is perceived"**: Emphasizes writing’s power to reshape understanding. - **"The key to style is understanding the reader’s make-believe world"**: Stresses empathy in communication.

How does Pinker critique traditional style guides?

He argues many rules (e.g., avoiding split infinitives) stem from prescriptive preferences, not linguistic reality. Pinker encourages writers to prioritize clarity and rhythm over rigid edicts, using data on language evolution to debunk myths.

风格感

21 世纪思想者的写作指南！

斯蒂芬·平克

4.04(9101 Reviews)

《风格感》概述

平克为数字时代带来了写作变革，在废除陈旧规则的同时，武装你对抗“知识的诅咒”。学术界对其提升清晰度的认知科学方法赞誉有加。有没有想过为什么天才思想家的文章往往写得很烂？本指南揭示了真正具有说服力的散文背后的心理学。

选择讲述方式

一本书，多种聆听方式。

来自《风格感》的相同理念。选择适合你的声音、深度和节奏，随时切换。

第 1 章

The Art of Clarity: Why Good Writing Matters

Steven Pinker's "The Sense of Style" has been called the thinking person's guide to writing in the 21st century. Unlike traditional style manuals that often present rigid rules without explanation, Pinker's approach combines cognitive science with linguistic insight to explain not just how to write well, but why certain techniques work. The book has garnered praise from literary giants like Patricia Cornwell and Richard Dawkins, who called it "the most cheerful and helpful book on language use I've read." Since its publication, it has become required reading in university writing programs and a favorite among professional writers, journalists, and anyone seeking to communicate with greater clarity and grace. What makes this book particularly valuable is that Pinker doesn't just tell us what to do-he shows us through his own crystalline prose exactly how good writing works.

第 2 章

The Cognitive Science Behind Effective Writing

At the heart of Pinker's approach lies a revolutionary insight: good writing isn't just about following arbitrary rules-it's about understanding how the human mind processes language. Traditional style guides often present writing as a matter of adhering to commandments handed down from on high, but Pinker reveals that many of these "rules" are actually linguistic superstitions with no basis in how language actually works. For instance, the prohibition against starting sentences with "and" or "but" has no linguistic foundation, and great writers have been doing it for centuries. Instead, he argues that writing is fundamentally unnatural. While spoken language is instinctive-children naturally learn to speak without formal instruction-writing is a recent cultural invention that requires deliberate learning and practice. Archaeological evidence suggests writing emerged only about 5,000 years ago, making it a newcomer in human evolutionary history. The key difference lies in the relationship between communicators: speakers can see their listeners and adjust in real time based on facial expressions, questions, and body language, while writers must imagine invisible readers who cannot ask for clarification or signal confusion. This cognitive challenge explains why even brilliant thinkers often produce terrible prose. When we know something well, we find it difficult to imagine what it's like not to know it-a phenomenon psychologists call "the curse of knowledge." This curse makes writers forget that readers don't share their background knowledge, vocabulary, or mental organization of the subject. A physicist might casually reference quantum entanglement without explaining it, while a lawyer might pepper documents with legal jargon that confuses laypeople. The result is prose that seems perfectly clear to the writer but baffles readers with unexplained terminology, missing context, and abstractions that never get grounded in concrete examples. Overcoming this curse requires a deliberate mental effort to simulate the reader's mind-to step outside your own expertise and see your words through fresh eyes. Professional writers develop specific strategies to combat this tendency: they create detailed reader personas, share drafts with test readers from their target audience, and deliberately simplify complex concepts. This is why professional writers rely so heavily on editors and why revision is essential. Multiple drafts allow writers to catch instances where they've assumed too much knowledge or failed to explain crucial concepts. As Pinker notes, "The form in which thoughts occur to a writer is rarely the same as the form in which they can be absorbed by a reader." Successful writers learn to bridge this gap through careful attention to their readers' needs and perspectives. The implications of this cognitive science approach extend beyond just clarity. Understanding how the brain processes information helps writers structure their work more effectively. For instance, readers better remember information presented in a logical sequence with clear transitions, and they process concrete examples more easily than abstract concepts. This knowledge can inform everything from sentence structure to paragraph organization.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《风格感》中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 3 章

