What is *Mother of Invention* by Katrine Marçal about?

*Mother of Invention* examines how systemic gender biases have historically sidelined innovations tied to "feminine" domains like caregiving and domestic life, while prioritizing "masculine" technologies in industry and warfare. Marçal argues this skewed perspective stifled progress by excluding diverse perspectives, using examples like early electric cars and wheeled luggage to reveal how patriarchy shaped technological priorities.

Who should read *Mother of Invention* by Katrine Marçal?

This book is essential for professionals in tech, economics, and gender studies, as well as readers interested in innovation history. It offers critical insights for those seeking to understand how systemic biases impact problem-solving and why diversifying STEM fields remains urgent.

Is *Mother of Invention* by Katrine Marçal worth reading?

Yes—the book combines rigorous research with engaging storytelling, earning praise for its fresh take on innovation history. It’s particularly recommended for its analysis of overlooked inventions (e.g., electric car starters) and its relevance to modern debates about equity in tech.

How does *Mother of Invention* explain the failure of early electric cars?

Marçal reveals early electric cars were marketed to women in the 1900s but dismissed as frivolous due to gendered stereotypes (e.g., quiet engines and plush interiors). Male-dominated industries prioritized gasoline cars, delaying sustainable transportation innovations by decades.

What role did Bertha Benz play in automotive history, according to *Mother of Invention*?

Bertha Benz financed her husband’s automobile prototype and undertook the first long-distance car journey in 1888, proving its viability. Despite her pivotal role, historical narratives often minimize her contributions, reflecting broader patterns of erasing women’s ingenuity.

How does *Mother of Invention* challenge traditional views of the wheel’s invention?

The book critiques the myth of the wheel as a singular “eureka” moment, highlighting its 5,000-year evolution. Marçal emphasizes later adaptations—like wheeled luggage—as equally revolutionary, arguing society undervalues incremental improvements tied to “feminine” needs.

Why does *Mother of Invention* claim domestic inventions were overlooked?

Technologies like washing machines or meal prep tools were deemed economically insignificant because they served private, caregiving roles—spheres traditionally devalued in male-centric economies. This bias slowed labor-saving breakthroughs that could have liberated women earlier.

What critiques does *Mother of Invention* face?

Some critics argue Marçal oversimplifies complex economic forces, while others note limited analysis of non-Western innovation histories. However, the book is widely praised for its compelling thesis and accessible storytelling.

アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性

男性中心の経済において、いかに優れたアイデアが無視されるか

カトリーヌ・マルサル

3.89(2377 Reviews)

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』の概要

『マザー・オブ・インベンション（発明の母）』で、ジェンダー・バイアスがいかに何世紀にもわたってイノベーションを停滞させてきたかを解き明かしましょう。なぜキャスター付きのスーツケースは1970年代まで現れなかったのでしょうか？ベンチャーキャピタルのわずか1%しか女性創業者の元へ届いていない現状の中、カーネギー賞にノミネートされたマルシャルの告発書は、私たちが何を失ってきたのか、そして何を得ることができるのかを明らかにします。

語り方を選ぶ

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性の同じアイデアを、あなたに合う声・深さ・ペースで学べます。いつでも切り替えられます。

第1章

The Gendered History of Innovation: A Journey Through Overlooked Genius

Have you ever wondered why it took 5,000 years to put wheels on suitcases? Or why early cars required such strength to start that they occasionally broke jaws? These seemingly simple innovations were delayed not by technological limitations, but by deeply entrenched gender biases that have shaped our relationship with technology throughout history. Katrine Marcal's "Mother of Invention" has become a cultural touchstone for understanding how gender prejudice has stifled innovation, earning praise from tech industry leaders and feminist scholars alike. The book has sparked conversations in Silicon Valley boardrooms and university classrooms about reconsidering what we value as innovation and whose contributions we celebrate. As Melinda Gates noted, this work "brilliantly reveals how our gendered approach to technology has repeatedly left out half the population's needs, wants and experiences."

