第4章
The Crisis of Catholicism: An Institution in Freefall
No American institution has been more devastated by the post-1960s revolution than the Catholic Church. Once thriving under Pope Pius XII with doubling numbers of Catholics and priests, packed Sunday Masses, and cultural influence through figures like Fulton Sheen, the Church has experienced catastrophic decline since Vatican II.
The statistics reveal a Church in free fall: priests declining from 58,000 in 1965 to 45,000 by 2002; ordinations plummeting from 1,575 to 450; seminarians dropping by 90 percent; two-thirds of Catholic nuns lost; teaching nuns collapsing from 104,000 to 8,200; religious orders facing extinction with 99 percent fewer seminarians; and parochial schools losing two-thirds of their enrollment. The Pew Forum confirmed one in three Catholics raised in the faith have left, with Catholics maintaining their percentage of the population only through immigration. Latinos now comprise 29 percent of U.S. Catholics and may reach 50 percent by 2020.
Even Catholics who remain show diminishing devotion: Catholic marriages have fallen by a third while annulments skyrocketed from 338 to 50,000 annually; Sunday Mass attendance collapsed from 75 percent to 25 percent; and most lay teachers reject Church teachings on contraception, abortion, and divorce. A Georgetown University study found 45 percent of Catholics had never made a sacramental confession, while 70 percent of younger Catholics view the Eucharist as merely symbolic.
Anti-Catholicism, called "the deepest bias in the history of the American people" by Arthur Schlesinger, has emerged from the shadows as the Church has weakened. The entertainment industry regularly mocks Catholic symbols and beliefs through blasphemous art and media portrayals. While Hollywood fearlessly ridicules Catholicism, it cowers before Islam, with director Roland Emmerich admitting he destroyed Christian symbols but avoided Muslim ones in his film "2012" for fear of fatwa.
Notre Dame's 2009 invitation to President Obama to deliver its commencement address exposed deep divisions within American Catholicism. Despite Obama's perfect record of supporting abortion rights-including partial-birth abortion and embryonic stem cell research-the university honored him, prompting philosophy professor Ralph McInerny to declare Notre Dame had "forfeited its right to call itself a Catholic University." Bishop John D'Arcy boycotted the event, noting Obama had "separated science from ethics."
As America abandons its Christian roots, principled Catholic opposition to embryonic stem cell research, abortion, gay marriage, and euthanasia increasingly places believers outside the American mainstream. Pope Leo XIII's warnings about "Americanism" in 1899-that Catholics might rely too heavily on secular ideas and neglect spiritual values-now seem prophetic.
第5章
The End of White America: Demographic Transformation
According to the 2010 Census, white Americans will become a minority by 2041, with white children becoming a minority by 2019. Music critic and Vassar professor Hua Hsu welcomes this shift as "a cultural and demographic inevitability." The cultural response has already begun, with some white Americans eager to "divest themselves of their whiteness," as evidenced by Larry King's anecdote about his eight-year-old son wanting to be black because "black is in."
Census Bureau projections confirm that whites will become a minority by 2042, dropping to 46.3% of the population by 2050. The demographic transformation is already visible in schools-Hispanic children comprised 25% of kindergartners in 2010, up from 15% in 2000, while the white share fell from 59% to 53%. Former Census Bureau director Steve Murdock grimly predicts "it's basically over for Anglos" in Texas, where two-thirds of children are non-Anglo.
Buchanan identifies three causes for white America's decline: birth rates below replacement level for decades, a forty-year immigration wave primarily from Asia, Africa, and Latin America, and higher birth rates among Hispanic immigrants. Between 2000-2010, the number of white children fell by 4.3 million (10%), and by 2020, whites over 65 will outnumber those under 17.
In 1997, President Clinton celebrated America's demographic transformation as "the third great revolution," proving we could live "without having a dominant European culture." Most Americans, rather than being alarmed at becoming a minority, seem to welcome it. Buchanan calls this "ethnomasochism"-taking pleasure in one's own ethnic group's dispossession-a phenomenon Susan Sontag epitomized when she called "the white race the cancer of human history."
The 2007 census revealed alarming trends: illegitimacy rates rose to 71.6% for blacks, exceeded 50% for Hispanics (who account for one in four U.S. births), and reached 28% for whites. Overall, 41% of U.S. births occur outside marriage. Charles Murray calls illegitimacy "the single most important social problem of our time" because it drives everything from dropout rates to crime. Hopes that Catholic Hispanic immigrants might reinforce traditional values have proven false. Instead, Hispanics have assimilated into America's "culture of secular individualism."
