What is The Theory of Everything by Stephen Hawking about?

The Theory of Everything is a compilation of seven lectures by Stephen Hawking covering the universe's origins, evolution, and ultimate fate. The book explores complex scientific theories including the Big Bang, black holes, quantum mechanics, relativity, and string theory, all explained in accessible language for non-scientists. Hawking's goal is to present a unified theory that could explain all known physical laws and the existence of the universe itself.

Who should read The Theory of Everything by Stephen Hawking?

The Theory of Everything is perfect for anyone curious about cosmology but lacking advanced scientific training. Stephen Hawking wrote this book specifically to make complex scientific knowledge accessible to general readers, using simple explanations and everyday examples. Whether you're a science enthusiast, student, or simply interested in understanding the universe's mysteries, Hawking's lucid writing style makes even concepts like black hole radiation and quantum gravity approachable for naive science readers.

Is The Theory of Everything by Stephen Hawking worth reading?

The Theory of Everything is absolutely worth reading for its ability to demystify complex cosmological concepts without requiring technical expertise. Stephen Hawking combines rigorous scientific explanation with wit and humor, making the work both educational and enjoyable. Readers consistently praise how Hawking explains theories like relativity and quantum mechanics in such clear terms that even those with average scientific education can grasp mind-bending concepts like reverse arrows of time.

How difficult is The Theory of Everything to understand?

The Theory of Everything is surprisingly accessible despite covering advanced physics. Stephen Hawking deliberately presents scientific theories in very simple ways, avoiding overly technical jargon and using daily life examples to illustrate complex ideas. Even readers describing themselves as "naive science readers" report understanding concepts like black hole radiation and quantum gravity thanks to Hawking's lucid explanations. The book prioritizes clarity over complexity, making cosmology comprehensible to general audiences.

What is the Big Bang theory explained in The Theory of Everything?

Stephen Hawking describes the Big Bang as a singularity where the universe's density and temperature were infinite, marking the absolute beginning of time itself. He explains that the universe has been expanding since this moment, eventually forming galaxies and stars. Critically, Hawking emphasizes that events before the Big Bang have no observational consequences, meaning time itself began at this moment. He supports this theory with evidence like cosmic microwave background radiation.

What are black holes according to Stephen Hawking's The Theory of Everything?

Black holes in The Theory of Everything are regions formed when massive stars collapse under their own gravity, creating areas from which nothing can escape. Hawking explains the event horizon as the boundary beyond which escape becomes impossible. Revolutionary to physics, he introduces Hawking radiation—the concept that black holes emit radiation, challenging the notion that they're completely black. These cosmic phenomena are central to understanding universal structure and fundamental physics laws.

What is the "no boundary" proposal in The Theory of Everything?

The no boundary proposal suggests the universe is finite in extent but has no boundaries, similar to Earth's surface. Stephen Hawking introduces imaginary time—where time and space become indistinguishable—eliminating traditional singularities. This creates a self-contained universe requiring no external creation or destruction. The proposal fundamentally challenges conventional creation views by suggesting a universe that simply exists without needing a beginning point in the traditional sense.

What is Hawking radiation in The Theory of Everything?

Hawking radiation is Stephen Hawking's groundbreaking concept that black holes emit radiation despite their reputation for absorbing everything. This discovery challenged fundamental assumptions about black holes being completely black and unable to release anything. Hawking explains that if our understanding of general relativity and quantum mechanics is correct, black holes must radiate like hot bodies. He humorously notes that finding a primordial black hole emitting gamma and X-rays would earn him the Nobel Prize.

