What is *Hard Choices* by Hillary Rodham Clinton about?

*Hard Choices* chronicles Hillary Clinton’s tenure as U.S. Secretary of State (2009–2013), detailing diplomatic challenges like rebuilding alliances, addressing global crises, and navigating decisions such as the Osama bin Laden raid and Middle East conflicts. Clinton reflects on her collaboration with President Obama and lessons learned about U.S. leadership in a rapidly changing world.

Who should read *Hard Choices* by Hillary Rodham Clinton?

This memoir suits readers interested in modern U.S. foreign policy, political leadership, or Clinton’s career trajectory. It offers insider perspectives for policy students, professionals analyzing diplomatic strategy, and voters evaluating her 2016 presidential campaign context.

Is *Hard Choices* worth reading?

Yes, for its granular analysis of Obama-era foreign policy and Clinton’s candid reflections on mistakes like her Iraq War vote. While critics note restrained personal revelations, it provides historical value for understanding U.S. diplomacy and Clinton’s political evolution.

What are the main themes in *Hard Choices*?

Key themes include balancing idealism with pragmatism in diplomacy, rebuilding U.S. global credibility post-Iraq War, and addressing asymmetric threats like cyberattacks. Clinton emphasizes coalition-building and gender equality as foreign policy tools.

How does Hillary Clinton describe her relationship with Barack Obama in *Hard Choices*?

Clinton portrays a professionally collaborative but initially strained dynamic post-2008 primary, evolving into mutual respect. She highlights their shared decision-making on issues like Libya and bin Laden, though some passages subtly hint at unresolved tensions.

What foreign policy decisions does Clinton critique in *Hard Choices*?

Clinton admits regret over her 2002 Iraq War vote and discusses challenges like the Afghan surge, Arab Spring responses, and Russia’s annexation of Crimea. She defends interventions in Libya but acknowledges later instability.

How was *Hard Choices* received by critics?

Critics praised its detailed policy analysis but noted its cautious tone, with *The New York Times* calling it “sober and substantive” while *The Independent* highlighted its strategic avoidance of controversy ahead of Clinton’s 2016 run.

What key quotes define *Hard Choices*?

- “We were playing the long game”: Clinton’s approach to incremental diplomatic progress. - “The world is too interconnected to go it alone”: Advocacy for multilateralism.

ハード・チョイス

ヒラリー・ロダム・クリントン

3.61(14730 Reviews)

『ハード・チョイス』の概要

ヒラリー・クリントンの外交の世界へ足を踏み入れてみましょう。そこでは、地球規模の危機と個人の信念が交差しています。政治的論争を巻き起こし、イラク戦争への後悔を明かし、歴史上最も激動の瞬間におけるアメリカの権力の中枢への前例のないアクセスを提供した、ニューヨーク・タイムズ紙第1位のベストセラーです。

語り方を選ぶ

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

ハード・チョイスの同じアイデアを、あなたに合う声・深さ・ペースで学べます。いつでも切り替えられます。

第1章

Diplomacy in the Crucible: A Secretary's Journey

When Hillary Clinton accepted President Obama's offer to become Secretary of State in 2009, she was taking a historic gamble. The two had been fierce rivals in a grueling primary campaign just months earlier, and now they would need to form an effective partnership to tackle global challenges during one of America's most difficult periods. This "team of rivals" approach was unprecedented in modern politics. Clinton's tenure would span four years, nearly a million miles of travel across 112 countries, and some of the most consequential diplomatic decisions of the 21st century. What began as a political risk evolved into what President Obama later called "an unrivaled team" that reshaped American foreign policy. As Clinton's book has become required reading in diplomatic circles and international relations programs, her approach to "smart power" - integrating diplomatic, economic, military, legal and cultural tools - offers a masterclass in modern statecraft during an era of rapid global transformation.