Mexican presidents have repeatedly claimed extraterritorial rights in the United States. President Felipe Calderon declared "Mexico does not end at its borders. Where there is a Mexican, there is Mexico," continuing a tradition started by President Ernesto Zedillo who told Mexican Americans, "You're Mexicans who live north of the border." In 1998, Mexico changed its constitution to restore citizenship to Mexican Americans who had become U.S. citizens, aiming to strengthen ties between Mexican Americans and their mother country.
California has become a cautionary tale for America's demographic future. Once the golden land of opportunity, it now resembles a failing state with the nation's lowest bond rating, highest taxes, and worst business climate. Between 2000-2008, 1.4 million domestic migrants fled California while 1.8 million international migrants moved in. By 2010, immigrants comprised 35% of California's workforce, with illegal aliens holding 10% of all jobs, creating an estimated $22 billion fiscal burden on state and local governments.
第6章
Demographic Winter: The Global Population Implosion
Japan faces demographic catastrophe, projected to lose 25-32 million people by 2050, with a fifth of its population disappearing and one in six Japanese over 80. Tokyo's birth rate has plummeted to 1.09 children per woman. Despite government incentives like $3,000 child allowances, Japan's fertility has remained below replacement level since the 1970s. This demographic decline parallels Japan's economic stagnation-from 10% annual growth in the 1960s to the "lost decade" of the 1990s with just 1.8% growth.
Germany's demographic destiny has profoundly shaped European history. After two devastating world wars, Germans are now disappearing-the country hasn't seen births exceed deaths since 1972. This decline was temporarily masked by immigration, but since 2003, Germany's population has been shrinking, with projections showing a loss of eight million inhabitants by mid-century-equivalent to losing Berlin, Hamburg, Munich, Cologne and Frankfurt combined. By 2050, 32% of Germans will be over 65, and 14% over 80.
The United Kingdom appears to be the exception to shrinking European populations, projected to add 10 million people by 2050 while Germany loses 8.5 million. Yet Britain's fertility has been below replacement since the 1970s, with scores of native Britons emigrating annually. The growth comes from immigration, with Caribbean, African, Arab, and Asian populations keeping birthrates up. Oxford demographer David Coleman projects Britain's non-white population will grow from 9% in 2001 to 29% by 2051, with Britons becoming a minority by 2066.
Israel faces a demographic crisis more threatening than any Iranian weapon. While its population of 7.5 million is 80% Jewish, the Arab minority grows faster, except for ultra-Orthodox Jews who typically have eight children per family. By 2040, 78% of all primary school children will be either ultra-Orthodox or Arab. Palestinians west of the Jordan River will outnumber Jews two-to-one by midcentury. Without a two-state solution, Israel faces three unpalatable options: annexing the West Bank (creating a 40% Arab population that would eventually outnumber Jews), expelling Palestinians (inviting war and isolation), or permanent control of territories (creating what Defense Minister Barak warned would be "an apartheid state").
Russia faces catastrophic population decline, falling from 148 million in 1991 to a projected 116 million by 2050. With a fertility rate two-thirds of replacement level and 15 deaths for every 11 births per thousand Russians, the country is experiencing what experts call "hypermortality." Rampant alcoholism, HIV/AIDS, and a deteriorating healthcare system have created death rates comparable to less-developed countries. Simultaneously, Russia's Muslim population has grown 40% since 1989, potentially reaching one-fifth of the nation by 2020.
China faces its own demographic crisis after three decades of its one-child policy. The birthrate has plummeted from six children per couple to 1.8, while the elderly population is projected to reach 31.1% by 2050. Shanghai already has over 20% of its population above sixty with a birthrate below one child per couple. This demographic imbalance creates a "4-2-1" society where one child must support two parents and four grandparents.
第7章
Equality or Freedom: America's Founding Principles Reconsidered
The Founding Fathers believed in equality of God-given rights, not social equality or democracy. Jefferson's famous phrase "all men are created equal" has been taken out of context from a declaration primarily about independence from Britain. The Constitution and Bill of Rights never mention "equality" or "democracy." Jefferson himself owned slaves and referred to Native Americans as "merciless Indian Savages." In his writings, Jefferson repeatedly invoked blood ties with "British brethren" and described the Revolution as severing bonds of kinship.
