What is *You Just Need to Lose Weight* by Aubrey Gordon about?

*You Just Need to Lose Weight* debunks 20 widespread myths about fatness, such as “obesity is a choice” or “BMI measures health,” using research, historical context, and personal narratives. Aubrey Gordon challenges anti-fat bias in healthcare, media, and daily life, advocating for systemic change rather than individual weight loss.

Who should read *You Just Need to Lose Weight*?

This book is essential for anyone seeking to understand fat justice, including healthcare workers, educators, or individuals impacted by weight stigma. It’s also valuable for readers interested in dismantling systemic oppression or fans of Gordon’s podcast *Maintenance Phase*.

Is *You Just Need to Lose Weight* worth reading?

Yes—the book combines rigorous research with accessible writing, offering actionable tools to counter fatphobia. It’s praised for its intersectional approach, addressing how race, disability, and gender intersect with anti-fat bias.

What are the main myths addressed in *You Just Need to Lose Weight*?

Key myths include: - “Fat people are unhealthy” - “Losing weight is simple (calories in/out)” - “Fat acceptance promotes obesity” Gordon dismantles these with data, highlighting how anti-fat narratives harm public health and perpetuate discrimination.

How does *You Just Need to Lose Weight* critique diet culture?

Gordon argues diet culture profits from weight cycling and insecurity, not sustainable health. She cites studies showing 95–98% of weight-loss efforts fail long-term, emphasizing systemic barriers like food deserts and medical bias over individual choices.

Does Aubrey Gordon use personal experiences in the book?

Yes—Gordon blends anonymized stories from fat communities with her own experiences, like facing discrimination in healthcare. This approach grounds statistical arguments in human realities, enhancing emotional impact.

Is *You Just Need to Lose Weight* backed by research?

The book cites 350+ sources, including peer-reviewed studies on weight stigma’s psychological effects and meta-analyses debunking “obesity epidemic” claims. Gordon also critiques flawed methodologies in pro-dieting research.

How does this book compare to Gordon’s earlier work?

Unlike her first book (*What We Don’t Talk About When We Talk About Fat*), which focused on personal essays, this title prioritizes myth-busting and activism strategies. Both emphasize fat liberation, but *You Just Need to Lose Weight* is more action-oriented.

Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids

Et 19 autres mythes sur les personnes grosses

Aubrey Gordon

4.32(11316 Reviews)

Vue d’ensemble du Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids

Aubrey Gordon démolit 20 mythes anti-gros dans ce best-seller du New York Times qui transforme notre vision des corps. Jameela Jamil qualifie Gordon de « l'une des plus grandes penseuses de notre génération » - une voix qui remet en question les biais médicaux et déclenche une révolution allant au-delà de la tolérance, vers la justice.

Choisissez la façon de le raconter

Explorez le Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids selon différents styles d’apprentissage

Les mêmes idées de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids. Choisissez la voix, la profondeur et le rythme qui vous conviennent. Changez à tout moment.

Chapitre 1

The Weight of Stigma: How Society's Obsession with Thinness Harms Us All

When Aubrey Gordon boards a plane, she's not just carrying luggage-she's carrying the weight of society's judgment. As a fat person who has worn plus sizes since adolescence and size 26+ since college, she's intimately familiar with the myths that follow fat bodies like unwanted shadows. These aren't harmless misconceptions but powerful social weapons that frame fat people as failed thin people, restricting their lives and dignity. Gordon's book has become a cultural touchstone, praised by The New York Times as "revolutionary" and endorsed by celebrities like Roxane Gay and Lindy West. In a world where weight stigma affects nearly 70% of Americans yet remains largely unchallenged, Gordon's work offers a desperately needed perspective on how anti-fatness shapes our society-and how we might begin to dismantle it.