第2章

The Pivot to Asia: Rebalancing American Power

When Hillary Clinton boarded her official plane for her first trip as Secretary of State in February 2009, she broke with longstanding tradition by heading to Asia rather than Europe or the Middle East. This deliberate choice signaled that America was "back" in a region where much of the 21st century's history would be written. The decision reflected a strategic calculation that the United States needed to rebalance its diplomatic attention after years focused on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Asia-Pacific region, home to more than half the world's population, contained America's most trusted allies, valuable trading partners, and vital trade routes. Economic recovery depended on exports to Asia's expanding middle class, while the region harbored serious threats like North Korea's nuclear program. Clinton's "forward-deployed diplomacy" integrated three strategic approaches: focusing on China, strengthening treaty alliances, and elevating regional multilateral organizations. In Japan, South Korea, and Indonesia, Clinton engaged not just with government officials but with civil society through town halls and media appearances. At Tokyo University and Seoul's Ewha Womans University, young people asked surprisingly personal questions about dealing with sexism and balancing family with career. This people-to-people diplomacy became a hallmark of Clinton's approach, viewing civil society as the crucial "third leg" of the societal stool alongside government and business. The pivot strategy faced its first major test at the 2010 ASEAN Regional Forum in Hanoi. When Chinese Foreign Minister Yang tried to prevent discussion of South China Sea territorial disputes, Clinton firmly stated that freedom of navigation represented a "national interest" of the United States. Yang was livid, warning against outside interference and reminding everyone that "China is a big country." His intimidation tactics failed as smaller nations gained confidence to assert their rights. This confrontation marked a turning point for American leadership in Asia and regional pushback against Chinese overreach. By 2011, Clinton had articulated a comprehensive vision in her Foreign Policy essay "America's Pacific Century," emphasizing that the United States could pivot to Asia without pivoting away from other obligations. The strategy successfully reasserted America's presence in the region while establishing patterns of cooperation with China that proved more resilient than many expected.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『ハード・チョイス』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第3章

Navigating the China Challenge: Cooperation and Competition

The U.S.-China relationship defies simple categorization as friend or rival. Managing it requires both principled direction and flexibility to make course corrections, recognizing that pushing too hard risks aggression while being too accommodating invites exploitation. Success depends on bridging gaps in understanding and interests, following the example of early diplomats who ventured into uncharted waters. Clinton's approach to China balanced cooperation on global challenges with firm stances on human rights, Taiwan, Tibet, and maritime disputes. During her first visit in February 2009, she reconnected with women activists she'd first met in 1998, including Dr. Gao Yaojie, an 82-year-old AIDS activist who had faced government harassment for exposing a tainted blood scandal. Despite continued pressure, Dr. Gao remained undeterred: "I am already 82. I am not going to live that much longer. This is an important issue. I am not afraid." Clinton's primary Chinese counterparts were State Councilor Dai Bingguo and Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi. Dai, a career diplomat close to President Hu, was philosophical and thoughtful. Their relationship developed personally as well as professionally - he gave thoughtful gifts for her family, and she reciprocated for his granddaughter. Yang had risen through diplomatic ranks, starting as an interpreter with superb English. A proud nationalist, they had tense exchanges about difficult topics. For decades, China had followed Deng Xiaoping's "hide and bide" strategy, avoiding conflict while building strength. By 2009, however, Chinese officials-especially military leaders-were chafing at this restraint, believing America was receding from Asia while trying to block China's rise. Emboldened by the 2008 financial crisis, China began testing how hard it could push, particularly in maritime disputes in the South and East China Seas. In March 2011, Clinton was in Paris meeting with G-8 foreign ministers when she received urgent news: Chen Guangcheng, a blind human rights activist known as the "barefoot lawyer," had escaped house arrest and sought refuge at the American Embassy in Beijing. The timing couldn't have been worse - Clinton was scheduled to depart for Beijing in five days for the annual Strategic and Economic Dialogue with Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. If America helped Chen, the Chinese might cancel this crucial summit. Clinton faced a difficult choice between protecting one man and preserving America's relationship with China. In the end, it wasn't a close call. America's values are its greatest source of strength and security. Clinton calculated that Beijing, having invested heavily in the upcoming summit and already dealing with the Bo Xilai scandal during their leadership transition, wouldn't blow up the entire relationship over this incident. She gave the order: "Go get him." After tense negotiations and multiple setbacks, Chen was eventually transferred to a Beijing hospital, reunited with his family, and later allowed to study in the United States. The successful resolution validated Clinton's diplomatic approach with China - developing "habits of trust" while maintaining clear positions on human rights.