Madison's Constitution makes no mention of equality, nor do The Federalist Papers he co-authored. This silence is striking-the founding document and its defense contain no reference to Jefferson's famous words about equality from the Declaration. Even the Bill of Rights that Madison introduced to the first Congress omits any mention of equality. As Willmoore Kendall observed, "Publius has a way of clamming up whenever the topic of equality heaves into sight."
Lincoln, though opposing slavery as a "monstrous injustice," explicitly rejected racial equality. In his 1858 debate with Douglas, he declared: "I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races." Lincoln believed in the "superior position assigned to the white race" and considered white supremacy a "universal feeling" among Americans. Lincoln went to war not to free slaves but to preserve the Union, writing to Horace Greeley: "If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it."
The civil rights movement's goals shifted dramatically in 1965 when President Johnson declared at Howard University that "freedom is not enough." He committed the nation to "equality as a fact and equality as a result," arguing that equal opportunity alone couldn't overcome historical disadvantages. This radical shift had no basis in the Constitution or civil rights laws. By 1978, in Regents v. Bakke, the Supreme Court endorsed racial discrimination against whites to advance equality. As Justice Blackmun declared, "In order to get beyond racism, we must first take account of race."
Historians Will and Ariel Durant concluded that "Nature has not read very carefully the American Declaration of Independence." They argued that inequality is natural and inborn, growing with civilization's complexity. "Freedom and equality are sworn and everlasting enemies," they wrote. "To check the growth of inequality, liberty must be sacrificed."
第8章
The Diversity Cult: Unity vs. Multiculturalism
America's founding fathers understood that unity was essential for national strength, as reflected in the motto E pluribus unum. Yet today, many claim America's greatness comes from diversity, with some like Ben Wattenberg celebrating "the non-Europeanization of America" as "heartening news of an almost transcendental quality."
The contemporary concept of diversity represents an ideological construct distinct from traditional appreciation of variety in food, talents, or functional roles. As Peter Wood explains, diversity is a "contemporary set of beliefs" asserting that certain social categories deserve compensatory privileges due to historical discrimination. This ideology holds that preferential treatment for women and people of color is necessary until equality is achieved, and that diversity will transform attitudes, breeding tolerance and enhancing economic prosperity through a wider pool of skills.
America's founders would have rejected today's celebration of diversity. The Jamestown settlers built forts against Indians they viewed as enemies. Early colonists were WASP supremacists who drove out indigenous peoples and excluded Catholics. When Washington became president, the thirteen states were 99% Protestant, with citizenship restricted to "free white persons." Even Benjamin Franklin worried about German immigrants "Germanizing" Pennsylvania. In Federalist No. 2, John Jay described America as "one united people" of common ancestry, language, religion and principles, warning against splitting into "unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties."
Despite public celebration of diversity, Americans' private behavior reveals a different story. Harvard professor Orlando Patterson notes that Black Americans "remain remarkably excluded from most regions of the nation's private sphere," being more segregated than ever with few intimate friendships with non-blacks despite progress in public integration. Even Attorney General Eric Holder lamented persistent self-segregation half a century after the civil rights movement's triumph.
Multiple studies confirm that diversity undermines social cohesion. The New York Times' Eduardo Porter concluded that "racial and ethnic diversity undermine support for public investment in social welfare." Harvard economists traced America's lower social spending compared to Europe to America's "more varied racial and ethnic mix," as Europeans believe government programs benefit people like themselves while Americans suspect otherwise.
第9章
The Triumph of Tribalism: Ethnic Nationalism's Enduring Power
Ethnonationalism-the drive of ethnic groups to establish their own nation-states-represents one of the most powerful forces in human history. Jerry Muller's Foreign Affairs article argues that tribal ties of blood and kinship will threaten all multiethnic nations in the twenty-first century, with ethnic separation often being "the least bad answer" once ethnic nationalism takes hold.
The early 20th century demonstrated ethnonationalism's power through conflicts like the Boer War and Norway's separation from Sweden. The Balkans exemplified this violently, with Christian Slavs uniting to expel Muslim Turks in the First Balkan War (1912-1913). Serbia's nationalist fervor after the Balkan Wars led to Gavrilo Princip's assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand in Sarajevo-an act of ethnonational terrorism that triggered World War I. Marxists were stunned when workers across Europe abandoned class solidarity for tribal loyalty, as German Social Democrats unanimously voted for the kaiser's war credits.