ホーキング、自らを語る

宇宙の起源と終焉

スティーヴン・ホーキング

4.18(28711 Reviews)

『ホーキング、自らを語る』の概要

ホーキング博士の傑作は、ベストセラーリストに記録的な237週間にわたってランクインし、世界中の900万人の読者に対して宇宙の秘密を解き明かしました。カール・セーガンの序文がその出版を後押ししたこの物理学の金字塔は、複雑な科学を、時間、空間、そして人類の理解をめぐる親しみやすい旅へと変貌させたのです。

語り方を選ぶ

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

ホーキング、自らを語るの同じアイデアを、あなたに合う声・深さ・ペースで学べます。いつでも切り替えられます。

第1章

The Universe Through Hawking's Eyes: A Journey From Nothing to Everything

When Stephen Hawking published "A Brief History of Time" in 1988, few could have predicted it would sell over 10 million copies worldwide and remain on bestseller lists for years. This remarkable achievement came from a man who defied medical odds, living with ALS for decades while revolutionizing our understanding of black holes and the cosmos. What makes Hawking's work so captivating is his ability to translate the universe's most profound mysteries into accessible language without sacrificing depth. His theories have influenced not just physics but popular culture-from "The Simpsons" to "The Theory of Everything" biopic starring Eddie Redmayne. Even celebrities like Benedict Cumberbatch and Elon Musk have cited Hawking's work as transformative to their worldviews. What if the secrets of the universe-from its fiery birth to its possible end-could be understood through the lens of one brilliant mind? Let's explore the cosmos as Hawking saw it.

第2章

From Ancient Models to the Big Bang: Our Evolving Cosmic Picture

Humanity's understanding of the universe has undergone remarkable transformations. Ancient Greeks like Aristotle recognized Earth's sphericity in 340 B.C. through simple observations-the curved shadow during lunar eclipses and the changing position of stars when viewed from different locations. Ptolemy later developed an elaborate geocentric model with eight concentric spheres carrying celestial bodies around Earth. This remained scientific consensus for nearly 1,400 years. The true revolution came when Copernicus proposed in 1514 that Earth orbits the sun-not the reverse. Galileo's telescope observations later supported this heliocentric model, while Kepler discovered planets follow elliptical paths rather than perfect circles. Newton's Principia Mathematica provided the mathematical framework explaining these motions through universal gravitation, yet his model created a paradox: in a static universe, gravity should cause stars to collapse together. This contradiction remained unresolved until the 20th century, partly because philosophers and scientists preferred eternal, unchanging models. Religious traditions generally favored a finite beginning-with St. Augustine arguing for creation around 5000 B.C. based on civilization's recent progress-while Greek philosophers preferred an eternal universe, explaining away human advancement as merely recovery after periodic disasters. The debate transformed fundamentally in 1929 when Edwin Hubble observed distant galaxies moving rapidly away from us, proving the universe is expanding. This meant everything was closer together in the past, converging at a single point about 10-20 billion years ago-the big bang. This scientific discovery suggested time itself began at this moment, since earlier times cannot be meaningfully defined. What's particularly fascinating is how this scientific revelation doesn't necessarily contradict religious creation narratives but rather provides a framework for understanding when creation might have occurred. The big bang represents not just a physical beginning but the birth of time itself-a concept that bridges scientific inquiry and philosophical questions about existence.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『ホーキング、自らを語る』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第3章