第4章

Burma's Opening: The Lady and the Generals

Clinton's historic first meeting with Aung San Suu Kyi in December 2011 felt like meeting a longtime friend. Both dressed in white, they spent two hours in private conversation on the terrace of the U.S. diplomat's residence overlooking Inya Lake. Suu Kyi sought assurances about America's response to potential reforms, while Clinton promised to "match action for action" with diplomatic recognition, eased sanctions, and investment in exchange for concrete progress. Clinton's Burma policy began with unusual bipartisan cooperation. In January 2009, she met with Republican Senator Mitch McConnell, a passionate advocate for Burma's democracy movement, to discuss rethinking U.S. strategy. She also consulted Democratic Senator Jim Webb, who argued that sanctions had only impoverished Burma while allowing China to expand influence through investments in dams, mines and energy projects. In May 2009, an unexpected complication arose when John Yettaw, a troubled American veteran, twice swam across Inya Lake to reach Suu Kyi's home. After his second intrusion, Suu Kyi reluctantly allowed the exhausted man to stay before contacting authorities. This led to her arrest for violating house arrest terms, resulting in an eighteen-month sentence extension that would prevent her participation in the 2010 elections. Clinton enlisted Senator Webb to negotiate Yettaw's release. A turning point came when Burma's new President Thein Sein surprisingly halted construction of a Chinese-built hydroelectric dam across the upper Irrawaddy River. The sacred river was central to Burmese culture, but the project threatened local ecosystems and would primarily benefit China. This decision - a surprising repudiation of China - provided the most compelling evidence yet of potential reforms. Clinton arrived in the remote capital Nay Pyi Taw on November 30, 2011, becoming the first Secretary of State to visit Burma in over half a century. The city, built secretly in 2005 by the military, felt like a Potemkin village with vast empty buildings and few residents. Meeting President Thein Sein in his ceremonial office, Clinton found him surprisingly low-key and unassuming for a military leader. Despite speculation that he was merely a front man for regime hardliners, he had shown unexpected independence in pushing reforms. In Rangoon, Clinton visited the magnificent Shwedagon Pagoda, walking barefoot through its halls, lighting candles, striking the ceremonial bell, and pouring water over a Buddha statue - sending a message that America wanted to engage with Burma's people and culture. Finally meeting Suu Kyi at her colonial childhood home, which had also been her prison, Clinton was introduced to party elders who had endured decades of persecution. Standing together on her porch, they addressed journalists, with Clinton promising American friendship and Suu Kyi cautiously expressing hope for a new future. Despite Burma's progress, Suu Kyi expressed concerns about remaining political prisoners, worsening ethnic conflicts, and corruption opportunities from foreign investment. When President Obama visited Burma in November 2012, crowds lined streets waving American flags to witness something previously unimaginable. The Burma experience represented America at its best - championing dignity and democracy while remaining clear-eyed about challenges ahead.

『ハード・チョイス』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第5章

Afghanistan and Pakistan: War Without End

The Afghanistan conflict presented one of the Obama administration's most difficult challenges. In late November 2009, President Obama gathered his National Security Council in the White House Situation Room to make a fateful decision: whether to deploy more troops after eight years of war. The team was divided - Secretary Gates and military leaders supported a surge of 30,000 troops, while Vice President Biden strongly opposed it. Afghanistan, a mountainous country between Pakistan and Iran, has been called the "Graveyard of Empires" for defeating many would-be occupiers. After 9/11 and the Taliban's refusal to surrender bin Laden, President Bush invaded Afghanistan and backed the Northern Alliance to overthrow the Taliban. The swift victory soon gave way to a long-running insurgency as the Taliban regrouped in Pakistani safe havens. By 2008, nearly 300 Coalition forces were killed, making it the deadliest year yet. When President Obama took office in January 2009, the Pentagon was already requesting additional troops. Despite campaign pledges to focus on Afghanistan, the new administration questioned whether to deploy more troops before developing a new strategy. The Iraq surge precedent loomed large over the Afghanistan debate. General Petraeus had implemented a comprehensive counterinsurgency (COIN) strategy in Iraq focused on protecting civilians and winning "hearts and minds." His "Clear, hold, and build" approach, combined with the unexpected "Sunni Awakening" where tribal fighters switched sides against al Qaeda, had changed the trajectory of that war. Vice President Biden strongly opposed the Pentagon's surge proposal for Afghanistan, arguing it wasn't Iraq and that large-scale nation-building was doomed to fail. He advocated for a smaller military footprint focused on counterterrorism. Richard Holbrooke, despite his support for counterinsurgency strategy, wasn't convinced more troops were necessary, fearing they might alienate Afghan civilians. Working with Afghan President Hamid Karzai proved consistently frustrating. Though charming and erudite, he was also proud and quick to bristle at perceived slights. Clinton cultivated a personal connection with him, finding that respect and courtesy yielded the most productive partnership. During Afghanistan's fraud-plagued 2009 election, she worked intensively with Senator John Kerry to convince a resistant Karzai to accept UN monitors' findings and allow a runoff vote. On November 23, Clinton met with President Obama multiple times, culminating in a National Security Council session. She supported the military's proposed troop increase, combined with a civilian surge and diplomatic efforts. Obama decided to announce his policy at West Point, sending 30,000 additional troops with a timeline to begin withdrawal after eighteen months. The civilian surge tripled the number of diplomats and development experts, leading to economic growth, reduced opium production, improved healthcare, and increased educational opportunities, especially for girls. Meanwhile, Clinton and Holbrooke explored paths toward a political resolution with the Taliban, establishing core principles: insurgents must lay down arms, reject al Qaeda, accept the Constitution, and not reverse progress on gender equality and human rights. Clinton felt passionately about protecting Afghan women's rights, having supported them since her time as First Lady. When President Karzai signed a terrible law restricting Shiite women's rights in 2009, she called him three times in two days, explaining that this violation of the constitution would undermine his moral case against the Taliban. In all discussions about reconciliation with the Taliban, she insisted women's rights couldn't be traded away to buy peace.

