第4章
The Migration Patterns of Internet People
In linguistics, the "founder effect" describes how early members of a speech community disproportionately influence its development. Just as regional accents trace back to founding populations of settlers, internet language has been shaped by waves of early adopters.
Old Internet People went online before their real-life friends, interacting with strangers through topic-based platforms like Usenet, IRC, Bulletin Board Systems, MUDs, listservs, and forums. These early adopters were highly tech-savvy, often knowing programming languages and how to modify their computers' inner workings. Their jargon was chronicled in the "Jargon File," a document maintained from 1975 onwards that evolved from a 49-word text file to a published book.
Old Internet People's greatest contribution wasn't specific vocabulary but a mindset that the internet could be social. The creation of "lol" exemplifies this transition - Wayne Pearson coined it in the 1980s when something made him literally laugh out loud while alone at his computer, demonstrating how online interactions could evoke genuine emotions in the physical world.
The second wave brought the internet mainstream in the late 1990s and early 2000s. By 2000, over half of Americans were online, compared to just 3% in 1995. This wave split into two distinct cohorts defined not by age or technical skill but by how they integrated the internet into their social lives.
Full Internet People came online in the late 1990s to early 2000s, joining an internet with established norms they absorbed implicitly from peers. Unlike Old Internet People seeking escape, they used the internet primarily to communicate with existing friends through instant messaging platforms like AIM and MSN Messenger. Their screennames were identity performances rather than anonymity shields - TarnishedDreamZ wasn't a stranger but Kayla from school. While they maintained the link between online and offline identities, they reshaped informal writing to convey the full range of human emotions.
Semi Internet People also came online during this period, but primarily for work purposes rather than social connection. They gradually expanded to functional tasks like reading news and shopping before cautiously dipping into social aspects. Unlike Full Internet People who learned internet language through immersion, Semi Internet People sought explicit guides like "Wired Style." They excel at email with complex folder systems and formal etiquette, and their cultural touchstones are chain emails rather than Flash animations.
The third wave came online after the internet became unavoidable, representing both the youngest users who never knew life without it (Post Internet People) and older reluctant adopters who could no longer avoid it (Pre Internet People). Both groups share a notable lack of relationship with email, often skipping directly to social media and chat apps.
Pre Internet People typically have a single online account set up by a more tech-savvy person, perhaps on "the Facebook." They don't use internet slang or acronyms like "LOL," viewing them as signals of membership in a community they don't identify with. Instead, they use distinctive punctuation patterns - strings of periods, dashes or commas to separate thoughts ("thank you all for the birthday wishes - great to hear from so many old friends - hope you all are doing well").
Post Internet People don't remember their first time using a computer or going online. The internet is simply part of their social landscape. The dividing line between Full and Post Internet People is often whether you got Facebook before or after your parents. Post Internet People faced an especially dire version of "context collapse" - when people from all your overlapping friend groups see your shared posts. While adults might find this a minor issue, for young people it's a collective problem: they need space to figure out their identity without constant supervision.
第5章
The Typography of Emotion
When communicating online, we don't want to sound like emotionless robots. While novelists and poets traditionally bridge the gap between writing and emotions, everyday internet users need practical ways to express nuance in real-time conversations without the luxury of multiple drafts or edits.
The baseline for communication differs between generations. For internet-oriented writers, the most neutral way to indicate an utterance is with a new line or message break - efficient in digital media where scrolling is easy. For those with offline-oriented linguistic norms, the neutral separator is a dash or string of dots (ellipses).
All caps has become the quintessential way to express shouting or strong emotions online, but its history predates the internet. While all caps makes happy messages seem happier, it doesn't necessarily intensify sad messages. Single capped words serve as emphasis markers, similar to how we emphasize words in speech.
Though all caps feels like internet slang, it dates back to at least the 1940s, with references to "shouting in capital letters" appearing as early as 1856. The prevalence of all caps online partly stems from early computer limitations - Morse code and early systems like the Apple II only supported uppercase letters to save memory.
Despite early internet communication being characterized by flamewars and misunderstood sarcasm, the coldness was merely a temporary learning curve. A 1999 study revealed that people who typed more words online were significantly more polite - using their increased typing fluency to maintain the same politeness level they'd use in speech.
The exclamation mark has been repurposed to indicate warmth rather than just excitement. A 2006 study found exclamation marks in emails indicated friendliness 32% of the time and emphasized facts 29.5% of the time, while indicating actual excitement only 9.5% of the time. This shift has made exclamation marks quasi-obligatory in friendly communication, as satirized by The Onion's article about a "stone-hearted ice witch" who sent a thank-you email without any.
Creating solidarity online also happens through in-jokes and shared references. Early internet users played with pseudo-code like <sarcasm>text</sarcasm> or /rant, while decorative typography flourished with *asterisks*, ~tildes~, and other sparkle punctuation. Hashtags evolved from practical topic-grouping tools to metacommentary markers like #awkward or #sarcasm, creating another layer of typographical meaning.
