What is
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits and Other Writings about?
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits and Other Writings by Philip A. Fisher outlines a growth investing strategy focused on identifying companies with strong management, sustainable competitive advantages, and long-term growth potential. It emphasizes thorough research, the "scuttlebutt" method (gathering insights from industry insiders), and holding high-quality stocks indefinitely. The book also critiques short-term speculation and dividend-centric investing, advocating for patience and disciplined analysis.
Who should read
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits and Other Writings?
This book is essential for long-term investors, stock market enthusiasts, and finance professionals seeking timeless strategies for evaluating companies. It’s particularly valuable for those interested in qualitative analysis, growth investing, or understanding Warren Buffett’s influences. Fisher’s principles are ideal for readers willing to prioritize deep research over quick trades.
Is
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits and Other Writings worth reading?
Yes—Fisher’s insights remain foundational in modern investing. The book’s emphasis on management quality, competitive positioning, and long-term horizons offers actionable frameworks. Its blend of practical advice (e.g., the "Fifteen Points" checklist) and philosophical rigor makes it a classic, cited by legends like Buffett as a key influence.
What is Philip Fisher’s "scuttlebutt" method?
Fisher’s "scuttlebutt" method involves gathering non-public information about a company by interviewing employees, customers, suppliers, and competitors. This approach helps assess management integrity, operational efficiency, and growth prospects beyond financial statements. Investors use it to uncover qualitative strengths often missed in traditional analysis.
What are Philip Fisher’s "Fifteen Points to Look for in a Common Stock"?
Fisher’s "Fifteen Points" are criteria for evaluating companies, including:
- Strong management with integrity and innovation.
- Sustainable competitive advantages (e.g., patents, brand loyalty).
- High-profit margins and efficient R&D spending.
- Long-term growth drivers and shareholder-friendly policies.
These principles help identify companies capable of outperforming the market.
How does Philip Fisher’s approach differ from Benjamin Graham’s?
While Benjamin Graham focused on quantitative metrics and "value investing," Fisher prioritized qualitative factors like management quality and growth potential. Graham sought undervalued stocks, whereas Fisher advocated paying a premium for exceptional companies to hold indefinitely. Buffett blended both philosophies.
What does Fisher say about dividends in
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits?
Fisher argues dividends should not dictate investment decisions. Companies retaining earnings for R&D, expansion, or cost-saving initiatives often create more shareholder value than high dividend payouts. He advises evaluating whether reinvested earnings yield higher returns than alternative investments after taxes.
What are common criticisms of
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits?
Critics argue Fisher’s methods require significant time and access to industry networks, making them impractical for casual investors. Some also note his focus on high-growth companies can lead to overvaluation risks if growth stalls. However, his core principles remain widely respected.
How does
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits apply to modern investing?
Fisher’s emphasis on durable competitive advantages and management quality aligns with today’s focus on companies like tech innovators. His "buy-and-hold" philosophy resonates in volatile markets, while the "scuttlebutt" method adapts to using social media and expert networks for deeper insights.
What is Philip Fisher’s view on selling stocks?
Fisher believed stocks should rarely be sold if the company’s fundamentals remain strong. Exceptions include irreversible declines in competitive position or management quality. He warned against selling due to temporary price fluctuations or achieving target gains, advocating patience.
How does
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits compare to
The Intelligent Investor?
The Intelligent Investor (Graham) focuses on margin-of-safety and quantitative analysis, while Fisher’s book emphasizes qualitative growth factors. Graham’s work is a primer on risk mitigation, whereas Fisher’s guides investors in identifying multi-baggers. Both are essential for a balanced strategy.
What are key takeaways from
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits?
- Prioritize companies with visionary management and competitive moats.
- Use "scuttlebutt" to gather actionable insights.
- Hold stocks indefinitely unless fundamentals deteriorate.
- Avoid over-diversification and short-term thinking.
These principles help build a portfolio of high-growth, resilient businesses.