第2章

When Masculinity Delayed the Wheeled Suitcase

The story of the wheeled suitcase exemplifies how gender norms can delay even the most obvious innovations. For millennia, humans had both wheels and luggage, yet combining them seemed unthinkable until the 1970s. Why? Because carrying one's own bags was deeply intertwined with notions of masculinity and strength. Real men didn't need wheels on their luggage. When Bernard Sadow finally introduced the wheeled suitcase in 1972, he faced overwhelming rejection. Major department stores dismissed his invention not because the concept was flawed, but because they couldn't imagine consumer demand. One executive bluntly told him, "No man would ever use a suitcase with wheels." The resistance wasn't technical but cultural - wheeled luggage was perceived as feminine, as an admission of physical weakness. This gender-based resistance to innovation appears repeatedly throughout history. Consider how long women struggled with heavy suitcases while the solution was technically possible for thousands of years. The cultural perception that "real men" should carry their burdens without assistance prevented an entire industry from evolving. The eventual success of Robert Plath's Rollaboard suitcase in the early 1990s came only after significant shifts in cultural attitudes about gender and mobility. By then, women had entered the workforce in unprecedented numbers, business travel had become commonplace for all genders, and the rigid masculinity of earlier decades had begun to soften. The advertisement that finally normalized wheeled luggage captured this cultural shift perfectly - showing the liberated, modern traveler effortlessly navigating airports with their new wheeled companion. What other innovations might we be missing today because they don't align with our gendered expectations of how the world should work?

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第3章

Bertha Benz: The Woman Who Made Cars Viable

Dawn broke on August 5, 1888, as Bertha Benz quietly took her husband's experimental "horseless carriage" for an unprecedented journey. Without Karl Benz's knowledge, Bertha and her teenage sons embarked on a daring 90-kilometer drive from Mannheim to Pforzheim, Germany - the world's first long-distance automobile journey. This wasn't merely a joyride. Bertha understood something her inventor husband didn't: for the automobile to succeed commercially, it needed to prove itself practical for everyday use. Karl had focused on perfection in the workshop, but Bertha recognized the importance of real-world testing and public demonstration. The journey was fraught with challenges that would have defeated less determined travelers. When the fuel line clogged, Bertha cleared it with her hatpin. When the ignition wire needed insulation, she used her garter. When the wooden brakes began to fail, she sought out a cobbler to nail leather onto them - inventing brake linings in the process. Each obstacle became an opportunity for innovation. Upon reaching Pforzheim, Bertha had accomplished something revolutionary. Her journey proved that automobiles could be practical for travel, not just novelties. She identified crucial improvements needed for commercial viability, from better brakes to an additional gear for hill climbing. Most importantly, she demonstrated the automobile's potential to the public, generating invaluable publicity. Yet despite this pioneering achievement, women's relationship with automobiles quickly became complicated. Society rapidly branded driving as unsuitable for women, citing supposed emotional and physical limitations. Medical journals published articles claiming women lacked the mental capacity for driving. One physician wrote that women's "physical and mental characteristics" made them "unfit to operate any sort of vehicle." This skepticism mirrored broader societal prejudices against women's capabilities, echoing arguments against women's suffrage and education. The irony is striking - the automobile industry owes its commercial viability to a woman's ingenuity, yet quickly developed narratives to exclude women from the driver's seat. The early competition between electric and petrol cars further reveals these gender dynamics. Electric cars, with their quiet operation and push-button starting, were marketed to women as "feminine" vehicles. Meanwhile, petrol cars required physical strength to crank-start and were considered "masculine." When Charles F. Kettering invented the electric starter in 1911, eliminating the dangerous hand-cranking process, he essentially incorporated "feminine" convenience features into "masculine" petrol vehicles - making them accessible to all drivers. This innovation helped cement the petrol car's dominance, showing how technological progress often occurs when we transcend, rather than reinforce, gender stereotypes.