Classic Style: The Secret to Engaging Prose

To combat the natural tendencies that lead to bad writing, Pinker recommends adopting what scholars Francis-Noel Thomas and Mark Turner call "classic style." This approach treats writing as a window onto reality rather than a performance of the writer's intelligence. In classic style, the writer has seen something in the world and is directing the reader's attention toward it, as if saying, "Look at that!" The writer assumes the role of a knowledgeable guide showing the reader something that already exists, rather than constructing or arguing for a particular viewpoint. This approach contrasts sharply with the self-conscious, hedging prose that dominates academic and bureaucratic writing. The difference becomes apparent in how these styles present the same information: Academic style: "It has been observed that the presence of significant quantities of dihydrogen monoxide in the cranial cavity is associated with adverse cognitive and physiological outcomes." Classic style: "Water in the brain can kill you." Technical report: "The implementation of precipitation monitoring protocols revealed statistically significant variations in annual moisture levels." Classic style: "It rained more last year than the year before." The classic stylist avoids several common writing traps. They eliminate meta-discourse (writing about the writing), such as "This paper will argue" or "In the following sections." They strip away unnecessary hedging phrases like "it seems that," "it could be argued," or "in most cases." They abandon professional narcissism ("in my humble opinion," "as I have demonstrated") and reject the excessive use of abstract nouns derived from verbs ("the implementation of," "the development of," "the establishment of"). Instead, classic style creates the impression of a natural conversation between writer and reader. The writer presents ideas as if pointing to something visible to both parties, using concrete language and direct statements. This approach works particularly well in explanatory writing, whether describing scientific concepts, historical events, or complex processes. This doesn't mean classic style is simplistic or unsuited for sophisticated ideas. Rather, it assumes the reader is equally intelligent but simply lacks specific knowledge the writer possesses. A classic stylist writing about quantum physics or philosophical concepts still aims for clarity and directness, but without sacrificing technical precision where necessary. Adopting classic style solves many common writing problems. It forces writers to clarify their thoughts before putting them on paper - if you can't explain something simply, you might not fully understand it yourself. It eliminates unnecessary jargon and abstractions that often mask incomplete thinking. Most importantly, it creates the sense that there's a real person behind the words - someone who has seen something worth sharing and is guiding you to see it too, much like a friend pointing out a constellation in the night sky. The result is prose that respects readers' time and attention by presenting information clearly and directly, without the verbal smoke screens that often mask insecurity or fuzzy thinking. This approach creates engagement through transparency rather than complexity, making even difficult subjects more accessible and compelling.

第 4 章

The Architecture of the Sentence

While many writing guides focus on word choice or grammar rules, Pinker argues that understanding sentence structure is crucial for clear communication. Drawing on modern linguistics, he explains that sentences are not merely strings of words but hierarchical structures-trees with branches that connect related ideas. This tree structure explains why some grammatically correct sentences are nearly impossible to understand. Consider: "The man the woman the child hugged kissed laughed." Though technically correct, this sentence overloads our mental processing because we must hold too many unresolved dependencies in memory before we can assemble the meaning. Good writers intuitively avoid such constructions by following principles that align with how our brains process language. One key principle is "light before heavy"-placing short, simple phrases before longer, more complex ones. Another is "given before new"-introducing familiar information before novel concepts. These aren't arbitrary rules but cognitive principles that reduce the mental effort required to understand a sentence. Understanding syntax also helps writers deploy the right construction for the right purpose. The much-maligned passive voice, for instance, isn't inherently bad-it's a tool that serves specific functions, like emphasizing the recipient of an action or maintaining thematic continuity. The problem isn't passive voice itself but its overuse or inappropriate use. Pinker offers practical advice for untangling syntactic knots: When a sentence becomes too complex, break it into several shorter ones. When a modifier could attach to multiple phrases, rewrite to eliminate ambiguity. And when you need to present complex relationships, use parallel construction to help readers see the pattern. By understanding the architecture of sentences, writers can build prose that guides readers smoothly from one idea to the next, without forcing them to backtrack or puzzle over meaning. This architectural approach treats sentences not as collections of rules to follow but as structures designed to perform specific cognitive functions.