第6章

The Hunt for Bin Laden: Justice at Last

The hunt for Osama bin Laden culminated on May 1, 2011, as Clinton watched alongside President Obama and Secretary Gates while Navy SEALs raided a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. When one helicopter crashed against the compound wall, they feared a repeat of the failed 1980 Iran hostage rescue. They had debated informing Pakistan beforehand but decided against it, knowing elements in Pakistani intelligence maintained ties with extremists. On September 11, 2001, as New York's Senator, Clinton flew with Chuck Schumer on a FEMA plane to the devastated city. Circling Ground Zero in a helicopter, she saw twisted girders and shattered beams where rescuers searched for survivors. The air was acrid as they walked toward the site, encountering exhausted firefighters emerging from the dust. During her Senate years, she fought for healthcare for first responders and helped create the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund. By 2009, intelligence reports showed the Taliban regrouping in Pakistan's tribal areas after being overthrown in Afghanistan, with al Qaeda leaders likely hiding there as well. This border region had become a global terrorist epicenter, fueling instability within Pakistan itself. In September 2009, the FBI arrested Najibullah Zazi, who had trained with al Qaeda in Pakistan and was planning an attack on New York City - another reminder of the dangers emanating from Pakistan. Throughout her visits to Pakistan, Clinton confronted anti-American sentiment head-on through town halls and media engagement. When Pakistani reporters challenged her about conditions on U.S. aid, she responded directly: "You do not have to take this money." She faced persistent questions about drone strikes, which she couldn't discuss publicly despite their effectiveness against al Qaeda leadership. In March 2011, CIA Director Leon Panetta told Clinton privately that they had a promising lead on bin Laden's whereabouts. Intelligence suggested he might be living in a walled compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, near their military academy. A small, secret group at the White House debated three options: sharing intelligence with Pakistan (immediately rejected), bombing the compound (risking civilian casualties and uncertainty), or sending in Special Operations forces (highest risk but greatest certainty). Clinton concluded the intelligence was convincing and benefits outweighed risks. Admiral McRaven assured them his Special Operations forces had conducted hundreds of similar missions. The SEALs trained extensively, including rehearsals on full-sized compound replicas. At their final meeting on April 28, Clinton methodically laid out the case for action, acknowledging the risks but recommending they proceed. The tense operation continued as SEALs swept through the compound. Though they couldn't see inside the building, they waited for updates from the ground team. After about fifteen minutes, word came that bin Laden was "E-KIA" - enemy killed in action. In a telling gesture, the SEALs moved all women and children to safety behind a wall to shield them from the blast when they destroyed their damaged helicopter - a humane action that spoke volumes about American values even in this high-stakes mission.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『ハード・チョイス』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第7章

The Arab Spring: Revolution and Response

By January 2011, Clinton was exasperated with the lack of reform in the Middle East, telling her team, "They're sitting on a powder keg and if they don't change, it's going to explode." The 2002 Arab Human Development Report painted a devastating portrait of regional decline - unemployment double the global average, growing poverty, and women's political participation the lowest in the world. In Doha, Qatar, on January 13, Clinton delivered an unusually direct speech to assembled Arab leaders, warning that "in too many places, in too many ways, the region's foundations are sinking into the sand." She challenged them to "build a future that your young people will believe in" rather than clinging to an unsustainable status quo. The very next day, Tunisia's President Ben Ali fled his country as protests that began with Mohamed Bouazizi's self-immolation grew into a full revolution. The Tunisian protests proved contagious, igniting massive demonstrations in Cairo against Mubarak's regime. After escalating protests and violence, Mubarak finally stepped down on February 11, ceding power to the military. A month later when Clinton visited Tahrir Square, Egyptians proudly welcomed her to their "new Egypt," though she remained concerned about the challenges ahead. Meeting with student activists, she found them disorganized and unprepared for electoral politics, lacking platforms or coalition-building skills. She worried they would hand the country to either the Muslim Brotherhood or military by default - which is exactly what happened. Throughout this delicate transition, America tried balancing democratic values and strategic interests without taking sides, yet many Egyptians distrusted us. Brotherhood supporters accused America of having propped up Mubarak, while their opponents claimed we conspired with the Brotherhood to remove him. As the Arab Spring spread to Libya in February 2011, protests against Muammar Qaddafi's regime quickly escalated into armed rebellion after he unleashed brutal force against demonstrators. By March, Clinton was in Paris meeting with G-8 foreign ministers and Arab leaders to discuss international intervention as Qaddafi's forces threatened to overwhelm rebels in Benghazi. The Obama administration initially showed little appetite for direct U.S. intervention in Libya. The calculus changed dramatically when the Arab League voted to request UN Security Council action for a no-fly zone over Libya - a major step for an organization previously known as a club for autocrats. The UAE Foreign Minister confirmed they were prepared not only to support foreign military action but to contribute their own aircraft. With the National Security Council divided over intervention, President Obama decided to move forward with military planning and securing UN authorization, but with two key stipulations: we would need Security Council backing for "all necessary measures" beyond just a no-fly zone, and our allies would need to shoulder most of the burden. When Qaddafi went on television threatening Benghazi residents with "no mercy," Clinton called Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov, who agreed to abstain rather than veto the resolution. Within 72 hours of the resolution passing, Libya's air defenses were destroyed and Benghazi was saved from devastation. Despite later criticism that Obama was "leading from behind," the mission required American leadership from every direction, utilizing unique military capabilities and diplomatic skill to build and maintain a broad coalition.