Cosmic Expansion and the Inevitable Beginning

Until 1924, astronomers believed our Milky Way constituted the entire universe. Edwin Hubble shattered this notion by proving the existence of other galaxies separated by vast distances. Today we understand our galaxy is merely one among roughly hundred thousand million, each containing about hundred thousand million stars. Our sun-an ordinary yellow star near the edge of a spiral arm-takes about hundred million years to complete one rotation around our galaxy's center. Alexander Friedmann embraced Einstein's equations of general relativity, which predicted a non-static universe, while Einstein himself initially resisted this implication. Friedmann made two simple yet powerful assumptions: the universe looks identical in all directions and would appear so from any vantage point. These assumptions received remarkable validation in 1965 when Penzias and Wilson accidentally discovered uniform microwave background radiation coming from all directions-earning them the Nobel Prize. Friedmann's model elegantly explains how galaxies move directly away from each other like dots on an expanding balloon, with their speed proportional to their distance-precisely matching Hubble's observations. All Friedmann solutions show that 10-20 billion years ago, the distance between neighboring galaxies was zero-the moment we call the big bang, when density and space-time curvature would have been infinite. At this singularity, general relativity breaks down because space-time becomes infinitely curved. Since our scientific theories assume smooth, nearly flat space-time, they cannot describe what happened "before" the big bang. This limitation suggests we should consider time as beginning with the big bang, with previous events having no scientific consequences for our universe. Many scientists resisted this conclusion. The steady state theory (1948) suggested new galaxies continuously formed as existing ones moved apart, maintaining constant density. However, radio source surveys in the 1950s-60s and the discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation in 1965 contradicted this model. The definitive proof came through Roger Penrose and Hawking's 1970 paper demonstrating that a big bang singularity must have occurred if general relativity is correct and the universe contains as much matter as we observe. This inevitable beginning presents profound implications. Unlike previous cosmological models that could extend infinitely backward in time, modern physics points to a definite starting point-a moment of creation that demands explanation. This scientific boundary pushes us to confront questions that were once solely in the realm of philosophy and theology.

第4章

Black Holes: Gravity's Ultimate Victory

The term "black hole" entered scientific vocabulary in 1969 through John Wheeler, though the concept has much deeper roots. In 1783, John Michell theorized that sufficiently massive stars could have gravity strong enough to prevent light from escaping-an idea also proposed by the Marquis de Laplace. However, these early concepts were incompatible with Newtonian physics. Only Einstein's general relativity (1915) provided the framework to properly understand these cosmic phenomena. Stars form when hydrogen gas clouds collapse under gravity, heating until nuclear fusion ignites. This creates an equilibrium between gravitational attraction and outward pressure from fusion energy. Eventually, stars exhaust their nuclear fuel-with more massive stars burning out faster. In 1928, Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar calculated that cold stars exceeding about 1.5 solar masses (now called the Chandrasekhar limit) couldn't support themselves against gravity through electron degeneracy pressure. Stars below this limit become white dwarfs-supported by electron repulsion-with radii of a few thousand miles and densities of hundreds of tons per cubic inch. Alternatively, some become neutron stars, supported by neutron repulsion, with just ten-mile radii and densities of hundreds of millions of tons per cubic inch. But what happens to stars above the Chandrasekhar limit remained controversial until Robert Oppenheimer finally applied general relativity in 1939 to show they would collapse indefinitely. As a star collapses, its gravitational field bends light paths inward. To distant observers, the star appears progressively dimmer and redder. Eventually, when the star shrinks below a critical radius, the gravitational field becomes so strong that light cannot escape-creating a black hole bounded by an event horizon. Time dilation creates bizarre effects: if an astronaut on a collapsing star sent signals every second by their watch, observers would see these signals arrive with increasingly longer intervals, never receiving the signal sent at the moment the star crosses its critical radius. Work by Penrose and Hawking between 1965-1970 showed that general relativity predicts a singularity of infinite density within black holes-like the big bang in reverse, marking the end of time for anything falling in. This breakdown of predictability led Penrose to propose the "cosmic censorship hypothesis"-that singularities are always hidden behind event horizons, protecting outside observers from unpredictability. In 1967, Werner Israel proved non-rotating black holes must be perfectly spherical, with size dependent only on mass. Through subsequent work by Roy Kerr, Brandon Carter, Hawking, and David Robinson, we learned that stationary black holes must settle into states determined solely by mass and rotation rate-leading to the famous saying "a black hole has no hair," meaning vast information about the collapsed body is permanently lost. Though invisible by definition, black holes can be detected through their gravitational effects on visible companions. Cygnus X-1, where a visible star orbits an unseen object of about six solar masses, provides compelling evidence for black holes. X-rays generated by matter spiraling from the visible star toward its companion further support this hypothesis. Smaller "primordial" black holes might have formed during the extreme conditions of the early universe, potentially revealing much about our cosmic origins if we could detect them.