从《风格感》中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 5 章

Creating Coherent Prose: Beyond the Sentence

While well-constructed sentences form the foundation of good writing, coherent paragraphs and essays require additional skills. Pinker explains that readers desperately seek connections between sentences, so much so that they'll often supply coherence where none exists. This explains why disjointed sentences can create unintentional humor, as in the famous church bulletin blooper: "The ladies of the church have cast off clothing of every kind and they can be seen in the church basement on Friday afternoon." Creating coherence requires managing what linguists call "arcs of coherence"-the threads that connect ideas across sentences and paragraphs. These include consistent references to entities (using pronouns and descriptions consistently), logical relationships between propositions (using appropriate connectives like "however" and "therefore"), and thematic consistency (organizing related concepts together). One particularly powerful tool for creating coherence is what Joseph Williams calls "thematic strings." After introducing a topic, writers typically present multiple concepts that explain or comment on that topic. To maintain coherence, these concepts should be organized around recurring themes, with each reference clearly connected to previous mentions. Pinker illustrates this principle by contrasting two historians writing about warfare. One jumps haphazardly between loosely related concepts-Clausewitz, monotheistic religions, the Enlightenment, Freud-without explaining their connections. The other clearly labels his themes (criminal warfare and disciplined warfare), explores each in consecutive paragraphs, and uses transparently related terms within each thematic string. The second approach creates a coherent narrative that readers can follow without struggling to connect the dots. Coherence also depends on managing negation, proportion, and thematic consistency. Negation creates unique cognitive challenges-readers struggle to process statements that deny implausible propositions without context. Proportion requires balancing the space devoted to a point with its importance to the overall argument. And thematic consistency means maintaining clear connections between related concepts throughout a text. By attending to these principles, writers can create prose that flows naturally from one idea to the next, carrying readers along without forcing them to stop and reconstruct the logical connections on their own.

第 6 章

Grammar Myths and Language Reality

Perhaps the most controversial aspect of Pinker's approach is his debunking of many traditional grammar rules. As both a linguist and a cognitive scientist, he distinguishes between genuine rules that enhance clarity and mere superstitions that impede good writing. Many supposed grammar rules turn out to be myths with dubious origins: prohibitions against splitting infinitives or ending sentences with prepositions stem from misguided attempts to force English into Latin grammatical structures; the distinction between "which" and "that" in restrictive clauses was invented by a usage maven in 1926; and the idea that "between" applies only to two items while "among" requires three or more misunderstands how these prepositions actually function. Pinker argues that language isn't governed by edicts from authorities but evolves through the collective choices of its users. This doesn't mean "anything goes"-standard written English follows conventions that signal a writer's care and competence. But these conventions should be understood as agreements among community members rather than eternal truths. This perspective allows writers to distinguish between genuine errors that impede comprehension and harmless variations that reflect the natural evolution of language. It also explains why even the best writers throughout history have "violated" many supposed rules-these weren't errors but legitimate alternatives within the language's grammatical system. For instance, the singular "they" ("Everyone returned to their seat") isn't a modern corruption but has appeared in English literature for centuries. It serves a useful function by providing a gender-neutral pronoun for indefinite antecedents. Similarly, beginning sentences with conjunctions like "and" or "but" has been common practice among great writers for hundreds of years, despite what elementary school teachers might claim. This doesn't mean grammar doesn't matter. Clear communication depends on following the genuine patterns of English syntax. But Pinker encourages writers to distinguish between rules that enhance clarity and superstitions that merely signal membership in a linguistic in-group. The former deserve respect; the latter can often be safely ignored.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《风格感》中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 7 章