H.G. Wells recognized in 1920 that artificial political boundaries couldn't suppress the "natural political map of the world" based on language, race and culture. He understood that nations are organic living entities, not fabricated constructs, writing that "It is extraordinarily inconvenient to administer together the affairs of peoples speaking different languages." Wells predicted that forcing different ethnicities into artificial states would lead to conflict, as the natural map "heaves and frets beneath the artificial political map like some misfitted giant."
When the Soviet Union collapsed, ethnonationalism triumphed over the moribund ideology of Marxism-Leninism. The USSR splintered into fifteen nations as the Baltic states, Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, the Caucasus republics, and Central Asian states declared independence. But this was "only the end of the beginning"-minorities within these new nations demanded their own independence. Transnistria broke from Moldova, Nagorno-Karabakh from Azerbaijan, while Russia fought bloody wars to keep Chechnya.
China faces serious ethnic challenges that prompted President Hu Jintao to cancel a meeting with Obama during deadly riots between Han Chinese and Uighurs in Xinjiang. Unlike Soviet leaders who allowed their empire to dissolve, Chinese authorities demonstrate their willingness to crush secession through bloodshed, as seen in Tiananmen Square and Tibet. Beijing employs demographic engineering to maintain control over restive regions-flooding Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, Xinjiang and Tibet with Han Chinese settlers while relocating indigenous populations.
Is ethnonationalism mankind's genetic disease that good men should quarantine, or a natural force requiring accommodation for peace? The twentieth century showed ethnonationalism's horrors from Nanking to Auschwitz to Rwanda. Yet it also liberated captive nations, brought down the "evil empire," and birthed scores of African and Asian nations from European empires. America herself emerged from ethnonationalism-colonists' awakening consciousness that they were a new, unique people.
第10章
The Last Chance: America's Path to Renewal or Ruin
America's elites are conducting an unprecedented experiment-transforming a Western Christian republic into a global, egalitarian democracy encompassing all races, creeds, and cultures. They've dethroned God, purged faith from public life, rejected traditional morality, and declared all lifestyles equal. They impose equality through judges, bureaucrats, and cultural institutions despite Middle America's opposition. Buchanan argues this experiment is doomed to fail because it contradicts human nature and reality.
The president's first duty must be addressing America's financial crisis before facing default, currency collapse, or devastating inflation. With federal spending at 25% of GDP while taxes produce only 15%, substantial cuts must come from both entitlement programs (Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security) and the national security apparatus that costs over $1 trillion across wars, foreign bases, embassies, and intelligence work.
Buchanan argues it's absurd that America must borrow from countries to defend those same countries. He questions why 310 million Americans must defend 500 million wealthy Europeans from 140 million Russians, especially with buffer states between them. He advocates withdrawing from NATO, transferring leadership to Europeans, and closing costly overseas bases, citing U.S. Air Force General Brady's admission that "We've got too many daggone bases" and "big money" could be saved.
Buchanan contrasts photos of rebuilt Hiroshima with Detroit's decline to illustrate America's post-Cold War economic losses. He notes that America lost 50,000 factories and 6 million manufacturing jobs in the 2000s while trade competitors ran huge surpluses against us. The problem isn't worker quality but that "China, Japan, and Germany are trade predators not trade partners" who "practice economic nationalism" while reciting free trade rhetoric. Their policies-from currency manipulation to value-added taxes and subsidies-advantage their products in both markets.
If America is to regain unity, we must readopt immigration policies from the Eisenhower-Kennedy era so the melting pot can work again. Buchanan proposes a moratorium on new immigration until unemployment falls to 6 percent, reform of laws to prefer immigrants who share our values and bring skills, completing the border fence, deporting illegal aliens (criminals first), correcting the erroneous interpretation that grants citizenship to children of illegal aliens, raiding businesses that hire illegal workers, and making English our official language.
America has become two countries with wide, deep differences. We've seceded into enclaves of like-minded people, enabled by cable channels and internet sites that create separate worlds. Unlike the segregated past where we at least shared a culture, language, heroes and holidays, today we aren't one people anymore. We don't share a common faith, culture or vision of what America should be. Obama says we're "bound by ideals and values," but what values bind us when we can't even agree on what marriage is?