『ホーキング、自らを語る』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第5章

The Quantum Revolution: Black Holes Aren't So Black

In November 1970, Hawking made a remarkable discovery about black hole event horizons-their boundaries behave like light rays that can never approach each other, causing the horizon area to always increase when matter falls in. This nondecreasing behavior strikingly resembles entropy-a physical quantity measuring disorder that never decreases in isolated systems. When Jacob Bekenstein suggested the event horizon area might represent black hole entropy, it seemed to preserve the second law of thermodynamics. However, this created a paradox: if black holes have entropy, they must have temperature and emit radiation-contradicting their very definition as objects from which nothing escapes. Hawking initially opposed this interpretation in a 1972 paper with Carter and Bardeen, highlighting what seemed to be a fundamental flaw in Bekenstein's reasoning. Yet in 1973, after Soviet scientists Zeldovich and Starobinsky convinced Hawking that rotating black holes should emit particles according to quantum principles, he made a startling discovery. When calculating this mathematically, he found that even non-rotating black holes emit radiation with precisely the spectrum of a hot body. This emission occurs because quantum fluctuations create virtual particle pairs near the horizon. When one particle with negative energy falls into the black hole, its partner with positive energy can escape to infinity, appearing as radiation emitted from the black hole. This quantum mechanism means black holes aren't truly black but glow with thermal radiation-the smaller the black hole, the higher its temperature and emission rate. As black holes lose mass through radiation, their temperature and emission rate accelerate, eventually leading to a tremendous final explosion equivalent to millions of H-bombs. Large black holes of several solar masses have temperatures near absolute zero, making their radiation negligible compared to the cosmic microwave background. Such holes would take about 10^66 years to evaporate. However, primordial black holes from the early universe with masses around a thousand million tons would have lifetimes roughly equal to the universe's age and emit significant X-rays and gamma rays. These "white hot" black holes could theoretically generate enormous power-about ten thousand megawatts-though harnessing this energy would be impractical since such a black hole would fall through Earth to its center. Detecting primordial black holes presents significant challenges. While we observe a background of gamma rays that could potentially come from these objects, this radiation was likely generated by other processes. Observations indicate there cannot be more than three hundred little black holes per cubic light-year in the universe. The apparent scarcity of primordial black holes tells us something important-the early universe must have been remarkably smooth and uniform rather than chaotic or irregular. Hawking's radiation prediction represented the first successful combination of general relativity and quantum mechanics, initially meeting strong skepticism. Eventually most scientists accepted that black holes must radiate if our understanding of physics is correct. This radiation implies gravitational collapse isn't as final as once thought-matter falling into a black hole would eventually return to the universe as radiation, though in a completely different form.