The Art of Word Choice

Beyond grammar and structure lies the art of choosing the right words-what traditional rhetoricians called "diction." Pinker approaches this topic not as a matter of rules but of judgment, balancing several competing values: precision, clarity, concreteness, familiarity, and appropriateness to context. One key principle is avoiding unnecessary jargon and abstractions. Technical terms serve valuable functions within specialized fields, but writers often forget that readers may not belong to their "clubhouse." When technical terms are necessary, considerate writers explain them ("Arabidopsis, a flowering mustard plant") and provide concrete examples that ground abstractions in sensory experience. This doesn't mean all writing should be simplified to the lowest common denominator. Pinker celebrates the richness of English vocabulary, where careful writers appreciate subtle distinctions between near-synonyms. When writers misuse "upmarket" words (like "simplistic" for "simple"), they reveal inattention to reading and pollute a common resource. The solution isn't to avoid sophisticated vocabulary but to use it precisely and appropriately. A well-chosen technical term or literary word can express a concept more efficiently than a lengthy explanation in simple language. The key is ensuring that each word serves a purpose rather than merely signaling the writer's erudition. Pinker also addresses the evolution of language through "verbing" (converting nouns to verbs) and other neologisms. While purists often object to innovations like "to contact" or "to impact," such conversions have been a natural part of English for centuries. About a fifth of English verbs began as nouns or adjectives. The question isn't whether such conversions are "allowed" but whether specific examples add useful tools to our linguistic toolkit or merely create redundant jargon. This approach to word choice emphasizes judgment over rigid rules. Writers must constantly balance competing values-precision versus accessibility, novelty versus familiarity, concision versus elaboration-based on their purpose and audience. The goal isn't to follow a formula but to develop the judgment to make these trade-offs wisely.

第 8 章

The Psychology of Punctuation

Punctuation might seem like a minor technical matter, but Pinker reveals how it reflects deeper cognitive principles that shape how we process written language. Punctuation marks serve as sophisticated visual cues that guide readers through the syntactic structure of sentences, indicating pauses, connections, and hierarchical relationships among ideas. These marks essentially function as traffic signals in text, directing the flow of meaning and helping readers navigate complex thoughts. Consider the Oxford comma-the comma before "and" in lists like "red, white, and blue." While style guides disagree about its necessity, Pinker shows how omitting it can create genuine ambiguity in numerous situations. For example, "I'd like to thank my parents, Ayn Rand and God" could be read as claiming that Ayn Rand and God are the writer's parents. The Oxford comma clarifies the intended meaning by separating each item in the list. Similar confusion can arise in more practical contexts, as in "The highlights of his global tour included encounters with Nelson Mandela, an 800-year-old demigod and a dilettante." The Oxford comma would clearly separate these into three distinct entities. Similarly, the placement of quotation marks and periods reflects different cognitive priorities and cultural approaches to punctuation. The American convention of placing periods inside quotation marks ("like this.") prioritizes visual tidiness and typographical elegance, while the British convention ("like this".) prioritizes logical accuracy about what falls within the quotation. Neither is inherently superior-they simply reflect different trade-offs between competing values of aesthetics and precision. This difference exemplifies how punctuation conventions often emerge from balancing multiple cognitive and practical considerations. Even seemingly arbitrary conventions serve sophisticated cognitive functions that aid comprehension. Paragraph breaks signal shifts in topic or perspective, helping readers chunk information into manageable units and providing natural pauses for processing complex ideas. Dashes create dramatic pauses or set off parenthetical information more emphatically than commas, allowing writers to create subtle hierarchies of emphasis. Semicolons connect closely related independent clauses, suggesting a relationship stronger than separate sentences but less integrated than clauses joined by coordinating conjunctions. Em dashes, colons, and parentheses each offer distinct ways of managing the flow of information and marking relationships between ideas. Understanding these cognitive functions helps writers deploy punctuation strategically rather than mechanically following rules. Effective writers consider how different punctuation marks affect reading rhythm, emphasis, and clarity. For instance, the difference between "Stop walking" and "Stop, walking" demonstrates how a single comma can completely alter meaning. The goal isn't perfect adherence to arbitrary conventions but using visual signals to guide readers smoothly through complex ideas while maintaining clarity and impact. This understanding transforms punctuation from a set of mechanical rules into a sophisticated tool for precise communication.

