
Sowell's intellectual masterpiece dissects why political opponents talk past each other. Dividing worldviews into "constrained" and "unconstrained" visions, this mind-blowing framework makes ideological conflicts suddenly click. The New York Times called it "extraordinary" - prepare for sentences that will reshape your understanding of human nature.
通过作者的声音感受这本书
将知识转化为引人入胜、富含实例的见解
快速捕捉核心观点,高效学习
以有趣互动的方式享受这本书
Why do reasonable people disagree so fundamentally about politics? Why do the same individuals consistently take opposing sides on seemingly unrelated issues? The answer lies not in our values, but in our visions - our core assumptions about human nature and how the world works. These competing frameworks shape everything from our economic policies to our views on crime and punishment. Two distinct perspectives have emerged throughout history: the "constrained" vision that sees humans as inherently limited beings, and the "unconstrained" vision that sees vast potential for human improvement. These aren't simply political positions but comprehensive worldviews that explain why intelligent people can look at the same evidence and reach wildly different conclusions about what society needs. Adam Smith perfectly captured the constrained vision when he noted that a European might express sorrow about millions dying in a Chinese earthquake but would sleep soundly that night, while the loss of his little finger would cause him real distress. Smith didn't condemn this egocentricity - he accepted it as an unchangeable fact of human nature, like gravity. The constrained vision sees humans as inherently self-interested and limited in both moral and intellectual capacity. Rather than fighting these limitations, it seeks to channel self-interest productively through institutions like markets and constitutional democracy. In stark contrast, William Godwin believed humans possess untapped potential for moral development. He saw people as capable of directly feeling others' needs as more important than their own and acting impartially even when personal interests are involved. For Godwin, human selfishness wasn't inevitable but resulted from circumstances that could be changed. This unconstrained vision sees human nature as highly malleable, capable of dramatic improvement through education and institutional reform. Imagine the difference between designing a bridge (accounting for gravity's constraints) versus developing a vaccine (transforming what's possible) - that's how differently these visions approach social problems.
将《A Conflict of Visions》的核心观点拆解为易于理解的要点,了解创新团队如何创造、协作和成长。
将《A Conflict of Visions》提炼为快速记忆要点,突出坦诚、团队合作和创造力的关键原则。

通过生动的故事体验《A Conflict of Visions》,将创新经验转化为令人难忘且可应用的精彩时刻。
随心提问,选择声音,共同创造真正与你产生共鸣的见解。

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."
"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."
"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."
"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."
"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."
"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."
"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."
"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."
"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"
"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."
"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."
"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

免费获取《A Conflict of Visions》摘要的 PDF 或 EPUB 版本。可打印或随时离线阅读。