第8章

Benghazi: Tragedy and Aftermath

On September 11, 2012, terrorists attacked the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, killing Ambassador Chris Stevens and Information Management Officer Sean Smith. Hours later, during an attack on the nearby CIA compound, two CIA officers - Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods - were also killed. As Secretary, Clinton felt the crushing responsibility for her people's safety. Since the 1970s, terrorists have killed sixty-six American diplomatic personnel and over a hundred contractors and local staff. Four U.S. Ambassadors were murdered between 1973-1979 alone. Diplomacy must often be practiced in dangerous places where America's interests hang in the balance. On the morning of September 11, 2012, Clinton began the day at the State Department receiving intelligence briefings amid tumultuous events across the Middle East. Ambassador Chris Stevens was visiting Benghazi, a city he knew well. Despite understanding the security risks, he believed the visit's importance outweighed the dangers. Forty minutes after Chris and Sean retired for the night, dozens of armed men overwhelmed the local Libyan guards and stormed the compound, setting fires as they advanced. The Diplomatic Security agents followed their training - Scott moved Chris and Sean to a fortified safe haven while the others collected weapons but became pinned down. When the attackers briefly withdrew, they doused the building with diesel fuel and set it ablaze. As thick smoke filled the air, Scott led Chris and Sean toward an emergency exit, but in the blinding smoke, they became separated. Clinton first learned of the attack when Steve Mull rushed to her office from the Operations Center. She immediately called National Security Advisor Tom Donilon. President Obama, meeting with Secretary of Defense Panetta and Joint Chiefs Chairman Dempsey, ordered all possible resources mobilized. Clinton directed her State operations team to work with the Tripoli embassy and break down doors with the Libyan government if necessary. Critics later questioned why our military couldn't reach Benghazi in time. The reality was that despite establishing Africa Command in 2008, U.S. military infrastructure in Africa was minimal. Special Operations forces in North Carolina were over 5,000 miles away. Our military is not positioned to defend 270 diplomatic posts worldwide. For the first time since 1979, a U.S. Ambassador had been killed in the line of duty. Clinton's first priority was calling the families of those we'd lost. She spoke with Chris Stevens's sister Anne, who despite her grief expressed hope that this tragedy wouldn't prevent continued support for the Libyan people - exactly what her brother would have wanted. As Secretary of State responsible for nearly 70,000 people worldwide, Clinton was accountable for what happened in Benghazi. She quickly established an Accountability Review Board led by Ambassador Thomas Pickering and Admiral Mike Mullen. The Board's unflinching report identified systemic problems in diplomatic security management, poor coordination between security and policy offices, confusion about decision-making authority, and inadequate leadership on security matters. Clinton accepted all twenty-nine recommendations and tasked Deputy Secretary Tom Nides with implementing them through sixty-four specific action items. Before leaving office, they had initiated all recommendations, including increasing Marine Security Detachments, upgrading safety equipment, installing modern surveillance cameras, creating 151 new Diplomatic Security positions, and enhancing security training.