第6章

Origins and Destiny: How the Universe Began

At a 1981 Vatican conference on cosmology, Hawking was advised by the pope that studying the universe's evolution after the big bang was acceptable, but scientists shouldn't inquire into the big bang itself as that was "God's work." This anecdote highlights the profound philosophical implications of cosmological research. The hot big bang model describes a universe beginning infinitely hot at zero size, cooling as it expands. One second after the big bang, temperatures would have fallen to about ten thousand million degrees. As expansion continued, most electrons and antielectrons annihilated each other, producing more photons. About 100 seconds after the big bang, at one thousand million degrees, protons and neutrons combined to form deuterium and helium nuclei. The model predicts about a quarter of protons and neutrons converted into helium, with remaining neutrons decaying into protons-matching observations perfectly. The model also explains the microwave background radiation discovered by Penzias and Wilson in 1965-the cooled remnant of the hot early universe. After element formation, the universe continued expanding for a million years until electrons and nuclei combined into atoms. In slightly denser regions, expansion eventually halted, leading to collapse and rotation that formed disk-like galaxies. Within these galaxies, smaller gas clouds collapsed to form stars, with nuclear fusion converting hydrogen to helium. Despite its success, the hot big bang model leaves crucial questions unanswered: Why was the early universe so hot? Why is it so uniform on large scales? Why did it begin expanding at almost exactly the critical rate to avoid recollapse? And what caused the small density fluctuations that developed into stars and galaxies? Alan Guth proposed the inflationary model to address these issues. In this model, the universe experienced a period of extraordinarily rapid exponential expansion-increasing by a factor of 10^30 in a tiny fraction of a second. This inflationary expansion would smooth out irregularities, explaining the universe's uniformity, and drive the expansion rate toward the critical value. During inflation, both positive matter energy and negative gravitational energy doubled repeatedly, creating what Guth called "the ultimate free lunch." To understand the universe's beginning requires quantum gravity-a theory combining quantum mechanics and gravity. While we lack a complete theory, Hawking proposed the "no boundary" condition, suggesting space-time can be finite yet have no boundary or edge-like Earth's surface with two additional dimensions. The universe would be completely self-contained, neither created nor destroyed, unaffected by anything outside itself. This proposal predicts that most possible universe histories are extremely improbable, but a particular family of histories is much more likely. These can be visualized as resembling Earth's surface, with the North Pole representing the beginning in imaginary time, expanding to maximum size at the equator, then contracting to the South Pole. Though zero-sized at the poles, these points wouldn't be singularities. The no boundary proposal suggests the universe began with minimal non-uniformity, which was then amplified during inflation to eventually form galaxies and stars. This self-contained universe concept profoundly impacts theological questions-if the universe has no boundary and is completely self-contained, what place remains for a creator?

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『ホーキング、自らを語る』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第7章

Time's Arrow: Why We Remember Yesterday But Not Tomorrow

Why does time move forward? Why do we remember the past but not the future? These questions explore the fundamental asymmetry of time despite the fact that physics laws themselves don't distinguish between past and future. The laws of physics remain unchanged under the combination of three operations: C (changing particles for antiparticles), P (taking the mirror image), and T (reversing motion direction). Yet ordinary life shows a clear difference between forward and backward time-broken cups don't reassemble themselves and jump back onto tables. Three distinct arrows give direction to time: the thermodynamic arrow (disorder increases), the psychological arrow (how we experience time passing), and the cosmological arrow (universe expansion). Hawking argues that the psychological arrow is determined by the thermodynamic one, and both relate to the cosmological arrow under the no boundary assumption. The second law of thermodynamics states that disorder increases because disordered states vastly outnumber ordered ones. A jigsaw puzzle has only one correct arrangement but countless disordered ones. Systems naturally evolve from rare ordered states to more probable disordered states-like shaking a completed puzzle. If the universe began in high order, disorder would increase with time. Computer memory provides a model for understanding our psychological time arrow. When recording information, a memory device moves from a disordered state to an ordered one, but this process dissipates energy as heat, increasing overall disorder. Thus, the direction in which we remember is the same as that in which disorder increases. Why was the universe in a highly ordered state at one end of time? Why does disorder increase in the same direction the universe expands? The no boundary condition suggests the universe began in a smooth, ordered state with only minimal quantum fluctuations. It started with inflationary expansion, during which density fluctuations remained small initially but eventually grew, forming galaxies and stars as regions of higher density slowed their expansion. This explains why the thermodynamic arrow points in the same direction as our psychological sense of time. What happens when the universe stops expanding and begins contracting? Would disorder decrease and the thermodynamic arrow reverse? Initially, Hawking believed disorder would decrease during universal contraction, creating a symmetry between expanding and contracting phases where people would live their lives backward. However, his colleague Don Page pointed out this wasn't required by the no boundary condition, and his student Raymond Laflamme demonstrated in a more complex model that collapse differs fundamentally from expansion. Hawking realized his mistake-the no boundary condition actually implies disorder continues increasing during contraction. Unlike some scientists who never admit errors, Hawking believed it's better to acknowledge mistakes openly. Einstein exemplified this when he called his cosmological constant "the biggest mistake of his life."