从《风格感》中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 9 章

The Ethics of Good Writing

Throughout "The Sense of Style," Pinker suggests that good writing isn't merely a technical skill but an ethical practice-a form of respect for readers and their cognitive limitations. This perspective transforms writing from a performance of the writer's intelligence into a service to readers seeking knowledge or insight. Whether in academic papers, business communications, or creative works, writers bear a responsibility to facilitate understanding rather than demonstrate their own sophistication. The curse of knowledge-our difficulty imagining what it's like not to know something we know-creates a moral challenge as well as a cognitive one. Overcoming it requires a kind of empathy-stepping outside our own perspective to understand how others will receive our words. This empathetic leap doesn't just improve writing; it cultivates a valuable human quality that extends beyond the page. For instance, when explaining complex scientific concepts, writers must consciously bridge the gap between expert understanding and novice comprehension, much like a teacher adapting material for students at different levels. Similarly, the classic style's emphasis on clarity and directness reflects an ethical commitment to honest communication. By presenting ideas as if pointing to visible objects in the world, writers implicitly invite readers to verify their claims rather than accepting them on authority. This transparency stands in stark contrast to styles that use obscurity to mask weak reasoning or lack of evidence. Academic writing often falls into this trap, using complex terminology and convoluted sentences when simpler expressions would suffice. Even grammatical choices reflect ethical values. Using precise language shows respect for truth; avoiding unnecessary jargon demonstrates concern for accessibility; and maintaining coherence acknowledges readers' limited cognitive resources. These aren't merely stylistic preferences but expressions of how writers view their relationship with readers. For example, choosing active voice over passive construction often reveals a commitment to accountability and directness. Similarly, organizing paragraphs with clear topic sentences and logical transitions shows respect for readers' time and attention. Good writing also involves ethical decisions about what to include and exclude. Writers must balance completeness against concision, deciding which details serve the reader's needs and which merely indulge the writer's desire to display knowledge. This requires honest self-reflection about whether each element truly serves the reader's understanding. Pinker concludes by placing writing in this broader ethical context. Style matters not because following arbitrary rules signals membership in an educated elite, but because clear, coherent prose helps spread ideas, earns readers' trust, and adds beauty to the world. In this view, the effort to master good writing isn't merely practical but a contribution to human flourishing-an endeavor that enriches both writer and reader through the shared pursuit of understanding. Good writing becomes an act of generosity, sharing knowledge in a way that respects and empowers readers rather than intimidating or excluding them.

第 10 章

The Practical Path to Better Writing

Pinker's approach to improving writing is refreshingly practical. Rather than memorizing rules or striving for an unattainable perfection, he recommends specific strategies that align with how our minds actually work. First, he emphasizes the importance of reading good prose and reverse-engineering its techniques. Good writers are invariably avid readers who have absorbed a vast inventory of words, idioms, constructions, and rhetorical devices. By reading attentively-noticing how skilled writers construct sentences, organize paragraphs, and maintain coherence-aspiring writers develop that elusive "ear" for good prose that no rulebook can provide. Second, he stresses the value of revision. Few writers can produce coherent prose in a single pass because too many things must go right simultaneously. Instead, most skilled writers get their thoughts on the page first, then revise extensively to make sentences grammatical, graceful, and transparent. This multi-stage process allows writers to focus on different aspects of the task sequentially rather than juggling all concerns simultaneously. Third, he recommends getting feedback from actual readers. Social psychologists have found that we're overconfident about inferring what others think, so even showing your draft to someone who isn't your target audience helps break the curse of knowledge. Each reviewer brings their own biases, so the goal isn't to implement every suggestion but to identify patterns in feedback that reveal where your prose isn't achieving its intended effect. Finally, he suggests showing drafts to yourself after time has passed. The temporal distance helps you read your own writing with fresh eyes, noticing gaps in logic, unclear references, or awkward constructions that weren't apparent when the ideas were fresh in your mind. These practical strategies demystify the writing process. Rather than presenting good writing as an innate talent or the result of following arcane rules, Pinker shows how it emerges from specific cognitive skills that anyone can develop through deliberate practice. This approach makes writing more accessible while acknowledging the genuine challenges involved in transforming complex thoughts into clear prose.