第4章

From Bras to the Moon: The Seamstresses Behind Spacesuits

When Neil Armstrong took his historic steps on the lunar surface, few knew that his life-saving spacesuit was crafted by the same hands that made Playtex bras and girdles. This remarkable connection between women's undergarments and space exploration reveals how expertise traditionally coded as "feminine" proved crucial for one of humanity's greatest technological achievements. The story begins with Abram Spanel, whose company International Latex Corporation (ILC) faced a crisis during World War II when the Japanese invasion of British Malaya cut off rubber supplies. Spanel's strategic pivot from civilian products to military gear - producing lifeboats for Marines and helmets for the Air Force - ensured his company's survival. Foreseeing post-war consumer demand, he positioned ILC (with its Playtex brand) to capitalize on Christian Dior's "New Look" fashion revolution, transforming the company into a women's lingerie powerhouse. When NASA sought contractors to develop spacesuits for the Apollo program, traditional military contractors proposed rigid, armor-like designs. ILC, drawing on its expertise in creating flexible, form-fitting undergarments, offered something revolutionary: a soft, hand-sewn suit that allowed astronauts the mobility needed for lunar exploration. The seamstresses who crafted these spacesuits brought unique skills honed in lingerie production. Their precision was legendary - they sewed at exactly 10 stitches per inch, without using pins that might puncture the suit's integrity. Many couldn't read the technical blueprints but understood fabric behavior intuitively from years of experience creating garments that had to perform under stress while conforming perfectly to human bodies. These women, working with specialized sewing machines and overcoming language barriers with engineers, created 21 layers of material that protected astronauts from extreme temperatures, micrometeorites, and the vacuum of space. Their expertise in creating seams that could withstand pressure while allowing movement proved invaluable. NASA initially hesitated to trust a women's undergarment company with such a critical mission component. Yet after rigorous testing, ILC's design outperformed all competitors. The seamstresses' precision, attention to detail, and deep understanding of how materials interact with the human body - skills developed in a traditionally feminine industry - proved essential for space exploration. This story challenges the narrative that technological innovation emerges primarily from traditionally masculine fields or wartime destruction. The Apollo spacesuits demonstrate that revolutionary technologies can arise from peaceful endeavors when properly resourced and valued. The seamstresses' contribution represents a powerful counterpoint to the notion that violence drives innovation, highlighting how traditionally feminine skills played a crucial role in one of humanity's most significant technological achievements. What might we achieve if we valued all forms of expertise equally, regardless of gender associations?

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第5章

From Human Computers to Digital Pioneers

In the summer of 1946, scientists and engineers gathered at the University of Pennsylvania for a groundbreaking event: the Moore School Lectures, the world's first course on computer technology. The star attraction was ENIAC, a massive 30-ton machine that had revolutionized computational speed during World War II. As attendees marveled at this "mathematical brain," Dr. George Stibitz raised a crucial question about the economics of these new machines, introducing a peculiar metric: "girl-years." This term reflected a historical reality - before machines were called computers, "computer" was a job title for people, predominantly women, hired to perform complex calculations by hand. These human computers made significant contributions to scientific endeavors, from astronomy to ballistics tables, despite being paid less than men with comparable skills. The reference to "girl-years" in economic discussions exemplified the historically significant yet undervalued role women played in computation. When Stibitz calculated that a new computer might save "about four girl-years" of work, he was quantifying value through the lens of gendered labor - highlighting how women's computational work was simultaneously essential and undervalued. This pattern extended to Bletchley Park, where Alan Turing and his team worked to crack Nazi Germany's Enigma code during World War II. While Turing's brilliance has been rightfully celebrated, less attention has been paid to the women who constituted three-quarters of Bletchley Park's workforce. These women operated the code-breaking machines, effectively becoming the world's first computer programmers. Despite societal perceptions that women were merely "following instructions," their work required tremendous skill, precision, and problem-solving abilities. They worked grueling shifts, maintaining absolute secrecy about their crucial contributions to the war effort. Their programming expertise laid the foundation for modern computing, yet their stories remained largely untold for decades. The transition from human computers to electronic machines reveals a fascinating gender dynamic. Initially, programming was considered "women's work" - detailed, painstaking, and less prestigious than hardware design. As the field's importance and prestige grew, men increasingly entered programming, and narratives shifted to portray it as inherently masculine and unsuited for women. This historical amnesia about women's foundational role in computing persists today. The stereotype of the male programmer emerged not because women lacked aptitude but because the field's history was actively rewritten as it gained status and higher pay. Understanding this history challenges contemporary assumptions about who "naturally" belongs in computing and reminds us that what we consider inherently masculine or feminine skills often reflects social construction rather than innate abilities. The story of computing's evolution from mechanical calculators to digital computers demonstrates how gender perceptions shape technological development and who receives credit for innovation. By recognizing the crucial contributions of these pioneering women, we gain a more accurate understanding of computing history and the artificial nature of gender barriers in technology.