第8章

Unification: The Quest for a Theory of Everything

Finding a complete unified theory of everything remains one of physics' greatest challenges. We've made progress through partial theories addressing limited phenomena-chemistry calculates atomic interactions without requiring complete knowledge of nuclear structure. The ultimate goal is a consistent unified theory incorporating all these partial theories as approximations. Einstein spent his later years unsuccessfully seeking a unified theory, but the time wasn't right-nuclear forces remained mysterious and Einstein rejected quantum mechanics despite helping develop it. Today, our prospects seem better with greater knowledge, though we must avoid overconfidence. History shows previous declarations about physics being "nearly complete" have been premature. We currently have general relativity governing gravity and separate theories for weak, strong, and electromagnetic forces. The main difficulty in unification is that general relativity is classical while other theories are quantum-based. Combining general relativity with the uncertainty principle produces remarkable consequences like non-black black holes and a boundary-free universe, but also creates mathematical problems-virtual particle pairs would have infinite energy, curving space-time to infinitesimal size. While other quantum theories manage infinities through renormalization, this approach doesn't work for general relativity. Supergravity theory, proposed in 1976, attempted to solve this by adding particles of various spins that could cancel out infinities, but the calculations proved too complex to verify. String theories emerged as an alternative. Unlike particles occupying single points, strings have length but no other dimensions. Particles become waves traveling along strings, and forces result from strings joining or dividing. Originally developed to explain strong forces, string theory was repurposed by Scherk and Schwarz in 1974 to describe gravity. The heterotic string version seemed promising for explaining observed particles, though string theories work only in ten or twenty-six dimensions rather than our familiar four. These extra dimensions are curled up into spaces so incredibly small-a million million million million millionth of an inch-that we don't notice them. The anthropic principle offers an explanation for why only three space dimensions expanded-two dimensions wouldn't allow complex life (creatures would fall apart or have to climb over each other), while more than three dimensions would make planetary orbits and atoms unstable due to gravitational and electrical forces behaving differently.

『ホーキング、自らを語る』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第9章

The Mind of God: Philosophy Meets Physics

There are three possibilities regarding a unified theory: we might someday discover a complete theory; there might be an infinite sequence of increasingly accurate theories with no ultimate one; or perhaps no comprehensive theory exists because events occur randomly beyond a certain point. The quantum uncertainty principle has shown us events can't be predicted with complete accuracy. Our scientific goal is now to formulate laws that predict events up to this uncertainty limit. While our experience suggests an endless sequence of more refined theories, gravity may provide a natural endpoint. At the Planck energy (10^19 GeV), particles would form tiny black holes, suggesting some ultimate theory must exist. Though current accelerators reach only GeV energies, the early universe experienced Planck-level energies. Hawking believed mathematical consistency and studying the early universe would lead us to a complete unified theory by century's end-if we don't destroy ourselves first. Such a discovery would revolutionize our understanding. Unlike Newton's time when educated people could grasp all human knowledge, science has become increasingly specialized. But like Einstein's relativity-once understood by only two people but now taught widely-a unified theory would eventually be simplified and taught in schools. If the no-boundary proposal is correct, God had no freedom in choosing initial conditions for the universe, though He could still choose its governing laws. Yet even this choice may be limited-there may be only one or a few self-consistent unified theories allowing intelligent beings to exist. Science's mathematical models can't answer why there should be a universe at all. Why does the universe bother to exist? Does the unified theory somehow necessitate its own existence, or does it require a creator? And if so, who created the creator? Scientists have been too busy describing what the universe is to ask why, while philosophers haven't kept pace with scientific advances. In the eighteenth century, philosophers considered all knowledge their domain, but as science grew more technical, philosophy narrowed its scope dramatically-to the point where Wittgenstein claimed philosophy's only task was analyzing language. If we discover a complete theory, it should eventually become broadly understandable, allowing everyone to discuss why the universe exists. Finding that answer would be human reason's ultimate triumph-we would know the mind of God.