★★★★★

你已读完《风格感》

深受 100 万+ 学习者喜爱

“坚持使用 23 天了，我每天都会打开它。它现在已经成为我的日常习惯。”

jayallen

《风格感》核心主题

curse of knowledge
cognitive linguistics
classic style
reader-centric writing
linguistic psychology

《风格感》经典语录

The curse of knowledge is the single best explanation I know of why good people write bad prose.
Classic style is a wonderful alternative: a prose that is clear, simple, and direct.
The main cause of incomprehensible prose is the difficulty of imagining what it’s like not to know something.
Writing is fundamentally unnatural.
Water in the brain can kill you.

《风格感》主要人物

Steven PinkerAuthor and cognitive scientist
Francis-Noel ThomasScholar who co-defined the 'classic style'
Mark TurnerScholar who co-defined the 'classic style'

关于作者

斯蒂芬·阿瑟·平克（Steven Arthur Pinker）是畅销书《风格感觉》（The Sense of Style）的作者，也是著名的认知心理学家。在这本现代写作指南中，他结合了数十年在语言和思维领域的专业知识，探讨了清晰沟通的艺术。作为哈佛大学教授和前麻省理工学院研究员，平克将他在实验心理学方面的学术背景与对语法、风格以及可读性认知科学的深刻见解结合在一起。

他的代表作包括《语言本能》（The Language Instinct）和《人性中的善良天使》（The Better Angels of Our Nature），这些作品曾获得普利策奖提名，并被翻译成30多种语言。

平克经常出现在《纽约时报》、TED演讲以及《时代》杂志“全球百大最具影响力人物”名单中。他担任《美国传统词典》（American Heritage Dictionary）用法小组主席，巩固了他在语言规范方面的权威地位。平克出生于蒙特利尔，曾就读于麦吉尔大学和哈佛大学，他那反传统但以证据为导向的方法，将传统的风格指南重塑为适合21世纪思考者的工具。

《风格感觉》提炼了这些原则，为写作者提供了一个基于科学的框架，以有效地吸引读者。平克的著作累计销量已达数百万册，其中《人性中的善良天使》被比尔·盖茨誉为“我读过的最鼓舞人心的书”。

下载《风格感》摘要

免费获取《风格感》摘要的 PDF 或 EPUB 版本。可打印或随时离线阅读。

用户还喜欢

The Stuff of Thought

Steven Pinker

The Language Instinct

Steven Pinker

Rationality

Steven Pinker

Enlightenment Now

Steven Pinker

Do I Make Myself Clear?

Harold Evans

On Writing Well

William Zinsser

Secret Life of Pronouns

James W. Pennebaker

Clear Thinking

Shane Parrish

关于本书的常见问题

该学习计划的一部分

学习计划

Submit design/UX papers to ACMCHI as designer

4 h 15 m•4 集数

发现更多

学习计划

The Strategist's Guide to Clear Thinking

In an era of information overload, the ability to think structurally and argue ethically is a critical leadership asset. This guide is designed for professionals and decision-makers who need to strip away noise, validate evidence, and lead through high-level persuasion and debate.

2 h•4 章节

学习计划

Practical Logic for Everyday Life

In an era of information overload, the ability to think critically is a vital survival skill. This plan is designed for professionals and students who want to move beyond intuition and master the formal tools of clear, persuasive communication.