Chapitre 2

The Myth of Choice: How We Misunderstand Fatness

In 2016, Us Weekly published a story about plus-size model Rosie Mercado that followed a familiar arc: painting her fat life as bleak before celebrating her 240-pound weight loss. Such narratives saturate our media, from reality TV shows like "The Biggest Loser" to countless magazine covers promising weight loss secrets. These stories reinforce the belief that our bodies reflect our choices, suggesting that being fat is simply a matter of poor willpower or lack of discipline. But this cultural insistence that fatness is a choice isn't about truth-it's about minimizing fat people's experiences and perpetuating bias that has real consequences in healthcare, employment, and social settings. Medical researchers understand that fat people are fat for many reasons, but public perception lags far behind the science. Numerous health conditions cause weight gain resistant to traditional interventions: lipedema, a painful fat tissue disorder, affects up to 10% of people assigned female at birth; PCOS affects 6-12%, causing hormonal imbalances and metabolic issues; and even common diabetes treatments like insulin often cause significant weight gain. Medications for depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder frequently list weight gain as a side effect. Research consistently shows that attempting weight loss often backfires-a landmark study of Biggest Loser contestants found their metabolisms permanently suppressed, burning up to 700 fewer calories per day. Furthermore, 75% of studies show dieting predicts future weight gain, creating a frustrating cycle of loss and regain. Some fat people do choose fatness, like "gainers" who are "fat on purpose," but they face marginalization from both anti-fatness and body positivity communities. These individuals challenge our assumptions about body autonomy and choice. Historically, labeling any marginalized identity as a "choice" has been used to justify discrimination-from homophobia to transphobia to religious persecution-by implying the wrong choice was made. This rhetoric shifts responsibility to the marginalized person rather than addressing systemic bias and structural barriers to equality. The dismissive command to "just lose weight" reveals profound ignorance about living in a fat body and the complex biological, genetic, and environmental factors that influence body size. For someone Gordon's size to reach a "healthy" BMI would require losing 220 pounds-three perfect years of steady weight loss with no plateaus or setbacks, a feat that fewer than 1% of people achieve long-term. This seemingly simple phrase serves as self-absolution for those with anti-fat bias, allowing them to ignore fat people's immediate needs for dignity, healthcare access, and basic accommodation while preserving their own complicity in discrimination. It reduces complex medical and social issues to a matter of personal responsibility, ignoring decades of research on the multiple factors that influence body size.

Voyez chaque mot au fil de l'écoute

Suivez facilement la lecture tandis que chaque mot du Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids s'illumine en temps réel.

Chapitre 3

The Broken Promise of Weight Loss: Why "Calories In, Calories Out" Fails

At nineteen, Gordon was accosted at her first college party by a stranger demanding to know why she was fat, insisting weight loss was "not that complicated" and "just calories in, calories out." This interaction exemplified how fat people are constantly expected to explain our bodies to thin people, who then lecture us on how to fix ourselves. The science of weight loss contradicts these simplistic assumptions. What's dismissed as insufficient willpower is actually biological response: studies show hormones like ghrelin increase for at least a year after weight loss, driving hunger, while leptin resistance affects satiety signals. Our bodies defend our highest sustained weight by dropping energy usage by about 200 calories daily when we restrict intake. Exercise, though beneficial for health, produces minimal weight loss. Research reviews show intensive short-term exercise programs yield just 0.4 pounds of loss, while year-long high-intensity programs result in only 3.3 pounds-less than 1% of Gordon's 340-pound body weight. Diet research consistently shows initial success followed by failure. A massive 2020 BMJ review of 121 trials covering 14 popular diets found all produced about 10 pounds of weight loss that disappeared after one year. UCLA researchers similarly concluded, "You can initially lose 5-10% on any diet, but then the weight comes back." More troublingly, studies show dieters often gain more weight long-term, with one finding only 4.6% maintained weight loss over three years. The popular "calories in, calories out" model stems from a 1959 paper claiming each pound equals 3,500 calories-a formula now thoroughly debunked as lacking "contemporary scientific foundation." Even the FDA's 2,000-calorie daily recommendation wasn't scientifically derived but merely rounded down from Americans' self-reported intake averages. Ultimately, we don't know precisely why some people are fat and others thin, or why weight loss is so limited and unsustainable. What's clear is that nearly all weight-loss interventions fail most people while driving toward an exclusionary vision of a world without fat bodies.