第6章

The Rollator Revolution: Innovation Born from Necessity

In the quiet Swedish city of Vasteras, Aina Wifalk's life took a dramatic turn when she contracted polio in her twenties, leaving her partially paralyzed and dependent on crutches. For decades, she struggled with mobility, experiencing chronic pain and fatigue from the strain crutches placed on her shoulders and arms. But rather than accepting these limitations, Wifalk channeled her frustration into innovation. Inspired by a library trolley she encountered at work, Wifalk envisioned a walking aid that would distribute weight differently - providing support while freeing the arms and shoulders. Her vision became the rollator: a four-wheeled walker with handlebars, brakes, and a seat for resting. Unlike previous mobility devices designed primarily for temporary rehabilitation, Wifalk conceived the rollator as a permanent companion for daily life - a tool for independence. Working with a local technical college, she refined her design and introduced it to the world in 1978. The rollator revolutionized mobility for millions of elderly and disabled people, offering independence with dignity. Today, rollators are ubiquitous in care facilities and public spaces worldwide, so commonplace we hardly notice their innovative design. Yet despite creating this life-changing invention, Wifalk received minimal financial compensation. She sold her idea for a nominal sum, never patenting it internationally. Her story highlights the systemic exclusion many women face in entrepreneurship and innovation - particularly women with disabilities. This exclusion manifests most dramatically in access to capital. Women entrepreneurs face what amounts to a perpetual "credit crunch," with female-founded startups receiving just 2% of venture capital despite women owning nearly 40% of businesses. Financial systems designed by and for men often fail to recognize the potential of women's innovations, especially when those innovations address needs outside male experience. The bias becomes even more pronounced when gender intersects with other factors like disability or race. Studies show investors consistently rate identical business plans lower when presented by women versus men, with the gap widening further for women of color or disabled women. This occurs despite evidence that women-led businesses often reach profitability faster and deliver better returns on investment. The venture capital model itself, rooted in 19th-century whaling expeditions, prioritizes high-risk, high-reward investments in large ventures over smaller, steadier innovations. This philosophy favors male-led startups and shapes the technological landscape to prefer big, flashy "unicorns" over more modest but potentially more useful innovations - often those addressing needs outside male experience. Wifalk's rollator exemplifies how innovations born from lived experience can transform millions of lives when given the chance. Yet our systems for funding and recognizing innovation continue to overlook such contributions, particularly when they come from women addressing needs that men might never experience. How many life-changing innovations have we missed because their creators couldn't access the resources needed to bring them to market?