『ハード・チョイス』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第9章

Climate Change and Energy: Global Challenges, American Leadership

When diplomacy gets messy, improvisation becomes necessary. At the 2009 Copenhagen climate conference, President Obama and Clinton discovered that Chinese Premier Wen was holding a "secret" meeting with Indian, Brazilian, and South African leaders to undermine their climate agreement goals. They launched an impromptu "footcade" through the convention center, pushing past protesting Chinese officials to enter the meeting room. The science was clear despite deniers - thirteen of the fourteen warmest years on record had occurred since 2000, with extreme weather events measurably increasing. Clinton viewed climate change as both a national security threat and a test of American leadership, recognizing that Secretaries of State now faced global challenges beyond traditional war and peace issues. The emerging powers - or "emerging emitters" as Clinton thought of them - posed the greatest diplomatic challenge. In India, Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh argued that wealthy countries should bear responsibility for climate action, not developing nations with pressing poverty challenges. Yet the stubborn fact remained: even if America reduced emissions to zero, global temperatures would continue rising without commitments from rapidly developing countries. With negotiations deadlocked in Copenhagen, Clinton called a press conference announcing America's readiness to mobilize $100 billion annually by 2020 to help vulnerable nations - if they could reach an emissions agreement. This temporarily energized talks, but fundamental impasses remained. When President Obama arrived, they forced their way into a meeting of China, India, Brazil and South Africa - nations representing 40% of world population. Despite Chinese resistance to outside scrutiny, they eventually crafted a compromise where all major economies agreed to carbon emission commitments through 2020 with transparent reporting. After Copenhagen, Clinton shifted to a pragmatic approach. As she learned playing softball in Illinois, if you only swing for home runs, you'll often pop out - but singles, doubles and walks can add up to something bigger. This philosophy led her to launch the Climate and Clean Air Coalition in February 2012, targeting "super pollutants" like methane, black carbon, and hydrofluorocarbons that cause 30% of global warming but disperse more quickly than carbon dioxide. Energy became a critical intersection of economics and geopolitics during her tenure. To address this, Clinton created a dedicated bureau at State for energy diplomacy, led by Ambassador Carlos Pascual. Their work focused on five challenges: resolving disputes between countries over shared resources, discouraging energy intimidation tactics like Russia's gas price gouging, implementing sanctions on Iran's oil industry, promoting clean energy to combat climate change, and fighting the "resource curse" through transparency in extractive industries. Meanwhile, American innovation unlocked new energy supplies, with the U.S. reportedly surpassing Saudi Arabia and Russia in oil and gas production by 2013. This domestic energy revolution created tens of thousands of jobs, gave U.S. manufacturers a competitive advantage through lower costs, and reduced dependence on foreign oil. With the right investments in infrastructure, technology, and environmental protection, America could become the clean energy superpower for the 21st century, creating jobs while tackling climate change.

第10章

Human Rights: Unfinished Business of the 21st Century

Clinton's journey toward human rights advocacy began in her Methodist upbringing in Park Ridge, Illinois. The pivotal moment came when her youth minister Don Jones took their suburban youth group to hear Dr. Martin Luther King speak in Chicago. Despite some parents' objections that King was a "rabble-rouser," Clinton attended and was transfixed by his speech "Remaining Awake through a Revolution." This experience challenged her to reconcile her father's reverence for American democracy with the reality that many Americans weren't experiencing the freedom and equality promised in our founding documents. In September 1995, as First Lady leading the U.S. delegation to the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, Clinton delivered a speech declaring that "human rights are women's rights and women's rights are human rights." She named specific abuses against women - domestic violence, forced prostitution, rape as a tactic of war, genital mutilation - as violations of human rights. The speech received a standing ovation and has resonated globally for nearly twenty years. Following Beijing, there was exciting progress: discriminatory laws repealed, creation of UN Women, Security Council resolutions recognizing women's role in peacemaking, and increased research on women's economic potential. Yet despite these advances, women and girls still comprised the majority of the world's unhealthy, unfed, and unpaid. Women held less than 22% of legislative seats worldwide, faced legal barriers to economic participation in over a hundred countries, and continued to earn less than men even in America. As Secretary of State in 2009, Clinton appointed Melanne Verveer as the first Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women's Issues to help integrate women's participation into all aspects of foreign policy. Tired of being merely nodded at when raising women's issues, she built a case based on hard data showing how women's participation directly supports security and prosperity. The economic evidence was compelling - women's increased workforce participation added $3.5 trillion to U.S. GDP over four decades, while Latin America saw extreme poverty decrease 30% through women's economic gains. Clinton worked to extend human dignity to historically excluded groups, including LGBT people. After Ugandan activist David Kato was murdered following public threats against him, she confronted President Museveni about Uganda's proposed law making homosexuality punishable by death. When she raised these issues with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov, he became contemptuous, dismissing concerns as "sentimental nonsense." Following the enthusiastic reception to her Pride remarks at the State Department, Clinton delivered a major speech on LGBT rights in Geneva at the UN Human Rights Council headquarters. She wanted the speech to be measured yet powerful, acknowledging religious and cultural traditions while firmly establishing that "gay rights are human rights, and human rights are gay rights." Rather than naming and shaming specific countries, she highlighted positive examples from non-Western nations like Mongolia, Nepal, and South Africa. The speech resonated globally, appearing on countless Pride banners and posters worldwide. After leaving the State Department in 2013, Clinton continued working on "the great unfinished business of the 21st century" through the Clinton Foundation. With the approaching twentieth anniversary of the Beijing Conference, she developed the No Ceilings: The Full Participation Project to evaluate progress since Beijing, identify remaining gaps, and create a 21st-century agenda addressing new challenges like the digital divide between women and men online.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『ハード・チョイス』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第11章