★★★★★

『ホーキング、自らを語る』を最後まで読み終えました

100万人以上の学習者に愛用されています

“23日間、毎日使い続けています。今では日課の一部です。”

jayallen

『ホーキング、自らを語る』の主要テーマ

cosmic origins
black hole singularities
expanding universe
unification of physics
nature of time

『ホーキング、自らを語る』の名言

Even if there is only one possible unified theory, it is just a set of rules and equations. What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe?
However, if we discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few scientists.
Thus, the eventual goal of science is to provide a single theory that describes the whole universe.
The laws of science do not distinguish between the past and the future.
Time dilation creates bizarre effects.

『ホーキング、自らを語る』の登場人物

Stephen HawkingAuthor and physicist who studied black holes
Edwin HubbleAstronomer who proved the universe is expanding
Alexander FriedmannPhysicist who modeled the non-static universe
Roger PenrosePhysicist who co-authored work on singularities

著者について

スティーヴン・ウィリアム・ホーキング（1942–2018）は、『ホーキング、自らを語る（The Theory of Everything）』の著者であり、ブラックホール、宇宙論、そして宇宙の起源に関する画期的な研究で知られる、現代で最も著名な理論物理学者の一人です。イギリスのオックスフォードに生まれたホーキングは、オックスフォード大学ユニバーシティ・カレッジで物理学を学び、1966年にケンブリッジ大学で応用数学と理論物理学の博士号を取得しました。彼はキャリアの大部分をケンブリッジで過ごし、空間、時間、重力を支配する基本法則の研究に捧げました。

20代前半に筋萎縮性側索硬化症（ALS）と診断されたにもかかわらず、ホーキングは革命的な科学研究を続け、1974年にブラックホールが放射を放出していること（現在は「ホーキング放射」として知られる）を発見しました。これは量子力学と一般相対性理論を根本的に結びつけるものでした。

複雑な宇宙論の概念を一般の人々にも分かりやすく伝える彼の能力は、彼を科学的アイコンとしてだけでなく、文化的現象としての地位も確立させ、『新スタートレック（Star Trek: The Next Generation）』、『ザ・シンプソンズ』、『フューチュラマ』などの番組にも出演しました。ホーキングのベストセラー『ホーキング、宇宙を語る（A Brief History of Time）』（1988年）は、サンデー・タイムズのベストセラーリストに237週間ランクインし、世界中で1,000万部以上を売り上げ、数十の言語に翻訳されました。彼は大統領自由勲章を授与され、ウェストミンスター寺院のアイザック・ニュートンとチャールズ・ダーウィンの傍らに埋葬され、歴史上最も偉大な科学的頭脳の一人としての遺産を確固たるものにしました。

ホーキング、自らを語るの要約をダウンロード

ホーキング、自らを語るの要約をPDFまたはEPUBで無料でダウンロード。印刷やオフラインでいつでもお読みいただけます。

他のユーザーのお気に入り

A Brief History of Time

Stephen Hawking

The Grand Design

Stephen Hawking & Leonard Mlodinow

Brief answers to the big questions

Stephen Hawking

The Theory of Almost Everything

Robert Oerter

On the Origin of Time

Thomas Hertog

Biggest Ideas in the Universe

Sean Carroll

Something Deeply Hidden

Sean Carroll

Science of Interstellar

Kip S. Thorne

この本に関するよくある質問

この学習プランの一部

学習プラン

Neutron stars

3 h 28 m•4 エピソード

学習プラン

The Cosmic Blueprint: Logic and Proof

This plan offers a profound cross-cultural journey into the evolution of human logic and its connection to the universe. It is ideal for philosophy students, history buffs, and science enthusiasts seeking to understand the metaphysical foundations of mathematics.

2 h•4 セクション

学習プラン

Physics theories

This learning plan provides a comprehensive journey through the evolution of physics, from classical mechanics to the frontiers of modern theoretical research. It's ideal for curious minds seeking to understand how our view of reality has transformed over centuries, science enthusiasts wanting a solid conceptual foundation in physics without heavy mathematics, and anyone fascinated by questions about the nature of space, time, and the universe itself.