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

第7章

The Rise of Female Digital Influence

When Kylie Jenner tweeted her disinterest in Snapchat in 2018, the company's stock plummeted by $1.3 billion in market value. This moment crystallized a new economic reality: in the digital age, influence - particularly female influence - had become a powerful currency. Jenner's cosmetic empire exemplifies this new economy. Leveraging early exposure on reality television and an intimate connection with millions of followers, she built a billion-dollar business faster than Mark Zuckerberg built Facebook. Her success represents a significant shift in how value is created in the digital economy - one where women have carved out substantial territory. The 2010s witnessed a transformation as social media merged the reach of television with the personal touch of phone calls, creating new economic opportunities. While traditional tech remained predominantly male, platforms like Instagram became spaces where women found remarkable success by monetizing traditionally undervalued female labor. Homemaking, beauty routines, and child-rearing - activities once dismissed as trivial - became content that generated substantial revenue through sponsorships and product lines. This shift built upon women's historical role as primary consumers. Despite shopping being culturally stigmatized as frivolous, women have long wielded significant economic power through purchasing decisions. From leading anti-slavery boycotts in the 1700s to navigating household budgets, women's consumer choices have shaped markets and economies, often without recognition. The department store revolution of the late 19th century illustrates this dynamic. Stores like Selfridges created unprecedented public spaces where women could move freely without male escorts - a radical development in an era of limited female public autonomy. These commercial spaces became sites of both consumption and liberation, offering women forms of independence previously unavailable. The digital economy has intensified this blending of public and private spheres. Personal life has become increasingly commercialized, especially for women whose identities traditionally straddled these domains. Social media enabled women to turn motherhood, beauty routines, and domestic life into business opportunities, creating flexible, home-based enterprises that circumvented gender-specific limitations in traditional workplace culture. This commercialization of personal life has created new opportunities but also comes with costs. The digital economy's intimate strategies often erode privacy and perpetuate appearance-focused pressures. Moreover, while influencers like Jenner have achieved remarkable success, their commercial power remains embedded within broader male-dominated economic structures. The rise of the female influencer economy reveals both the persistence of gendered economic patterns and women's ingenuity in creating value within constrained circumstances. It challenges us to reconsider what counts as innovation and economic contribution, recognizing that women have long been pioneers in blending personal connection with commercial opportunity - a skill that has become central to the digital economy.

第8章

Redefining Intelligence Beyond the Machine

As technology advances, we increasingly define ourselves through mechanical metaphors. We "process information," "recharge our batteries," and worry about "bandwidth" - language that reflects our tendency to see humans as machines and machines as humans. This perspective has profound implications for how we understand intelligence and value different forms of human capability. The field of artificial intelligence has been shaped by distinctly male-centric definitions of intelligence. Tasks like chess mastery and mathematical calculation - traditionally coded as masculine - became the benchmarks for machine intelligence. Meanwhile, capabilities like emotional understanding, bodily knowledge, and social intelligence - often associated with femininity - were dismissed as less complex or important. This gendered perspective has limited our understanding of both human and machine intelligence. Consider the contrast between Garry Kasparov's defeat by IBM's Deep Blue and the physical intelligence embodied by athletes like Serena Williams. While machines have mastered tactical games, they struggle with the embodied intelligence that humans develop through physical experience - the kind of intelligence that allows Williams to calculate ball trajectories, adjust muscle movements, and make split-second decisions during play. This corporeal intelligence - knowledge rooted in physical experience - represents a form of understanding that machines cannot easily replicate. It encompasses not just athletic prowess but everyday physical tasks, emotional intelligence, and social navigation. By privileging abstract reasoning over embodied knowledge, we've created an artificially narrow definition of intelligence that fails to capture the full spectrum of human capability. The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically exposed this false dichotomy between mind and body. As the virus swept through populations, it revealed how deeply our supposedly disembodied digital economy depends on physical health and labor. The pandemic forced recognition that even our most advanced technologies ultimately serve bodies that can fall ill, need care, and exist in physical spaces. This realization points toward a more integrated understanding of intelligence and technology - one that values both rational calculation and embodied knowledge, both individual achievement and collective care. Rather than seeing technology as transcending the body, we might recognize how it extends and supports our embodied existence in the world. Such a perspective would transform how we design technologies and measure their value. Instead of pursuing narrow forms of machine intelligence that mimic traditionally masculine capabilities, we might develop technologies that complement the full spectrum of human intelligence - including the emotional, physical, and social dimensions often associated with femininity. This shift requires moving beyond gendered stereotypes about intelligence and recognizing the artificial nature of distinctions between "hard" and "soft" skills. The future of both human flourishing and technological development depends on integrating rather than opposing these different forms of knowing - valuing the full range of human intelligence in all its embodied complexity.