Chapitre 4

Childhood and Control: The Dangerous Myth of Parental Responsibility

When dieting and "lifestyle changes" fail, some parents turn to weight-loss surgery for their children, a trend that has increased dramatically in the past decade. Children's National Hospital provides gastric sleeves and bypasses to children and adolescents with no listed age limits, requiring only that children have had BMIs in the "obese" category for three years and "understand the lifelong dietary commitment." A 2013 case study even discussed surgery on a two-and-a-half-year-old child. These surgeries come with significant risks, including malnutrition, vitamin deficiencies, and potential complications from anesthesia in young patients. The push for such extreme interventions is built on the false assumption that parents can and should control their children's size. Research has thoroughly undermined this logic through multiple channels: longitudinal studies show that 95-98% of weight-loss interventions fail long-term, researchers have identified dozens of genetic markers influencing weight and 59 distinct subtypes of fatness, and extensive public health research demonstrates that individual health is largely determined by social determinants like racial inequality, access to healthcare, environmental factors, and poverty rather than personal behaviors. Studies of identical twins raised apart consistently show that body size is heavily influenced by genetics, with heritability estimates ranging from 70-80%. Threatening parenthood has historically been used as a weapon to control marginalized communities, creating intergenerational trauma. From the American eugenics movement forcibly sterilizing disabled people and immigrants in the early 20th century to the forced sterilization of American Indians (3,406 documented cases between 1973-1976 alone) to recent attacks on trans children's parents in Texas, targeting parental rights is a tactic with deep roots in oppression. These interventions disproportionately impact families of color, with Black children facing the highest risk of CPS investigation - up to three times more likely than white children in some jurisdictions. Native American families face similar discrimination, with their children being removed at rates up to four times higher than the general population. The trauma of parent-child separation causes profound, lifelong harm that extends far beyond the immediate emotional impact. Research from Romanian orphanages shows separation fundamentally alters children's brain development, reducing gray and white matter volume in areas critical for emotional regulation and executive function. Studies of children in foster care show increased rates of anxiety (up to 60% higher than the general population), depression (45% higher), addiction (2-3 times more likely), suicide attempts (4 times more likely), heart disease (2 times more likely), and lower lifetime earnings (averaging 30% less). Ironically, removing fat children "for their health" likely worsens the very health markers used to justify their removal, as chronic stress and trauma are strongly linked to inflammation, metabolic disorders, and weight gain. This creates a cruel cycle where intervention causes the very "problems" it claims to solve.

Profitez davantage du Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids

Recevez des idées chaque jour parmi plus de 100 000 leçons
Les mots s'illuminent au rythme de l'audio
Votre bibliothèque sauvegardée sur tous vos appareils

Chapitre 5

The Harmful Myth of "Helping": When Support Becomes Control

Growing up fat meant weight-loss encouragement and advice followed Gordon everywhere like a stubborn shadow. From grade school adults suggesting too-small clothing to inspire food restriction, to supervisors hinting at advancement if she lost weight, to dates offering diet tips-the ceaseless advice never stopped. This pressure from loved ones hurts more than even the cruelest jibes from strangers, because few things sting like rejection from those we love most, especially when wrapped in the insistence that they "just want to help." For many fat people, our bodies seem to invite constant, unsolicited "advice" that sends clear messages: I'm watching your size, I disapprove of how you look, I think your body is a problem you've failed to solve. This logic assumes thin people are weight-loss experts and that thinness is always a hard-fought victory rather than simply a different body type. In reality, lifelong thin people lack the life experience to offer meaningful input to fat people, many of whom have years of experience navigating anti-fatness and pursuing weight loss. Research confirms this experience-a 2005 study found that experiences of anti-fatness were nearly universal among fat participants, with family members being the most common source (98% reported disparaging remarks from family; 86% said loved ones were embarrassed by their size). When loved ones monitor what we eat or offer unsolicited calorie counts and diet tips, they're communicating that fat people somehow owe our loved ones thinness. While offering weight-loss advice cloaks itself in good intentions, it fundamentally asserts a thin person's superiority over fat people-a kind of zealotry reminiscent of white missionaries colonizing Black and Brown Indigenous cultures. As Sabrina Strings shows in "Fearing the Black Body," anti-fatness has deep roots in anti-Blackness and white supremacy, from the transatlantic slave trade through the creation of the BMI (derived solely from white male bodies) to contemporary attitudes.

Chapitre 6

Medical Bias: How Healthcare Fails Fat Bodies

Ellen Maud Bennett's obituary went viral in 2018 with her dying wish: that women of size advocate for their health after she received a terminal cancer diagnosis too late because doctors had dismissed her symptoms as weight-related for years. Her story resonated with countless fat people who shared similar experiences of medical neglect. Rebecca Hiles endured bloody coughing fits for six years before being diagnosed with lung cancer, while doctors blamed her weight. Patty Nece's hip pain from progressive scoliosis was misdiagnosed as "obesity pain" despite her having lost seventy pounds. These aren't isolated incidents-they represent a systemic problem. Research confirms fat patients' fears aren't unfounded. A 2014 study found 53% of women have been shamed by doctors, while another study revealed fat patients actually overestimate how respectfully they'll be treated. A comprehensive review identified ten common themes in fat people's healthcare experiences, including contemptuous treatment, attribution of all health issues to weight, and avoidance of healthcare services. For patients with multiple marginalized identities, bias intensifies dramatically. Fat transgender patients face BMI restrictions for gender-affirming surgeries despite research showing weight-loss attempts rarely change their BMI classification. Black patients routinely receive inadequate pain treatment due to providers' racist beliefs about pain sensitivity. Healthcare providers' anti-fat attitudes are well-documented. Studies show physicians spend less time with fat patients while ordering more tests, describe them as "annoying" and appointments as "a waste of time," and view them as "awkward, unattractive, ugly, and noncompliant." Even obesity specialists demonstrated implicit bias, believing fat people are "lazy, stupid, and worthless." This bias directly impacts care quality, with providers building less emotional rapport with fat patients and nurses who believe weight is controllable showing greater discrimination in medical settings.