Epilogue: A Nation at a Crossroads

During their final trip together to Burma in November 2012, Clinton reflected on how far they'd come since that meeting in Dianne Feinstein's living room four years earlier. On Air Force One to Cambodia, President Obama surprised her by asking if she'd stay on for his second term. Despite feeling the tug of her "service gene," she declined, knowing diplomacy is a relay race and she was nearing the end of her leg. On February 1, 2013, her final day at State, Clinton wrote John Kerry a letter, signed her resignation, and said goodbye to the dedicated staff. Looking ahead, she believed Americans must decide whether they'll learn from history to defend their values in pursuit of a more just world. At home, they needed good jobs, economic opportunity, and an end to political dysfunction. As Clinton wrote her book from her home in Chappaqua during 2013-14, she and Bill received wonderful news about becoming grandparents. When asked if she'd run for President in 2016, she hadn't decided yet, but knew the important questions weren't "Do you want to be President?" or "Can you win?" but "What's your vision for America?" and "Can you lead us there?" Whatever she decided, Clinton was grateful for having represented America and believed the nation's future remained full of possibility. But for that day, at least, she just wanted to stretch her legs and enjoy the spring. Everywhere around her there was new life. There had been too few quiet moments like these over the years, and she wanted to savor them. The time for another hard choice would come soon enough.

★★★★★

『ハード・チョイス』を最後まで読み終えました

100万人以上の学習者に愛用されています

“23日間、毎日使い続けています。今では日課の一部です。”

jayallen

『ハード・チョイス』の主要テーマ

smart power diplomacy
pivot to asia
international statecraft
us-china relations
forward-deployed diplomacy

『ハード・チョイス』の名言

China is a big country.
Go get him.
match action for action

『ハード・チョイス』の登場人物

Hillary Rodham ClintonU.S. Secretary of State and author
Chen GuangchengBlind human rights activist and 'barefoot lawyer'
Dai BingguoChinese State Councilor and career diplomat
Yang JiechiChinese Foreign Minister and nationalist diplomat

著者について

ヒラリー・ダイアン・ローダム・クリントンは、元米国国務長官であり、国際外交の設計者でもあります。彼女は、国際関係を舵取りした任期中の極めて重要な決断を記録した説得力のある回顧録『Hard Choices（邦題：ハード・チョイス）』に、比類なき政治経験を注ぎ込みました。この国政術の内幕を記した記録は、地政学的分析と個人的な内省を融合させたものであり、ファーストレディ、米国上院議員、そして米国の外交トップとしての役割を通じて築かれた、外交政策におけるクリントンの専門知識に裏打ちされています。

「女性の権利は人権である」と宣言した1995年の歴史的な北京での演説に象徴される彼女の人権擁護活動は、本書のテーマであるリーダーシップとグローバルな公平性に影響を与えています。

クリントンの権威は、アーカンソー・アドボケイツ・フォー・チルドレン・アンド・ファミリーズの共同設立、医療改革の推進、そしてイラン核合意へとつながる制裁交渉など、数十年にわたる公職での経験に基づいています。ルイーズ・ペニーとの共著による政治スリラー小説『State of Terror（邦題：ステイト・オブ・テラー）』は、国際的な陰謀に対する彼女の把握力をさらに示しています。『Hard Choices』はニューヨーク・タイムズのベストセラーとなり、21世紀の地政学を定義する分析者としてのクリントンの声を確固たるものにしました。