30 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Psychology of Everyday Mind Tricks

In an era of digital manipulation and complex social dynamics, understanding the hidden forces of the mind is essential for clear thinking. This plan is ideal for professionals and social navigators looking to sharpen their influence, emotional intelligence, and critical thinking skills.

2 h 18 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Science of Smarter Choices

In an age of information overload, our brains often rely on outdated shortcuts that lead to poor decisions. This plan is essential for professionals and students who want to master their cognitive processes and design environments that naturally support their long-term goals.

2 h 18 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Copywriter's Guide to Consumer Psychology

This plan is essential for marketers and writers who want to move beyond basic grammar and master the biological drivers of human behavior. It is designed for professionals looking to increase conversion rates by aligning their messaging with the subconscious mind of the consumer.

2 h•4 章节

学习计划

How to be attractive and smart

This plan bridges the gap between social grace and cognitive sharpness, offering a holistic approach to personal influence. It is designed for ambitious professionals and individuals looking to enhance their social capital and intellectual presence.

4 h 34 m•4 章节

学习计划

Master psychology and influence for success

Understanding the psychological drivers of behavior is essential for navigating modern professional and social landscapes. This plan is designed for leaders, negotiators, and individuals looking to enhance their interpersonal impact through science-backed persuasion and emotional intelligence.

6 h 35 m•4 章节

学习计划

Master the art of persuasion

Persuasion is one of the most valuable skills in professional and personal life, directly impacting your ability to lead, negotiate, sell, and inspire action. This learning plan is essential for business professionals, entrepreneurs, managers, sales professionals, and anyone who needs to influence decisions, win buy-in for ideas, or drive meaningful change. Whether you're pitching to investors, negotiating contracts, or leading teams, mastering persuasion gives you a decisive advantage in achieving your goals.

5 h 4 m•4 章节

由哥伦比亚大学校友在旧金山创建

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

查看更多网络上关于 BeFreed 的讨论

由哥伦比亚大学校友在旧金山创建

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

查看更多网络上关于 BeFreed 的讨论

开启你的学习之旅，就是现在

第 3 章

风格感

概述《风格感》概述

一本书，多种聆听方式。

The Art of Clarity: Why Good Writing Matters

The Cognitive Science Behind Effective Writing

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

Classic Style: The Secret to Engaging Prose

The Architecture of the Sentence

从 《风格感》中收获更多

Creating Coherent Prose: Beyond the Sentence

Grammar Myths and Language Reality

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Art of Word Choice

The Psychology of Punctuation

从 《风格感》中收获更多

The Ethics of Good Writing

The Practical Path to Better Writing

你已读完 《风格感》

《风格感》核心主题

《风格感》经典语录

《风格感》主要人物

关于作者

下载《风格感》摘要

用户还喜欢

关于本书的常见问题

What is The Sense of Style by Steven Pinker about?

Who should read The Sense of Style?

Is The Sense of Style worth reading?

What is "classic style" in The Sense of Style?

该学习计划的一部分

Submit design/UX papers to ACMCHI as designer

发现更多

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

一本书，多种聆听方式。

The Art of Clarity: Why Good Writing Matters

The Cognitive Science Behind Effective Writing

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

Classic Style: The Secret to Engaging Prose

The Architecture of the Sentence

从 《风格感》中收获更多

Creating Coherent Prose: Beyond the Sentence

Grammar Myths and Language Reality

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Art of Word Choice

The Psychology of Punctuation

从 《风格感》中收获更多

The Ethics of Good Writing

The Practical Path to Better Writing

你已读完 《风格感》

用户还喜欢

该学习计划的一部分

Submit design/UX papers to ACMCHI as designer

发现更多

《风格感》概述

从《风格感》中收获更多

从《风格感》中收获更多

你已读完《风格感》

从《风格感》中收获更多

从《风格感》中收获更多

你已读完《风格感》