Voyez chaque mot au fil de l'écoute

Suivez facilement la lecture tandis que chaque mot du Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids s'illumine en temps réel.

Chapitre 7

The BMI Myth: A Pseudoscientific Tool of Oppression

Despite its universal acceptance in modern medicine, the Body Mass Index (BMI) has a surprisingly unscientific history and continues to perpetuate racial and gender disparities. Recent studies during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that fat Black people and People of Color in the UK were significantly more likely to test positive for COVID-19 than their white counterparts. However, most research failed to adequately investigate crucial social determinants of health - such as access to healthcare, living conditions, occupational exposure, and systemic racism - instead defaulting to simplistic biological explanations based on body size. The notion of an "obesity paradox" - where higher BMI correlates with better survival rates in certain conditions - exemplifies our deeply ingrained biases. This phenomenon is only considered paradoxical because it contradicts our unfounded assumption that fat people cannot be healthy. The BMI's persistent use despite proven inaccuracies bears striking parallels to historical pseudosciences like phrenology and eugenics that used questionable measurements to uphold whiteness as an idealized norm. Even as contemporary research increasingly reveals the complex relationship between size and health, including factors like metabolic health, cardiovascular fitness, and genetic diversity, society remains attached to oversimplified narratives that justify the continued marginalization of fat people. The BMI's origins further highlight its problematic nature. Belgian mathematician Adolphe Quetelet developed it in the 1830s as a population measurement tool, explicitly stating it should not be used for individual health assessment. Quetelet's formula (weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was designed to track population trends, not determine individual health status. More troublingly, the BMI was developed using data exclusively from white European men, yet is now applied universally across genders, ethnicities, and body types despite well-documented physiological variations among different populations. The BMI's transformation into a medical standard was driven more by financial interests than scientific evidence. When insurance companies adopted it in the mid-20th century, they arbitrarily lowered the threshold for "overweight" classification to expand their market for weight-related policies. A more recent and egregious example occurred in 1998, when the National Institutes of Health (NIH) further reduced the BMI threshold for "overweight" from 27.8 to 25 for men and from 27.3 to 25 for women. This single administrative decision instantly categorized 29 million Americans as "overweight" without any new scientific evidence supporting the change. Investigation revealed that this modification was heavily influenced by the Weight Loss Medication Panel, where eight out of nine members had direct financial ties to pharmaceutical companies manufacturing weight-loss drugs, highlighting how commercial interests often drive medical standards rather than scientific evidence or patient welfare.

Chapitre 8

The Emotional Eating Myth: Pathologizing Fat Bodies

"Emotional eating" as a cultural concept is relatively recent, with a more complex history and science than commonly understood. Jean Nidetch, Weight Watchers founder and celebrity who dated Hollywood legends, was an early champion of the emotional eating framework. At a 1973 Madison Square Garden event before 16,000 people, she presented herself as "a combination Cinderella and Aimee Semple McPherson" with the evangelical message that "overeating is an emotional problem with an emotional solution." Both fat and thin people eat for reasons beyond hunger-comfort, celebration, socialization, boredom. But unlike thin people, fat people's food choices are constantly monitored, judged, and laden with cultural meaning. Ordering salad becomes a message about acknowledging fatness and trying to become thin; ordering fries becomes a commitment to "unhealthy behaviors." This scrutiny stems from the belief that fat people have failed their bodies. The connection between fatness and trauma resonates with some fat people. Research has shown links between higher body weights and trauma, including the landmark Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study, which began when physician Vincent Felitti noticed high dropout rates at his extreme low-calorie weight-loss clinic. After discovering that 55% of his patients had experienced childhood sexual abuse, he launched what became one of America's largest trauma studies. Body weight can also be influenced by epigenetic factors-environmental imprints on gene expression that can be passed through generations. Ancestral experiences of famine, internment, colonization, or migration can alter descendants' metabolism and body size. Anti-fatness itself can be traumatic and drive "obesogenic processes." In one study, nearly 98% of fat participants reported nasty comments from family, 89% inappropriate comments from doctors, and 86% said loved ones were embarrassed to be associated with them.