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第9章

The Second Machine Age: Rethinking Work and Gender

In 1842, young Friedrich Engels arrived in Manchester, England, witnessing firsthand the brutal realities of industrialization that would shape his socialist philosophy. The technological revolution he observed - with steam-powered looms replacing human labor - transformed society in ways that parallel today's digital disruption. We may now be entering what economists call a "second machine age," where automation and artificial intelligence reshape work as dramatically as steam power did in Engels' time. This new technological wave threatens jobs previously considered safe from automation, particularly middle-class positions. Unlike previous industrial revolutions that primarily affected manual labor, AI and automation now target knowledge work - analyzing legal documents, diagnosing diseases, and even creating art. This shift raises fundamental questions about economic adaptation and social stability, with some proposing Universal Basic Income as a solution for those permanently displaced from the workforce. What Engels missed in his analysis - and what many modern commentators overlook - is how technological disruption affects different genders differently. The first industrial revolution dramatically altered women's economic roles, often pushing them from skilled home production into factory labor or domestic service. Similarly, today's technological shifts will likely have gendered impacts that require specific attention. As AI and automation advance, the nature of valuable human work is changing. Machines excel at tasks requiring physical strength or logical reasoning - capabilities traditionally coded as masculine. Meanwhile, jobs requiring emotional intelligence, creativity, and interpersonal skills - often labeled "feminine" - prove more resistant to automation. Caring professions, creative fields, and roles requiring complex social navigation may become increasingly valuable as machines take over more analytical tasks. This shift creates both opportunities and challenges for gender roles in the economy. Women may find their "soft skills" suddenly in higher demand, while men raised to value traditionally masculine capabilities might struggle to adapt. Economies will need to reassess how they value and compensate care-centered professions that have historically been underpaid despite their essential nature. The coming technological transformation offers a chance to redefine our relationship with work and gender. Rather than reinforcing traditional gender roles, we might use this moment to create more flexible, inclusive understandings of valuable contribution. This could mean elevating the status and compensation of care work, encouraging all genders to develop emotional and social capabilities, and designing economic systems that value the full spectrum of human skills. As we navigate this second machine age, we face choices about how technology will shape society. Will we repeat the mistakes of past industrial revolutions, allowing technological change to reinforce existing inequalities? Or will we seize this opportunity to create more equitable economic systems that value diverse forms of human contribution? The answers depend not on technology itself, but on the social, political, and economic choices we make alongside technological development.

第10章

Nature, Gender, and Climate Crisis

In 1589, Princess Anne of Denmark's stormy voyage to marry King James VI of Scotland sparked a witch-hunting frenzy that would claim thousands of lives. When bizarre weather threatened the royal union, blame fell heavily on women - particularly poor, marginalized women accused of controlling the elements through dark arts. This historical episode reveals deep connections between attitudes toward nature, gender, and power that continue to shape our response to environmental challenges today. The witch trials occurred during Europe's "Little Ice Age," when climate fluctuations caused crop failures and economic hardship. Rather than recognizing these as natural phenomena, authorities scapegoated women, whose supposed alliance with nature made them suspicious. The torture and execution of accused witches reflected cultural fears about female power and the perceived threat of women operating outside male control. This historical pattern reveals how deeply intertwined our concepts of nature and gender have been. In patriarchal societies, nature is often feminized - portrayed as Mother Nature, simultaneously nurturing and wild, requiring masculine control and exploitation. This framing has justified both the domination of women and the exploitation of natural resources, creating parallel systems of control. Today, these connections manifest in attitudes toward climate change. Research shows that men, particularly those with traditional views on gender, are more likely to deny climate science and resist environmental protection efforts. Climate skepticism correlates strongly with views that reject gender equality, revealing how deeply intertwined these belief systems remain. The traditional division between "wizards" and "prophets" in environmental discourse - those who favor technological solutions versus those who advocate conservation - often reproduces gendered assumptions about humanity's relationship with nature. Wizards, typically embodying masculine approaches, see nature as a resource to be managed and improved through technological mastery. Prophets, often employing more traditionally feminine perspectives, view nature as sacred and advocate for limiting human impact. Both approaches contain valuable insights but remain limited by their gendered framing. The wizard's technological optimism can ignore ecological limits and community impacts, while the prophet's reverence for untouched nature can romanticize suffering and resist beneficial innovations. A more integrated approach might combine technological innovation with deep respect for natural systems - developing technologies that work with rather than against ecological processes. The witch offers an alternative metaphor for our relationship with technology and nature. Unlike the wizard who seeks dominance, the witch works with natural forces, understanding their patterns and potentials. This perspective suggests a future where technology serves not as a tool of domination but as a means of deeper connection with natural systems - one that transcends gendered stereotypes and views technology as an integrative rather than dominating force. As we confront climate change and environmental degradation, we need approaches that move beyond gendered dichotomies between technology and nature. By recognizing how gender biases have shaped our relationship with both innovation and the natural world, we can develop more holistic responses to environmental challenges - ones that value both technological creativity and ecological wisdom, regardless of their gendered associations.