The power of minimalist typography extends beyond mere style - it creates an open canvas that invites readers to fill interpretive gaps. This minimalist approach deliberately subverts autocapitalization, embracing earlier connotations of laziness and antiauthoritarianism as an intentional stylistic choice. Like glitchy internet art that gained popularity despite high-definition alternatives, minimalist typography mirrors emotional incoherence through stylized verbal incoherence.
Ironic typography creates social connection through shared understanding. When I wrote "my Brand is Strong" in a linguistics group, I deliberately overrode my phone's default formatting to signal ironic self-awareness rather than sincere arrogance. This typographical choice aligned me with internet-fluent people while making me approachable through self-deprecation.
第6章
The Digital Return of Gesture
Our bodies play a crucial role in how we communicate, often conveying more truth than our words. When someone slams a door while insisting they're not angry, we believe their body language. Much of our emotional language is embodied - racing hearts, arching eyebrows, flushing cheeks. Writing, as a technology, fundamentally removes the body from language, which is both its advantage (portability, storage) and limitation.
Emoji aren't equivalent to words but serve a crucial communicative function as "emblems" - a specific type of gesture with stable meanings. Emblems are gestures with precise forms and culturally-specific meanings that can function both within speech or independently. They include familiar gestures like thumbs up, peace signs, and eye rolls - many of which have direct emoji equivalents.
Some emoji, like the eggplant or smiling poo, have developed specific cultural meanings beyond their literal representation. The eggplant functions as a phallic symbol, while the poo emoji softly expresses displeasure. These emblematic uses extend beyond emoji to other digital communications - Snapchat lets users "use your face as the emoticon," while animated GIFs frequently display emblematic gestures.
Beyond emblematic gestures are the harder-to-describe co-speech or illustrative gestures that accompany our everyday speech. Research shows we gesture even when it's communicatively useless - on the phone or between blind people - suggesting these gestures are more about the speaker's thinking process than the listener's understanding.
Despite media hype about emoji storytelling, extended emoji-only messages are extremely rare. Analysis with SwiftKey revealed emoji function more like gestures than words - showing repetition patterns fundamentally different from word sequences. About half of common emoji sequences were pure repetition (like multiple laughing-crying faces), while others showed complex repetition or thematically related strings.
If emoji function as gestures, why did it take so long to develop a way to write our gestures? We've actually been trying for centuries. Medieval manuscripts were richly illustrated, but the printing press made text production easier than images. The manicule () - a pointing finger used in margins from the 12th to 18th centuries - was one early attempt at written gesture before being replaced by arrows in the 19th century.
A breakthrough came in 1982 when Carnegie Mellon University professor Scott Fahlman proposed using :-) and :-( as "joke markers" after a miscommunication on the university message board. These sideways text faces, named emoticons (emotion + icon), allowed facial expressions to integrate seamlessly with typed words - just as gestures accompany speech.
Meanwhile in Japan, kaomoji like ^_^ (happy), T_T (crying), and o.O (wide-eyed) developed on ASCII Net around 1985-86. Unlike Western emoticons that are read sideways and emphasize mouth shapes, kaomoji are read straight-on and emphasize eye shapes - reflecting cultural differences in how emotions are read.
By the late 1990s, Japanese cellphone carrier SoftBank solved the problem of sending image messages by encoding common pictures as short number codes. These became the first emoji - from Japanese e ("picture") and moji ("character"). Different carriers created incompatible emoji sets until the Unicode Consortium standardized 608 common Japanese emoji in 2010.
第7章
The Evolution of Digital Conversation
The telephone revolutionized conversation just as the internet did, upending established norms of communication. Before phones, conversations were either face-to-face and immediate or written and delayed; telephones suddenly enabled real-time distant communication at any hour. This caused problems similar to our current "internet problems," though these phone-related issues have faded from memory as we've taken telephones for granted.
Phatic expressions are social phrases whose meaning comes from context rather than literal words. Early emails ignored greeting niceties entirely, with people writing tersely even to superiors without causing offense. By 2001, as email systems improved with features like spellcheck, more formal conventions emerged.
Email greetings have evolved significantly over time. While David Crystal observed "Dear David" as the most common greeting in 2001, this form has become increasingly uncommon for younger generations who find "dear" oddly intimate rather than formal. This reflects a centuries-long trend toward shorter, less descriptive greetings. Historical letters featured elaborate salutations like "To the Right noble, and Valorous," while closing with phrases like "Your Obedient Servant" - phrases that were once routine but now seem ironic or overly formal.
Conversation is fundamentally built on turns, a rhythm we learn before we even acquire language. As babies, our caregivers treat our gurgles as meaningful contributions, teaching us the back-and-forth pattern of dialogue. But this turn-taking isn't based on pauses - we typically transition between speakers with minimal delay, often predicting when someone will finish speaking.
The breakthrough in digital conversation came in 1980 with CB Simulator, which treated chat as a stream of turns rather than concurrent typing spaces. This radio-inspired format allowed multiple participants without the chaos of overlapping voices. By 1988, Internet Relay Chat (IRC) had solidified this approach, enabling multiple simultaneous conversations that users could follow despite their interleaved nature.