Profitez davantage du Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids

Recevez des idées chaque jour parmi plus de 100 000 leçons
Les mots s'illuminent au rythme de l'audio
Votre bibliothèque sauvegardée sur tous vos appareils

Chapitre 9

The "Glorifying Obesity" Myth: Fat Visibility as Cultural Threat

The year 2019 was a banner one for "glorifying obesity." Pop star Lizzo attended a Lakers game wearing an oversized black T-shirt dress with a cutout showing her buttocks in a thong-more conservative than her stage wear and showing less skin than the thin woman sitting next to her and the Laker Girls dancers. When she appeared on the jumbotron, she twerked briefly before sitting down. Internet commenters erupted, insisting her actions "glorified obesity." That same year, fat influencer Anna O'Brien modeled for Gillette's Venus razors in a two-piece bathing suit. The backlash was so intense that Gillette issued a statement defending their casting decision: "Venus is committed to representing beautiful women of all shapes, sizes, and skin types because ALL types of beautiful skin deserve to be shown." Accusations of "glorifying obesity" follow fat people everywhere-at beaches in bathing suits, playing sports, going to the gym, or appearing in media without expressing shame about our bodies. Activities celebrated or ignored when done by thin people become controversial when fat people do them. Despite frequent use, there's no clear definition of "glorifying obesity." The dictionary defines glory as "praise, honor, or distinction extended by common consent." But photographing a fat person for a razor ad isn't praise-it's just hiring a fat model as companies have hired countless thin models. The objection isn't about bestowing glory but about the audacity to treat fat people as if we were thin. These accusations aren't about behaviors but about fat people receiving media attention without performing weight loss pursuit or expressing shame. Simply put, critics don't want to see fat people depicted neutrally, sexually, or joyfully. Their objections are rooted in bias and disgust, weapons to perpetuate anti-fatness and cut fat people down to size. By claiming they're fighting a "health threat" rather than expressing judgment, they justify their prejudice.

Chapitre 10

Reclaiming Language: The Power of Calling Ourselves Fat

When Gordon refers to herself as fat, thin people rush to deny this simple truth about her body. At airports, when children innocently observe her fatness, their parents scold them harshly, teaching that "fat" is a bad word. This creates powerful negative associations, teaching children that naming fatness brings embarrassment rather than understanding it as a neutral body type. She is fat, tall, blonde, and thirty-eight-all simple facts about her body, none more insulting than another. Yet straight-size people act like bodyguards between her and the word "fat." For fat people, the hurt doesn't come from naming our bodies; it comes from the discrimination we face-street harassment, medical bias, and the silence of thin people when we're bullied. The fear of being called fat reveals a deeper anxiety: thin people are terrified of being treated the way they've seen fat people treated or how they've treated fat people themselves. Thinness represents power and privilege, and "fat" threatens that status. When thin people insist "you're not fat, you're beautiful" or "you have fat, you aren't fat," they deny lived experience and preserve anti-fat bias. Reclaiming "fat" is about reclaiming our bodies and the right to name them. It should be a neutral descriptor like "tall" or "short." Let fat people name their own bodies, and instead of distancing yourself from fatness, work to dismantle anti-fat bias. This reclamation isn't merely semantic-it's political. By using "fat" as a neutral descriptor rather than an insult, we begin to separate the word from shame and judgment. We create space for fat people to exist without constant apology. We acknowledge that bodies come in different sizes naturally, just as they come in different heights and colors. Most importantly, we challenge the underlying assumption that being fat is inherently bad, wrong, or worthy of correction.

Voyez chaque mot au fil de l'écoute

Suivez facilement la lecture tandis que chaque mot du Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids s'illumine en temps réel.

Chapitre 11

Beyond Individual Bias: Dismantling Systemic Anti-Fatness

Anti-fat discrimination is not only real and deeply harmful, but as of 2022, it remains perfectly legal in forty-eight states. Only Michigan (1976) and Washington (2019) offer statewide protections against weight-based discrimination, with just a handful of cities like San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Urbana, Binghamton, and Madison following suit with local ordinances. The economic impact of this discrimination is severe. Research shows fat men lose approximately $2,646 annually in wages, while fat women lose nearly double that at $4,879. Even more alarming, one study found "very thin" women earned $22,000 more annually than "very heavy" women, who earned $19,000 less than average. Even a modest weight gain of 13 pounds could result in a $9,000 annual salary loss. Employment discrimination against fat people is shockingly overt. Forty-five percent of British employers admitted they were less likely to hire fat candidates than thin ones. Hiring managers consistently shuffle fat employees into lower-wage positions emphasizing physical activity while keeping them away from public-facing roles. Among workers with BMIs over 35, 40 percent reported experiencing workplace discrimination, making anti-fatness one of the four most common forms of discrimination in the United States. The criminal justice system compounds this bias. Studies show thin male jurors are more likely to find fat women defendants guilty and to believe they will reoffend. In sexual assault cases, anti-fat beliefs were the strongest predictor of victim blaming-but only when the victim was fat. Dismantling these systems requires more than individual awareness-it demands policy change, legal protections, and cultural transformation. It means creating accessible spaces, challenging discriminatory practices, and building a world where all bodies can exist with dignity. It means recognizing that anti-fatness intersects with and reinforces other systems of oppression, particularly racism, ableism, and misogyny. Most importantly, it means listening to fat people about their lived experiences rather than imposing thin-centered "solutions" that cause more harm than good.