★★★★★

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』を最後まで読み終えました

100万人以上の学習者に愛用されています

“23日間、毎日使い続けています。今では日課の一部です。”

jayallen

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』の主要テーマ

gendered innovation
invisible female inventors
masculinity and technology
unconscious bias in design
economic history of sexism

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』の名言

Real men didn't need wheels on their luggage.
Each obstacle became an opportunity for innovation.
Driving [is] unsuitable for women.
The automobile industry owes its commercial viability to a woman's ingenuity.
What other innovations might we be missing today?

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』の登場人物

Katrine MarçalAuthor and journalist exploring gender and tech
Bertha BenzAutomotive pioneer who took the first long drive
Bernard SadowInventor who introduced the wheeled suitcase
Karl BenzInventor of the experimental horseless carriage
Robert PlathInventor of the Rollaboard suitcase

著者について

『Mother of Invention: How Good Ideas Get Ignored In An Economy Built For Men』（邦題：『父さんが焼くパイは、なぜおいしいのか。：経済学が無視してきた、ケアと愛の物語』著者）のベストセラー作家であるカトリーン・マルサルは、ジェンダー、経済、イノベーションにおける第一人者です。スウェーデン出身でイギリスを拠点に活動するジャーナリストであり、『Dagens Nyheter』やEFNの経済コメンテーターも務めるマルサルは、鋭い分析と分かりやすいストーリーテリングを組み合わせ、テクノロジーやビジネスにおける構造的なバイアスを暴き出しています。彼女の著作は、無償のケア労働から見過ごされてきた発明に至るまで、女性の貢献を軸に据えることで、伝統的な経済学の枠組みに挑戦しています。

マルサルのデビュー作『Who Cooked Adam Smith’s Dinner?』（邦題：『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？：経済学には「女」が足りない』）は、古典派経済学におけるジェンダーを批判的に探求した一冊で、マーガレット・アトウッドから絶賛され、2015年のガーディアン紙「ブック・オブ・ザ・イヤー」に選出、20以上の言語に翻訳されました。アンドリュー・カーネギー・メダルやドイツの「ビジネス・ブック・オブ・ザ・イヤー」の最終候補に選ばれた『Mother of Invention』は、厳密なリサーチとウィットを融合させる彼女の評価をさらに確固たるものにしました。彼女はオックスフォード大学やロンドン・スクール・オブ・エコノミクス（LSE）などの機関で定期的に基調講演を行っており、2015年には「BBCの100人の女性」の一人に選ばれました。

アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性の要約をダウンロード

アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性の要約をPDFまたはEPUBで無料でダウンロード。印刷やオフラインでいつでもお読みいただけます。

他のユーザーのお気に入り

Inventology

Pagan Kennedy

Invisible Women

Caroline Criado Perez

The Innovators

Walter Isaacson

Bloody Brilliant Women

Cathy Newman

Alchemy of Us

Ainissa Ramirez

The Innovation Mindset

Lorraine Marchand

Where Good Ideas Come From

Steven Johnson

How Creativity Rules the World

Maria Brito

この本に関するよくある質問

学習プラン

The Evolution of the Feminine Principle

This plan provides a critical framework for understanding how the social status of women was systematically reshaped from prehistory to the digital age. It is ideal for students of sociology, history, and media studies seeking to understand the roots of gender inequality.