米国の主要政党で初めて大統領候補の指名を獲得した女性として、彼女の視点は草の根の擁護活動と、国家の命運をかけた国政術の架け橋となっています。

ハード・チョイスの要約をダウンロード

ハード・チョイスの要約をPDFまたはEPUBで無料でダウンロード。印刷やオフラインでいつでもお読みいただけます。

他のユーザーのお気に入り

Chasing Hillary

Amy Chozick

Dear Madam President

Jennifer Palmieri

Hard Choices and the Art of Self-Creation の書籍表紙

29 sources

Hard Choices and the Art of Self-Creation

Shattered

Jonathan Allen & Amie Parnes

Values-based decision making | How to Think AI

8 sources

Hard Choices and the Identity Gap

Speaking for Myself

Sarah Huckabee Sanders

Hard choices are different than you think の書籍表紙

19 sources

Hard choices are different than you think

Melania

Melania Trump

この本に関するよくある質問

学習プラン

The Beijing Backchannel: Nixon and Kissinger's Secret Opening

This plan provides a masterclass in high-stakes diplomacy, detailing how Nixon and Kissinger bypassed traditional bureaucracy to reshape the global order. It is essential for aspiring diplomats, historians, and strategic leaders interested in the mechanics of secret negotiations and geopolitical pivot points.

30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Analyze Profiles in Courage & Modern Lessons

This plan is essential for aspiring leaders and public servants who want to anchor their decision-making in proven moral frameworks. It bridges the gap between historical presidential integrity and the high-stakes ethical dilemmas of the modern political landscape.

5 h 31 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Drama of Statecraft and Power

This plan is essential for anyone seeking to understand the mechanics of political authority and the rise of nations. It is ideal for aspiring leaders, history buffs, and policy students wanting to grasp the forces that shape our world.

2 h•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Grit of Change

This plan offers a deep dive into the volatile eras that reshaped the modern world, focusing on the friction between progress and human rights. It is essential for students of history, sociology, or activism who want to understand how collective action drives societal evolution.

1 h 55 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

The Kennedy Dynasty: Power, Scandal, and Survival

This plan offers a deep dive into the tension between political mythology and the reality of power. It is ideal for history buffs and political science students seeking to understand how one family shaped American leadership through triumph and turmoil.

30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

politica,

This comprehensive political education is essential for anyone seeking to understand how power shapes our world—from local governance to global conflicts. It's ideal for aspiring policy professionals, journalists, activists, business leaders navigating political risk, or engaged citizens who want to move beyond headlines to grasp the deeper forces driving political events and decisions.

5 h 14 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Navigate High-Stakes Conve...

High-stakes conversations can make or break careers, relationships, and business deals. This learning plan equips professionals with proven frameworks and psychological tactics to transform difficult discussions into productive exchanges that achieve desired outcomes.

3 h 17 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

36 Strategies of Power: A War Manual

This course bridges the gap between ancient wisdom and modern survival, offering a deep dive into the mechanics of influence and tactical superiority. It is essential for leaders, entrepreneurs, and strategists who need to navigate high-stakes environments where psychological insight and political acumen are the primary tools for success.

6 h 4 m•4 セクション

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

今すぐ学習の旅を始めよう

第5章

ハード・チョイス

概要『ハード・チョイス』の概要

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

Diplomacy in the Crucible: A Secretary's Journey

The Pivot to Asia: Rebalancing American Power

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Navigating the China Challenge: Cooperation and Competition

Burma's Opening: The Lady and the Generals

『ハード・チョイス』をもっと深く楽しむ

Afghanistan and Pakistan: War Without End

The Hunt for Bin Laden: Justice at Last

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Arab Spring: Revolution and Response

Benghazi: Tragedy and Aftermath

『ハード・チョイス』をもっと深く楽しむ

Climate Change and Energy: Global Challenges, American Leadership

Human Rights: Unfinished Business of the 21st Century

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Epilogue: A Nation at a Crossroads

『ハード・チョイス』を最後まで読み終えました

『ハード・チョイス』の主要テーマ

『ハード・チョイス』の名言

『ハード・チョイス』の登場人物

著者について

ハード・チョイスの要約をダウンロード

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この本に関するよくある質問

What is Hard Choices by Hillary Rodham Clinton about?

Who should read Hard Choices by Hillary Rodham Clinton?

Is Hard Choices worth reading?

What are the main themes in Hard Choices?

もっと見る

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

Diplomacy in the Crucible: A Secretary's Journey

The Pivot to Asia: Rebalancing American Power

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Navigating the China Challenge: Cooperation and Competition

Burma's Opening: The Lady and the Generals

『ハード・チョイス』をもっと深く楽しむ

Afghanistan and Pakistan: War Without End

The Hunt for Bin Laden: Justice at Last

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Arab Spring: Revolution and Response

Benghazi: Tragedy and Aftermath

『ハード・チョイス』をもっと深く楽しむ

Climate Change and Energy: Global Challenges, American Leadership

Human Rights: Unfinished Business of the 21st Century

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

Epilogue: A Nation at a Crossroads

『ハード・チョイス』を最後まで読み終えました

他のユーザーのお気に入り

もっと見る

『ハード・チョイス』の概要