★★★★★

Vous êtes arrivé au bout du Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids

“Cela fait 23 jours et je l'utilise tous les jours. Cette application fait désormais partie de ma routine.”

jayallen

Thèmes clés du Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids

anti-fat bias
weight stigma
diet culture myths
body autonomy
systemic fatphobia

Meilleures citations du Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids

These aren't harmless misconceptions but powerful social weapons.
Fat people are constantly expected to explain our bodies to thin people.
Exercise, though beneficial for health, produces minimal weight loss.
Threatening parenthood has historically been used as a weapon.
Weight stigma affects nearly 70% of Americans yet remains largely unchallenged.

Personnages du Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids

Aubrey GordonAuthor and fat activist sharing her experiences
Rosie MercadoPlus-size model used as a case study in media

À propos de l'auteur

Aubrey Gordon, auteure à succès de You Just Need to Lose Weight et figure de proue de la défense des droits des personnes grosses, conjugue expérience personnelle et recherches rigoureuses pour démanteler les préjugés anti-gros dans ses ouvrages de non-fiction.

Ancienne organisatrice communautaire LGBTQ, Gordon a commencé à écrire anonymement sous le pseudonyme Your Fat Friend en 2016, avant de révéler son identité en amont de son premier livre acclamé par la critique, What We Don’t Talk About When We Talk About Fat.

Elle co-anime le podcast Maintenance Phase, qui déconstruit les modes liées à la santé et les mythes de la culture des régimes, et tient une chronique régulière pour le magazine SELF. Le travail de Gordon a été mis en avant dans le New York Times, Vox et Lit Hub, l'établissant comme une voix incontournable du discours sur la libération des corps.

Son influence s'étend au documentaire de 2023 Your Fat Friend, présenté en première au Festival du film de Tribeca, qui explore la discrimination systémique à l'encontre des personnes grosses.

Telecharger le resume de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids

Obtenez le resume de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids en PDF ou EPUB gratuit. Imprimez-le ou lisez-le hors ligne a tout moment.

Les utilisateurs ont aussi aimé

Why we get fat

Gary Taubes

Why Diets Make Us Fat

Sandra Aamodt

Christy Harrison

Michael Greger

Andrew Jenkinson

Sofie Hagen

Eat to Beat Your Diet

William W. Li

Eat It! : The Most Sustainable Diet and Workout Ever Made

Jordan Syatt

Questions fréquentes sur le Résumé de Il suffit de perdre un peu de poids

Découvrir plus

PLAN D'APPRENTISSAGE

Lose weight

This plan is designed for individuals tired of fad diets who want a science-based approach to body transformation. It combines metabolic education with psychological tools to help anyone build a lifestyle where healthy choices become effortless.

4 h 23 m•4 Sections

PLAN D'APPRENTISSAGE

The Sustainable Weight Loss Shift

This plan is designed for individuals tired of the cycle of restrictive dieting and seeking a psychology-based approach to health. It focuses on biological feedback and environmental design rather than willpower, making it ideal for those wanting a permanent lifestyle transformation.

1 h 36 m•4 Sections

PLAN D'APPRENTISSAGE

The Body Recomposition Blueprint

This blueprint is essential for fitness enthusiasts who want to move beyond basic weight loss and focus on changing their body composition. It provides a scientific approach to balancing metabolic health with high-performance training and recovery for lasting results.

1 h 30 m•3 Sections

PLAN D'APPRENTISSAGE

lose weight and fix stammering

This comprehensive learning plan addresses two life-changing goals that significantly impact confidence, health, and quality of life. It's ideal for anyone who feels held back by their weight or speech difficulties and wants to make a lasting transformation. By tackling both challenges simultaneously with evidence-based strategies, learners can experience compound benefits as improved physical health boosts confidence, which in turn supports better communication skills.

4 h 55 m•4 Sections

PLAN D'APPRENTISSAGE

Nutrition

This comprehensive guide bridges the gap between scientific theory and practical application, making it essential for anyone looking to master their health. It is ideal for fitness enthusiasts, health-conscious individuals, or professionals seeking a holistic understanding of food psychology and performance.