Chat has proven remarkably durable for four decades despite technological evolution. Its stream format accommodates multiple interwoven conversation threads, making it the perfect intersection of written and informal language. Unlike formal writing, chat embraces interruptions and high information density. The "is typing" indicator, read receipts, and other features have evolved with our devices, but the core stream format remains unchanged.
The most successful social media posts strike a balance between obscurity and accessibility, creating in-group appeal that encourages engagement from specific segments of our audience. Online information often exists in a state of "obscurity" rather than strict privacy. Four factors determine online obscurity: searchability, access restrictions, identifiability, and comprehensibility. Even public content can remain effectively private if people don't know it exists, who wrote it, or what it means.
第8章
The Atoms of Internet Culture
The concept of "memes" originated with Richard Dawkins in 1976 as ideological counterparts to genes - ideas that spread through social selection and fitness rather than physical reproduction. The internet definition emerged when technologist Mike Godwin, frustrated by Usenet discussions devolving into Hitler comparisons, created "Godwin's Law" as a deliberate counter-meme. By seeding this idea across newsgroups, he was surprised to find others citing it - the counter-meme was reproducing independently.
This timing coincided with a major cultural rupture: the "Eternal September" of 1993, when AOL unleashed a million new users onto the internet, overwhelming the ability of existing netizens to acculturate newcomers to proper Netiquette. Internet memes became something remade and recombined, spreading as atoms of internet culture - not just popular content, but content that people actively transform and participate in creating.
Early meme creators believed technical skill and subcultural understanding were linked. They worried that easier meme creation would dilute the culture. This tension emerged with the rise of macros - originally computer commands for larger tasks that evolved into tools for easier meme creation. On Something Awful in 2004, image macros let users summon standard images with simple commands, while later macro generators automatically placed text on images with the now-iconic black-bordered white Impact font.
Lolcats exemplified this democratization, starting on 4chan's "Caturday" in 2005 and eventually receiving mainstream media coverage. The simplified creation process split the community between "MemeGeeks" (who valued technical prowess and moved on to other memes) and "Cheezfriends" (who demonstrated belonging through fluency in stylized lolspeak).
Advice Animals (2008-2014) further democratized and fragmented meme culture. Unlike lolcat's unified "kitteh grammar," these memes featured stock character archetypes (Philosoraptor, Scumbag Steve, Grumpy Cat) with two-line captions in the distinctive Impact font. What made them revolutionary was their openness - they were a meme family different subgroups could engage with at different levels.
The power of memes lies in their ability to create in-group belonging. When I created debate-themed Ryan Gosling memes in 2012, they spread quickly within that community but stopped there - perfectly demonstrating how memes function as in-jokes with variable scale. They were only funny to a few hundred people, but those people felt deeply understood.
Memes have long coexisted with technology, from physically mailed chain letters in the 1930s to "faxlore" or "Xeroxlore" - jokes circulated via fax and photocopier. The famous "Blinkenlights" mock-German warning dates back to 1955 at IBM, with roots in WWII machine shop signs.
What makes a meme uniquely a meme is that it's an atom of internet culture. Creating, sharing, or laughing at one stakes a claim: I am an insider in internet culture, and if you don't get this, you aren't. Like typographical irony creating space for sincerity, memes are claims to cultural space. Laughing at an in-joke says "I was here when this happened."
第9章
Language as a Network, Not a Book
When we think of the English language, we typically picture books. Google Images searches for "English language" return mostly books - dictionaries, grammar texts, and books with "English" on the cover. This association isn't accidental. The phrase "English language" saw a major upswing between 1750-1800, coinciding with Samuel Johnson publishing the first major English print dictionary in 1755. The late 1700s and early 1800s brought a massive trend in publishing dictionaries and grammars, constructing what it meant to be "the English language" - and what it meant was to be a book.
The book metaphor has run its course. Just as brain analogies evolved from steam engines to computers, our language metaphors need updating. The internet offers the perfect new metaphor for language. Like Wikipedia or the decentralized network of websites, language is a network, a web - humanity's most spectacular open source project.
Language spreads through our conversations like we find things on the internet by following links. We each inhabit our own idiosyncratic corner of the internet, just as we each speak a slightly different idiolect informed by our unique linguistic history.
When we thought of language as a book, we saw it as static, authoritative, and finite. But language as a network is flexible, emergent, and infinite. Any person can create a sentence never before uttered - even something simple like "The otters enjoyed the moon" yields zero Google hits. Our creative linguistic capacity exceeds our entire recorded history.
The internet will soon be ambient for all generations. There won't be "internet people" versus others - just as no one can escape books or telephones. We should avoid calling offline life "real life" because the internet has become real life. Language's changeability is its strength, allowing it to survive where more rigid systems would break. In this linguistic web, there's space for innovation, for many Englishes, for creativity - space for you.