6 h 31 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Physics of Interstellar Survival

This plan bridges the gap between theoretical physics and practical engineering for the future of humanity. It is essential for aspiring aerospace engineers, science enthusiasts, and anyone fascinated by the technical realities of becoming a multi-planetary species.

1 h 12 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

The Geometry of Existence

This curriculum is essential for students and enthusiasts seeking to understand the mathematical elegance underlying the physical universe. It provides a high-level synthesis of classical mechanics, quantum theory, and relativity, making it ideal for those with a foundation in physics who want to see the 'big picture' of cosmic design.

3 h•6 セクション

学習プラン

The Quantum Reality Paradox

This plan is essential for anyone seeking to bridge the gap between classical intuition and the counterintuitive truths of modern physics. It is designed for curious minds and science enthusiasts who want to grasp the profound philosophical and physical implications of quantum mechanics.

2 h•4 セクション

学習プラン

From Clockwork to Quanta

This learning plan provides a vital bridge between the intuitive laws of Newton and the complex, counter-intuitive reality of modern physics. It is ideal for science enthusiasts and students seeking to understand how the collapse of classical certainty birthed the quantum revolution.

1 h 24 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Cosmic Mirror: Science Meets Spirit

This plan is essential for seekers and thinkers looking to reconcile modern physics with ancient metaphysical truths. It is designed for those who want to move beyond reductionist science toward a deeper, unified understanding of the mind and the cosmos.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

The Unified Physics Masterclass

This masterclass is essential for anyone seeking a rigorous, top-down understanding of the laws governing our universe. It bridges the gap between classical mechanics and modern quantum gravity, making it ideal for aspiring physicists, engineers, or science enthusiasts.

3 h 45 m•4 セクション

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

今すぐ学習の旅を始めよう

第6章

ホーキング、自らを語る

概要『ホーキング、自らを語る』の概要

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Universe Through Hawking's Eyes: A Journey From Nothing to Everything

From Ancient Models to the Big Bang: Our Evolving Cosmic Picture

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Cosmic Expansion and the Inevitable Beginning

Black Holes: Gravity's Ultimate Victory

『ホーキング、自らを語る』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Quantum Revolution: Black Holes Aren't So Black

Origins and Destiny: How the Universe Began

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Time's Arrow: Why We Remember Yesterday But Not Tomorrow

Unification: The Quest for a Theory of Everything

『ホーキング、自らを語る』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Mind of God: Philosophy Meets Physics

『ホーキング、自らを語る』を最後まで読み終えました

『ホーキング、自らを語る』の主要テーマ

『ホーキング、自らを語る』の名言

『ホーキング、自らを語る』の登場人物

著者について

ホーキング、自らを語るの要約をダウンロード

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この本に関するよくある質問

What is The Theory of Everything by Stephen Hawking about?

Who should read The Theory of Everything by Stephen Hawking?

Is The Theory of Everything by Stephen Hawking worth reading?

How difficult is The Theory of Everything to understand?

この学習プランの一部

Neutron stars

もっと見る

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Universe Through Hawking's Eyes: A Journey From Nothing to Everything

From Ancient Models to the Big Bang: Our Evolving Cosmic Picture

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Cosmic Expansion and the Inevitable Beginning

Black Holes: Gravity's Ultimate Victory

『ホーキング、自らを語る』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Quantum Revolution: Black Holes Aren't So Black

Origins and Destiny: How the Universe Began

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Time's Arrow: Why We Remember Yesterday But Not Tomorrow

Unification: The Quest for a Theory of Everything

『ホーキング、自らを語る』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Mind of God: Philosophy Meets Physics

『ホーキング、自らを語る』を最後まで読み終えました

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この学習プランの一部

Neutron stars

もっと見る

『ホーキング、自らを語る』の概要