6 h 4 m•5 Sections

PLAN D'APPRENTISSAGE

Female Body Recomp: Build Muscle & Lose Fat

This plan is essential for women who want to move beyond traditional dieting to build a strong, lean physique. It bridges the gap between hormonal science and practical training, making it ideal for those seeking sustainable body transformations.

4 h 22 m•4 Sections

PLAN D'APPRENTISSAGE

Mind, Body, God: The Path to a Perfect Self

This comprehensive guide is designed for high-achievers seeking a holistic approach to self-actualization beyond mere productivity. It bridges the gap between modern science and ancient spirituality, making it ideal for anyone looking to integrate physical health, mental mastery, and divine purpose.

5 h 51 m•4 Sections

PLAN D'APPRENTISSAGE

The Metabolic Shift: Navigating Your 30s

As biological systems shift in your 30s, standard fitness advice often fails to address underlying hormonal and cellular changes. This plan is designed for professionals and proactive individuals looking to master their metabolic health through science-backed strategies.

2 h•4 Sections

Cree par des anciens de Columbia University | a San Francisco

BeFreed rassemble une communauté mondiale d'esprits curieux

4.7

note moyenne

Plus de 7,84 k notes sur l’app

Communauté BeFreed

Franchement, je n'ai pas encore exploré toute l'app, mais après quelques jours d'utilisation, je suis bluffée… BeFreed est à un tout autre niveau que toutes les autres apps d'apprentissage que j'ai essayées. C'est ultra captivant et ça améliore vraiment la concentration — parfait pour tous les accros au scroll !

@ladyInfinity

J'ai acheté BeFreed il y a exactement 23 jours et je l'ai utilisée chaque jour depuis. Elle s'est complètement intégrée à mon quotidien de travail et à mes habitudes d'apprentissage.

@jayallen

La vérité, c'est que l'app a dépassé toutes mes attentes. Je peux lui demander de générer de l'audio sur n'importe quel sujet, quel qu'il soit, et le résultat est impressionnant. Mon domaine professionnel est une spécialisation en psychothérapie, très pluridisciplinaire ; pourtant, les réponses sont très justes.

@Raguipa

Ce que j'apprécie le plus, c'est à quel point ça a réduit mon temps de scroll : je passe moins de temps à chercher et plus de temps à retenir. La combinaison des livres audio complets, des podcasts et des plans d'apprentissage est brillante.

@colonyofcreatorsNGO

Je suis instructeur en apprentissage accéléré PhotoReading depuis 24 ans… les livres, la lecture et l'apprentissage, c'est mon domaine, et BeFreed a fait un excellent travail en proposant une approche innovante pour transmettre l'information de façon facile à assimiler.

@BeFreed user

Ce n'est pas qu'une app de résumés de livres : j'ai utilisé l'option de lecture fun et c'est un bien meilleur résumé, une meilleure façon de saisir les idées qu'à la manière traditionnelle. Rien que ça vaut le coup.

@austinakon

J'adore cette app. Je l'utilise depuis plusieurs jours et je ne peux plus m'arrêter d'écouter. Une excellente façon de commencer.

@jcrules328

J'aime beaucoup ce programme ; je le teste depuis environ un mois et c'est une vraie pépite. Ça marche très bien parce que je peux utiliser BeFreed pour créer mes propres sujets, et la voix est excellente, avec un choix illimité de narrations.

@DanielCZ

Franchement, je n'ai pas encore exploré toute l'app, mais après quelques jours d'utilisation, je suis bluffée… BeFreed est à un tout autre niveau que toutes les autres apps d'apprentissage que j'ai essayées. C'est ultra captivant et ça améliore vraiment la concentration — parfait pour tous les accros au scroll !

@ladyInfinity

J'ai acheté BeFreed il y a exactement 23 jours et je l'ai utilisée chaque jour depuis. Elle s'est complètement intégrée à mon quotidien de travail et à mes habitudes d'apprentissage.

@jayallen

La vérité, c'est que l'app a dépassé toutes mes attentes. Je peux lui demander de générer de l'audio sur n'importe quel sujet, quel qu'il soit, et le résultat est impressionnant. Mon domaine professionnel est une spécialisation en psychothérapie, très pluridisciplinaire ; pourtant, les réponses sont très justes.

@Raguipa

Ce que j'apprécie le plus, c'est à quel point ça a réduit mon temps de scroll : je passe moins de temps à chercher et plus de temps à retenir. La combinaison des livres audio complets, des podcasts et des plans d'apprentissage est brillante.