1 h 45 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Unstoppable: Women Leading Global Change

This plan is essential for aspiring and established female leaders looking to break systemic barriers and drive meaningful global change. It offers a unique blend of historical perspective, practical navigation of modern workplace dynamics, and advanced visionary leadership skills.

4 h 49 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Rise and Fall of Glass Tires

This exploration into Goodyear's mid-century innovation is essential for automotive enthusiasts and material scientists interested in the intersection of design and safety. It provides a unique case study on why some revolutionary engineering concepts fail to transition from the lab to the open road.

45 m•2 セクション

学習プラン

Innovate Like the Top 1%

In an era of rapid change, the ability to innovate systematically is the only sustainable competitive advantage. This program is designed for ambitious leaders and entrepreneurs who want to move beyond luck and master the repeatable frameworks used by the world's most successful disruptors.

5 h 21 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

read mom test

The Mom Test methodology helps entrepreneurs and product builders avoid the common pitfall of receiving false validation for their ideas. This learning plan teaches practical skills for conducting effective customer interviews that reveal genuine needs and problems, essential for anyone developing products or services who wants to minimize risk and maximize market fit.

3 h 33 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Inventing 101: From Idea to Asset

This course is essential for entrepreneurs and engineers who need to bridge the gap between creative concepts and protected intellectual property. It provides a practical roadmap for navigating the complexities of patent research and commercial validation.

1 h 12 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

The Edited Woman: Sovereignty & Artistry

This program is essential for women who feel their creative potential is limited by external expectations or internal blocks. It is designed for aspiring and established artists who want to align their personal autonomy with their professional craft.

5 h 40 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Glass Revolution: From Sand to Super-Science

This plan explores how a simple material transformed human perception and global connectivity. It is ideal for history enthusiasts, science students, and curious minds interested in the intersection of material science and technological progress.

2 h•4 セクション

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

今すぐ学習の旅を始めよう

第10章

アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性

概要『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』の概要

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Gendered History of Innovation: A Journey Through Overlooked Genius

When Masculinity Delayed the Wheeled Suitcase

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Bertha Benz: The Woman Who Made Cars Viable

From Bras to the Moon: The Seamstresses Behind Spacesuits

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』をもっと深く楽しむ

From Human Computers to Digital Pioneers

The Rollator Revolution: Innovation Born from Necessity

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Rise of Female Digital Influence

Redefining Intelligence Beyond the Machine

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Second Machine Age: Rethinking Work and Gender

Nature, Gender, and Climate Crisis

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』を最後まで読み終えました

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』の主要テーマ

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』の名言

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』の登場人物

著者について

アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性の要約をダウンロード

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この本に関するよくある質問

What is Mother of Invention by Katrine Marçal about?

Who should read Mother of Invention by Katrine Marçal?

Is Mother of Invention by Katrine Marçal worth reading?

How does Mother of Invention explain the failure of early electric cars?

もっと見る

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Gendered History of Innovation: A Journey Through Overlooked Genius

When Masculinity Delayed the Wheeled Suitcase

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Bertha Benz: The Woman Who Made Cars Viable

From Bras to the Moon: The Seamstresses Behind Spacesuits

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』をもっと深く楽しむ

From Human Computers to Digital Pioneers

The Rollator Revolution: Innovation Born from Necessity

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Rise of Female Digital Influence

Redefining Intelligence Beyond the Machine

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Second Machine Age: Rethinking Work and Gender

Nature, Gender, and Climate Crisis

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』を最後まで読み終えました

他のユーザーのお気に入り

もっと見る

『アダム・スミスの夕食を作ったのは誰か？――経済学から消された女性たちの労働と創造性』の概要