@colonyofcreatorsNGO

Je suis instructeur en apprentissage accéléré PhotoReading depuis 24 ans… les livres, la lecture et l'apprentissage, c'est mon domaine, et BeFreed a fait un excellent travail en proposant une approche innovante pour transmettre l'information de façon facile à assimiler.

@BeFreed user

Ce n'est pas qu'une app de résumés de livres : j'ai utilisé l'option de lecture fun et c'est un bien meilleur résumé, une meilleure façon de saisir les idées qu'à la manière traditionnelle. Rien que ça vaut le coup.

@austinakon

J'adore cette app. Je l'utilise depuis plusieurs jours et je ne peux plus m'arrêter d'écouter. Une excellente façon de commencer.

@jcrules328

J'aime beaucoup ce programme ; je le teste depuis environ un mois et c'est une vraie pépite. Ça marche très bien parce que je peux utiliser BeFreed pour créer mes propres sujets, et la voix est excellente, avec un choix illimité de narrations.

@DanielCZ

J'adore pouvoir obtenir des informations et des idées utiles et condensées dans un audio façon podcast de 8 à 15 minutes. Je ne suis pas fan des podcasts à cause de tout le remplissage, mais là, on va droit à l'essentiel.

@BeFreed user

Je termine mon doctorat et je dois lire beaucoup de contenus que je ne connais pas… Avec BeFreed, il suffit d'entrer un prompt : l'app trouve les sources pour vous et génère un podcast audio. Je trouve le processus de BeFreed plus fluide que celui de NotebookLM.

@Brad

Je cherche souvent sur YouTube quelque chose à écouter en préparant le petit-déjeuner, en marchant ou dans les transports, et BeFreed offre une approche encore plus ciblée, sans pubs et sans remplissage !

@BeFreed user

Le meilleur atout de cette plateforme, c'est sa polyvalence. Il n'y a littéralement aucun sujet hors de portée. Elle gère tout ce qu'on lui donne… Il est rare de trouver un outil d'apprentissage sans aucune limite qui tient vraiment ses promesses.

@jayallen

BeFreed est fantastique. Son design intuitif me fait passer moins de temps à naviguer et plus de temps à apprendre. Le mélange de livres audio, de podcasts et de plans d'apprentissage est une combinaison géniale qui a complètement changé ma routine quotidienne.

@BeFreed user

Au début, il m'a fallu un moment pour comprendre comment créer des podcasts en italien, et boum ! C'est génial ! Je peux lui demander d'expliquer n'importe quel sujet et elle le fait super bien, avec beaucoup d'intelligence !

@matteo77

BeFreed est devenue mon app quotidienne pour les livres audio… Ce que je préfère, c'est de pouvoir déposer son texte et obtenir un audio à écouter en déplacement.

@kotanzu1

J'adore pouvoir obtenir des informations et des idées utiles et condensées dans un audio façon podcast de 8 à 15 minutes. Je ne suis pas fan des podcasts à cause de tout le remplissage, mais là, on va droit à l'essentiel.

@BeFreed user

Je termine mon doctorat et je dois lire beaucoup de contenus que je ne connais pas… Avec BeFreed, il suffit d'entrer un prompt : l'app trouve les sources pour vous et génère un podcast audio. Je trouve le processus de BeFreed plus fluide que celui de NotebookLM.

@Brad

Je cherche souvent sur YouTube quelque chose à écouter en préparant le petit-déjeuner, en marchant ou dans les transports, et BeFreed offre une approche encore plus ciblée, sans pubs et sans remplissage !

@BeFreed user

Le meilleur atout de cette plateforme, c'est sa polyvalence. Il n'y a littéralement aucun sujet hors de portée. Elle gère tout ce qu'on lui donne… Il est rare de trouver un outil d'apprentissage sans aucune limite qui tient vraiment ses promesses.

@jayallen

BeFreed est fantastique. Son design intuitif me fait passer moins de temps à naviguer et plus de temps à apprendre. Le mélange de livres audio, de podcasts et de plans d'apprentissage est une combinaison géniale qui a complètement changé ma routine quotidienne.

@BeFreed user

Au début, il m'a fallu un moment pour comprendre comment créer des podcasts en italien, et boum ! C'est génial ! Je peux lui demander d'expliquer n'importe quel sujet et elle le fait super bien, avec beaucoup d'intelligence !

@matteo77

BeFreed est devenue mon app quotidienne pour les livres audio… Ce que je préfère, c'est de pouvoir déposer son texte et obtenir un audio à écouter en déplacement.

@kotanzu1

Decouvrez comment BeFreed est discute sur le web